On 4/26/17 10:02 AM, jim stephens via cctalk wrote:
>
>
> The boards bend up or down in the center of the card
> as you pull very hard on each edge.
fortunately, Alto cards have steel bus bar/stiffeners at the edge connector end
that
keeps that from happening.
do you know of anyone that
on a whim I bought
http://www.ebay.com/itm/142363021266
640x480x8 Multibus graphics board with 80286 and NEC 7220
apparently they were commonly used in process control, a fair number turn up at
absurd prices
On 4/16/17 11:28 AM, Anders Nelson via cctalk wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I recently impulse-bought a paper tape reader from eBay, a Remex
> RRS6500BE1/660/DRB/U901
Tucker had a copy of the RRS6500 series manual
A scan is now up at
On 4/28/17 9:13 AM, Tony Duell wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 5:10 PM, dwight via cctalk
> wrote:
>> I'll have to give mine a look. I hate that foam.
>
> There seem to be 2 types. One turns to a sticky goo, the other turns to
> dust. I refer to them both as 'Evil
On 4/28/17 9:00 AM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote:
> The door latch and load lamp is driving me nuts. Dug out my extender card
> this morning
> to try and figure out why the driver transistors aren't turning on.
Quick work once I could probe the IC pins.
A gate on the J2 card w
Was working on some Drives this week, and took some pictures of it disassembled.
http://bitsavers.trailing-edge.com/pdf/diablo/photos/Diablo_33F/
The prefilter was orange crumblefoam. I took a look at my NOS ones and they have
a greenish prefilter that still appears to be OK. The gasket going up
On 8/4/17 9:23 AM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote:
> weird, it doesn't look like I scanned these. I thought I did..
I did, it's under "528x" but OS X collation puts it with 3 digit part numbers
(grrr..)
On 8/4/17 11:14 AM, Warner Losh via cctalk wrote:
> most SD cards can easily handle 100-200 writes
The issue would be things like the swap partition on a unix disk
or whatever the equivalent is under RSX
and we do have a 5285
http://www.computerhistory.org/collections/catalog/102633515
I need to see if that floppy in the picture is still in the left-hand drive
On 8/4/17 11:34 AM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote:
> I just uploaded GA21-9353-1_5280_Functions_Reference_Manual_Apr81 w/o
On 8/4/17 10:34 AM, Phil Blundell via cctalk wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-08-04 at 09:17 -0800, David Bridgham via cctalk wrote:
>>
> So my question is: do industrial SD cards exist?
>
> Yes they do. Most of the big card manufacturers have an "industrial"
> range, for example:
>
>
utils, and DE/RPG
I'll see if I can get to those this weekend.
On 8/4/17 9:23 AM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote:
>
>
> On 8/4/17 9:20 AM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote:
>> https://halsoft.wordpress.com/2008/06/02/the-next-generation-key-punch-the-ibm-5280/
>>
>> http://www.comp
I just uploaded a bunch of ACS 8600 documentation to bitsavers, but the Users
manual I
have is preliminary from 1982. Does anyone have a later version that has the
missing
chapters (esp the schematics Appendix)?
On 7/28/17 10:02 AM, Dominique Carlier via cctalk wrote:
> Maybe I'm wrong, I always believed that the J3 connector was an RS-232 port.
> Here it is:
>
> http://www.zeltrax.com/classiccmp_forum/04.jpg
That also shows there is a firmware cartridge :-(
On 7/28/17 10:49 AM, Dominique Carlier via cctalk wrote:
>> That also shows there is a firmware cartridge :-(
>>
>
> Is it specifically a bad thing from your point of view ? Why ? Do you think
> eproms could be damaged over the years?
it will just make the firmware more difficult to dump
http://www.tape-replacement.com/support/lucent-at-t-5ess/
I've seen M4 Data 9914V drives configured for 48v and At part numbers
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5ESS_Switching_System
On 7/30/17 11:53 AM, Pete Lancashire via cctalk wrote:
> Anyone know the spec s for the tape drives in a ESS5
Another stillborn project?
I don't see any software to make the Beaglebone talk Unibus
On 8/1/17 9:39 AM, Toby Thain via cctalk wrote:
> I just saw this a few minutes ago...
