Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question

You are absolutely righttwo ccm groups required having one ccm in each. --- On Sun, 3/29/09, anil batra wrote: From: anil batra Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question To: "ccie Me" , "CCIE OSL" , "kapil atrish" Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.co

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question

trish wrote: From: kapil atrish Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question To: "ccie Me" , "CCIE OSL" Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Sunday, March 29, 2009, 10:55 AM You can try this: Create two trunks between CCM and GK having only one CCM in each trunk i.e

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question

imitation over that trunk (Location). Next call should fall back to Pub trunk which is having gw-priority 9. Thanks... --- On Sun, 3/29/09, CCIE OSL wrote: From: CCIE OSL Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question To: "ccie Me" Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Sun

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question

I have some questions for you. 1. Are you running on 1 tech-prefix or two with on the gatekeeper? 2. Does entire BR2 has to able to call HQ or just a single phone? 3. Does it required to only use 1#, are you allow to use other prefixes? Your first requirement for HQ to BR2 is fairly easy, Howeve

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question

Don't know for sure but . Under the gatekeeper config :Look at the command "endpoint max-calls h323id" On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 4:33 PM, ccie Me wrote: > Gents, > > i'm working on this case on gatekeeper: > > i need to only allow ONE active call that should be going through SUB > now for a

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper blues :|

. >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Chris Parker wrote: >> >>> Does the call complete as 729 withthe mtp checked? >>> >>> -- >>> From: ccielab...@gmail.com >>> Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 12:28

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper blues :|

; From: ccielab...@gmail.com >> Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 12:28 PM >> To: Chris Parker >> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper blues :| >> >> Yep, everything started working once I checked off requires MTP on the &

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper blues :|

e mtp checked? > > -- > From: ccielab...@gmail.com > Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 12:28 PM > To: Chris Parker > Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper blues :| > > Yep, everything started working once I checked off re

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper blues :|

Does the call complete as 729 withthe mtp checked? -Original Message- From: ccielab...@gmail.com Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 12:28 PM To: Chris Parker Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper blues :| Yep, everything started working once I checked

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper blues :|

well... the "mtp" option was by default disabled... never thought u might have enabled it... mostly a busyout after ringing.. occurs as a codec problem ;)...a rule of thumb i guess.. On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 9:58 PM, wrote: > Yep, everything started working once I checked off requires MTP on

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper blues :|

thats right... mostly a codec/regions problemm but just as an additional measure.. just check if u have connectivity between the 2 ip phones... i mean that the iphone in one site must be able to connect with other site ipphone using direct ip addresses u have a separate reachable link..or

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper blues :|

Yep, everything started working once I checked off requires MTP on the trunk. . But why? The call is coming in as g.729 and the device pool the trunk is in is set to g.729 On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Chris Parker wrote: > If you are getting ring through when you place the call, then y

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper blues :|

If you are getting ring through when you place the call, then your GK config is probably OK. If its ringing that tells me the GK sent the call to the UCM. The fact that it goes fast busy when you pick up sounds like a codec/media problem to me. Check the media resources config and your region

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper registration

What you posted is the none secured working version. I'd suggest you post the one that doesn't work. Also, I find that sometimes after configuring these things I need to kick start the CCM process on the servers for them to behave correctly. - Original Message - From: Josh Rein

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper registration

Saturday, March 14, 2009 11:37 AM To: Josh Reinmann Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper registration Did you configure "h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr" for CUME to 172.25.102.1/32? On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Josh Reinmann wrote: > Wh

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper registration

Did you configure "h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr" for CUME to 172.25.102.1/32? On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Josh Reinmann wrote: > When I have a gatekeeper set up without any security, I am able to get both > CCM’s to register no problem.  Once I put security on, only 1 registers. I’m > no

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper CAC - call no longer works

Yep,, My Trunk was in HQ. Thanks... Christian Hennrich wrote: hi, your device pool of the GK Trunk needs a g729 only region. Ensure, that there is definitively no g711 relationship on the region used on your GK Trunk. HTH CCIE OSL schrieb: I just activated bandwidth for my gatekeeper, ba

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper CAC - call no longer works

hi, your device pool of the GK Trunk needs a g729 only region. Ensure, that there is definitively no g711 relationship on the region used on your GK Trunk. HTH CCIE OSL schrieb: I just activated bandwidth for my gatekeeper, bandwidht interzone CME 64, My calls from HQ to BR2 is no longer

