Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_VOICE] Location Based Call Admission Control

2013-01-30 Thread ie ravindra
Dear All, Thanks for your great explanation which I gained lots about the CAC I believe. Thanks again. Ravi. On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Sergey Heyphets wrote: > For G711 with RSVP, it would be 80k*+16k, right? > > Sergey > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Bill wrote: > >> Great walk

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_VOICE] Location Based Call Admission Control

2013-01-30 Thread Fawad Asad
Please unsubscribe -Thx On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Sergey Heyphets wrote: > For G711 with RSVP, it would be 80k*+16k, right? > > Sergey > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Bill wrote: > >> Great walk through but just one note, this is for g729 calls which surely >> you will be doing but

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_VOICE] Location Based Call Admission Control

2013-01-30 Thread Sergey Heyphets
For G711 with RSVP, it would be 80k*+16k, right? Sergey On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Bill wrote: > Great walk through but just one note, this is for g729 calls which surely > you will be doing but just to be sure you don't use these numbers with g711 > ;) > > Bill > > > On Jan 30, 2013, at

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_VOICE] Location Based Call Admission Control

2013-01-30 Thread Joel
Study; ie ravindra Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_VOICE] Location Based Call Admission Control One more comment on CAC, but for the real world not for the lab... Locations CAC is quick and easy to setup, you don't touch the routers at all. The downside is it is really des

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_VOICE] Location Based Call Admission Control

2013-01-30 Thread Bill
Great walk through but just one note, this is for g729 calls which surely you will be doing but just to be sure you don't use these numbers with g711 ;) Bill On Jan 30, 2013, at 7:03 AM, Justin Carney wrote: > The two types of CAC are locations-based and RSVP-based. On CUCM they both > have

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_VOICE] Location Based Call Admission Control

2013-01-30 Thread Justin Carney
One more comment on CAC, but for the real world not for the lab... Locations CAC is quick and easy to setup, you don't touch the routers at all. The downside is it is really designed for a hub and spoke topology and it does not account for multiple circuits. RSVP on the other hand is path-aware,

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_VOICE] Location Based Call Admission Control

2013-01-30 Thread Justin Carney
The two types of CAC are locations-based and RSVP-based. On CUCM they both have a configuration set on the location page, which may seem confusing at first. The key words to watch for in the scenario will be "once bw is exceeded reroute call over PSTN" means you need AAR, which could be either lo

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_VOICE] Location Based Call Admission Control

2013-01-30 Thread Cory Gray
It should be pretty clear whether to use it or not Sent from my iPhone On Jan 30, 2013, at 6:07 AM, "Suresh Bhandari" wrote: > Again it depends on if you are asked to do so. > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 3:56 PM, ie ravindra wrote: >> Hi All, >> Do we need to enable ip rsvp bandwidth comman

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_VOICE] Location Based Call Admission Control

2013-01-30 Thread Suresh Bhandari
Again it depends on if you are asked to do so. On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 3:56 PM, ie ravindra wrote: > Hi All, > Do we need to enable ip rsvp bandwidth command when we configure location > based CAC. > > Thanks, > Ravi. > > ___ > For more information re