Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA partial match issue

2013-03-27 Thread William Bell
I have ran into a similar problem. In my case I would get a fast busy after entering the extension number followed by #. The issue was I neglected to provision Mobile Voice Access under Media Resources. On Tuesday, March 26, 2013, Barrera, Hugo wrote: Regarding MVA during my first attempt

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Workaround for SRST VM calling/redirecting number

2013-03-27 Thread Suresh Bhandari
Experts! When SB in srst mode, if a call from pstn happen to go to VM, it translates through the translation pattern for 5600. Translation pattern is set to mask calling number down to 4 digits (). What it is doing is that both the calling number, and redirecting number are translated into

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Exam Speed Strategy

2013-03-27 Thread chase mergenthal
When I have lab time on weekends, I go through each section and makes notes of the start and end time. Looking at my times from about 10 months ago, its a big difference... -Chase Mergenthal -- If

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX agent routing and script verification!!

2013-03-27 Thread sanity insanity
hi William, Thanks again for your reply . You are the man : - ) I tested it after reducing the retries to 0 and 1 ( media step) Here are my findings... 1) When I call 4000 . I hear the prompt saying Thank you for calling this number ...if you dialled this number by mistake please press 1

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS big question

2013-03-27 Thread singh
hi Guys,I need to configure 384 K link between by HQ and site B site .FRF.12 needs to used and configuration of QOS for 4 G729 calls 16K signalingCRTP should be also enabled.How do I do this?Please help.singhGet Yourself a cool, short @in.com Email ID now!

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA partial match issue

2013-03-27 Thread Barrera, Hugo
But would the MVA number still work on the gateway when you dial in? May it would huh because the MVA AA on the IOS is separate? Regards, Hugo From: William Bell [mailto:b...@ucguerrilla.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 4:47 AM To: Barrera, Hugo Cc: Justin Carney; donny f;

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Workaround for SRST VM calling/redirecting number

2013-03-27 Thread Suresh Bhandari
I found the solution.. please ignore this. Thanks. On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Suresh Bhandari bring...@gmail.com wrote: Experts! When SB in srst mode, if a call from pstn happen to go to VM, it translates through the translation pattern for 5600. Translation pattern is set to

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS big question

2013-03-27 Thread Suresh Bhandari
A very basic QoS question, I must say. Go to the intended interface, issue bandwidth 384 command and go into frame-relay dlci. run the auto qos voip trust It will prepare you the required MQC. In the same sub-interface the auto qos adds frame-relay ip rtp header-compression, you should remove

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS big question

2013-03-27 Thread ikizoo4 kwon
i am looking at this issue for a while,,thing is cRTP header size is 2 or 4 bytes. (8 + 2 + 20)*8*50 = 12 (8 + 4 + 20)*8*50 = 12.8 i know 4 bytes is in case of UDP checksum, but in the real Lab what is the case? To: ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com From:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS big question

2013-03-27 Thread Suresh Bhandari
I must say, rather an easy one. Go to the intended interface, issue bandwidth 384 command and go into frame-relay dlci. run the auto qos voip trust It will prepare you the required MQC. In the same sub-interface the auto qos adds frame-relay ip rtp header-compression, you should remove this to

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS big question

2013-03-27 Thread ikizoo4 kwon
how you got the 49? Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 23:17:28 +0545 From: bring...@gmail.com To: singh8...@in.com CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS big question A very basic QoS question, I must say. Go to the intended

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Exam Speed Strategy

2013-03-27 Thread Jamie Parr (jamparr)
First attempt I was very slow - did not use the device based approach, did not finish all tasks. Second I was much faster - using the device based approach, finished with 3 hours to test. Third attempt I finished with more than 3 hours to test and pick up the issues - Passed My advice: *

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA partial match issue

2013-03-27 Thread Sergey Heyphets
The prompts you hear on the when you dial-in are the results of IOS executing the VXML script, which was defined in the application/service definition. When you, however, press 1 to make the call and enter the number, the VXML script instructs the IOS to place the call to the MVA number defined

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS big question

2013-03-27 Thread Suresh Bhandari
In the lab, I really don't know. But your calculation of the bandwidth is correct. And somewhere I read about some ±10% margin on that, so I had 1k bandwidth added to ensure the calls. Just a nonsense thought, you can say :) Thanks! On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:22 PM, ikizoo4 kwon