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper E164 ao-reg both address registration

Yep,, It works, Thanks... /Jin Jung... Vik Malhi wrote: You need no-reg after dialplan pattern within telephony-service. Vik Malhi - CCIE#13890 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert Inc Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com Join IPexpert's Free CCIE P

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper E164 ao-reg both address registration

You need no-reg after dialplan pattern within telephony-service. Vik Malhi - CCIE#13890 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert Inc Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com Join IPexpert's Free CCIE Peer Groups & Study Communities at www.IPexpert.com/communiti

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper E164 ao-reg both address registration

Here it is,, ! ephone-dn 1 dual-line number 4001 no-reg both call-forward busy 4100 call-forward noan 4100 timeout 12 ! ! ephone-dn 2 dual-line number 4002 no-reg both call-forward busy 4100 call-forward noan 4100 timeout 12 ! ! ephone-dn 3 dual-line number 4003 no-reg both call-f

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper E164 ao-reg both address registration

Try rebooting the BR2 router. If that still doesn't work, Post the BR2 config and the output of the SHOW GATEWAY command on the BR2 router. - Original Message - From: "CCIE OSL" To: Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 8:29 PM Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper E164 ao-reg both address

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper: CCM to BR2 call failed: Debug outputand config shown

no shutdown > Any ther ideas? Lke i said if I set the default technology prefix, It > works? > Thanks in advance for the help. > > Tony > -- > *From:* Alex > *To:* Tony reyes ; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > *Sent:* Sunday, January 18, 2009 1

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper: CCM to BR2 call failed: Debug outputand config shown

technology prefix, It works? Thanks in advance for the help. Tony From: Alex To: Tony reyes ; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2009 1:55:18 PM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper: CCM to BR2 call failed: Debug outputand config shown

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper: CCM to BR2 call failed: Debug outputand config shown

Jan 18 18:26:01.870: //006158870500/006158870500/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo: (3001) Tech-prefix match failed.<= You are not prepending 3001 with 2#. Make sure 2# is prepended to 3001 on CCM Route-list/Route-Group level. Rgds Alex - Original Message - From: Tony reyes To: ccie_v

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper One way audio

Could be many things, but check your MTP and Media resource settings. I assume you are using an MTP for your trunk? Maybe the BR1 phones are using a different device as a MTP than the HQ phones and there is something wrong with whatever the HQ phones have in their MRGL? Like the 6608 Transcoder

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper E164 registration

s. Same way for ephone-hunt Pilot number, dialplan-pattern number. "Kumar, Narinder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper E164 registrationWhen you do no telephony setup, and telephony service again by default the ephones will register

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper E164 registration

PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Key Sent: Thursday, 13 November 2008 1:27 PM To: Greg Miglucci (gmiglucc); ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper E164 registration Thanks Greg. Did that (several times actually) also shut down the gatekeeper,

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper E164 registration

: Greg Miglucci (gmiglucc) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 11/12/2008 7:10 PM To: James Key; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper E164 registration Verify no-reg and then do no gateway gateway on the CME router. From: [EMAIL

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper E164 registration

Verify no-reg and then do no gateway gateway on the CME router. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Key Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 4:45 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper E164 regis

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper routing

It has to be in zone A. Vik Malhi - CCIE #13890 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Join our free online support and peer group communities: http://www.IPexpert.com/communities

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper 1st call g711 2nd call g729 - works but not as expected

You might want to uncheck the Media Transcoder required check box and try that way. What I found out that if you do not have hardware transcoder in your MRGL then the calls come in from CME over Gatekeeper to IPCC do not work. On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Rimon Vallavanatt Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper 1st call g711 2nd call g729 - worksbut not as expected

I removed the transcoding resources from my MRGLs and now the phones at HQ work as expected. Why is transcoding being invoked when transcoding resources are present?