>
> https://trmm.net/Unibus
>
>
> --Toby
They canceled my order as well, just after sending me a message wondering if I
wanted the keyboard
I hope they just relist it
On the other hand, this isn't the same as your unit, the connectors on the back
are in a different
place and I don't see the 9 pin keyboard connector so this may be a
On 8/1/17 8:41 AM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote:
> I hope they just relist it
jackass relisted it for $1000, still w/o keyboard
www.ebay.com/itm/142462575631
On 8/1/17 10:49 AM, Noel Chiappa via cctalk wrote:
> Any guesses as to what's going on?
sellers not getting the prices they wanted.
correct
that was how I've always low-level formatted RX02s, using 3rd party controllers.
On 8/2/17 9:46 AM, Jay West wrote:
> Eric (via AEK) wrote
> --
> "RX02 format uses single-density address fields even for double density. The
> RX02 can "reformat" standard single-density
On 8/1/17 11:25 AM, jim stephens via cctalk wrote:
>
>
> I would not void a closed
> sale either if I couldn't help it. But that's just me.
Like I say most people agreed up until this year.
I've had more bad deals or people just canceling my bid and closing
auctions with 'item no longer
ok, got this clarification from Eric Smith
"RX02 format uses single-density address fields even for double density. The
RX02 can "reformat" standard single-density
into RX02 modified MFM format just by rewriting all of the data fields.
It still can't low-level format a blank or MFM disk."
So
On 8/9/17 9:23 AM, Josh Dersch wrote:
> The manual I linked contains configuration details for the RX01, RX8E and
> RX11. See page 2-10.
yea, just pulled the manual and realized that, sorry.
it is device code 75
http://homepage.divms.uiowa.edu/~jones/pdp8/man/rx01.html
On 8/9/17 9:24 AM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote:
>
>
> On 8/9/17 9:23 AM, Josh Dersch wrote:
>
>> The manual I linked contains configuration details for the RX01, RX8E and
>> RX11. Se
On 8/9/17 8:32 AM, Josh Dersch via cctalk wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Rod Smallwood via cctalk <
> cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Lis
>>
>> It looks like RX8 SEL is not asserted due to the device address not being
>> set up on the DIP switches.
>>
>> Anybody know what they
On 7/25/17 4:53 PM, Ian S. King via cctalk wrote:
> I thought the point of going to scrap was that
> the scrapper makes money on the metals, and pays you for that privilege.
We have trouble getting ecyclers to even come here to pick stuff up.
Most of the time I have to drive stuff to Weird
On 8/4/17 7:07 AM, Christian Corti via cctalk wrote:
> If you really want a non-rotating media, then I
> suggest that you use SATA SSDs.
Can you actually buy SATA PHYs in small quantities now
or even SATA to PATA bridges?
I remember looking for them in the past and either not
being able to buy
On 8/4/17 7:37 AM, Phil Blundell via cctalk wrote:
> ASSPs like TI's TUSB9260
which turns up a big fat nothing in a web search
is there a data sheet somewhere?
the 6250 is a SATA 2 to USB using an 8051 core, but I suspect you
can't get the code for that.
one of the common pata-sata bridges
On 8/3/17 2:45 PM, Curious Marc via cctech wrote:
> Wow, that's mighty impressive. I knew about your FPGA 360/65 project but had
> never seen your website before.
There is also a simulation book in the works in cooperation with 'vaxman'
http://www.analogmuseum.org/english/about_me/
On 8/4/17 7:44 AM, systems_glitch via cctalk wrote:
> There are indeed cheap SATA -> IDE bridge ICs.
yup, I'm running around 50 of them in my upgraded XServe RAIDs
when I converted to 1tb 2.5" SATA-2 drives in 2015.
the cheap bridges are actually based on the 20330
you can find a real data sheet if you search for JM20330_datasheet_v2.5.pdf
hard enough
some discussions of their use with ssd trim
https://forum.thinkpads.com//viewtopic.php?t=115329
On 8/4/17 8:08 AM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote:
>
>
On 8/4/17 9:20 AM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote:
> https://halsoft.wordpress.com/2008/06/02/the-next-generation-key-punch-the-ibm-5280/
>
> http://www.computerhistory.org/collections/catalog/102675777
>
> i'll see what's there..
