Re: [ccp4bb] microdiffraction data assembly method

For serial crystallography at the SLS, the procedures that were in place more than a year ago are described in https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28573576 . I'd say these procedures are an order of magnitude more straightforward than what is in the paper that you cite, and give better results.

Re: [ccp4bb] microdiffraction data assembly method

Hi Charles, a couple of years ago a colleague and I put together a perl script based on this paper. It worked pretty well in our hands. I'd be happy to share it with you if you'd like. Best wishes Kevin -- Kevin Jude, PhD Structural Biology Research Specialist, Garcia Lab Howard Hughes Medical

Re: [ccp4bb] [Off-topic] Comparison of the same structure built by many people

Perhaps this can be automated: https://www.phenix-online.org/papers/wd5073_reprint.pdf Software doesn't get tired or bored, and thus potentially can try more and produce more plausible interretations. Then one can hire a number of people of various expertise to choose "best" result according to

Re: [ccp4bb] [Off-topic] Comparison of the same structure built by many people

It sounds a bit like this paper from a year ago: https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms12549 apart from the conclusion: here the point is that amateurs build higher quality models than crystallographers. On 20 November 2017 at 20:25, Shintaro Aibara wrote: > Dear All,

Re: [ccp4bb] microdiffraction data assembly method

On Tuesday, November 21, 2017 9:32:15 AM PST CPMAS Chen wrote: > Hi, CCP4ers, > > I came across this paper about improving data by microdiffraction data > assembly method from Raymond C. Stevens group, > https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3338336/#SD1. > > By reading their methods,

[ccp4bb] microdiffraction data assembly method

Hi, CCP4ers, I came across this paper about improving data by microdiffraction data assembly method from Raymond C. Stevens group, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3338336/#SD1. By reading their methods, this seems to me like manually selecting data based on Rmerge. After almost 5

Re: [ccp4bb] [Off-topic] Comparison of the same structure built by many people

Thanks Mark for the paper, it kind of catches the essence of what I was looking for. I do however remember it was more people and I think I'm looking for a figure where all the builds (which if I remember correctly was in the 10's rather than 3) were superimposed over each other to make what