OSL mailto:ccie...@gmail.com
*Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
*Sent:* Sunday, March 29, 2009 2:37 AM
*Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question
Hi,
I've not tested this since I don't have lab access yet. I can use
can do with it.
- Original Message -
From: CCIE OSL ccie...@gmail.com
To: Cliff McGlamry cl...@mcglamry.net
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question - possible solution
Thanks Cliff,
I was planning to put
This bugged me. I kept thinking about it.
Went back and started googling for some additional gatekeeper documentation.
Found what I was looking for. To summarize the problem as I understand it:
1. Trunks coming in from CCM to GK. Trunk to sub is priority for incoming
calls from GK.
Hey, Cliff,
Man!
First, Thanks for all you time on this.
I see your method, and it's wonderful that this works..
One question,
Let's say, if you are allow to use bandwidth command on Gk, would you
use same method??
bandwidth interzone 16
/Jin Jung...
Cliff McGlamry wrote:
This bugged me.
Hi All,
Can somebody please provide the steps to configure the following:
For instace:- Tech Prefix 1#, Zone Prefix 1*, 2*.
First call should go
through Subscriber, if one call in progress, second call should go through
Publisher.
What else do I need other than following:
a. Make
Cliff,
This looks great I will try it out tonight. Been thinking about this
all day too but my pesky job has been keeping me busy ... :-)
Good work
Chris
Cliff McGlamry wrote:
This bugged me. I kept thinking about it.
Went back and started googling for some additional gatekeeper
I hope, you are not dreaming about it!
/Jin Jung...
Chris Parker wrote:
Cliff,
This looks great I will try it out tonight. Been thinking about this
all day too but my pesky job has been keeping me busy ... :-)
Good work
Chris
Cliff McGlamry wrote:
This bugged me. I kept thinking
round-robin, including calls made to the same DN,
you don't need max-conn but need dial-peer hunt 3 or 4.
Cheers
Alex
- Original Message -
From: SYED HUSSAIN
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:28 PM
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper load
Wouldn't be the first time :-)
CCIE OSL wrote:
I hope, you are not dreaming about it!
/Jin Jung...
Chris Parker wrote:
Cliff,
This looks great I will try it out tonight. Been thinking about this
all day too but my pesky job has been keeping me busy ... :-)
Good work
Chris
| CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question
To: ccie Me ccievoic...@yahoo.com
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Sunday, March 29, 2009, 9:52 AM
I have some questions for you.
1. Are you running on 1 tech-prefix or two with on the gatekeeper?
2. Does entire BR2 has to able to call HQ
:
zone-prefix GK 1* gw-priority 10 Sub_Trunk_1
zone-prefix GK 1* gw-priority 9 Pub_Trunk_2
--- On Sun, 3/29/09, CCIE OSL ccie...@gmail.com wrote:
From: CCIE OSL ccie...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question
To: kapil atrish nice_cha...@yahoo.com
Cc: ccie Me ccievoic
Gents,
i'm working on this case on gatekeeper:
i need to only allow ONE active call that should be going through SUB
now for any other new call
if:
- it is from HQ to SiteC via GK it will be rejected by GK and rerouted to pstn
via 6608 on HQ
- if it is from SitC to HQ via GK it will
Don't know for sure but .
Under the gatekeeper config :Look at the command endpoint max-calls h323id
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 4:33 PM, ccie Me ccievoic...@yahoo.com wrote:
Gents,
i'm working on this case on gatekeeper:
i need to only allow ONE active call that should be going through
I have some questions for you.
1. Are you running on 1 tech-prefix or two with on the gatekeeper?
2. Does entire BR2 has to able to call HQ or just a single phone?
3. Does it required to only use 1#, are you allow to use other prefixes?
Your first requirement for HQ to BR2 is fairly easy,
that trunk
(Location). Next call should fall back to Pub trunk which is having gw-priority
9.
Thanks...
--- On Sun, 3/29/09, CCIE OSL ccie...@gmail.com wrote:
From: CCIE OSL ccie...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question
To: ccie Me ccievoic...@yahoo.com
Cc: ccie_voice
nice_cha...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: kapil atrish nice_cha...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question
To: ccie Me ccievoic...@yahoo.com, CCIE OSL ccie...@gmail.com
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Sunday, March 29, 2009, 10:55 AM
You can try this:
Create two trunks between
You are absolutely righttwo ccm groups required having one ccm in each.
--- On Sun, 3/29/09, anil batra anil...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: anil batra anil...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question
To: ccie Me ccievoic...@yahoo.com, CCIE OSL ccie...@gmail.com, kapil
atrish
If you are getting ring through when you place the call, then your GK
config is probably OK. If its ringing that tells me the GK sent the call
to the UCM.
