Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Off topic: Cisco UCM 7.x versus Microsoft OCS R2

2009-04-07 Thread Michael Ciarfello
A mature product with 8+ years of experience and companies that have many tens of thousands of endpoints on some of the largest companies in the world vs a new technology that just came out. You need to ask questions on supportability (how is MS supporting hardware phones, gateways, trunks,

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VPIM urgent reply needed

2009-04-07 Thread Michael Ciarfello
You were better off on your first config. Cliff is even more correct now. See the VPIM intergration guide. In it, it will tell you one domain can't be a subset of another. Also has a pretty good overview of some DNS, domain and MX record stuff that you can further research to no end by a

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Voice Lab Diagram V 3.0

2009-04-07 Thread Michael Ciarfello
Check the Cisco Learning network at cisco.hosted.jivesoftware.com/community/certifications/ccie_voice/lab_exam?view=overview They have a list of equipment and software as well as the new blueprint. There is no lab topology. Somewhere on there (their discussion forum maybe), one of the staff

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Off topic: Cisco UCM 7.x versus MicrosoftOCS R2

2009-04-09 Thread Michael Ciarfello
. There are hundreds more subjects you have to compare. It's a very complex decision. You have to determine your criteria, make the decision and the hardest of all, live with it. Michael Ciarfello Unified Communications Subject Matter Expert IPLogic, Inc. www.iplogic.comhttp://www.iplogic.com Connect

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Off topic: Cisco UCM 7.x versus MicrosoftOCS R2

2009-04-09 Thread Michael Ciarfello
1. No 2. Many existing legacy Avaya to Cisco instead of upgrading to Avaya IP. Working on winning some Avaya IPs to Cisco. 3. No Michael Ciarfello Unified Communications Subject Matter Expert IPLogic, Inc. www.iplogic.comhttp://www.iplogic.com Connect . Communicate . Compete

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] FXS scenarios

2009-04-09 Thread Michael Ciarfello
And STCIAPP (sccp for FXS) to have features that are not available with H.323 such as pickup and park, hold, etc. You can also customize the feature access codes. From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NM/AIM_CUE Lab's Default Configuration

2009-04-10 Thread Michael Ciarfello
After you configure the VLANs and IP Addresses and you get get into CUE, check to see what you need to do. Configure it real quick then move on to something else while it's rebooting, etc. Same for IPCC initial config. Same for CCM services same for anything else that takes a while. Depends

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ipcc express - contacts waiting

2009-04-15 Thread Michael Ciarfello
You are on the right track. One of the parameters in get reporting statistic (if my memory serves correctly) should give you the number of users in queue. What value are you getting in your variable? What are you doing afterwards to make sure there is max only one caller in the queue? I

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IP to IP GW (or CUBE) and GateKeeper coexistence

2009-04-20 Thread Michael Ciarfello
. Michael Ciarfello Unified Communications Subject Matter Expert IPLogic, Inc. 518.724.2350 direct www.iplogic.comhttp://www.iplogic.com Connect . Communicate . Compete . BetterTM From: Mehdi Ben Khedija [mailto:mbk23061...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 11:23 AM To: Michael Ciarfello Cc

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 2811 ISDN status

2009-04-22 Thread Michael Ciarfello
hxxp://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk801/tk379/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094b78.shtml It's for BRI troubleshooting, but applies to PRI also. Michael Ciarfello Unified Communications Subject Matter Expert IPLogic, Inc. 518.724.2350 direct www.iplogic.com Connect . Communicate . Compete

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Question - v3 BP

2009-04-27 Thread Michael Ciarfello
. New 7.0 customers can download AC until April 17th (which as passed.) or until the new stuff is released. So it's gone. So I guess the question is, is Cisco going to include one of the not-free ACs as part of the new exam? Another good Q for the next ask the expert. Michael Ciarfello