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Bandwith

Interzone bandwidth restricts bandwidth between zones. Are you using more than one zone in your gatekeeper config? On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Onur Tufekci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am looking at the bandwidth utilizations from CCM to CME and CME to CCM. > > Calls that are going out fr

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Registration

: 630-769-4394 From: jason sung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 8:50 PM To: boonchin .ng Cc: Santry, Ryan; CCIE Maillist; Jacob Owen Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Registration this is dependent on you callmanager group configuration. On Mon, Apr 28, 2008

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Registration

-Original Message- > > From: Jacob Owen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 3:17 PM > > To: Santry, Ryan; CCIE Maillist > > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Registration > > > > Pub would be _1 > > Sub woul

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Registration

,60515 > SNR: 630-769-4394 > > -Original Message- > From: Jacob Owen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 3:17 PM > To: Santry, Ryan; CCIE Maillist > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Registration > > Pub would be _1 > Sub would be _2

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Registration

] Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 3:17 PM To: Santry, Ryan; CCIE Maillist Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Registration Pub would be _1 Sub would be _2 --- "Santry, Ryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When you register CCM with a PUB and SUB to a > gatekeeper what >

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Registration

Pub would be _1 Sub would be _2 --- "Santry, Ryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When you register CCM with a PUB and SUB to a > gatekeeper what > determines who has the _1 and _2? > > > > For example: > > > > 10.1.200.20 51156 10.1.200.20 49727 HQ-RTR > VOIP-GW > >

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper tech prefix

Like you said.. GK registers to each other via zone remote command. JD> Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 10:18:44 -0500> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper te

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper tech prefix

gt; > priority. A higher priority has a higher number. For example, priority > 10 > > > is higher than priority 5. > > > > > > JD > > > > > > > > > Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 09:20:08 +1100 > > > Fr

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper tech prefix

Well, zone prefix is for routing calls based on the selected trunk or gateway to a remote device. The remote device can be either a CME, CCM or another GK. JD> Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 08:25:48 -0500> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper tech prefix

___ > Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 09:20:08 +1100 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper tech prefix > > > > Thanks adam > > So what happens to GK if I have two or more ho

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper tech prefix

Tue, 8 Apr 2008 09:20:08 +1100From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper tech prefixThanks adamSo what happens to GK if I have two or more hosts registered with th same tech prefix. Does it then look at the zone prefix. Paul On Mon, Apr 7,

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper tech prefix

Yes. On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Paul and Bobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks adam > > So what happens to GK if I have two or more hosts registered with th same > tech prefix. Does it then look at the zone prefix. > > Paul > > On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 10:53 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper tech prefix

Thanks adam So what happens to GK if I have two or more hosts registered with th same tech prefix. Does it then look at the zone prefix. Paul On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 10:53 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The tech prefix helps GK steer the call to the correct registered gateway. > i.e., 1# co

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper tech prefix

BTW, what you desire is possible... provided all endpoints register their prefixes with the GK... CCM will only register the trunks... So, if you want to tie a bunch of CCMEs together, the GK is prob your best bet Jonathan On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 9:16 PM, Paul and Bobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper tech prefix

You need to set up your route-patterns to prefix the 1# to the GK trunk... Not sure yet what the config does on the CCM side... prob just identifies you to the GK: "Hey, if you see 1# in front of digits, that means it is coming from me" Jonathan On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 9:16 PM, Paul and Bobs <[EM

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper configuration question- Proctor lab guide

Because they are both controlled by THIS gatekeeper. A remote zone is a zone controlled by a different Gatekeeper. Jonathan On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Vik Ahuja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Members, > Question 19 from lab 1 for proctor lab guide given at that bootcamp relates > to configu

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper

I believe it chooses the Loopback interface.. -- Vik Malhi - CCIE # 13890 Sr Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Join our free online support and peer group communities:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper

Paul really the only thing the RAS IP does in the zone local command is to specify which interface IP to use on that router when the router is contacted via zone discovery protocol. when an endpoint or gateway contact a gatekeeper via zone discovery protocol they are told to use the RAS IP for all

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper question

Voice Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications. -- _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jane Ryer (jryer) Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 12:04 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper question Sorry, correcting my typos

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper question

@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper question Hi, Daniel, I have also been working my way through Exam II recently, and came to the same conclusion that you did - that the solution is wrong. Here's what I ended up with, which seems to work: RL-GK-ADD-P

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper question

Hi, Daniel, I have also been working my way through Exam II recently, and came to the same conclusion that you did - that the solution is wrong. Here's what I ended up with, which seems to work: RL-GK-ADD-PREFIX RL_GK predot + add prefix 1# RL-GK-NO-PREFIXRL_GK

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper h225 trunks and making calls

Put this config on your gateway: interface Loopback0 ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 h323-gateway voip interface h323-gateway voip id [zone] ipaddr [GK1 IP] 1719 priority 1 h323-gateway voip id [zone] ipaddr [GK2 IP] 1719 h323-gateway voip h323-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] h323-gateway voip tech