>
weird, it doesn't look like I scanned thes
the terminals pop up on eBay every so often. I picked up a couple in poor
physical
condition as donor machines for the one clean one I've found
On 8/5/17 10:56 PM, Eric Smith via cctalk wrote:
> With Intel devices, there is a special "seed module" and procedure that can
> be used to recover
On 8/7/17 7:08 AM, william degnan via cctalk wrote:
> I agree. I keep meaning to archive my software
dumping the firmware and character generator would be a good thing to do as well
I was looking at this thread
https://forum.kryoflux.com/viewtopic.php?f=3=749
And they mention the data they were looking at has AGC applied.
I didn't know any floppies used AGC in their read channel and in particular
I'm trying to find a block diagram or schematic of the logic in the Teac
http://www.retrotechnology.com/herbs_stuff/drive.html
is more detailed than the
On 8/10/17 1:32 PM, Tom Gardner via cctalk wrote:
> Me too - great rant.
On 8/16/17 11:20 AM, Tony Duell via cctalk wrote:
> But I am not so sure about AGC. I've looked at the schematics for
> some 5.25" drives and I can find no AGC circuits. Nor on the Sony
> 3.5" full-height 600rpm drives. So I would not be at all surprised if
> there was no AGC on this Teac.
I
On 8/22/17 6:34 AM, Nick Allen via cctalk wrote:
> looking
> into Network boot with Carl, but this is not yet a possibility.
Maybe you can get one of the LCM 3mbit PCI-e cards from LCM?
On 8/22/17 8:31 AM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote:
>
>
> On 8/22/17 6:34 AM, Nick Allen via cctalk wrote:
>> looking
>> into Network boot with Carl, but this is not yet a possibility.
>
> Maybe you can get one of the LCM 3mbit PCI-e cards from LCM?
>
I wish Ken
Max Mathews produced a set of three fonts at Bell Labs in 1967 as well.
"Three Fonts of Computer-drawn Letters"
The Journal of Typographic Research pp 345-356
https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/visiblelanguage/pdf/V1N4_1967_E.pdf
which we have in the collection
On 5/11/17 7:45 AM, Paul Koning wrote:
> Computer drawn characters are older than that
going back to Whirlwind, et. al.
I don't think the point was a 'first' beyond the Hershey set being one of the
earliest
generally available glyphs made available, and as such end up getting used in
This is an early version. They made some changes like adding a protection diode
and resistor on the coax input
after a nearby lightning strike at PARC wiped out a bunch of them. I guess I
should pull apart the original Xerox
10 meg one which was designed by the same guy to see how similar they
Did someone on the list outbid me on these?
http://www.ebay.com/itm/262963986628
here was the thread way back when
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/vmsnet.pdp-11/0RZKjpVmIGQ
and
http://www.dbit.com/pub/pdp11/rt11/putr.mac
I'm still looking for my version of putr.mac
but that should get you started.
Most of the non PDP-11 tapes on bitsavers were read with this.
that does seem to be the case. I never looked to see that rhodium plates silver
white.
http://www.foxfinejewelry.com/blog/article/rhodium-plating-or-dipping-your-yellow-gold-jewelry-into-white-gold-jewelry/
On 6/12/17 10:43 AM, Paul Koning wrote:
That seems odd because rhodium is a noble metal
On 6/12/17 7:17 AM, Mattis Lind via cctech wrote:
> There is a note in my RS64 manual, page 3-1 / Figure 3-2, that says "Silver
> colour Soaped water, Dark blue Special cleaning liquid" and then an arrow
> to the disk surface in the picture.
> Any thoughts about what the "Special cleaning
> Which brings it all down to:
> "How do you read 5.25" MS-DOS disks?"
>
Try reading the cctlk archives
This has been discussed AGAIN and AGAIN for several decades.
cctlk badly needs a FAQ
On 6/24/17 9:14 AM, Noel Chiappa via cctalk wrote:
> So, Paul A lent me a set of these (thanks Paul!) so I could scan them in (they
> are not currently available online).
sigh..
http://bitsavers.org/pdf/dec/unibus/DB11-A_RevS_Engineering_Drawings_Jan76.pdf
which has the schematic
they have
Kossow via cctalk wrote:
>
>
> On 6/24/17 9:14 AM, Noel Chiappa via cctalk wrote:
>
>> Does anyone else have a set of these prints?