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUBE vs IPIPGW vs SBC

2009-04-27 Thread Michael Ciarfello
for years on the PIX (now ASA) firewalls. Hope there is a better key management feature. And the phone home feature has to keep a port open for it to phone home. Because your SIP trunks SHOULD be behind a firewall. Michael Ciarfello Unified Communications Subject Matter Expert IPLogic, Inc

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco Version 7 NFR kit from Cisco

2009-04-27 Thread Michael Ciarfello
off of ebay? Hmmm. Sounds like you lucked out. Others may not. Note the meaning of NFR. It's up to you to determine the morality of obtaining such. Probably should have kept that to yourself. Michael Ciarfello Unified Communications Subject Matter Expert IPLogic, Inc. 518.724.2350 direct

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] PUB DR Simulation

2009-05-01 Thread Michael Ciarfello
HI, Nope. Only the other way. Only if a sub dies will it get the DB from the pub. If the pub dies you have to reinstall the SW on the pub then restore from the backup file. Keep a record of the IP address, hostname and probably IP addresses and passwords. cr*p. Forgot what to do with the

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ATA IVR not responding

2009-05-02 Thread Michael Ciarfello
Can you turn the IVR off via a config register? Might be disabled. When you pick up the phone does the red light come on? Try the factoryreset thingie. Try re-loading the software image. Try shaking it. (lol. just kidding) From:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ATA IVR not responding

2009-05-03 Thread Michael Ciarfello
@onlinestudylist.com; Michael Ciarfello Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ATA IVR not responding Hi Michael, Can u give more inputs reg turning IVR off via config-register? Haven't heard abt this before, sounds interesting. Yes the Red light does come on and goes off perfectly fine. I was able

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3 Blue Print Question

2009-05-04 Thread Michael Ciarfello
Check the pub and sub requirements / restrictions for CUCMBEr. Explore the differences between CUC 7 and CUC on BE. Look at the installation and upgrade guide for CUPS to determine its server requirements. I predict Cisco will be using VMware in the lab for all these machines, so using it at

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Suggestion for version stamping posts?

2009-05-04 Thread Michael Ciarfello
Good idea. I would keep the label though even for GK, H323. GK involves trunks and trunking is better in 7. Could get to a point in the conversation where one would have to ask v2 or v3. -Original Message- From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] What type of VMware machine

2009-05-08 Thread Michael Ciarfello
I have an intel i920 (quad-core processor) with 12GB memory and two RAID 0 drives. I store the images on an external box so I don't care about the lack of redundancy. Machine flies. I think there are some issues with AMD processors, VMware and CallManager. Running Vista 64 Bit. XP 64 bit

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS support over MPLS network in a GRE tunnel

2009-05-08 Thread Michael Ciarfello
Try q-in-q? From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Benny Chung [bennych...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 9:04 PM To: Mike Thompson Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL |

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Add Domain on MGCP Gateway V3

2009-05-08 Thread Michael Ciarfello
ring, ring. (I know you got it.) I think sh ccm-manager or sh mgcp will show you the MGCP domain and format it expects. Usually copy and paste that to CCM. Verifies DNS and domain name are correctly configured on router. From:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VPIM issue with DNS on Unity

2009-05-08 Thread Michael Ciarfello
What are your (Sandy's) DNS settings for both sides? According to the VPIM networking guide, one can't be a subset of another domain. Need two forward lookup zones. Take a look at the VPIM guide in Unity the section titled domain naming or something like that.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Software conference bridge

2009-05-08 Thread Michael Ciarfello
MRGLs will allow you to select what server to use first. MRG will select the resources in that MRG in whatever order it determines. Troubleshooting book has a good discussion on MRG and MRGLs. I don't think you can do both simultaneously. What workbook did the question come from?

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3560 vs 3750

2009-05-08 Thread Michael Ciarfello
They appear at a glance to have the same capabiltities. Both appear to use SRR. Both appear to have the same egress queueing. Both appear to generate the same autoqos commands. BOth seem to have 4 egress queues with queue 1 as the priority queue. Take a look at each configuration guide:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3 Security?

