Re: [CentOS] qemu-kvm

2019-11-19 Thread Nux!
You should really use cockpit (if you can't get virt-manager) if you 
want a GUI.


hth

---
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

On 2019-11-19 15:55, Jerry Geis wrote:

I am running this command
/usr/libexec/qemu-kvm -no-acpi -smp 4 -m 2048 -drive
file=myimg.img,format=raw -vga std -device rtl8139

and expecting a window to open up for the console. It does not. This is 
on

CentOS 8.
Do I have something missing/not installed - or something wrong on the
command line.

Jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 8 Installation Not Recognizing Local Disk

2019-10-10 Thread Nux!
There was a recent thread about Redhat's removal of drivers from LSI 
SAS2, it's probably the problem you are facing.

It can be worked around with the help of Elrepo repo.


https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2019-October/173682.html

https://elrepoproject.blogspot.com/2019/08/rhel-80-and-support-for-removed-adapters.html

https://elrepo.org/linux/dud/el8/x86_64/dd-mpt3sas-27.101.00.00-1.el8_0.elrepo.iso



---
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

On 2019-10-10 14:01, Brewer, Mitchell wrote:

I have an older Dell PowerEdge server with one hard drive, with CentOS
7 currently installed. I wanted to do a clean install of CentOS 8, but
it doesn't pick up the hard drive. When I click on the destination to
pick the hard drive it only shows the USB drive that I'm installing
from. I checked for a RAID configuration on the server, but there is
only one disk, and no RAID is configured. The disk is controlled by
the PowerEdge Raid Controller (PERC), but when I disable that I lose
the disk completely. I suspect that PERC is part of the problem, but a
CentOS 7 install proceeds normally with PERC enabled. Do you know of a
change from CentOS 7 to 8 that would cause this, or if there is a
workaround? I've searched for several days and haven't found anything
yet.


Thank you!


Mitch


Mitchell Brewer
Research Systems Administrator
Laboratory for Physical Sciences (LPS)
(410)570-3516 (Mobile)
(443)-654-7897 (Office)
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Install tunctl on CetnOS 7 ?

2019-08-07 Thread Nux!

It's not in the main repo, try to get it from here:

http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/misc/el7Server/x86_64/tunctl-1.5-12.el7.nux.x86_64.rpm

---
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

On 2019-08-07 16:42, John Chludzinski wrote:

EPEL doesn't have uml_utilities and NUX doesn't have tunctl.

On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:42 PM Jonathan Billings  
wrote:


On Aug 6, 2019, at 5:38 PM, John Chludzinski 
 wrote:

> Which repo has tunctl for CentOS 7 ?

It looks like uml_utilities, which is where it is in CentOS6 EPEL and 
Fedora, isn’t built on CentOS7’s EPEL.  It looks like the Nux repo has 
a ’tunctl’ package though.


--
Jonathan Billings 


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Mate on Centos 7

2019-08-07 Thread Nux!

Good job and thanks, but I won't add anything that overwrites EPEL.
Can help with hosting it in a separate repo if you wish, though.

---
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

On 2019-08-07 16:02, isdtor wrote:

isdtor writes:


> > Can I really be the only user of Mate on Centos 7??
>
> No, definitely not. I use MATE on C7, because Gnome is, how do I
> say this politely..., um, horrible. Not a KDE fan either.
>
> Gnome-2.x wasn't broken, didn't need to be thrown away and
> replaced by something completely different.

Not broken, but full of bugs that will never get fixed.

I did a while back rebuild the EPEL rpms for 1.20. There are spec 
files I could make available but I can't find the build environemnt 
setup now. It involves mock, a custom local repo to receive the fresh 
builds as you don't want to pull in the rpms from EPEL, and a build 
script that defines the order, among other things. If I have time next 
week I can try and locate everything.


I have done the hard lifting and rebuilt mate 1.22 on CentOS 7. It's
not without quirks, and I haven't actually installed and tested, but
I'm willing to make the srpms available - without any commitments.
This might make a good addition to Nux :)

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Fastboot and Google pixel 3a

2019-07-26 Thread Nux!
I've had to use newer than stock/epel packages in the past for various 
phones.

Just get the latest binaries from here:
https://dl.google.com/android/repository/platform-tools-latest-linux.zip

hth

---
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

On 2019-07-26 03:28, H wrote:

Has anyone used fastboot together with the Google Pixel 3a/3a XL
phone? I cannot get it to be recognized and wonder if the version of
fastboot available for Centos 7 may not be recent enough? It does work
with older phones I have so the setup should be correct.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] how to increase DNS reliability?

