Hi
Just noticed this -
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-20978904
do we know the artist? He has just moved to Cambridge...
Harry
--
Dr Harry Powell, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, MRC Centre, Hills Road,
Cambridge, CB2 0QH
Chairman of European Crystallographic Association SIG9
I am afraid now I just use PISA at the EBI to answer this sort of question . It
tells you the answer with lots of other useful information as well, and then
you can use your intelligence to see why that operator is the correct one!
Eleanor
On 11 Jan 2013, at 01:05, James Stroud wrote:
The
Dear colleagues,
We are pleased to announce the upcoming EMBO practical course on
Computational Structural Biology - from data to structure to function
EMBL Hamburg, Germany
15th - 19th April 2013
The course covers computational aspects of protein structure
determination, validation and
if you zoom in 10exp9-10exp10 times (lots of cmd-+ in macosx), you can see the
amino acids.
tried to check the accuracy; however, I couldn't find the mtz file to display
the density...does this journal not enforce depositing the data?
Mark J van Raaij
Laboratorio M-4
Dpto de Estructura de
To be honest I preferred this more homespun work:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/gallery/2013/jan/10/research-as-art-competition-in-pictures?INTCMP=SRCH#/?picture=402066318index=3
Somewhat reminiscent of Byron's Bender models:
http://www.umass.edu/microbio/rasmol/history.htm#bender
/Derek
Friday afternoon Good time to look at some artistic
representations of protein molecules. This is pretty amazing:
http://www.julianvossandreae.com/
Johan
On 11 January 2013 14:26, Derek Logan derek.lo...@biochemistry.lu.se wrote:
To be honest I preferred this more homespun work:
Surprised Mercedes didn't sued him for that :-)
@Mr. Emsley I assume you soon will be Sir Emsley after that marvelous
painting.mentioned in Harry's email.
Jürgen
..
Jürgen Bosch
Johns Hopkins University
Bloomberg School of Public Health
Department of Biochemistry Molecular
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Pat,
for several versions adxv has been able to save as tif, although
(maybe) not from the GUI. If you type 'adxv -?' you get the
instruction manual including the '-sa' option which converts to some
tiff file.
Buy the whey, tiff is not an image
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Nat!
How recent is recent? From today's 'phenix-online.org':
New Phenix version 1.8.1 now available, but
tg@slartibartfast:~/uni/datasets/nk/xds_run3$ labelit.png_1.8.1-1168
DX-CORRECTIONS.cbf
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
I got that error blurb too when I run without an image on the
commandline. Not very elegant.
Try:
labelit.png --help
On 11/01/2013 16:34, Tim Gruene wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Nat!
How recent is recent? From today's 'phenix-online.org':
New Phenix version
I think the help message refers to another program. Anyway, it's an
extremely simple script - having examined the code, the command-line
invocation is:
labelit.png input_file [output_file]
and that's it - no other options available. But Nick or I will fix it
so it prints something more useful
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The formatting of icedove probably created confusion, but these error
message come from running labelit.png WITH the file DX-CORRECTIONS.cbf
as one and only command line option and no output is created. adxv has
not problem dealing with XDS cbf-files.
Normally the input files for Labelit must have sequential numbering
like lysozyme_001.cbf. The file name DX-CORRECTIONS.cbf causes the
reported error as it does not conform to this format.
Nick
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Tim Gruene t...@shelx.uni-ac.gwdg.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED
***NB: Posted on behalf of Dr. Macedo-Ribeiro, whom you should contact for
further information (e-mail address below).***
The Associate Laboratory IBMC-INEB is recruiting a highly motivated
researcher to integrate a multidisciplinary team in the field of the
Biochemistry and Structural
I have a challenge for all those expert model-builders out there: can
you beat the machine?
It seems these days that everything is automated, and the only decision
left for a crystallographer to make is which automation package to use.
But has crystallography really been solved? Is looking
Dear CCP4 Users,
A CCP4 update has just been released, consisting of the following changes:
All systems:
* molrep: Significantly more accurate packing function implemented
* pisa: Now reports on monomeric properties ina no-complex situations
* JLigand: Compounds derived from smile
Hi James,
As an aside (as your point is looking for a John Henry, not investigating
automated model-building) I would point out that it is not uncommon at all to
find cases where a very small difference in starting parameters or starting
phases leads to a very different final result in
17 matches
Mail list logo
