Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Is the list actually down?
Looks like it works. Robert On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Jeffrey Girard jeffrey.gir...@girardinc.com wrote: Just a test ___ Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless Security Videos :: iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc ___ Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless Security Videos :: iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 911 calls by mistake
Hi, You could use Unity Connection to intercept 911 calls. In few cases where this was becoming a big issue I setup a call handler that would play a message: If you are trying to reach 911 press 1 or just stay on the phone, if you dialed 911 by mistake hang up now. CSS on most phones --911 -- CFA to VM CSS on Unity--911-- PSTN 911CallHandler -- DTMF1 -- 911 After Greeting --911 HTH, Robert On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Ben John benjoh...@hotmail.com wrote: Guys, Our users are dialing 911 by mistake and cops are responding to the calls i think the reason being we use 9 to dial out. For long distance it is 91 and international it is 9011 . i thought about using 8 instead of 9 to dial out but we have some DNs that start with 8. Some of the guys suggest to use secondary dial tone when we press 9. Below are the route patterns that start with 9. Any idea how to solve this ? 9.011! 9.011!# 9.1[2-9]XX[2-9]XX 9.[2-9]XX[2-9]XX 91.[2-9]XX[2-9]XX 9.911 911 91.800[2-9]XX Thanks, Ben ___ Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless Security Videos :: iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc ___ Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless Security Videos :: iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Question about CCIE Written Exam
Hi, Here is a quote from cisco site: You must make an initial attempt of the CCIE lab exam within 18-months of passing the CCIE written exam. If you do not pass the lab exam within three years of passing the written exam, you must retake the written exam before being allowed to attempt the lab exam again. https://www.cisco.com/web/learning/certifications/expert/ccie_collaboration/index.html HTH Robert On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Chrysostomos Christofi ch.christ...@logicom.net wrote: Hi guys Could you pls advice about the CCIE written policy? I mean you pass the written and then you have 18 months to take the first lab? After that how long is valid for the second attempt lab? Thank you Chrysostomos ___ Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless Security Videos :: iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc ___ Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless Security Videos :: iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] AXL servers and CUC
This is also what I wonder about. I know it looks like the voicemail should be easy but there must be more to it. That's why I started looking closer at the AXL servers and CUC. My guess would be to have pub always as the first choice, add sub as a backup and make sure that AXL is active on sub. On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 6:49 AM, CCIEing aboaz...@gmail.com wrote: Why the guys keep getting not 100% in voicemail integration, what common mistakes happened Sent from my iPhone On Oct 25, 2013, at 12:42 AM, William Bell b...@ucguerrilla.com wrote: In this instance, best practice is a relative concept. Many applications leverage AXL to retrieve information and you can leverage that API to retrieve information on any node in the cluster. Applications that push configurations should be leveraging the publisher to do so. That said, I would think that you could send a SQL update, addphone, updateuser, etc. AXL command to a subscriber node. Of course, it would only succeed if the publisher node is on line. Anyway, my policy is to enable a secondary AXL server in the cluster if I have applications that are leveraging AXL to pull information. Like CUxAC, CUC, UCM IM/P, etc. CCX actually writes using the AXL API. Not that having a redundant AXL server would hurt but if I just have CCX and UCM, I typically go with a single AXL instance. IMO, you will not harm your cluster if you enable AXL on subsequent nodes in the cluster. You must have it on the first node (pub) if you are going to have it at all. In the IE lab, at least the current blue print, you will want to enable the AXL service on both Pub and Sub. If for no other reason than to avoid goofy issues during initialization of CUE in a scenario where CUE registers directly to UCM. HTH. -Bill -- William Bell, CCIE #38914 blog: http://ucguerrilla.com twitter: @ucguerrilla On Oct 24, 2013, at 2:38 PM, probert...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have few questions related to AXL servers and CUC. Should CUC be configured to use both sub and pub as AXL servers? According to doc: Cisco AXL Web Service Activate on the first node only. Failing to activate this service causes the inability to update Cisco Unified Communications Manager from client-based applications that use AXL. But as far as I know CUC will not be updating anything on CUCM using AXL it is just used to read data during the user import. So since AXL can be activated on SUB can we use it with CUC? I know it works I just want best practice, if we don't than we have no redundancy. I guess this also applies to UCCX. Should we activate AXL on sub in the lab and should we configure CUC to use both AXL servers in the lab? Thanks! ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] AXL servers and CUC
