Re: [cayugabirds-l] MNWR discsussion

2014-08-06 Thread Melissa Groo
: Tuesday, August 5, 2014 7:47 AM To: CAYUGABIRDS-L Subject: [cayugabirds-l] MNWR discsussion Many interesting points have been mentioned and certainly are worthwhile exploring if they fall within the purview of MNWR. Certainly out of car areas could be established once the major construction

Re: [cayugabirds-l] MNWR discsussion

2014-08-06 Thread whitings
...@list.cornell.edu] on behalf of John and Sue Gregoire [k...@empacc.net] Sent: Tuesday, August 5, 2014 7:47 AM To: CAYUGABIRDS-L Subject: [cayugabirds-l] MNWR discsussion Many interesting points have been mentioned and certainly are worthwhile exploring if they fall within the purview of MNWR

Re: [cayugabirds-l] MNWR discsussion

2014-08-06 Thread MW1971
We believe there are areas within any refuge that can be responsibly be explored. We do however, know there are sensitive areas that should not be disturbed. We have walked the levees at KM with a group with no apparent distress to the wildlife beyond anything an Eagle, Falcon or Harrier causes

Re: [cayugabirds-l] MNWR discsussion

2014-08-06 Thread Asher Hockett
I can remember CARavaning as a Spring Field Ornithology field trip where we used cellphones, radios, and car horns (attention - there's a Ruddy Duck!) a few years (10 maybe) ago. No one got out where they were not supposed to and everyone got to see lots of birds - lifers, even. I know I

[cayugabirds-l] MNWR discsussion

2014-08-05 Thread John and Sue Gregoire
Many interesting points have been mentioned and certainly are worthwhile exploring if they fall within the purview of MNWR. Certainly out of car areas could be established once the major construction is complete. The north area would be ideal and still allow the first portion of the drive

RE: [cayugabirds-l] MNWR discsussion

2014-08-05 Thread Meena Madhav Haribal
If the following is true why there is hunting allowed on the refuge? Is it better than foot traffic just disturbing them to some extent? It seems refuge managers are interfering with the nature in variety of ways by changing the habitats constantly. For example Benning Marsh was one of the

RE: [cayugabirds-l] MNWR discsussion

2014-08-05 Thread Marie P. Read
[m...@cornell.edu] Sent: Tuesday, August 5, 2014 8:40 AM To: CAYUGABIRDS-L Subject: RE: [cayugabirds-l] MNWR discsussion If the following is true why there is hunting allowed on the refuge? Is it better than foot traffic just disturbing them to some extent? It seems refuge managers

RE: [cayugabirds-l] MNWR discsussion

2014-08-05 Thread Meena Madhav Haribal
Because what happened after that! -Original Message- From: Marie P. Read Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2014 8:44 AM To: Meena Madhav Haribal; CAYUGABIRDS-L Subject: RE: [cayugabirds-l] MNWR discsussion they were not interfering with any of the management plans. How do you know

RE: [cayugabirds-l] MNWR discsussion

2014-08-05 Thread Marie P. Read
: bounce-117689184-5851...@list.cornell.edu [bounce-117689184-5851...@list.cornell.edu] on behalf of John and Sue Gregoire [k...@empacc.net] Sent: Tuesday, August 5, 2014 7:47 AM To: CAYUGABIRDS-L Subject: [cayugabirds-l] MNWR discsussion Many interesting points have been mentioned and certainly

Re: [cayugabirds-l] MNWR discsussion

2014-08-05 Thread Lisa Welch
, Meena Madhav Haribal m...@cornell.edu wrote: Because what happened after that! -Original Message- From: Marie P. Read Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2014 8:44 AM To: Meena Madhav Haribal; CAYUGABIRDS-L Subject: RE: [cayugabirds-l] MNWR discsussion they were not interfering with any