>
>
> http://www.computerhistory.org/collections/catalog/102753063
>
> i'll try to get to it today
>
>
On 6/24/17 9:14 AM, Noel Chiappa via cctalk wrote:
> Does anyone else have a set of these prints?
http://www.computerhistory.org/collections/catalog/102753063
i'll try to get to it today
would be nice if someone could save this, since it is so complete.
he's only off my about 20 years in the age of it
www.ebay.com/itm/292132955235
On 5/28/17 8:28 PM, jim stephens via cctalk wrote:
> The Pascal Microengine had a black and brushed aluminum package
There was a bus version. I have cards, but no backplane.
On 5/29/17 10:30 AM, Amardeep S Chana via cctalk wrote:
> I seem to recall this
> person who went by the moniker of Zoso
The mysterious Zoso was a reviewer of CP/M Users Group disks
and was a contributor to Creative Computing, and probably other
related SF Bay publications as well.
r.
We trust that the incredible typographical errors encountered in this first
emission do not extend to data lists as well as descriptive text. What the
heck is a 'partical' list {p*4)? Zoso, hire a proofreader^
On 5/29/17 12:40 PM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote:
>
>
> On 5/29/17 10:30
404
it may be for a bus version of the pascal microengine
On 5/28/17 7:42 PM, Mike Stein via cctalk wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Chuck Guzis via cctalk"
> To:
> Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2017 8:07 PM
> Subject: Re: What is this
On 6/2/17 7:20 AM, dwight via cctalk wrote:
> the CP1610 that was most of a PDP11 processor.
A very odd version of the PDP-11
I did some programming on it for GI in the late 70's
using their GIMINI development system and cross-development
tools on their Sigma 9.
On 6/3/17 10:21 AM, P Gebhardt via cctalk wrote:
> The surfaces of the disk packs of type 9871 or 871 that came with it where
> corroded and are not usable anymore.
Did you keep them?
The platters can be replaced with ones from the single-platter IBM 2315 (ie.
RK05) and use similar head
weird I would have missed that, it's the most common unibus disk interface
there is
http://www.computerhistory.org/collections/catalog/102749003
I'll have it up on bitsavers by noon PDT
On 6/3/17 5:56 PM, Marc Howard via cctalk wrote:
> Although I can find the RK11D users manual on the web
I had the privilege of doing Chuck's oral history for CHM a few years ago.
From: Christine Thacker [mailto:thac...@nhm.org]
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 6:58 PM
Subject: Chuck Thacker
Roy, Alan, Butler & Kurt,
I'm sorry to tell you that my father Chuck Thacker passed away in the
early
On 6/15/17 8:19 AM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote:
> If you look at the actual museum policy on copying material in the collection,
> it is done on demand by staff at 50 cents per page.
http://www.computerhistory.org/collections/requests/
On 6/10/17 1:59 PM, Mattis Lind wrote:
>
> BTW. Speaking of dumping. Now that I have a TC11 / TU56 that seems to be
> working, what is the best way to dump 18 and 12
> bit tapes? Is there some PDP-11 OS that can do it or is it assembly
> programming required? I had hopes that RT11 had such
>
On 6/14/17 7:27 AM, Toby Thain via cctalk wrote:
> A thousand boxes are not at all accessible.
They are trivial to access. You just have to cart your lazy asses to Fremont.
There are no plans or budget to scan this material en mass, so it wouldn't make
sense for anyone to come here assuming they would be allowed to do that.
If you look at the actual museum policy on copying material in the collection,
it is done on demand by staff at 50 cents per page.
On 6/14/17
On 6/13/17 11:22 AM, Alan Frisbie via cctalk wrote:
> 2. DTC 520-1 disk controller and its DTC-11 Q-Bus host adapter.
>
> Our current project is to replace the ST-506 disks with
> the David Gesswein MFM disk emulators. To do this, we
> need to determine the CRC algorithm used by DTC, which
You may as well run them through a shredder. All modern tapes have embedded
servo tracks.
On 4/30/17 7:38 AM, Mike Loewen via cctalk wrote:
>
>Looking for recommendations for a bulk tape eraser for SDLT and DLT IV
> tapes.
>
>
> Mike Loewenmloe...@cpumagic.scol.pa.us
>
I got lucky, and this ebay lot
http://www.ebay.com/itm/382069259067
contained single density copies of textpack 4, four copies of textpack
6, chart pack, report pack, bisync, async, and the training disks
images under http://bitsavers.org/bits/IBM/Displaywriter
--
these are very difficult
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Vintage-Military-IBM-Computer-/201911842662
https://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship/weaps/an-uys-1.htm
On 4/30/17 10:04 AM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:
> Certainly not DLT IV tapes--I've done the bulk eraser thing with them
> and the result re-recorded just fine.