The fact that it goes fast busy when you pick up sounds like a
codec/media problem to me. Check the media resources config and your
Yep, everything started working once I checked off requires MTP on the
trunk. .
But why? The call is coming in as g.729 and the device pool the trunk is in
is set to g.729
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Chris Parker cpar...@cparker.us wrote:
If you are getting ring through when you
thats right... mostly a codec/regions problemm
but just as an additional measure.. just check if u have connectivity
between the 2 ip phones... i mean that the iphone in one site must be able
to connect with other site ipphone using direct ip addresses u have a
separate reachable
well... the mtp option was by default disabled... never thought u might
have enabled it... mostly a busyout after ringing.. occurs as a codec
problem ;)...a rule of thumb i guess..
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 9:58 PM, ccielab...@gmail.com wrote:
Yep, everything started working once I checked
Does the call complete as 729 withthe mtp checked?
-Original Message-
From: ccielab...@gmail.com
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 12:28 PM
To: Chris Parker cpar...@cparker.us
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper blues
?
--
From: ccielab...@gmail.com
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 12:28 PM
To: Chris Parker cpar...@cparker.us
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper blues :|
Yep, everything started working once I
, 2009 12:28 PM
To: Chris Parker cpar...@cparker.us
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper blues :|
Yep, everything started working once I checked off requires MTP on the
trunk. .
But why? The call is coming in as g.729
Hi All,
my understanding is in V3 lab HQ router (HQ-RTR) will act as voice
gateway, gatekeeper, WAN and CUBE...is that correct? or do I need to
have a separate router at HQ acting as gatekeeper?
I would really appreciate if someone could clarify this for me.
Thanks
Aamir
Did you configure h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr for CUME to 172.25.102.1/32?
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Josh Reinmann jreinm...@fidelus.com wrote:
When I have a gatekeeper set up without any security, I am able to get both
CCM’s to register no problem. Once I put security on, only 1
, March 14, 2009 11:37 AM
To: Josh Reinmann
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper registration
Did you configure h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr for CUME to 172.25.102.1/32?
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Josh Reinmann jreinm...@fidelus.com wrote:
When I
Reinmann
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 10:48 AM
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper registration
When I have a gatekeeper set up without any security, I am able to get both
CCM's to register no problem. Once I put security on, only 1 registers. I'm
I just activated bandwidth for my gatekeeper,
bandwidht interzone CME 64,
My calls from HQ to BR2 is no longer working.
Check location, region, and other settings, still does not work.
where should I look??
/Jin Jung...
hi, your device pool of the GK Trunk needs a g729 only region. Ensure,
that there is definitively no g711 relationship on the region used on
your GK Trunk.
HTH
CCIE OSL schrieb:
I just activated bandwidth for my gatekeeper,
bandwidht interzone CME 64,
My calls from HQ to BR2 is no longer
Yep,,
My Trunk was in HQ.
Thanks...
Christian Hennrich wrote:
hi, your device pool of the GK Trunk needs a g729 only region. Ensure,
that there is definitively no g711 relationship on the region used on
your GK Trunk.
HTH
CCIE OSL schrieb:
I just activated bandwidth for my gatekeeper,
I put in no-reg both all ephone-dn for BR2.
But I am still getting
E164-ID: 85221314001
E164-ID: 85221314002
E164-ID: 85221314003
E164-ID: 85221314004
E164-ID: 85221314005
E164-ID: 852213140
E164-ID: 85221314007
E164-ID: 85221314008
registered to my gatekeeper from BR2.
work, Post the BR2 config and the output of the SHOW
GATEWAY command on the BR2 router.
- Original Message -
From: CCIE OSL ccie...@gmail.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 8:29 PM
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper E164 ao-reg both address
You need no-reg after dialplan pattern within telephony-service.
Vik Malhi - CCIE#13890
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert Inc
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com
Join IPexpert's Free CCIE Peer Groups Study Communities at
Yep,,
It works,
Thanks...
/Jin Jung...
Vik Malhi wrote:
You need no-reg after dialplan pattern within telephony-service.
Vik Malhi - CCIE#13890
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert Inc
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com
Join IPexpert's Free CCIE
Trying to get a calle establsihed from CCM to CME via Gatekeeper.
From MGCP BR1 extension 2001 dialed 3001 (73001) at BR2 CME site throuh GK.
