Hello,
For those who still know the Fortran language and its Fortran 77
variant, I used to have a g77 compiler here (Linux box), and now on the
new box it's no longer g77 but gfortran.
When compiling Fortran77 code (these are the flags used for compilation:
-o ../bin/$1 -std=legacy
Hi Fred
If you look very carefully at your Fortran code you will probably
find a small error/inconsistency that g77 allowed but gfortran picked
up on or compiled as written rather than as intended. My move from
g77 to gfortran when building Mosflm (which is moderately large) was
pretty
Hi Fred
I regularly compile F77 code with gfortran: I always get lots of warnings
and the occasional error that I didn't get with g77 mainly because gfortran
is much stricter applying the standard (and a good thing too!). I also
regularly use ifort (which isn't quite as strict as gfortran and
Hi Fred,
From: CCP4 bulletin board [CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] on behalf of vellieux
[frederic.velli...@ibs.fr]
When compiling Fortran77 code (these are the flags used for compilation:
-o ../bin/$1 -std=legacy -Wno-globals -w -O3 -malign-double
Hi Fred,
vellieux frederic.velli...@ibs.fr writes:
[...]
I get errors (at run time) of the type:
At line 138 of file program.f (unit = 6, file = 'stdout')
Fortran runtime error: Missing initial left parenthesis in format
[...]
Mmm, that kind of error rings a bell … is the relevant
Dear all,
By popular request here is an example of some code where gfortran gives
run time errors. This is at the very beginning of the program, the first
write statement where a parenthesis is seen as missing at run time: (the
first hyphens are not within the Fortran code but there to
Fred
The relevant bit of code, with the FORMAT statement closed with a ')' and
an END statement added to make it a viable program, is:
WRITE (*,10)
10 FORMAT(///,25X,'*',
. /,25X,'* *')
END
For me this compiles
Dear BB,
Please see details below of a PDRA position available at the University of
Manchester in the laboratory of Dr Lydia Tabernero. All enquiries should be
directed to Dr Tabernero and not myself please.
lydia.tabern...@manchester.ac.ukmailto:lydia.tabern...@manchester.ac.uk
Many thanks,
Hi all,
Problem solved thanks to Jorge Navaza's suggestion: remove all
compilation flags but only have -Wall as a compilation flag.
There is no run time error any more and there is no error at compilation
time. The program runs fine.
Thanks to Thomas Jens, Harry Powell, Ian Tickle, Ian
Fred, OK I just noticed I didn't have the -malign-double flag. With that
it compiles but on running I get:
Program received signal SIGSEGV: Segmentation fault - invalid memory
reference.
Backtrace for this error:
#0 0x12244B
#1 0x122A9C
#2 0x473907
#3 0x1BD238
#4 0x1CB4BF
#5 0x80486E2 in
Hi again Ian and list,
The following flags seem to work fine:
gfortran -o ../bin/$1 -std=legacy -ffixed-format -Wno-globals -w -O3
-funroll-loops -ffast-math -fno-second-underscore $1.f (followed by the
library or libraries, compiled with the same flags).
Problem solved as far as I am
On 03/04/2013 10:02 AM, Marcin Wojdyr wrote:
It also puzzled me, but I haven't done more careful benchmarking yet.
What did you get after compiling refmac?
My numbers are not as impressive, but I also get quite detectable
improvement, from 35s to 27s (ccp4-6.3.0 vs compiled from source). This
Dear All, thanks very much for the various suggestions--I finally made the
connection. A good point was also made that gene synthesis is becoming ever
cheaper (~$0.28/bp) so maybe PCRing from genomic DNA is not always
advisable. I'll keep this in mind for the future, although for this one I
had my
*Location: East Coast, USA (telecommuting OK)*
*Type: Full-time*
*Experience: Associate*
*Functions: Sales*
*Industries: Biotechnology*
*Compensation: Salary, Commission, Benefits*
*
*
*Please RSVP to casey.car...@ttplabtech.com*
*Job Description*
TTP Labtech is currently seeking an
Hi,
The command:
$ aptitude install fort77
would install an f77 command on Ubuntu/Debian Linux.
In fact that's a wrapper for f2c, but maybe it behaves like
a real f77 compiler, I would give it a try personnally.
On 03/06/2013 06:48 PM, vellieux wrote:
Hello,
For those who still know the
Thierry,
I ran both versions on the same input file and numerical results are
essentially the same. After 10 cycles of refinement the r.m.s.d.
between two models produced with different versions is 0.0004A.
Basically, about 5% of coordinates differ in the last digit (i.e. by
0.001A).
Hi, all,
Would anybody help me out there? I'd like to got the statistics about:
1, How many unique transmemberane protein structure have by far been solved by
X-ray?
2, How many X-ray structures of water-soluble domains in which their
membrane-anchoring alpha helices have been removed?
I
this website from Stephen White's lab is has many of the details you are
looking for, best wishes, Matt.
http://blanco.biomol.uci.edu/mpstruc/listAll/list
On 07/03/2013 08:10, Mike John wrote:
Hi, all,
Would anybody help me out there? I'd like to got the statistics about:
1, How many
18 matches
Mail list logo