Hi, I have few questions related to AXL servers and CUC. Should CUC be configured to use both sub and pub as AXL servers? According to doc: Cisco AXL Web Service Activate on the first node only. Failing to activate this service causes the inability to update Cisco Unified Communications Manager from client-based applications that use AXL. But as far as I know CUC will not be updating anything on CUCM using AXL it is just used to read data during the user import. So since AXL can be activated on SUB can we use it with CUC? I know it works I just want best practice, if we don't than we have no redundancy. I guess this also applies to UCCX. Should we activate AXL on sub in the lab and should we configure CUC to use both AXL servers in the lab? Thanks! ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Voice translation-rule 97
Hi, The called number of any length will be translated to last 4 digits if the 4th digit from the end is 3. For example if you have 86753309 you will get 3309 HTH On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Anthony Nwachukwu anwachu...@apafrica.comwrote: Can some one help explain the rule below. Voice translation-rule 97 Rule 1 /^.*\(3…$\)/ /\1/ exit Voice translation-profile TELCO Translate called 97 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Base configs and Dial Plan mapping
Hi, I think my strategy will be to set all Service Parameters to default before making changes. This way I can avoid and undesirable presets. Let me know your thoughts on this. Also why are you setting DSCP for Phone Configuration and DSCP for Cisco CallManager to Device Interface to AF31? Default CS3 should be good, let me know if I'm wrong on this? Rob On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Bill Hatcher wchatc...@gmail.com wrote: My test is just a couple of weeks away, and I've been reading different blogs on how to maximize your time. The one thing I'm really struggling with is mapping out my dial-plan during my read through of the lab. I would love to hear what others are doing. I have also been building base router configs for h323, gatekeeper, mgcp, srst,sip, etc so that I can practice quickly configuring those on the routers. One of the things I haven't really been keeping track of are some of the service parameters that I should adjust out of habit. Here are a few that I can think of off the top of my head that I plan on tweaking at the start of the exam. Please feel free to add to them. Enterprise Parameters DSCP for Phone Configuration - Set to AF31 DSCP for Cisco CallManager to Device Interface - Set to AF31 Change the Phone URL's to IP's Organization Top Level Domain Cluster Fully Qualified Domain Name Service Parameters - CallManager T302 Time - Know where it is if you need ot change interdigit timeout Call Classification - Offnet Builtin Bridge Enabled - True Device Name of GK-controlled Trunk That Will Use Port 1720 - Set as needed. Transfer On-hook Enabled - True (Also a great thing to do in production when migrating users from other phone systems) Block offnet to offnet transfers - Know where it's at. Auto Call Pickup Enabled - True Call Back Enabled Flag - True (Verify) Single Button Barge/CBarge Policy - Set to Barge unless otherwise directed. Stop routing on Unallocated Number Flag - False - H323 redundancy Preferred G.711 Millisecond Packet Size - 20 (Verify) Preferred G.729 Millisecond Packet Size - 20 (Verify) G722 Codec Enabled - Disabled (Unless otherwise directed) Intraregion Audio Codec Default - G711/G722 (Verify) Interregion Audio Codec Default - G729 (Verify) Automated Alternate Routing Enabled - True (This one gets me every time on AAR so I turn it on by default now) Enable Mobile Voice Access - Set as required Mobile Voice Access Number - Set as required System Remote Access Blocked Numbers - Set as required Service Parameters -Cisco IP Voice Media Streaming App Supported MOH Codecs - G711 mulaw and G729 Annex A HTH Bill Hatcher ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] cue + callmanger srst problem
Hi, *I'm sorry*, *we* are currently experiencing system problems and are *unable to process your call * Is usually played by UCCX I have never heard it from CUE. Try factory reset on CUE just to make sure there is nothing wrong with it. On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 7:54 AM, sanity insanity networksanitytoinsan...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Guys, Still waiting any update on this ? On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 4:22 PM, sanity insanity networksanitytoinsan...@gmail.com wrote: hi Guys, In the normal mode when wan is up I can call into the cue ( on site c ) through jtapi . However when the wan link breaks and the when my site c router and phones fall into srst and then try placing calls to the cue using sip dial peer I hear the following prompt - *I'm sorry*, *we* are currently experiencing system problems and are *unable to process your call * *I have checked everything in the setup and unable to figure out what the problem is . Has anyone seen this ? * *-MJ * ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] TFTP client