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper h225 trunks and making calls

Is the CCME configured as a gateway to register with the gatekeeper? Post the interface config of the CCME router... (just the interfaces, I don't need to see 200 dial peers...) Jonathan On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 1:43 AM, Paul and Bobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have changed the route patter

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper h225 trunks and making calls

No, the other side, the gateway, must register with the GK with its zone and tech-prefix... The GK will then look at what gateway controls this zone and send the call there no dial peers on the gatekeeper (unless it is also a gateway)... Jonathan On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 1:15 AM, Paul and B

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper h225 trunks and making calls

I have changed the route pattern to match the IP EXPERT labs now I have RoutePattern in CCM 0.! --> RL (predot-strip) --> RG --> H225 Trunk (g711) and H225 Trunk (g729) which both use the configured gatekeeper. I then have incoming called-number . voip dial peer and destination-pattern 011331320

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper h225 trunks and making calls

Another thing The ip address in the zone local [br2 or whatever] [domain] [ip] I believe that is the interface on the gatekeeper and has no relation to the zone that the end device is sitting in. Is that correct. If so then after the digits have matched in the gatekeeper config will it then match

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper h225 trunks and making calls

Well, let's look at this logically How does the gatekeeper know where to send the call? Since the call came into the GK on a GK-controlled trunk, then it needs to go somewhere... but where... and how would digit analysis on the GK know where to send that call? hint: zone local [br2 or whatev

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper h225 trunks and making calls

Paul, Are you trying to route a call via the GK out the BR2 gateway? On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 9:15 PM, Paul and Bobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > just working through the labs at the moment and am getting stuck on the > gatekeepers section. I have setup the gatekeeper in IOS and in CCM

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper to CCM

Also, you need ! dial-peer voice 1200 voip destination-pattern [12]... session target ras dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric no vad * tech-prefix 1#* ! So that you do not need gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology in your gatekeeper. Of course, do make sure your CallManager Trunk is configured with t

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper to CCM

Hi Edward: One way could be registering the CCM with a technology prefix, it could be 1#, 2# wichever number, and do the same with the CME, the CME tech prefix could be the same as the CCM, if you decide to register the CCM and the CME with different tech prefix the other site hast to append

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper "Unallocated/Unassigned" number

Hi Were you able to get this one working please !!! I am trying same but no luck ..will appreciate if you can share. -Anil --- abdulminim rizk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi > you can try method i will mention here , first do > it in lab setting and not production network until > you ma

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper issue

uary 06, 2008 6:59 PM To: Patel, Mrugesh Cc: Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper issue Not in front of a computer but I believe that the 3rd octet of your local zone (and thus where your GK is expecting a LCF from the PSTN GK) is incorrect. I beleive it should be 172.9.200.1 no

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper issue

REVERT button and the loopback comes up with 172.9.100.1 <http://172.9.100.1/> ip address. Regardless, I changed my third octet and reloaded but still the same issue. From: Mark Snow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 6:59 PM To: Patel, Mrugesh Cc: Subjec

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper issue

Chad Stachowicz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 7:56 PM To: Patel, Mrugesh Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper issue Patel, it matched the right zone, sure its not a PSTN-WAN configuration error? gateway config is correct. On 2/6/08, Patel, Mrugesh &l

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper issue

will wait for Mark of Vik to comment though. Usually I fly through this part of the gatekeeper config, but today this just blew my confidence away. From: Chad Stachowicz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 7:56 PM To: Patel, Mrugesh Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice]

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper issue

y 06, 2008 7:56 PM > *To:* Patel, Mrugesh > > *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper issue > > > > Patel, it matched the right zone, sure its not a PSTN-WAN configuration > error? gateway config is correct. > > > > > > > > On 2/6/08, *Patel, Mrugesh* <

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper issue

PM To: Patel, Mrugesh Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper issue Patel, it matched the right zone, sure its not a PSTN-WAN configuration error? gateway config is correct. On 2/6/08, Patel, Mrugesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Mark, I reverted the HQ gateway configs usi

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper issue

PM To: Patel, Mrugesh Cc: Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper issue Not in front of a computer but I believe that the 3rd octet of your local zone (and thus where your GK is expecting a LCF from the PSTN GK) is incorrect. I beleive it should be 172.9.200.1 not .100.1. Mark Snow Sr