2019-07-25 Thread Nux!
I'm about to do an overhaul of the DNS service at work and my plan is to 
use powerdns recursor + dnsdist + keepalived.



---
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

On 2019-07-25 14:28, Leroy Tennison wrote:

If you don't want multiple DNS server entries on the client then a
master and (possibly multiple) slave server configuration can be set
up (I'm assuming ISC DNS - their solution to redundancy/failover is
master and slave servers, this may be the way it is with all DNS).
keepalived can be used for fail over and will present a single IP
address (which the clients would use) shared among the servers.
haproxy or alternatives might be another fail over option.  Each
technology has its own learning curve (and doing this will require at
least two) and caveats.  In particular systemd doesn't appear to play
well with technologies creating IP addresses it doesn't manage.  The
version of keepalived we're using also has its own nasty quirk as well
where it comes up assuming it is master until discovered otherwise,
this is true even if it is configured as backup.  In most cases this
is probably either a non-issue (no scripts being used) or a minor
annoyance.  But if you're using scripts trigger
 ed by keepalived which make significant (and possibly conflicting)
changes to the environment then you'll need to embed "intelligence" in
them to wait until final state is reached or test state before acting
or some other option.


From: CentOS  on behalf of hw 
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2019 7:51:39 AM
To: centos@centos.org 
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [CentOS] how to increase DNS reliability?


Hi,

how can DNS reliability, as experienced by clients on the LAN who are
sending queries, be increased?

Would I have to set up some sort of cluster consisting of several
servers all providing DNS services which is reachable under a single
IP address known to the clients?

Just setting up several name servers and making them known to the 
clients

for the clients to automatically switch isn't a good solution because
the clients take their timeouts and users lacking even the most basic
knowledge inevitably panic when the first name server does not answer
queries.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Harriscomputer

Register now for the dataVoice User Conference,
October 9-11 at the Gaylord Rockies in Denver, CO.
To register click Here


Leroy Tennison
Network Information/Cyber Security Specialist
E: le...@datavoiceint.com


[cid:Data-Voice-International-LOGO_aa3d1c6e-5cfb-451f-ba2c-af8059e69609.PNG]


2220 Bush Dr
McKinney, Texas
75070
www.datavoiceint.com


This message has been sent on behalf of a company that is part of the
Harris Operating Group of Constellation Software Inc. These companies
are listed here.

If you prefer not to be contacted by Harris Operating Group please
notify us.



This message is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to
which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that
is proprietary, privileged or confidential or otherwise legally exempt
from disclosure. If you are not the named addressee, you are not
authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or
any part of it. If you have received this message in error, please
notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete all copies of the
message.




___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] bcachefs-tools

2019-07-25 Thread Nux!
You could try to get this slightly old rpm, save you the build troubles 
(untested):

http://ftp5.gwdg.de/pub/opensuse/repositories/home:/garloff:/storage/RHEL_7/x86_64/

Bare in mind there is no support in the stock kernel for bcachefs 
(afaik), you  might have better luck with the elrepo kernel-ml.


---
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

On 2019-07-25 14:45, Mike wrote:

Hello,

I want to test bachefs file system on CentOS 7.
~$  cat /etc/system-release
CentOS Linux release 7.6.1810 (Core)

I'm following the bcachefs howto:  https://bcachefs.org/Howto/.

Having  a problem trying to complete make && make install of the 
bcache-tools.

After going through all the dependencies and insuring they are
installed on Cent 7, I get the following output on make && make
install:

Package blkid was not found in the pkg-config search path.
Perhaps you should add the directory containing `blkid.pc'
to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
No package 'blkid' found
Package uuid was not found in the pkg-config search path.
Perhaps you should add the directory containing `uuid.pc'
to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
No package 'uuid' found
Package libsodium was not found in the pkg-config search path.
Perhaps you should add the directory containing `libsodium.pc'
to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
No package 'libsodium' found
Package libzstd was not found in the pkg-config search path.
Perhaps you should add the directory containing `libzstd.pc'
to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
No package 'libzstd' found
Makefile:42: *** pkg-config error, command: pkg-config --cflags "blkid
uuid liburcu libsodium zlib liblz4 libzstd".  Stop.

The packages are installed but I'm not certain how to satisfy
pkg-config and place them in the correct path.

The pkg-config man page states -
ENVIRONMENT VARIABLES
   PKG_CONFIG_PATH
A colon-separated (on Windows, semicolon-separated) list of
directories to search for .pc files.   The  default  directory  will
always  be searched  after  searching the path; the default is
libdir/pkgconfig:datadir/pkgconfig where libdir is the libdir for
pkg-config and datadir is the datadir for pkg-config when it was
installed.