Please see output and config of HQ and BR2 Rtrs. The call seems to work when
I set the default technology prefix, I tought that I didn't need to hae this
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2009 7:13 PM
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper: CCM to BR2 call failed: Debug
outputand config shown
Trying to get a calle establsihed from CCM to CME via Gatekeeper.
From MGCP BR1 extension 2001 dialed 3001 (73001) at BR2 CME site
prefix, It works?
Thanks in advance for the help.
Tony
From: Alex alex.arsen...@gmail.com
To: Tony reyes treye...@yahoo.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2009 1:55:18 PM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper: CCM to BR2 call failed
*Sent:* Sunday, January 18, 2009 1:55:18 PM
*Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper: CCM to BR2 call failed:
Debug outputand config shown
Jan 18 18:26:01.870: //006158870500/006158870500/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo:
(3001) Tech-prefix match failed.=
You are not prepending 3001 with 2
All,
HQPH---CCM-GK-TR-GK--BR2 ( All G729 CallS), I get one way audio. From
HQPH to BR2 ph audio is ok but from Br2 PH to HQ no audio.
ALSO
BR1PH---CCM-GK-TR-GK--BR2 ( All G729 CallS), Audio both way working. No
issues with Br1
On the GK Trunk MTP required is checked.
On the GK
Could be many things, but check your MTP and Media resource settings. I
assume you are using an MTP for your trunk? Maybe the BR1 phones are
using a different device as a MTP than the HQ phones and there is
something wrong with whatever the HQ phones have in their MRGL? Like the
6608
for
ephone-hunt Pilot number, dialplan-pattern number.
Kumar, Narinder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice]
Gatekeeper E164 registrationWhen you do no telephony setup, and
telephony service again by default the ephones will register back as no reg/no
reg both wont
Had an issue where all my DNs on cme would register to Gatekeeper. I
had no-reg defined for each number, and it still would always register
those numbers. Doing a no gateway and then gateway never resolved. Did
I miss something somewhere? I never have run into this issue during my
studies.
Verify no-reg and then do no gateway gateway on the CME router.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Key
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 4:45 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper E164
: Greg Miglucci (gmiglucc) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 11/12/2008 7:10 PM
To: James Key; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper E164 registration
Verify no-reg and then do no gateway gateway on the CME router.
From: [EMAIL
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Key
Sent: Thursday, 13 November 2008 1:27 PM
To: Greg Miglucci (gmiglucc); ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper E164 registration
Thanks Greg. Did that (several times actually) also shut down the gatekeeper,
did
I am fairly new to gatekeepers. Just trying to play around with my own
scenario.
I have 1 gatekeeper with 2 local zones, 1 is CCIE for Call Manager, 1 is for
CCIERemote for CME router. Why is the routers matching on the CCIE zone
when it should look at the zone prefix match send the call to the
Trying to call CCM PH from CME site via IPIP GW ( Volume 3 Lab 5 Task
18) get a fast busy tone all the time.
In the Gatekeeper main 10 debugs, can see call selecting the IPIPGW but
nothing after that. I would also expect to see the call hitting each of
the VOIP dial peer but in my case none at
HI Narinder,
For your config at GK if you add below listed command things shud work.
gw-type-prefix 1# default-technology
Please try it and let us know if all fine.
Thanks,
Regards,
Vikram Singh
You might want to uncheck the Media Transcoder required check box and try
that way. What I found out that if you do not have hardware transcoder in
your MRGL then the calls come in from CME over Gatekeeper to IPCC do not
work.
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Rimon Vallavanatt Jr. [EMAIL
hi all,
If the gatekeeper finds the destination zone for a call is in zone A, does
that mean that - using default tech-prefix routing - it has to find a GW in
the same destination zone that's registered with the default tech-prefix? Or
can it be any gateway, even in another zone, say zone B, as
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Juan
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 3:50 PM
To: 'OSL CCIE Voice Lab Exam'
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper routing
hi all,
If the gatekeeper finds the destination zone for a call is in zone A, does
that mean that - using default tech-prefix routing - it has to find a GW
I have setup the following:
Configured two regions on the CCM, one that talks G.711 to everything
else and one that talks G.729 to everything else. Created two DP, GK-711
and GK-729 with their respective regions. I registered the GK in call
manager and then created two trunks. One using the
I removed the transcoding resources from my MRGLs and now the phones at
HQ work as expected.
Why is transcoding being invoked when transcoding resources are present?
I am looking at the bandwidth utilizations from CCM to CME and CME to CCM.
