Re: [cellml-discussion] Representing the next version of the CellML Specification

2007-11-07 Thread Andrew Miller
scussion- >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Garny >> Sent: Wednesday, 7 November 2007 9:46 p.m. >> To: 'CellML Discussion List' >> Subject: Re: [cellml-discussion] Representing the next version of the >> CellML Specification >> >> I don't

Re: [cellml-discussion] Representing the next version of the CellML Specification

2007-11-07 Thread Andrew Miller
Matt wrote: > On 8/11/2007, at 10:27 AM, Randall Britten wrote: > > >> Hi all >> >> Another option to add to the mix: using a Wiki. In this case, I would >> specifically suggest MediaWiki (a la Wikipedia). >> Pros: >> -Widely used, lots of user familiarity. >> -Easy collaboration: edits done vi

Re: [cellml-discussion] Representing the next version of the CellML Specification

2007-11-07 Thread Matt
On 8/11/2007, at 10:27 AM, Randall Britten wrote: > Hi all > > Another option to add to the mix: using a Wiki. In this case, I would > specifically suggest MediaWiki (a la Wikipedia). > Pros: > -Widely used, lots of user familiarity. > -Easy collaboration: edits done via web interface. > -Built

Re: [cellml-discussion] Representing the next version of the CellML Specification

2007-11-07 Thread Randall Britten
gards, Randall > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cellml-discussion- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Garny > Sent: Wednesday, 7 November 2007 9:46 p.m. > To: 'CellML Discussion List' > Subject: Re: [cellml-discussion] Representing the next vers

Re: [cellml-discussion] Representing the next version of the CellML Specification

2007-11-07 Thread Alan Garny
I don't know much (if anything!) about the solutions offered here, but: - the current HTML version is nice for viewing from a web browser, but if you have ever tried to print things out you will no doubt have noticed that it doesn't look great anymore. I remember that there used to be a 'proper' P

Re: [cellml-discussion] Representing the next version of the CellML Specification

2007-11-06 Thread Andrew Miller
Matt wrote: > Without making a choice at the moment, I want to highlight that the > following are probably the most important aspects to consider in any > of these: > > 1) can represent MathML in either content or presentation format and > can render MathML in the HTML output using image repl

Re: [cellml-discussion] Representing the next version of the CellML Specification

2007-11-06 Thread David Brooks
Hi Andrew, My vote is for DocBook - I used it a few years ago for a software manual without too many issues, and the tools have matured since then. Keep away from anything DSSSL based (including the DSSSL flavour of DocBook), otherwise we will create a dependency on needing a Lisp expert to

Re: [cellml-discussion] Representing the next version of the CellML Specification

2007-11-06 Thread Matt
Without making a choice at the moment, I want to highlight that the following are probably the most important aspects to consider in any of these: 1) can represent MathML in either content or presentation format and can render MathML in the HTML output using image replacements instead of e

[cellml-discussion] Representing the next version of the CellML Specification

2007-11-06 Thread Andrew Miller
Hi, One issue which came up at today's meeting for people at Auckland involved with CellML is how we will represent the next version of the CellML specification. Having a 'source' format of the specification will make it easier for us to propose specific changes to the document and so will hop