2009-05-09 Thread Michael Ciarfello
I would suspect the same statement as was given in ask the expert over on Cisco netpro (last July?) Check out that discussion. I don't remember it 100%, but something to the effect of difficult to test topics blah blah but is still testable. Yea, not a definitive answer. I would study it.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] DSCP to COS map question

2009-05-09 Thread Michael Ciarfello
I'm a little confused what you are asking exactly. And I think you have the mappings backwards from what your premise statement is. Depending on switch / router model or software the COS to DSCP map may configure 24 or 26. If the requirement is to put signaling traffic in CS3, then use 24.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [cisco-voip] DSCP to COS map question

2009-05-12 Thread Michael Ciarfello
To: Jorge L. Rodriguez Aguila Cc: Wes Sisk ws...@cisco.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; cisco-v...@puck.nether.net cisco-v...@puck.nether.net; Michael Ciarfello mciarfe...@iplogic.com Sent: Mon May 11 18:47:50 2009 Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] [OSL

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper controller trunk MTP ( 7.X)

2009-05-14 Thread Michael Ciarfello
SRND 7.0. See the section: H.323 Trunks with Media Termination Points Your case 1 looks like it complies with the SRND. There is also other discussion in the SRND for when to use MTP vs when not to. Later on there is a good discussion on MTP and SIP and DTMF-Relay. All-in-All the SRND

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cannot access main menu on Vg248 console

2009-05-17 Thread Michael Ciarfello
I don't know about that last paragraph so you get half an answer as a possible answer. XON / XOFF (wax on, wax off) Read some history on modems and serial communication. If troubleshooting is purposely not on the v2 lab, you can always ask the proctor to check out an equipment problem

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] v3 Reading List

2009-05-17 Thread Michael Ciarfello
What's wrong with the deployment guide? (actually better than the administratino guide.) What's wrong with the CCM SRND, presence chapter? From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jason Granat

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS again: is cRTP supported with MLPPP

2009-05-21 Thread Michael Ciarfello
It's in the QoS SRND, page 3-17. ALL the SRNDs are worth reading cover to cover at least 10 times. For v2 studying, even reading parts of the 7.x SRNDs, the language is clearer, better examples, etc than the 4.x SRNDs. Slow-Speed (£768 kbps) Leased Lines Recommendation: Use MLP LFI and cRTP.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] v2 or v3 : CRS scripting

2009-05-22 Thread Michael Ciarfello
Why do you want to make a page to the phones? This sounds like you want to do a sort of Wallboard type functionality. Anyways, a customer created their own custom wallboard utility. It dips into the SQL database every x seconds and looks for status, format a web page and pushes it to a

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Presence Install

2009-05-22 Thread Michael Ciarfello
Yep, that's one of the things about the new Linux appliances.. The hardware support is really strict. Try an IBM or HP branded server equalivent and you'll go crazy. But it's a LOT better than customers installing stuff on the windows boxes and wondering why the server doesn't work anymore

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vmware tools on CUCM 7.0 Guest OS

2009-05-23 Thread Michael Ciarfello
You need root access to the OS to install VMware tools. It will just mess things up anyways. It can be don't but my opinion is don't bother. From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Tech Guy

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Security not on the v3 Blueprint?

2009-05-25 Thread Michael Ciarfello
I suspect we will get the same answer as before. I think it was a reply in the last ask the expert (June of 08?). Something about hard to test things blah blah (Cisco lab wise) but then a statement was given it's testable. I would go through it. Nothing much to lose. The two tokens are

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Security not on the v3 Blueprint?

2009-05-26 Thread Michael Ciarfello
To: Michael Ciarfello Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Security not on the v3 Blueprint? Tokens? On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Michael Ciarfello mciarfe...@iplogic.com wrote: I suspect we will get the same answer as before. I think it was a reply

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Antw: v2 - IPCC aware of MWI

2009-05-26 Thread Michael Ciarfello
Try posting your message on Netpro. There is a good IPCC forum there. The dipping into the CCM database sounded like the best idea. It's in there somewhere (MWI's require pub database to be up) --just might not jump out at you. Wonder what they say over at Netpro. Of source, version 5,

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Security not on the v3 Blueprint?

