Dear Murpholino,
Yes, I think you're right. For now, directly exporting my maps from Coot is
the most efficient solution. The normalization commands will certainly be
helpful to me and other users in the future, though. Thanks!
Best,
Chris
I think this is part of the problem.
https://pymolwiki.org/index.php/Normalize_ccp4_maps
El lun., 30 de sep. de 2019 a la(s) 10:09, Chris Fage (fage...@gmail.com)
escribió:
> Hi Paul,
>
> After exporting the maps from Coot, they are directly comparable in Pymol.
> That's quite a convenient
Hi Paul,
After exporting the maps from Coot, they are directly comparable in Pymol.
That's quite a convenient feature I was never aware of. Thanks!
Yes, I was comparing the map from FFT in Coot and PyMOL.
Best,
Chris
On 30/09/2019 13:00, Chris Fage wrote:
> Dear Paul, Herman, Robbie, and Santosh,
>
>
> My version of Pymol doesn't support loading of mtz files. I think it's
> only in the incentive version.
>
> Paul wrote: "No need to do this - just export the map (or the map
> fragment)." I'm not sure how to do
> > Chris Fage
> > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2019 14:00
> > To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> > Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] 2Fo-Fc maps in Coot vs. Pymol
> >
> > Dear Paul, Herman, Robbie, and Santosh,
> >
> > Thanks for your quick replies.
> >
>
, 2019 14:00
> To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] 2Fo-Fc maps in Coot vs. Pymol
>
> Dear Paul, Herman, Robbie, and Santosh,
>
> Thanks for your quick replies.
>
> The FFT-generated maps and mtz maps look roughly equivalent in Coot, but
> there are minor difference
Dear Paul, Herman, Robbie, and Santosh,
Thanks for your quick replies.
The FFT-generated maps and mtz maps look roughly equivalent in Coot, but
there are minor differences even at the same e/A^3 level (the mtz maps
actually look a bit weaker). I generated them using the default settings in
FFT:
Are you sure you used the right columns in FFT? AFAIK Coot uses FWT and PHWT.
I thought the more recent PyMOL versions finally had MTZ support, or is this
just for the incentive version? Also if it is for looking at the structure and
making figures, perhaps try CCP4mg. It has proper MTZ
On 30/09/2019 11:36, Chris Fage wrote:
I recently obtained structures of a protein bound to two different small molecules. When viewing the
structures in Coot with a similar contour setting, the 2Fo-Fc map around ligand 1 is clearly much weaker
than that around ligand 2.However, after