On my installation, the current path seems to be:
~$ pkg-config --variable pc_path pkg-config
/usr/lib64/pkgconfig:/usr/share/pkgconfig

~$ echo $PKG_CONFIG_PATH
<>

Using locate, I do not find any of these files, so how do I properly
add the packages to the path --
`blkid.pc'
`uuid.pc'
`libsodium.pc'
`libzstd.pc'

Thanks for reading and I appreciate any guidance.

Best,

Mike
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Mate on Centos 7

2019-07-15 Thread nux

There are loads of us, most are just happy with the current version.


On 2019-07-15 15:22, H wrote:
On July 15, 2019 8:21:10 AM EDT, Jonathan Billings 
 wrote:

On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 07:27:46AM -0400, H wrote:

What is the recommended way to upgrade to 1.22?


I see you've already done the appropriate thing, filed a ticket[1]
against the EPEL package in Bugzilla.

Not much else you can do here.  It's not part of CentOS, and is up to
the EPEL maintainers to upgrade.

1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1729951

--
Jonathan Billings 
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Can I really be the only user of Mate on Centos 7??
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Alternative to laptop

2019-07-10 Thread nux

Another NUC alternative:
https://www.gigabyte.com/uk/Mini-PcBarebone


On 2019-07-10 12:14, Mike wrote:

https://www.asrock.com/nettop/index.asp

Asrock has a series of Intel and/or AMD based mini-pc's called the 
DeskMini.

Competes in the Intel NUC space.
Plenty of power and up-to-date components, multiple ports for dual
monitor and at least two ssd's, etc.
I don't work for Asrock or sell their equipment.


On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 2:52 AM H  wrote:


I am considering buying a small, and therefore easily portable, 
computer as an alternative to the laptop I already have. Obviously it 
would not have battery, a screen, nor a keyboard etc. but more or less 
be an easily portable computing unit to move between offices where a 
keyboard and monitor(s) could then be connected. I want to run CentOS 
7, later CentOS 8.


The smaller, the better, however, there are certain key features I 
would like to have:


- HDMI for 2 monitors

- USB for keyboard

- 2 extra USB for eg external harddisk etc.

- both wifi and at least Gb Ethernet cable connector

Probably at least 16 Gb of memory, capability to drive two 
high-resolution monitors and whatever else might be nice such as SSD 
of at least 256 Gb.


Size wise it would be nice if it were no larger than a "book", 
whatever size that might be.


Does anyone use something like the above, or know of a computer 
meeting the above criteria?


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] how to find out the number of updates for a system

2019-05-22 Thread Nux!
Nice one, -q
However that command will still count an empty line that yum outputs, even with 
-q; it could also create problems due to stderr. I'd use something like:
yum -q check-update 2>/dev/null|grep -c -v ^$

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "SternData" 
> To: "CentOS mailing list" 
> Sent: Wednesday, 22 May, 2019 16:03:39
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] how to find out the number of updates for a system

> maybe
>  yum -q check-update | wc -l
> 
> On 5/22/19 8:42 AM, Ralf Prengel wrote:
>> Hallo,
>> I need the information how many updates are available for a system.
>> What is the best way to find it out in a one line bash script.
>> 
>> Von meinem iPad gesendet
>> ___
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>> 
> 
> 
> --
> -- Steve
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] how to find out the number of updates for a system

2019-05-22 Thread Nux!
You might want to increase 1000 if you expect to have more than that number of 
updates :)

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Nux!" 
> To: "CentOS mailing list" 
> Sent: Wednesday, 22 May, 2019 15:48:00
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] how to find out the number of updates for a system

> yum check-updates 2>/dev/null|grep -A1000 "^$"|grep -vc "^$"
> 
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> 
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
> 
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Ralf Prengel" 
>> To: "CentOS mailing list" 
>> Sent: Wednesday, 22 May, 2019 14:42:53
>> Subject: [CentOS] how to find out the number of updates for a system
> 
>> Hallo,
>> I need the information how many updates are available for a system.
>> What is the best way to find it out in a one line bash script.
>> 
>> Von meinem iPad gesendet
>> ___
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org
> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] how to find out the number of updates for a system

2019-05-22 Thread Nux!
yum check-updates 2>/dev/null|grep -A1000 "^$"|grep -vc "^$"