2009-05-27 Thread Michael Ciarfello
: Jonathan Charles [mailto:jonv...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 11:02 PM To: Michael Ciarfello Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Security not on the v3 Blueprint? wow... I thought it could just use the self-signed certificates and the hardware certs

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] voice rtp send-recv command

2009-05-27 Thread Michael Ciarfello
MoH IVR AA Streaming conference, distance learning, etc with video (RTP also used for Video) Note that the SIP protocol (ok, it's SDP) also has the SIP endpoints negotiate if an endpoint is send, receive or sendrecv. From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Security not on the v3 Blueprint?

2009-05-27 Thread Michael Ciarfello
...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 1:50 PM To: Michael Ciarfello Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Security not on the v3 Blueprint? Dude, what a butt pain... no way this is actually on the lab... Where do you get the token thingies? On Wed, May 27, 2009

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3. Something to consider or ask about

2009-05-27 Thread Michael Ciarfello
CCIE RS v4 Ask the expert is going on currently. Good post pasted below to consider as we learn more about how the upcoming voice v3 test will be given. Hopefully there will be an ask the expert SOON for voice v3. Replied by: [cid:image001.gif@01C9DED6.54402F70]

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3 : list of equipements and sotware required

2009-05-29 Thread Michael Ciarfello
There are none. It should just install—UCCX Also. I am using VMWare Workstation, I put 2GB ram, 200GB hard disk (don’t allocate all now,) Not at home to determine the SCSI controller type (it WAS SCSI though.) From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3 : list of equipements and sotware required

2009-05-29 Thread Michael Ciarfello
archives. From: Thaya Nagarajah [mailto:tnagara...@axispoint.com] Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 10:22 AM To: Michael Ciarfello Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3 : list of equipements and sotware required Any special way to create the VM server to tweak the Cisco

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] New voice Lab topology

2009-05-29 Thread Michael Ciarfello
There is none. And it's not guaranteed that Cisco will ever come out with one. The v2 topology was an EXAMPLE topology that didn't have to match the actual lab. Not every customer's network looks like that topology. It's my opinion they want to keep it more dynamic this time in order to

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] v3 HWIC-4ESW QoS

2009-05-30 Thread Michael Ciarfello
Yes. It's basically same commands as a 3500XL/2900XL. And the annoying thing is, especially with the HWICS (since smaller number of ports) are if you put two in, you have to use a xross-over cable to link them together (and a special command) wasting two ports. So they are basically

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Basic audio issue with CUE

2009-05-30 Thread Michael Ciarfello
It's slow. Give it a second or two. Do you get a connected message on the phone? What do you get when you dial the AA or promtmgmt applications? If those (AA and prompt) work then reload the software from scratch (boothelper.) I had to do that once. I attributed it to just unplugging the

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Basic audio issue with CUE

2009-05-30 Thread Michael Ciarfello
Oops. Should have read ahead. Was it the SIP gateway (ccn subsystem sip)? in cue? From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of john D [jkd1...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 9:18 PM To:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Voice v3

2009-05-31 Thread Michael Ciarfello
The roadmap doesn't really say, but it's easy enough and customers will want to have it. So PLEASE practice both. Unity connection also has LDAP sync and is good to learn. CUP is another one. I don't see Emergency Responder on the list either (E911), but is an EXCELLENT application to learn

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Voice v3

2009-06-01 Thread Michael Ciarfello
Oh c**p, I just saw you said CME. My mistake. I should have went to bed last night instead of reading forums and studying. Or learned how to read. From: Russ Meuchel [mailto:rmeuc...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 12:07 AM To: Michael Ciarfello Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Voice v3

2009-06-01 Thread Michael Ciarfello
one pretty much had the tone of everything and anything. In selected posts, the expert did give an opinion of the chances of something appearing in the lab. From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Michael Ciarfello Sent: Monday