>
Sorry, I flipped DLT and LTO in my mind..
On 5/24/17 12:58 PM, ben via cctalk wrote:
> With typo in VHDL you have hard problem finding that single gate
> error.
The world has been debugging 100,000+ gate systems with simulations for
a few decades now.
Once you've built up a set of test vectors, it actually becomes really
obvious
On 5/21/17 8:51 AM, Rob Doyle via cctalk wrote:
> How 'bout a brand new J11-based board for oldie S-100 systems?
Reinventing incompatible I/O for existing operating systems.
Maybe if they wrote a new unencumbered OS, but I'm not holding my breath.
I don't get why they abandoned their
On 6/5/17 2:06 PM, Brent Hilpert via cctalk wrote:
> I checked several Moto databooks from 1969 into the 70s last night and didn't
> find it. (Not to suggest my checking is the last word).
> SDA7 is not a 'standard' Motorola-style number.
> Might have been a custom order.
>
>
the 1972 books
I have the three volume moto transistor catalog from 1973 coming, it should
have it in vol 3
On 6/4/17 5:44 PM, Michael Thompson via cctalk wrote:
> I am trying to LTSpice simulate a DEC H-724 power supply from a PDP-12. It
> includes a Motorola SDA7 dual transistor. I can find any information
On 6/5/17 3:12 PM, Henry Bond via cctalk wrote:
> the same price for the keyboard as the terminal is greedy.
Welcome to the world of the keyboard collector, who buys up keyboards
and leaves terminals and classic computers behind, rendering them useless.
On 6/6/17 6:10 AM, Philipp Hachtmann via cctalk wrote:
> And I have cables and lots of spare heads: All submerged since Saturday. I
> most probly won't try to recover the packs
If they really are that rare you may want to reconsider.
On 6/6/17 11:56 AM, Paul Koning wrote:
>
>> On Jun 6, 2017, at 2:26 PM, Al Kossow via cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6/6/17 6:10 AM, Philipp Hachtmann via cctalk wrote:
>>
>>> And I have cables and lots of s
On 9/15/17 12:36 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:
> I recall that he was a bit of a pompous a** on his Usenet postings, but
> you have to realize that the tenor of online conversation was very
My one interaction with him was at a Hackers. insert DRUNKEN between
pompous and a**
I had to fix a key on CHM's keyset today, so I shot a bunch of pictures while
it was apart
http://bitsavers.org/pdf/xerox/alto/Alto_5-Key_Keyset
They spent a lot of money on this. There are two castings of the same material
as the keyboard
and monitors, and two injection molded parts for the
also a 7970E and a Kennedy 9000.
would like to have these gone before the second week in Oct if someone in
the Bay Area can pick them up and bring a couple hundred bucks with them.
i'm just about out of that space and want to get finished up.
there is also an 11/34A w FPU and cache, RK, RL and
On 10/6/17 5:59 AM, Anthony Bennett via cctalk wrote:
> If this is the machine that I am thinking of, it was made by Intel and
> marketed by them as the AS/5.
Itel
On 10/7/17 4:05 PM, Adrian Stoness via cctalk wrote:
> I've got a sx28 needs to be recapped has allot of humming going on was last
> serviced in the 70s by my dad he got it for free when he was 12 if he could
> carry it home a mile
this is all pretty far off-topic, so I'll leave this with
On 10/7/17 2:39 PM, couryho...@aol.com wrote:
> What homed you in collecting Hallicrafters?
A friends SX-43 got me interested in shortwave, and in getting my ticket
when I was in high school. I was given a basket-case SX-115 when I was 17
that I never got going. Apparently, those are worth
On 10/7/17 1:31 PM, Jerry Weiss via cctalk wrote:
> There wasn’t a head lock.
yes, there is.
It is a 'L' shaped bracket that screws onto the top of the actuator.
Details in the manual
You can tie-wrap the actuator or tape the disk with the cylinder numbers
on it to keep it from moving without
On 10/8/17 7:42 AM, dwight via cctalk wrote:
> Most hams today seem to be into 2 meter and not so much long range SW.
>
There is a huge base of HF work being done along with real-time mapping
of HF and Tropo propagation, along with all the software defined radio work.
