* Andrew Miller ak.mil...@auckland.ac.nz [2012-05-29 10:52] writes:
On 29/05/12 20:17, Michael Clerx wrote:
Dear all,
I'm glad to see uncertainty being taken into acount in cell models.
Perhaps it would be worthwhile to add the scenario where no assumptions
are made about the
...@auckland.ac.nz,
Bart Jardine bar...@u.washington.edu,
Gary Raymond ga...@u.washington.edu,
Dr. James Bassingthwaighte j...@u.washington.edu,
Lucian Smith lpsm...@u.washington.edu,
Rebecca Rowe rebika...@gmail.com, Dash, Ranjan rd...@mcw.edu,
Richard Ward ward
A couple questions. One: is there a defined way in CellML to find the
independent variables? The spec says (about 'initial_value'):
This attribute provides a convenient means for specifying the value of a
scalar real variable when all independent variables in the model have a
value of
* Maxwell Neal mn...@u.washington.edu [2011-10-21 22:03] writes:
Hi all,
I was wondering - can CellML models have nested components? That is, are
there instances where some model component is a component in another model
component?
Thanks,
Yes--this is covered by the concept of
For what it's worth, it's 'Darren', not 'Darryl' (the SBML 'distrib'
package guy).
-Lucian
* Dougal Cowan dj.co...@auckland.ac.nz [2011-05-26 22:32] writes:
I have put the minutes from this week's meeting up at:
http://www.cellml.org/community/meeting/minutes/2011/05.25
Cheers,
Dougal
* Andrew Miller ak.mil...@auckland.ac.nz [2011-02-02 03:27] writes:
Hi all,
I've just put up an unofficial draft CellML specification up at
http://www.cellml.org/Members/miller/draft-normative-spec-andrews-preferred/toplevel.xhtml
to prototype what some of the new features could look
My only comment is that lines 6 and 9 ('is it valid?' and 'is it
simulatable?') are the ones I'd be looking at/for the most, so if those
bit of the glyphs were emphasized or at least easy to pick out, that'd be
great.
-Lucian
* Catherine Lloyd c.ll...@auckland.ac.nz [2010-06-03 13:27] writes:
* Catherine Lloyd c.ll...@auckland.ac.nz [2010-06-03 20:55] writes:
Hi Lucian
Adding to that, I'll emphasise again that this list forms the bare
minimum and we will be happy to expand on the list in the future.
validity and simulation could be two areas which we choose to
expand on
Thanks to the help of many of you on this list, I now have a working
CellML-to-Antimony translator, and have used it to translate all the
models at models.cellml.org into the Antimony format. The results are at:
http://antimony.sourceforge.net/antimony-cellml.html
along with SBML versions of
(Whoops, I meant to send this to the list, but replied directly to Poul
instead...)
- Forwarded message from Lucian Smith lpsm...@spod-central.org -
A couple follow-up thoughts:
* Poul Nielsen p.niel...@auckland.ac.nz [2010-03-11 03:28] writes:
Dear Lucian
Many thanks for your
Thanks to all of you who were at the workshop for letting me attend
remotely. I found it quite valuable, and hope you didn't mind me asking
you all to repeat the questions too often. And special thanks to
Catherine for being the driving force behind getting it all set up!
I had a couple
anyone else
would like to comment.
I can at least put the answers I got; here they are:
Begin forwarded message:
From: Lucian Smith lpsm...@spod-central.org
-Currently, I must run my program from the directory with the
'components/'
subdirectory. Is there a way I can set things up
(Thanks for the link to the CellML2C source; that was very helpful.)
(Also, I'm more than willing to move this to some other forum if it's
better suited there.)
So, I feel like I'm missing something pretty fundamental here, because I
can't figure out how to set the name of a model. The
* Justin Marsh j.ma...@auckland.ac.nz [2009-07-28 00:31] writes:
Hi Lucian,
The basic C++ should have two functions for each member attribute,
named after the attribute; one with no arguments, which returns the
value of the attribute, and one with one argument which sets the value
of
14 matches
Mail list logo