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IOS version in 2851

2009-06-03 Thread Michael Ciarfello
Sorry, it just my style. Look in the command reference guide and your answer will be revealed. There is also a CCME Command Reference. From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of junk cisco Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 1:55 AM To:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unity Connection Integration

2009-06-06 Thread Michael Ciarfello
Works for me. VMWare workstation. Check telephony configuration and test port group pass. I don' t see where you are doing the PING test though. Is that what you are calling test port group? Under Telephony Integrations / Port Group? What Port Name are you using? What does SCCP (Skinny)

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Best Cisco Phone Options for v3 Blueprint

2009-06-06 Thread Michael Ciarfello
You should probably have 79x0 and either 79x1 and/or 79x2s. The 79x0s for the lack of SIP features and knowing how to deal with them and the 79x1 or 79x2s for full SIP features. The x2s have g722-64 codec and ILBC codec. My definition of: x0 means 7940 and 7960 x1 means 7941 and 7961 (this

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Quick way to wipe voicemail from ALL mailboxes.

2009-06-09 Thread Michael Ciarfello
Hmmm. Look around tools depot! Is deleting the users and re-creating an option? How about setting the max mailbox size to 0 in Exchange? Then set it back? There might be a few more or other things in Exchange you can do. I don't know Exchange well enough off the top of my head, but

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] unity vmware

2009-06-09 Thread Michael Ciarfello
If your company is a Cisco partner, purchase the NFR kit. If you are a Cisco customer, see your Cisco Account Manager or Cisco Sales Engineer If you are neither, then what are you? From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE v3 Lab Studying

2009-06-09 Thread Michael Ciarfello
Not interested in the partner thing, but we are here. Post your issues / questions / problems. We would love to hear them. From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Russ Meuchel [rmeuc...@gmail.com]

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2phones

2009-06-09 Thread Michael Ciarfello
Did this ever get solved? Am I correct in saying the answer so far is NO? From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Cliff McGlamry [cl...@mcglamry.net] Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 3:47 PM To: Cristi

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3 questions... again...

2009-06-10 Thread Michael Ciarfello
CUPS - the CCM 7 SRND and/or the CUP deployment guide has the number of servers. There are multiple servers for redundancy or more capacity. UCCX is 1 or 2. LDAP is not difficult so I would say practice it. SIP Trunk provider. Why not? I would jump off a bridge if LCS / OCS integration was

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on2phones

2009-06-10 Thread Michael Ciarfello
, 2009 11:26 AM To: Michael Ciarfello; Cristi Radescu; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on2phones My understanding is that you are correct. The answer thus far is no. From: Michael Ciarfellomailto:mciarfe...@iplogic.com Sent

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Its bad luck, but I was very very close to the lab

2009-06-10 Thread Michael Ciarfello
Oh boy, you should't leave that door open. My thoughts in --. Hi, It was a really amazing experience of CCIE we have to leave our family, friends and every our loved one. -- Whah whah. Don't break your violin. We are not joining the military and shipping out to Iraq. And WHO is this loved

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Integrating Cisco CallManager and Cisco SRST to Use Cisco SRST As a Multicast MOH Resource

2009-06-10 Thread Michael Ciarfello
Hi and welcome. Did you upload the MOH file to all the other servers in the cluster? Multicast routing enabled on the remote gateway? You have 239.1.1.1 which implies FIRST music source, G.711. Are you using G.711 over the WAN? What does show ccm-manager music-on-hold output when the phone is

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Hi everyone I passed the lab

2009-06-11 Thread Michael Ciarfello
We need to call an exterminator. These people are coming out of the woodwork like cockroaches!!! From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Larry Hadrava [lar...@ipexpert.com] Sent: Thursday, June 11,

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Hi everyone I passed the lab

2009-06-11 Thread Michael Ciarfello
to Networkers, bring it up! From: Chris Parker [cpar...@cparker.us] Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 9:32 PM To: Ahmed Elnagar Cc: Michael Ciarfello; lar...@ipexpert.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Hi everyone I passed the lab

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Blocking CUPC clients from seeing presence of other CUPC clients...

