A quick PDB search reveals that 551 crystal structures were deposited in
2010 that were refined with CNS.
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 13:32 +, REX PALMER wrote:
> Does anyone still use CNS ?
> Do we expect Rfree from CNS for example to be different from the value
> given by Refmac at the end of the
Dear Rex, Bernie and Fred,
The following paper bears on the question of generally slight, but not
always, R factor differences between published and recalculated
Rfactors.
[The paper is open access.]
Greetings,
John
J. Appl. Cryst. (2010). 43, 669-676[ doi:10.1107/S0021889810015608 ]
phenix.m
Hi Rex,
There will be small differences in particular due to the different ways
of treating the solvent. How large of a difference are you talking
about? Normally the difference should not be very large... And if this
related to solvent effects, it will affect the low resolution
reflections w
Wed, February 16, 2011 7:53 am, Boaz Shaanan wrote:
> Yes X 2
>
> Boaz
>
> - Original Message -
> From: REX PALMER
> Date: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 15:32
> Subject: [ccp4bb] CNS and protein structure refinement
> To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
>
>> Does an
Yes X 2
Boaz
- Original Message -
From: REX PALMER
Date: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 15:32
Subject: [ccp4bb] CNS and protein structure refinement
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Does anyone still use CNS ?
> Do we expect Rfree from CNS for example to be different fr
Does anyone still use CNS ?
Do we expect Rfree from CNS for example to be different from the value given by
Refmac at the end of the refinement?
Rex Palmer
Birkbeck College
