On 12 November 2012 13:52, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 13:11 -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> #!/bin/sh which is mandated to exist by POSIX
>
> Actually, unless there's been a change, POSIX doesn't mandate that the
> POSIX shell appear as /bin/sh.
Okay. Taking a deeper look here, I'm w
On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 13:11 -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
> #!/bin/sh which is mandated to exist by POSIX
Actually, unless there's been a change, POSIX doesn't mandate that the
POSIX shell appear as /bin/sh.
Unfortunately, this means that systems are free to provide definitively
non-POSIX /bin/sh an
On 12 November 2012 13:11, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 12 November 2012 13:04, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> yes, when people tell you forcing asinine behavior is wrong, you label them
>> trolls. i guess that's how you "win" arguments.
>
> Claiming that systems without /bin/bash are "crap" shows a level
On 12 November 2012 13:04, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> yes, when people tell you forcing asinine behavior is wrong, you label them
> trolls. i guess that's how you "win" arguments.
Claiming that systems without /bin/bash are "crap" shows a level of
naivete that only someone new to the open source wo
Initial results from a small .ccache (3.0) dir:
- 6476 objects
- 300MB
- probably about 500-1000 compiles/recompiles of around 100 small to large
projects
The test was:
1. Find the candidates for compression, based on: objdump -t | grep " g "
(defined symbols). If two objects had at least 4 symbo
On Monday 12 November 2012 06:03:37 Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> Running "sh -x test.sh" shows that the gcc command producing the error:
>
> + CCACHE_DISABLE=1 gcc -c test1.c -o reference_test1.o -O -O
> gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1': execvp: No such file or directory
>
> I don't understand what's wr
On Saturday 10 November 2012 05:08:40 Joel Rosdahl wrote:
> On 10 November 2012 06:45, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > i see old style portable code in there that could easily be modernized to
> > recent POSIX
>
> Please don't strive to do that. Solaris's /bin/sh isn't POSIX.
autoconf searches well kn
On Sunday 11 November 2012 06:31:14 Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 11 November 2012 00:46, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Saturday 10 November 2012 00:41:52 Eitan Adler wrote:
> >> On 10 November 2012 00:41, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> > if the script is written in bash and is intended to be, then
> >> > /b
On 12 November 2012 13:00, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 12 November 2012 06:03, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
>> Running "sh -x test.sh" shows that the gcc command producing the error:
>>
>> + CCACHE_DISABLE=1 gcc -c test1.c -o reference_test1.o -O -O
>> gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1': execvp: No such file or
On 12 November 2012 06:03, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> Running "sh -x test.sh" shows that the gcc command producing the error:
>
> + CCACHE_DISABLE=1 gcc -c test1.c -o reference_test1.o -O -O
> gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1': execvp: No such file or directory
>
> I don't understand what's wrong with t
On 12/11/12 14:08, Bogdan Harjoc wrote:
No but there is room for improvement. This could be optional, like a
CCACHE_COMPRESS that saves 99% instead of 40% when I routinely recompile 20
kernel branches, for example (v2.6.x, 3.0.x, 3.4.x, -git, -next, -ubuntu,
etc).
I realise that the more diverg
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> On 12/11/12 11:49, Bogdan Harjoc wrote:
>
>> Alternatively, a "compact" operation could be run periodically, that
>> compresses the cache using the same approach.
>>
>
> Is cache size/capacity a very big issue for you?
>
No but there is roo
On 12/11/12 11:49, Bogdan Harjoc wrote:
Alternatively, a "compact" operation could be run periodically, that
compresses the cache using the same approach.
Is cache size/capacity a very big issue for you?
Have you tried the CCACHE_COMPRESS feature? That simply gzips the
binaries in the cache.
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Jürgen Buchmüller wrote:
> Am Montag, den 12.11.2012, 13:49 +0200 schrieb Bogdan Harjoc:
> > Basically, before writing a new object file, ccache could find a similar
> > object in the cache (based on object-code or source-code hashes for
> > example)
>
> The main g
Am Montag, den 12.11.2012, 13:49 +0200 schrieb Bogdan Harjoc:
> Basically, before writing a new object file, ccache could find a similar
> object in the cache (based on object-code or source-code hashes for
> example)
The main goal of most hashes is to give very distinct results even for
even smal
I just did a quick search, and couldn't find discussions on the idea of
caching compiled objects as binary diffs from other existing objects.
Basically, before writing a new object file, ccache could find a similar
object in the cache (based on object-code or source-code hashes for
example) and st
On 11/11/12 11:31, Eitan Adler wrote:
Mike,
http://www.technollama.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/obvious-troll.jpg
Insulting respected members of the Linux community will get you nowhere.
I realise that some might call you the same, and BSD also, so you should
know better.
An
17 matches
Mail list logo