2009-06-11 Thread Michael Ciarfello
I think I'm on to something but it's late to fully test. Will resume tomorrow. Presence groups don't seem to do anything to CUPC--only on the phones themselves. Remember there is a difference between seeing presence status for a BLF/SD and the X directories presence status (corporate, missed,

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] XML PARSE ERROR

2009-06-11 Thread Michael Ciarfello
Did you resolve this? I get the same thing on an 7940/60 with SIP 8-8-0. Any service including corporate directory gives the error. A 70, 41, etc works. The kind of interesting thing is the 7940/60 end-user phone guide doesn't say Services and Services Button works for SIP, but Corporate

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Blocking CUPC clients from seeing presenceof other CUPC clients...

2009-06-12 Thread Michael Ciarfello
at the UCCX stuff. Hopefully, e-mail doesn't mean EIM. From: Cliff McGlamry [mailto:cl...@mcglamry.net] Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 2:03 PM To: Cristobal Priego; Michael Ciarfello Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Blocking CUPC clients from seeing presenceof other CUPC

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Have I been banned?

2009-06-12 Thread Michael Ciarfello
I volunteer to be a moderator. Lol lol lol. Problem is, these people (so far) have come in done their damage and don't care what the consequences are. The message has been delivered. But moderation is still needed for posting I had this question on my lab, please help which I have seen over

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Blocking CUPC clients from seeing presence of other CUPC clients...

2009-06-12 Thread Michael Ciarfello
with Cisco and open a TAC case and went to developer support and we have to submit a product enhacement in order to accomplish something like this. however if we can do this through rules, that's great. I'm going to check it out 2009/6/11 Michael Ciarfello mciarfe...@iplogic.commailto:mciarfe

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] DSP Calculation

2009-06-15 Thread Michael Ciarfello
Sorry. 99.9% of 99.9% of your statements are wrong. I stated to create a documentation sheet on this. The only thing I haven't worked out is how many credits a flex voice termination takes away from a transcoding session. Stated another way how many transcoding sessions will be left after X

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] DSP Calculation

2009-06-15 Thread Michael Ciarfello
Here are my DSP notes as promised: Maybe we can finalize this and have IPexpert post it on their web site. PVDM2-16 is one DSP chip (32=2, 48=3, 64=4) PVDM2-8 is one DSP chip but less processing capacity than DSP on the 16. PVDM2-16 - Signaling - 8 calls per DSP (medium complexity codecs) - 6

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Integrating Cisco CallManager and Cisco SRST to Use Cisco SRST As a Multicast MOH Resource

2009-06-15 Thread Michael Ciarfello
4:10 AM To: Michael Ciarfello Cc: Cristobal Priego; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Integrating Cisco CallManager and Cisco SRST to Use Cisco SRST As a Multicast MOH Resource Also do try putting in the ip pim sparse mode when you enable the Multicasting On Thu

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] how to practise the troubleshooting lab in workbook(second best method?)

2009-06-15 Thread Michael Ciarfello
That's the $64,000 Question. I wonder if the BAT export / import methods will work. They have been improved for CCM7 to supposively be able to export every object. If it works, I wonder if IPExpert would add those troubleshooting configurations to our my configs sections? IOS is easy.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Blocking CUPC clients from seeing presenceof other CUPC clients...

2009-06-16 Thread Michael Ciarfello
. The directions are not too clear. Let me know what you used. From: Cliff McGlamry [cl...@mcglamry.net] Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 2:03 PM To: Cristobal Priego; Michael Ciarfello Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Blocking CUPC clients from

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 4 open ended questions in CCIE VOICE

2009-06-16 Thread Michael Ciarfello
If you don't pass the open-ended questions, do they send you home without seeing the rest of the exam? (preferred) The discussion on Netpro wasn't clear what happens. People were saying must get 3/4 or something. From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 4 open ended questions in CCIE VOICE

