> On Jan 29, 2019, at 2:31 PM, John Foust via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> ...
> I posted about his a few years ago. See below.
> ...
> He wishes there was a modern replacement for reading old tapes.
> Seven-track and nine-track. Speed is not an issue; data recovery is.
> He says hardly anyone
Is anyone here bidding on them that intends to scan them?
I won't snipe them if that's the case
On 2019-01-29 14:45, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
> A 30+ track head to deal with a variety of tape formats would be ideal. Not
> just 7 and 9 but real oddballs -- there are some 10 track 1/2 inch tape
> formats around. Not to mention that one could read DECtape that way, even if
> the head
On 1/27/2019 11:01 PM, Fritz Mueller via cctalk wrote:
> Hi Jay,
>
>> On Jan 27, 2019, at 7:07 PM, Jay Jaeger wrote:
>>
>> I think I can help some... I DO have earlier PDP-11/45 CPU drawings...
>
> Man, this list is the absolute best!
>
> The '72 KB11-A drawings would be most immediately
Sorry, but no. It?s grossly offensive for things that work perfectly well and
that someone might actually find useful to go to scrap. There?s tons of useless
and broken junk that our civilization can mine for scrap, we don?t need to
actually destroy things that have actual value.
If someone
Dang it - the dates fooled me. (blush) Sorry to get your hopes up,
Fritz.
Here is some more accurate information:
The first set:
The first page (the directory) is actually 6/76 in the revisions
block. It is *later* than the one on bitsavers.
Interesting, though: it actually shows
On 01/29/2019 05:38 AM, John Foust via cctalk wrote:
Space is money. Organization is money. Information is money.
Advertising / listing for sale takes time and money. And it all only
gets worse if the item is heavy, dirty, or leaking.
One of the most impressive (videos of) ""organization
doesn't matter.
it would be on the options list, which the seller smeared out
the other odd thing was there should be a sun logo badge on the front
On 1/29/19 1:44 AM, Christian Corti via cctalk wrote:
> I read
> HP Tape Drive 1/2" 1600/6250 1E
> on the label at the back.
From: Jay Jaeger
> Here is what I have for drawings:
Wow. You have some very desirable stuff there! Let me point at a couple
of things of particular interest:
> B-TC-FP11-C-6 FP11-C (Print Set MP00038) December 75
> [M8126, M8127, M8128, M8129]
AFAIK, prints for the FP11-C are
On 1/28/19 8:08 PM, David Collins via cctalk wrote:
> I just restored a 7980XC (HP commercial version of the 88780) and it all
> worked after I reinitialised the gains in each channel.
David, do you know of anyone that has the schematics for these drives?
MANY years ago, someone in Seattle
> On Jan 29, 2019, at 1:46 PM, Jay Jaeger wrote:
>
> Dang it - the dates fooled me. (blush) Sorry to get your hopes up,
> Fritz.
Oh, darn! Well, thanks anyway for taking a look. And so the search
continues...
The later revisions and other docs are still quite a nice find, and it would
> Hi,
>
> I knew that since ~20 yrs, but I didn't know the affected gcc
> version(s). According to http://toni.technetium.be/hacker/pragma.htm
> this "special" pragma handling should be in gcc 1.34.
>
> But I cannot find gcc 1.34. ftp.gnu.org has gcc-1.30.atari (where the
> sequence doesn't
On 1/27/2019 9:07 PM, Jay Jaeger via cctech wrote:
>
> Let me know what you want me to scan - should be able to get to it later
> this week.
>
> JRJ
>
>
> On 1/27/2019 6:40 PM, Fritz Mueller via cctalk wrote:
>> Those reading through the recent "PDP-11/45 RSTS/E boot problem" thread here
>>
> The first batch of scanning is done... 600dpi, CCITT Group 4 except for
> the cover pages which are LZW.
>
> You will find them in my Google Drive at
>
> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B2v4WRwISEQRWWFFdVpCZWFTZEU
>
> In subfolder pdf/dec/pdp11/1145
Thanks, Jay!
I note with some
On 01/29/2019 14:53, Christian Groessler via cctalk wrote:
But I cannot find gcc 1.34. ftp.gnu.org has gcc-1.30.atari (where the
sequence doesn't exist), and gcc-1.35 (where it's "#if 0"ed).
Does anyone know where to find the source code of gcc 1.34?
I'm not positive that this is "pure"
> On Jan 28, 2019, at 8:26 AM, Noel Chiappa via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> E.g. my M8100 prints are dated 2/72, and none contain any entries in the
> 'Revisions' block (lower left). However, they are marked as Rev. D, which is
> newer than the KB11-A prints at Bitsaver, which are marked as Rev. C.
On 1/29/19 12:45 PM, Marvin Johnston via cctalk wrote:
Many times I find free to be far to expensive for most people
including myself (think postage/shipping/prep time.)
Aside from stuff like museum donations, I have found giving things away
for free is usually a pain. In my experience,
Hi,
I knew that since ~20 yrs, but I didn't know the affected gcc
version(s). According to http://toni.technetium.be/hacker/pragma.htm
this "special" pragma handling should be in gcc 1.34.
But I cannot find gcc 1.34. ftp.gnu.org has gcc-1.30.atari (where the
sequence doesn't exist), and
Al, I'm afraid I don’t... They were made in Greely Colorado but that plant has
long since closed and I don’t have any contacts from there.
-Original Message-
From: cctech On Behalf Of Al Kossow via cctech
Sent: Wednesday, 30 January 2019 3:55 AM
To: cctalk@classiccmp.org
Subject: Re:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2019, Al Kossow wrote:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/132933407806
this is interesting because of the price and that all of the Sun drives
I've ever come across had the 800bpi option in them
I read
HP Tape Drive 1/2" 1600/6250 1E
on the label at the back.
Christian
At 07:13 PM 1/28/2019, dwight via cctalk wrote:
>When looking at the 45 minutes, also consider the various overheads involved.
>They are in business. Time is money.
Space is money. Organization is money. Information is money.
Advertising / listing for sale takes time and money. And it all
21 matches
Mail list logo