Calls that are going out from CCM are showing as using 16 K and calls that
are originated from CME are showing up as 128 K. My interzone limit 64 K so
I am really confused about how this might be happening. Any ideas from
When you register CCM with a PUB and SUB to a gatekeeper what
determines who has the _1 and _2?
For example:
10.1.200.20 51156 10.1.200.20 49727 HQ-RTRVOIP-GW
H323-ID: HQ-RTR_1
Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0
10.1.200.21 52828 10.1.200.21
Pub would be _1
Sub would be _2
--- Santry, Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When you register CCM with a PUB and SUB to a
gatekeeper what
determines who has the _1 and _2?
For example:
10.1.200.20 51156 10.1.200.20 49727 HQ-RTR
VOIP-GW
H323-ID:
Guys,
I'm looking for some clarification on the significance/requirement of the
default-tech-prefix command for gatekeeper call routing. Per proctor lab
guide question 17, it says not to use this command, but when I look at the
configuration solution I still see h323-gateway voip tech-prefix
+1100From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper tech prefixThanks adamSo
what happens to GK if I have two or more hosts registered with th same tech
prefix. Does it then look at the zone prefix. Paul
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 10:53 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED
@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper tech prefix
Thanks adam
So what happens to GK if I have two or more hosts registered with th same
tech prefix. Does it then look at the zone prefix.
Paul
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 10:53 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The tech prefix
Thanks adam
So what happens to GK if I have two or more hosts registered with th same
tech prefix. Does it then look at the zone prefix.
Paul
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 10:53 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The tech prefix helps GK steer the call to the correct registered gateway.
i.e., 1# could
You need to set up your route-patterns to prefix the 1# to the GK trunk...
Not sure yet what the config does on the CCM side... prob just
identifies you to the GK: Hey, if you see 1# in front of digits, that
means it is coming from me
Jonathan
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 9:16 PM, Paul and Bobs
BTW, what you desire is possible... provided all endpoints register
their prefixes with the GK... CCM will only register the trunks...
So, if you want to tie a bunch of CCMEs together, the GK is prob your
best bet
Jonathan
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 9:16 PM, Paul and Bobs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Members,
Question 19 from lab 1 for proctor lab guide given at that bootcamp relates
to configuring gatekeeper, it states to configure both zones as local for CCM
and BR2. Why are both of these considering local?, I would think the BR2 site
would considered a remote site. If someone could
Because they are both controlled by THIS gatekeeper.
A remote zone is a zone controlled by a different Gatekeeper.
Jonathan
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Vik Ahuja [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Members,
Question 19 from lab 1 for proctor lab guide given at that bootcamp relates
to configuring
.
--
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of FrogOnDSCP46EF
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 8:16 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper
RAS ip is optional not necessary.
I was just wondering if it wasn't there what will happen
ON gatekeeper, what is the signifcance of the RAS ip address in the zone
local command. If its is left out what does it affect?
Paul
Paul really the only thing the RAS IP does in the zone local command is to
specify which interface IP to use on that router when the router is
contacted via zone discovery protocol. when an endpoint or gateway contact
a gatekeeper via zone discovery protocol they are told to use the RAS IP for
RAS ip is optional not necessary.
I was just wondering if it wasn't there what will happen?
Will it choose random interface for GK discovery?
Frog
*ras-IP-address*
(Optional) IP address of one of the interfaces on the gatekeeper. When the
gatekeeper responds to gatekeeper discovery messages,
@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper question
I'm working through Exam II from recent Ipexpert bootcamp (which was
excellent by the way). I'm not sure if there is an error the solutions
guide for a question, or I'm just not understanding.
On question 19 (exam II) it states
I'm working through Exam II from recent Ipexpert bootcamp (which was
excellent by the way). I'm not sure if there is an error the solutions
guide for a question, or I'm just not understanding.
On question 19 (exam II) it states that International calls from both
Call Manager sites to
No, the other side, the gateway, must register with the GK with its
zone and tech-prefix...
The GK will then look at what gateway controls this zone and send the
call there no dial peers on the gatekeeper (unless it is also a
gateway)...
Jonathan
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 1:15 AM, Paul and
Is the CCME configured as a gateway to register with the gatekeeper?
Post the interface config of the CCME router... (just the interfaces,
I don't need to see 200 dial peers...)
Jonathan
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 1:43 AM, Paul and Bobs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have changed the route pattern
Put this config on your gateway:
interface Loopback0
ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.255
h323-gateway voip interface
h323-gateway voip id [zone] ipaddr [GK1 IP] 1719 priority 1
h323-gateway voip id [zone] ipaddr [GK2 IP] 1719
h323-gateway voip h323-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
h323-gateway voip
to receive 2#1001 and knows this number belongs to
CCM. If you use the same tech prefix for CCM and CME you can use the zone
prefiz gw priority command.