2009-06-16 Thread Michael Ciarfello
as possible. Oh well. But at the 30,000 ft level, it seems to be working. Of course, you will get the complainers. Good stuff though. From: Aamir Panjwani [aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au] Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 1:16 AM To: Michael Ciarfello; Mark Snow Cc: OSL

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Integrating Cisco CallManager and Cisco SRSTto Use Cisco SRST As a Multicast MOH Resource

2009-06-17 Thread Michael Ciarfello
: Cliff McGlamry [mailto:cl...@mcglamry.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 12:44 PM To: Cristobal Priego; Cristi Radescu Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; Michael Ciarfello Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Integrating Cisco CallManager and Cisco SRSTto Use Cisco SRST As a Multicast MOH Resource Uuum

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Integrating Cisco CallManager and Cisco SRST to Use Cisco SRST As a Multicast MOH Resource

2009-06-17 Thread Michael Ciarfello
239.1.1.3 as in the example below. From: kapil atrish [nice_cha...@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 4:40 AM To: Michael Ciarfello; Azeem ahamed Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Integrating Cisco CallManager and Cisco SRST to Use Cisco SRST As a Multicast MOH

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Connection Monitor Duration

2009-06-17 Thread Michael Ciarfello
What's the highest connection monitor duration you can configure? Higher values in theory will solve network bounces. From: Daniel Tham [weik...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 11:08 PM To: Michael Ciarfello Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] check this out...

2009-06-17 Thread Michael Ciarfello
I don't think you want them to be. Different product for a different reason. These are proactive management and troubleshooting tools. I anticipate the troubleshooting is going to be how come a call from CCME to CCM is not working and giving fast busy. OPS MGR won't point out that you have

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Voice Written Study Materials

2009-06-17 Thread Michael Ciarfello
CS3 for QoS, but what does it mean with all the other PHB type DiffServ markings. From: Tanner Ezell [tanner.ez...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 11:44 PM To: Michael Ciarfello Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Voice

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] g729ar8 on dial-peer not showing up

2009-06-17 Thread Michael Ciarfello
What would cause the g729ar8 codec not to show up on a voip dial-peer? Only g729r8 is showing up (in that g729 family) and I want more practice on understanding codec compatibiltities, etc. For example G729ar8 is supposed to be compatible with g729r8. voice-card 0 is set to flex mode. If no

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] g729ar8 on dial-peer not showing up

2009-06-18 Thread Michael Ciarfello
/technologies_tech_note09186a00800b6710.shtml From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Michael Ciarfello Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 8:28 AM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] g729ar8 on dial

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS - Max-reserved-bandwidth needed? Not needed

2009-06-20 Thread Michael Ciarfello
I think the only time you need to fool with max-reserved is when the circuit (or CIR on the circuit) is extremly small and you can't fit your one call on it. Say a g711 call on a 128k CIR frame-relay circuit. Ok, the math didn't work out. Or when your circuit is very large, say 45mb and 11Mb

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS - Max-reserved-bandwidth needed? Not needed

2009-06-22 Thread Michael Ciarfello
Yes. hxxp://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk543/tk544/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094612.shtml From: Joel Jose [mailto:joeljose...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2009 4:00 AM To: Michael Ciarfello Cc: CCIE OSL; OSL Group Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS - Max-reserved-bandwidth needed

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on2phones

2009-06-22 Thread Michael Ciarfello
What about 3101 requirement? From: kapil atrish [mailto:nice_cha...@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 4:50 AM To: Cristi Radescu; Michael Ciarfello Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on2phones Yes, its possible. I've tried it and it works. Assume u want

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM presence issue

2009-06-22 Thread Michael Ciarfello
Hey Aamir, Does this work for you? SRND 7.0, page 28-2 Presence group authorization ensures that only authorized watchers can access the presence status for a destination. Because the administrator ensures that the watcher is authorized to monitor the destination when a BLF/Speed Dial is

