On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Mitch Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> J,
>
> My solution was better suited for the DBIx::Class list I suppose, but
> I posed the question here to see if there was already some sort of
> Catalyst solution I had overlooked... a view for example.
>
> I took a loo
Hi!
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:20:23AM -0400, John Goulah wrote:
> Since these fix tests, will these modules get patched and released
> with this applied?
Hm, actually I only notified Leon about the patches. I will also submit
the patches directly to Andy (for WWW::Mechanize)
--
#!/usr/bin/p
* Zbigniew Lukasiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-16 06:25]:
> Hmm - frankly I have never thought out REST entirely - but I
> have the feeling that it is always better to be cautious (and
> you know - be liberal in what you receive).
It’s like Turing completeness: you can do everything RESTfully
th
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Aristotle Pagaltzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Zbigniew Lukasiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-16 06:25]:
>> Hmm - frankly I have never thought out REST entirely - but I
>> have the feeling that it is always better to be cautious (and
>> you know - be liberal in
On Fri, 16 May 2008, Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote:
- a search
I tend to prefer expressing searches with query parameters… hm.
I understand that what you propose is '/cd?year=1968', is that right?
I really don't know - but some people would prefer to do the search by
POST, or might just like to ha
Hi,
I don't know what to do with this thread.
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 6:31 PM, Dave Rolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 16 May 2008, Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote:
>
- a search
>>>
>>> I tend to prefer expressing searches with query parameters… hm.
>>
>> I understand that what you propose
On Fri, 16 May 2008, Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote:
Why would anyone care about GET vs POST? I guarantee most users don't care.
If you mean they want to use a form, that has nothing to do with the method.
Forms can submit GET requests.
It might need to be a POST if you need to download a file as on
I'm sorry but something just feels wrong about your approach - feels
like your mixing at matching REST & a UI on top. Get the REST part down
first, & then worry about something the browser can see on top of it. I
don't think you should let 'what a browser can see' to influence the
REST design
On Fri, 16 May 2008, Mark Trostler wrote:
I'm sorry but something just feels wrong about your approach - feels like
your mixing at matching REST & a UI on top. Get the REST part down first, &
then worry about something the browser can see on top of it. I don't think
you should let 'what a br
Hello, J..
You write 16 мая 2008 г., 4:27:07:
JS> On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 11:50 PM, Dmitriy S. Sinyavskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> So what about my patch and test?
>> Is it right or someone can correct it?
>> The silence is here for a week or more (
>>
JS> Jonathan Rockway asked you to
Yes sorry - this was not directed at you Dave...
Mark
Dave Rolsky wrote:
On Fri, 16 May 2008, Mark Trostler wrote:
I'm sorry but something just feels wrong about your approach - feels
like your mixing at matching REST & a UI on top. Get the REST part
down first, & then worry about so
2008/5/15 John Goulah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Since these fix tests, will these modules get patched and released
> with this applied?
Thanks for the investigation Thomas, but I'd like to hold off until
someone actually fixes the real problems and quietens the warnings
using understanding.
For now
* On Sat, May 17 2008, Dmitriy S. Sinyavskiy wrote:
> It strange I haven't got received letter with this...may be deleted
> by antispam (
Yes, your mailserver rejected my reply. However, the list did receive
it.
> Nevertheless I've done it now:
>
> Index: Catalyst.pm
> ==
13 matches
Mail list logo
