Please, remove my address from the list.
Thank you,
Marat Yusupov, PhD
Department of Integrated Structural Biology
Institute of Genetics and Molecular and Cellular Biology (IGBMC)
1 rue Laurent Fries / BP 10142 / 67404 Illkirch CEDEX / France
Tel. : +33 (0)3 88 65 33 01
Dear Kenneth,
You should be able to find the information you are looking for in the logfiles
of your dataprocessing at the scaling/merging step. E.g. in the logfiles of
scala you will find Total number of observations and Total number unique. I
am sure Scalepack will produce similar output.
Dear Appu,
What is your problem? To me this crystal packing looks completely normal. If
you look for tetramers in space groups with 422 symmetry I am sure you will
find examples with a similar packing.
Best,
Herman
Von: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] Im Auftrag von Appu
Hi,
There is a problem about modified DNA refinement.
I generated one CIF file of a modified DNA base using eLBOW software of PHENIX.
However I found the modified DNA could not be linked to the downstream DNA when
I refined it in the COOT. Then I generated another CIF file using sketcher of
You may need to
1) modify _chem_comp.group to be DNA in the cif-file
2) import the resulting cif-file in coot
Cheers
Sent on a Sprint Samsung Galaxy S® III
div Original message /divdivFrom: Wang, Wei
wew...@ucsd.edu /divdivDate:07/15/2014 5:14 AM (GMT-05:00)
/divdivTo:
Hello Wei,
is the modified base defined as DNA in the cif? (see below)
Is the O3* or O3'? You need the latter.
And check whether there are three hydrogens on the O3. You need to
either remove one from the cif file manually, or name them according to
a normal DNA base. (In the latter case, by
I suggest submitting your coordinates to the PDBe (EBI) web site to run
PISA or using it via tthe CCP4I interface.
This analysing contacts, and suggests the most favoured packing. It is not
fool proof but worth checking.
Eleanor
On 15 July 2014 09:53, herman.schreu...@sanofi.com wrote:
Dear
If you were going to start with 4 different LCP lipids what would they be?
9:9, 9:7 etc? why- channel size, temp range?
So on second thought, practically speaking I guess observed is all,
since we never see the ones that are rejected by the -3 sigma
observed criterion
On 07/15/2014 12:44 PM, Edward A. Berry wrote:
I don't think observed means all the reflections that were integrated,
becasue one of the other
Dear Community,
I have some doubts to clarify. In a way to solve a structure by Phaser-MR,
I found phaser ended up with a potentially good MR solution (with good
statistics, packing and electron density, and as we know the homolog
structure so in a reasonable biological assembly also). However,
Dear All,
I would like to draw your attention to the postdoctoral vacancy in the
research group of Prof. Larry Wackett at the University of Minnesota (USA):
A postdoctoral position is available immediately at the University of
Minnesota to conduct research with a team of biochemists and
I think that 'observed' goes back to whether it was possible to see a
reflection (and estimate its intensity by eye) on the photographic FILM.
In small molecule crystallography it is usually understood to mean
F4sigma(F) (or I2sigma(I)).
George
On 07/15/2014 07:02 PM, Edward A. Berry wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone tried the tutorial on the CCP4 website for AMoRe?
http://www.ccp4.ac.uk/examples/tutorial/html/mr-tutorial-amore.html
I am trying to learn how to use the package in CCP4 and it fails and I am
wondering if the tutorial has become outdated?
Thank you,
George
13 matches
Mail list logo