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM presence issue

2009-06-22 Thread Michael Ciarfello
...@onlinestudylist.com [ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Vik Malhi [vma...@ipexpert.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 12:30 AM To: Aamir Panjwani; Michael Ciarfello; Bill Talley; OSL Group Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM presence issue If a destination is configured

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Pusblisher

2009-06-23 Thread Michael Ciarfello
Are you asking a production question or a CCIE Voice lab study question? If production, open a tac case. From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of bapijoseph lagardo Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 2:59 AM To:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM presence issue

2009-06-23 Thread Michael Ciarfello
So are all the statements in this thread correct? From: Aamir Panjwani [mailto:aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au] Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 1:42 AM To: Michael Ciarfello; Vik Malhi; Bill Talley; OSL Group Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM presence issue Thanks Guys ,it's sorted. When I

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM presence issue

2009-06-23 Thread Michael Ciarfello
can no longer see the presence status. My CCM is 7.0.1.21007-1 Thanks for your time. From: Vik Malhi [vma...@ipexpert.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 12:27 PM To: Michael Ciarfello; Aamir Panjwani; OSL Group Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM presence issue

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UntiyConnection 7.x

2009-06-24 Thread Michael Ciarfello
Do the ports register as seen in CallManager and does it work? Someone else pointed out that port test also fails and I also get errors (not your errors though I think) but it works. VMWare thing I guess. From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UntiyConnection 7.x

2009-06-24 Thread Michael Ciarfello
So your port group Device Name Prefix should be (for example) CiscoUM1-VI Under PORTS, your Port Name will be CiscoUM1-VI-001 the next one 002, etc. ON the same page, the SCCP (Skinny) Device Name should be CiscoUM1-VI1, 2, etc. It's a little confusing at first with the -001, 002. etc On CCM,

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UntiyConnection 7.x

2009-06-24 Thread Michael Ciarfello
7.0.1.21007-1, but I don't think that's your issue. Try my previous post and see if that clears it up for you. From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of J Hogan [j.jho...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vmvare for IPCCX 7

2009-06-25 Thread Michael Ciarfello
Obtain a legitimate MCS OS 2003.x.x and type the MS Product key that is located on the top corner of the CD sleeve. If you don't have access to a legitimate MCS OS CD, ask your local Cisco SE or account manager, partner representative, etc. If you don't have a local Cisco resource, then

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] FRTS and MLP issue

2009-06-25 Thread Michael Ciarfello
I've heard of that with virtual-templates. Did you have to do both sides of the connection? From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Aamir Panjwani Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 3:33 AM To: OSL Group Subject: Re: [OSL |

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need clarification on IPCC agent , rm user association

2009-06-25 Thread Michael Ciarfello
You are correct. Associate the ICD extensions to the rmjtapi user. If you login with a CAD application and forget to do that, it will tell you exactly what to do. The IP phone agent has no means to tell you that. What workbook? It should clearly tell you this is needed in the Cisco IPCC

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ccievoicelabX.com == X means s

2009-06-25 Thread Michael Ciarfello
We’re been ignoring this SPAM. That’s all it is. From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Turpin, Mark Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 11:09 AM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ccievoicelabX.com ==

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] FRTS and MLP issue

2009-06-25 Thread Michael Ciarfello
. From: Aamir Panjwani [aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au] Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 9:38 AM To: Michael Ciarfello; OSL Group Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] FRTS and MLP issue I only bounced HQ serial interface and it came good! Took me ages to figure this out

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPCC File location for script usage problem,

2009-06-26 Thread Michael Ciarfello
There's specific syntaxes on the play prompt, menu, etc. steps that can play media to the caller. You can specify another directory. Learn the difference between Prompt type variable and how to use it P[], system prompt type syntax SP[] and regular string type variable where you put the

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPCC File location for script usage problem,

2009-06-26 Thread Michael Ciarfello
unlikely Cisco will do an upgrade after your test, but maybe they are looking for your custom prompt in the correct user directory. From: jeremy co [mailto:jeremy.coo...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 11:30 AM To: Michael Ciarfello Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPCC File location for script

  1   2   3   4   5   >