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper issue

Not in front of a computer but I believe that the 3rd octet of your local zone (and thus where your GK is expecting a LCF from the PSTN GK) is incorrect. I beleive it should be 172.9.200.1 not .100.1. Mark Snow Sr Technical Instructor IPexpert, Inc. Sent from my iPhone On Feb 6, 2008, at 7:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Multicast

Enabling Multicast MoH has nothing to do with Multicast discovery of a GK by a GW. Multicast is just the transport - enable it for a GW and it will broadcast (or multicast) out a discovery packet destined for any GK with a specific Zone name (whatever you configured it as on the GW to regis

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper to CCM Registration

by trunk name do you mean the h225 gatekeeper controlled Device Name? Chad On 1/19/08, senthil natarajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > yes there is. > > making your endpoints appear static in the GK. > > create the trunk in the ccm - gktrunk (for example ) which points to the > GK. > > In the

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper to CCM Registration

yes there is. making your endpoints appear static in the GK. create the trunk in the ccm - gktrunk (for example ) which points to the GK. In the ccm service parameters, search for "gk" ccm service 1 - set the trunk name there. ccm service 2 - hardcode the RAS port to 1720 (instead of letting t

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Configuration and MTP

If the call comes in G711 - and forwards properly to CUE and the ONLY thing that is changing for it not to work is that you change the incoming DP to G729 - then the problem must be with the transcoders not invoking properly. What debugs have you run to try to troubleshoot this problem? Ma

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Configuration and MTP

Hi, Thanks Mark. When I have try voice class codec command, in CME side call-forward busy is not working when the class comes as g729 [call is not hitting the CUE] even when the transcoder is up on CME. When I remove the voice class codec the call is hitting the CUE. Cou

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Configuration and MTP

When trying to control BW and using a H323 GK - doing the CAC on the GK and NOT on the CCM side with Locations is recommended. Both will work - it is just less to troubleshoot. As far as having codec selection on a DP - create a "voice class codec" globally, define your codecs with their pref

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Configuration and MTP

Hi, For Gatekeeper CAC, update the region as g711 and for Gatekeeper device pool update the region [g711] and left none for location. Gatekeeper bandwidth is controlled via bandwidth command as "zone bw ipexpert 144" this example could support up to one G.711 and one g.729 calls.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Configuration and NTP

If you were to call from CCM over to CME and didn't have the MTP checked - then transferred the call or various other things known as 'supplementary services' - they would most probably fail. The 'enable outbound faststart' is due to the fact that the IPIPGW in IOS 12.4 mainline only suppor

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper integration question

URL: http://www.IPexpert.com Toll Free: +1.866.225.8064 International: +1.810.326.1444 -Original Message- From: LEDBETTER, JEREMY (ATTCLSMA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 5:32 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Vo

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper integration question

nal: +1.810.326.1444 _ From: Scott Monasmith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 6:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: LEDBETTER, JEREMY (ATTCLSMA); ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper integration question Vik, Regarding Te

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper integration question

Is their an example of this type of GK config? Thanks, Jeremy. -Original Message- From: Vik Malhi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 11:26 PM To: LEDBETTER, JEREMY (ATTCLSMA); ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper integration question

You only need to define the tech prefix on the gatekeeper if it a "default technology-prefix"- if you are using non-default tech-prefixes then there is no need to define them explicitly on the gatekeeper itself. You can register CallManager with a Tech-Prefix by configuring the Tech-Prefix field

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper "Unallocated/Unassigned" number

A guess in the dark - but do you happen to be trying to get a CCM RL to route to the next RG or GW in the list after a call fails enroute to the GK? Mark Snow CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security) CCSI #31583 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper "Unallocated/Unassigned" number

Hi you can try method i will mention here , first do it in lab setting and not production network until you make sure of tight design first IOS used is 12.4(9)T2 on 2811 ISR platform with ipvoice_ivs-mz code first thing: on the Gatekeeper config mode there is a command : arq reject-unknown-pr

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper "Unallocated/Unassigned" number

Valid "RejectReasons" in an Admission Reject message (ARJ) are shown below: calledPartyNotRegistered invalidPermission requestDenied undefinedReason resourceUnavailable securityDenial Unallocated/Unassigned number is a cause code in Q931 and H323 signaling (Release Message). In order to fo

<    1   2   3   4