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS big question

2013-03-27 Thread Suresh Bhandari
Actually it was ±5% overhead. So it comes to 48.72 for 4 calls. So 49 is my fav. HTH On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:30 AM, Suresh Bhandari bring...@gmail.comwrote: In the lab, I really don't know. But your calculation of the bandwidth is correct. And somewhere I read about some ±10% margin on

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] B-ACD drop through to loop ephone hunt a second time

2013-03-27 Thread Suresh Bhandari
Experts! I configured the embedded drop-through script to match the requirement that if, for the first time, both the agents do not pickup the call, it should once more attempt to send the call to the agents. Succeeded for one time only. On the calling phone, I hear the all of our agents ... or

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS big question

2013-03-27 Thread ikizoo4 kwon
i am not talking about theory, as you know there is lot of theory around. as you can see i enabled FRF.12 and cRTP , then make 1 g729 call, the bandwidth priority queue has 25K ( not even close to 12) sh policy-map int Serial0/3/0.2 Serial0/3/0.2: DLCI 103 - Service-policy output:

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA functionality

2013-03-27 Thread CCIEing
Hello Friends... I have the following setup, I am not sure if the will be suitable to enable the MVA feature ! I have CUCM cluster, but his CUCM cluster has no voice GW or DID .. but this CUCM cluster has Inter-cluster trunk to another CUCM cluster which has the DID numbers ? Can I configure

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] B-ACD drop through to loop ephone hunt a second time

2013-03-27 Thread William Bell
Suresh, If I follow your question you are looking for a way to cause the BACD application to: 1. Drop through to a hunt group 2. Ring the ephone-dns in the hunt group 3. Play the all of our agents are busy prompt 4. Attempt to ring out the agents again 5. Hang up If that is accurate then

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA partial match issue

2013-03-27 Thread William Bell
I concur with Sergey. On Mar 27, 2013, at 2:14 PM, Sergey Heyphets wrote: The prompts you hear on the when you dial-in are the results of IOS executing the VXML script, which was defined in the application/service definition. When you, however, press 1 to make the call and enter the number,

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] B-ACD problem

2013-03-27 Thread Mike
Anyone see any issues with the config? When I dial 5000 it just times out. application service aa flash:app-b-acd-aa-3.0.0.2.tcl paramspace english index 0 param number-of-hunt-grps 1 param drop-through-option 1 param handoff-string aa paramspace english language en param

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA partial match issue

2013-03-27 Thread scubajasona
Debug h245 asn1 or debug voip application vxml. If no h245 open logical channel I suspect dial peer. Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone Original message From: William Bell b...@ucguerrilla.com Date: 03/27/2013 6:38 PM (GMT-05:00) To: Sergey Heyphets

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Voicemail Ports on SA

2013-03-27 Thread Barrera, Hugo
Hi Guy's, For the voicemail ports on SA what do you recommend to put for the external mask? Should it match the phones external mask OR should it be only 10 digits because you're not supposed to send the 1 out of SA? Thoughts would be appreciated? - Hugo

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] B-ACD problem

2013-03-27 Thread Mike
Sorry its there should have included it in the config. ephone-hunt 2 longest-idle pilot list 3312 From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Sergey Heyphets Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 10:02 PM To: Online Study

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA partial match issue

2013-03-27 Thread Barrera, Hugo
Yah I thought about it as I was writing the original email...makes more sense now, thanks again all who responded! Regards, Hugo From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Sergey Heyphets Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 11:14 AM

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] B-ACD drop through to loop ephone hunt a second time

2013-03-27 Thread Suresh Bhandari
Thanks Bill for the information. I'll try it and let you know the results. On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 4:06 AM, William Bell b...@ucguerrilla.com wrote: Suresh, If I follow your question you are looking for a way to cause the BACD application to: 1. Drop through to a hunt group 2. Ring the

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS big question

2013-03-27 Thread Suresh Bhandari
Will check with the said value set, and update you. On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:04 AM, ikizoo4 kwon ikiz...@hotmail.com wrote: i am not talking about theory, as you know there is lot of theory around. as you can see i enabled FRF.12 and cRTP , then make 1 g729 call, the bandwidth priority

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] B-ACD problem

2013-03-27 Thread Suresh Bhandari
Change the hunt group to ephone-hunt 1 to match what is specified in your queue application. It will work. HTH On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Mike mik...@msn.com wrote: Sorry its there should have included it in the config. ** ** ephone-hunt 2 longest-idle pilot