Hope this help.
Regards,
Jose
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 12:19:15 -0800From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper
.
Regards,
Jose
--
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 12:19:15 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper to CCM
I am trying to get CCM to accept gatekeeper controller calls from CME I
hav the HQ-RTR configured
When I have an active call from BR2-CME to CallManager. Why does the current
interzone bandwidth value empty on the CCM-GK side???
When I place a call from CCM to CME, Both the zones CCM-GK and BR2-CME show
interzone bandwidth value.
HQ#sh gatek zone status
GATEKEEPER
Hello,
Would someone kindly explain to me the relationship between the inbound and
outbound dialpeers on the gatekeeper router and the RAS calls coming in from
and going out to CCM and BR2?
For example, the HQ-RTR is the gk that has 2 registered local zones; one from
CCM with prefix of 1#
2007 11:10:56 -0500From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: [OSL |
CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Unallocated/Unassigned
number
Does anyone know how to configure a gatekeeper so
that it produces a Unallocated/Unassigned number
response to its requestor when one of its configured
endpoints isn't
I am unable to route calls to the PSTN-WAN remote gatekeeper.
Here is the trace. Any ideas?
I place a call from HQ and it just waits and finally gives me a busy.
My configs
gatekeeper
zone local HQ-RTR ipexpert.com 172.9.100.1
zone remote PSTN-WAN ipexpert.com 10.9.200.2 1719
no zone
PM
To: Patel, Mrugesh
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper issue
Not in front of a computer but I believe that the 3rd octet of your local zone
(and thus where your GK is expecting a LCF from the PSTN GK) is incorrect. I
beleive it should be 172.9.200.1
PM
To: Patel, Mrugesh
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper issue
Patel, it matched the right zone, sure its not a PSTN-WAN configuration
error? gateway config is correct.
On 2/6/08, Patel, Mrugesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark,
I reverted the HQ gateway configs using
though.
Usually I fly through this part of the gatekeeper config, but today
this just blew my confidence away.
From: Chad Stachowicz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 7:56 PM
To: Patel, Mrugesh
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper issue
Patel, it matched
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 7:56 PM
To: Patel, Mrugesh
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper issue
Patel, it matched the right zone, sure its not a PSTN-WAN
configuration error? gateway config is correct.
On 2/6/08, Patel, Mrugesh [EMAIL PROTECTED
One can even console to it with their proctor lab username and password
from the terminal server.
From: Mark Snow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 9:06 PM
To: Chad Stachowicz
Cc: Patel, Mrugesh; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice
To: Patel, Mrugesh
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper issue
Not in front of a computer but I believe that the 3rd octet of your
local zone (and thus where your GK is expecting a LCF from the PSTN
GK) is incorrect. I beleive it should be 172.9.200.1
yes there is.
making your endpoints appear static in the GK.
create the trunk in the ccm - gktrunk (for example ) which points to the GK.
In the ccm service parameters, search for gk
ccm service 1 - set the trunk name there.
ccm service 2 - hardcode the RAS port to 1720 (instead of letting
by trunk name do you mean the h225 gatekeeper controlled Device Name?
Chad
On 1/19/08, senthil natarajan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes there is.
making your endpoints appear static in the GK.
create the trunk in the ccm - gktrunk (for example ) which points to the
GK.
In the ccm
If the call comes in G711 - and forwards properly to CUE and the ONLY
thing that is changing for it not to work is that you change the
incoming DP to G729 - then the problem must be with the transcoders
not invoking properly.
What debugs have you run to try to troubleshoot this problem?
Is their an example of this type of GK config? Thanks, Jeremy.
-Original Message-
From: Vik Malhi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 11:26 PM
To: LEDBETTER, JEREMY (ATTCLSMA); ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper
Monasmith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 6:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: LEDBETTER, JEREMY (ATTCLSMA); ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper integration question
Vik,
Regarding Tech-Prefixes, do you have to use # as a delimiter
Of LEDBETTER,
JEREMY (ATTCLSMA)
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 7:05 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper integration question
If I wanted to integrate a gatekeeper with CallManager and CME without any
tech prefixes being configured on the actual GK/router, what would
Does anyone know how to configure a gatekeeper so that it produces a
Unallocated/Unassigned number response to its requestor when one of its
configured endpoints isnt available. Or does anyone know under what capacity
or situation a Unallocated/Unassigned number response would be given by
301 - 393 of 393 matches
Mail list logo
