Hi!
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:20:23AM -0400, John Goulah wrote:
Since these fix tests, will these modules get patched and released
with this applied?
Hm, actually I only notified Leon about the patches. I will also submit
the patches directly to Andy (for WWW::Mechanize)
--
* Zbigniew Lukasiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-16 06:25]:
Hmm - frankly I have never thought out REST entirely - but I
have the feeling that it is always better to be cautious (and
you know - be liberal in what you receive).
It’s like Turing completeness: you can do everything RESTfully
that
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Aristotle Pagaltzis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Zbigniew Lukasiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-16 06:25]:
Hmm - frankly I have never thought out REST entirely - but I
have the feeling that it is always better to be cautious (and
you know - be liberal in what you
On Fri, 16 May 2008, Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote:
- a search
I tend to prefer expressing searches with query parameters… hm.
I understand that what you propose is '/cd?year=1968', is that right?
I really don't know - but some people would prefer to do the search by
POST, or might just like to
Hi,
I don't know what to do with this thread.
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 6:31 PM, Dave Rolsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 16 May 2008, Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote:
- a search
I tend to prefer expressing searches with query parameters… hm.
I understand that what you propose is
On Fri, 16 May 2008, Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote:
Why would anyone care about GET vs POST? I guarantee most users don't care.
If you mean they want to use a form, that has nothing to do with the method.
Forms can submit GET requests.
It might need to be a POST if you need to download a file as
I'm sorry but something just feels wrong about your approach - feels
like your mixing at matching REST a UI on top. Get the REST part down
first, then worry about something the browser can see on top of it. I
don't think you should let 'what a browser can see' to influence the
REST design.
Hello, J..
You write 16 мая 2008 г., 4:27:07:
JS On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 11:50 PM, Dmitriy S. Sinyavskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
So what about my patch and test?
Is it right or someone can correct it?
The silence is here for a week or more (
JS Jonathan Rockway asked you to regenerate
2008/5/15 John Goulah [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Since these fix tests, will these modules get patched and released
with this applied?
Thanks for the investigation Thomas, but I'd like to hold off until
someone actually fixes the real problems and quietens the warnings
using understanding.
For now
* On Sat, May 17 2008, Dmitriy S. Sinyavskiy wrote:
It strange I haven't got received letter with this...may be deleted
by antispam (
Yes, your mailserver rejected my reply. However, the list did receive
it.
Nevertheless I've done it now:
Index: Catalyst.pm
10 matches
Mail list logo