On 10/3/17 7:24 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:
> Al has a bunch of 7970 stuff on bitsavers, but not, I think (I
> could be wrong) the manual specific to the B and C models.
I still have several tubs of HP manuals that I haven't gone through and
I remember there were several revisions for the
fyi, just noticed this is up now
http://www.computerhistory.org/events/upcoming/#yesterdays-computer-tomorrow-xerox-alto
On 9/29/17 8:56 AM, Henk Gooijen via cctalk wrote:
> Now I'm looking for 8" mag tapes/reels that will fit!
http://www.ebay.com/itm/311973810676
even a good brand.
of my background projects has been trying to collect enough parts to bring
up a Sytek broadband
network, which IBM also sold as their first PC LAN.
On 8/30/17 8:56 AM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote:
>
>
> On 8/29/17 1:46 PM, Henk Gooijen via cctalk wrote:
>
>> Does anyone ha
On 8/30/17 10:05 AM, Guy Sotomayor Jr wrote:
>> One of my background projects has been trying to collect enough parts to
>> bring up a Sytek broadband
>> network, which IBM also sold as their first PC LAN.
>
> Cool! I worked on that (at IBM). ;-)
the PC network tech ref has been up since
On 8/29/17 1:46 PM, Henk Gooijen via cctalk wrote:
> Does anyone have more info about this (dusty) board:
>
> http://forum.datormuseum.se/data/87681DD5-B816-494C-AA4C-D8DB3FA35406/F7AD48D3-5450-4860-A0C9-23CB7277AC91.jpg
try dumping the eproms and see what the strings say
it looks like a
On 9/6/17 9:20 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:
> If you could spare it for a week or so, I'd be grateful. On the other
> hand, my MCU setup for the drive works great--it reads a tape and
> stashes the data as a .TAP file on an SD card.
The problem you're fighting is things are just a little
I could mail you a skew tape.
On 9/6/17 8:09 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:
> I'm just scratching around looking for ideas.
On 9/5/17 11:09 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:
> The read results have improved considerably.
tension arm servo acting reasonably?
what style arm sensor does your drive have?
On 9/28/17 7:38 AM, Mike Stein via cctalk wrote:
> What is it that usually fails when the drive can't read the servo info? The
> data on the platter, or?
I've never dug that far into it beyond fiddling with Micropolis trying to
mechanically get it to
find the servo tracks and calibrate to
On 9/29/17 8:48 AM, Jon Elson via cctalk wrote:
> I did a few of these on a lathe years ago. It was a couple minutes job per
> reel.
you are also going to have to cut holes near the hub so that you can get a tape
started
on the takeup reel.
On 9/29/17 11:35 AM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:
> Does the little Kennedy drive have a vacuum takeup reel?
No, they are tension arm, very similar design to the 7970
I wanted to compare the mechanical design of the 9000 to the 7970
but don't know if I have the time/interest any more.
On 9/28/17 7:21 AM, Geoffrey Oltmans via cctalk wrote:
> Were any earlier MFM/RLL voice coil/servo
> controlled, or were they all stepper drives?
>
Most drives 40mb and up are closed-loop with dedicated
servo surfaces and many have servos that don't work any more.
Maxtor and Atasi are early
On 10/3/17 2:50 AM, Jos Dreesen via cctalk wrote:
> Al is maintaining a set of ROM images for these machines, are tape images
> covered somewhere ?
> Do we have an fixed tape image format, as has been done with Dave's IMD for
> floppies ?
As far as I know, no one has successfully made a
On 10/3/17 8:29 AM, Mike Stein via cctalk wrote:
> Sounds like a similar system to what Burroughs used on their cassettes; I
> always thought that they'd be a lot easier to read than the 'normal' formats
> with embedded clock signals and always intended to try to read some of the
> tapes I
On 10/3/17 2:50 AM, Jos Dreesen via cctalk wrote:
> That "famous" QIC tape unit
Tektronix 405x tapes aren't QIC
They are 3M DC series cartridges, but the encoding is not a QIC standard.
On 8/26/17 7:36 AM, Jay West via cctalk wrote:
> For official bitsavers mirrors, rsyncd has been turned back on (it was off
> while bitsavers was migrated to the new classiccmp server, and during
> testing).
A HUGE thank you to Jay for taking the time to do this. I had about 100,000
pages
in
101 - 200 of 1374 matches
Mail list logo