You have full cmd / administrator access on the UCCX server. Robert On Jun 4, 2013 7:57 PM, Karen Johnson karen.johnson...@yahoo.ca wrote: in lab, do we have windows TFTP client in PC ? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Collaboration officially announced
Watching this video is ironic: Ben Ng at Cisco Live 2012: http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/23271405 But you can hear where the idea for the new name came from. On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Brian Schear brian.sch...@vitalsite.comwrote: It is Ben Ng. Found his linked in profile below which describes his position in Cisco. www.linkedin.com/pub/ben-ng/3/509/940 Profile on the Cisco site. https://www.cisco.com/web/learning/le31/communities/netpro/bios/benng.html Anyone have better contact info to send him respectful and thoughtful arguments on this? Brian -Original Message- From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Rrcrumm Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 11:11 AM To: Leslie Meade Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; vma...@ipexpert.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Collaboration officially announced Ben Ng comes to mind On May 29, 2013, at 7:28 AM, Leslie Meade leslie.me...@lvs1.com wrote: The question is... what if anything can we do ? Where would we start.. Original message From: Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.com Date: To: Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com Cc: OSL Group ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com,Vik Malhi vma...@ipexpert.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Collaboration officially announced Granted we all know that taking any CCIE Written will allow us to remain CCIE's even if Voice is retired, but I think the frustration is Voice and Collaboration are not THAT far apart and no matter how you look at it, it all falls under Cisco Unified Communications, which is what the name of the new CCIE really should be anyway. The core of the Voice blueprint is still there. The Collaboration equipment list looks like a refresh of current products, not a forklift of one technology replacing another. In my opinion this was too harsh of a move to retire Voice and start over again with Collaboration. There are too many similarities between the two. On May 29, 2013, at 7:10 AM, Bill Lake whl...@gmail.commailto: whl...@gmail.com wrote: Ranting about it won't change anything. I read on line that when they retire your CCIE, you can still renew by passing a CCIE level written or lab. If this is true then you do not loose your CCIE just the voice tag. That seems to be a difficult pill to swallow but it would not be the first from my reading. Storage had this happen earlier this year as have several others. See here with the snippet. Now the second is a wiki so we would want official confirmation. https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/docs/DOC-17226 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cisco_Career_Certifications#Retired_CCIE_ tracks Retired CCIE tracks Some previously awarded CCIE specializations have been retired by Cisco. These are: * WAN Switching CCIE (Essentially a specialisation focusing on the IGX/BPX switch products, which had been acquired as part of the StrataCom http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/StrataCom acquisition) * ISP Dial CCIE * SNA/IP Integration CCIE (aka CCIE Blue) * Design CCIE (NOTE: The CCIE Design and CCDE are completely different design tests in format and subjects examined) People who hold these now-retired certifications can remain CCIEs, provided they continue to take recertification exams. They now hold the title CCIE, rather than CCIE Security, or some other specialization. So if we can get official confirmation that we won't be stripped of CCIE if you pass the voice lab, it might be good, for those of us that have already passed we don't get a chance to change our minds for those that have yet to pass, this might be incentive to change your goal. Bill On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:29 AM, m george m.george00...@gmail.com mailto:m.george00...@gmail.com wrote: Vik, A 2nd grader can pass RS/Sec/SP much much easier than Voice IE. Voice is still the toughest one i know some double IE's who couldn't pass Voice. If Cisco has lost faith in re-cert, that should apply to every track, not just Voice. Naturally, they should have renamed Certification to Voice/Collaboration or Voice/Video etc introduced new version. If they had to do this retiring thing, why didn't they do when they introduced V3 from V2 ? Old days of Call Manager based on Windows literally everything based on windows, Analog endpoints/VGs/ATAs etc. Retiring CCIE Voice makes no sense whatsoever whether be it from marketing point of view or any other. Why can't big buck makers at Cisco just rename a Cert rather than do something completely rubbish. With just one announcement, they have made many people lose faith in Certification process. I am sure Voice labs will be the most deserted labs until Feb 2014. At the end of day, we can only request Cisco to re-consider this decision. I hope folks concerned collaborate put their suggestions forward on Cisco Support