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Ralf Prengel" 
> To: "CentOS mailing list" 
> Sent: Wednesday, 22 May, 2019 14:42:53
> Subject: [CentOS] how to find out the number of updates for a system

> Hallo,
> I need the information how many updates are available for a system.
> What is the best way to find it out in a one line bash script.
> 
> Von meinem iPad gesendet
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Opera browser on CentOS

2019-05-21 Thread Nux!
I'd wait for EL8.1 to be honest, EL8 won't be much usable without EPEL repo and 
the various extra repos for multimedia etc which will take time.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "CentOS mailing list" 
> To: "CentOS mailing list" 
> Sent: Monday, 20 May, 2019 17:09:55
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Opera browser on CentOS

> Am 20.05.2019 um 17:43 schrieb H :
>> 
>> On 05/20/2019 05:24 PM, Nux! wrote:
>>> Yes, it will not work on EL6, it requires newer glibc and gtk3.
>>> It's time to leave EL6 behind (or stick to Firefox).
>>> 
>> 
>> OK, thank you. I do indeed plan to migrate this laptop to CentOS 7 this or 
>> next
>> week...
> 
> 
> If its a laptop; I would suggest to wait a bit[*] (EL6 has still support) and
> migrate directly to EL8 ...
> 
> [*] https://wiki.centos.org/About/Building_8
> 
> --
> LF
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Opera browser on CentOS

2019-05-20 Thread Nux!
Yes, it will not work on EL6, it requires newer glibc and gtk3.
It's time to leave EL6 behind (or stick to Firefox).

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "H" 
> To: "CentOS mailing list" 
> Sent: Monday, 20 May, 2019 15:50:53
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Opera browser on CentOS

> On 05/20/2019 03:35 PM, Greg Bailey wrote:
>> On 5/20/19 6:22 AM, H wrote:
>>> Is anyone running the Opera browser on Centos 7 or 6? While not available 
>>> in a
>>> yum-repository, it seems to be available as a snap-package. Not familiar 
>>> with
>>> those yet but curious if the browser is worthwhile to run. I have generally
>>> found Firefox less useful/compatible than Chromium but would also like
>>> alternatives, particularly since Opera defaults to a VPN-connection.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> It is available in opera's yum repository:
>>
>> [opera]
>> name=Opera packages
>> type=rpm-md
>> baseurl=https://rpm.opera.com/rpm
>> gpgcheck=1
>> gpgkey=https://rpm.opera.com/rpmrepo.key
>> enabled=1
>>
>> I only run it very occasionally, in cases where I want a second login 
>> session to
>> AWS that's different from my primary Firefox session, etc.
>>
>> -Greg
>>
>> ___
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> 
> It seems that Opera does not run under Centos 6 since the dependencies won't
> install? I get the following messages:
> 
> Resolving Dependencies
> --> Running transaction check
> ---> Package opera-developer.x86_64 0:62.0.3323.0-0 will be installed
> --> Processing Dependency: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.17)(64bit) for package:
> opera-developer-62.0.3323.0-0.x86_64
> --> Processing Dependency: libgdk-3.so.0()(64bit) for package:
> opera-developer-62.0.3323.0-0.x86_64
> --> Processing Dependency: libatk-bridge-2.0.so.0()(64bit) for package:
> opera-developer-62.0.3323.0-0.x86_64
> --> Processing Dependency: libgtk-3.so.0()(64bit) for package:
> opera-developer-62.0.3323.0-0.x86_64
> --> Processing Dependency: libatspi.so.0()(64bit) for package:
> opera-developer-62.0.3323.0-0.x86_64
> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> Error: Package: opera-developer-62.0.3323.0-0.x86_64 (opera)
>   Requires: libgtk-3.so.0()(64bit)
> Error: Package: opera-developer-62.0.3323.0-0.x86_64 (opera)
>   Requires: libgdk-3.so.0()(64bit)
> Error: Package: opera-developer-62.0.3323.0-0.x86_64 (opera)
>   Requires: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.17)(64bit)
> Error: Package: opera-developer-62.0.3323.0-0.x86_64 (opera)
>   Requires: libatk-bridge-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
> Error: Package: opera-developer-62.0.3323.0-0.x86_64 (opera)
>   Requires: libatspi.so.0()(64bit)
> You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
> You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] root .bash_profile?

2019-05-13 Thread Nux!
Hi,

The $home of root is /root, just copy it there.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Bee.Lists" 
> To: "CentOS mailing list" 
> Sent: Monday, 13 May, 2019 13:28:24
> Subject: [CentOS] root .bash_profile?

> Hi folks.  Just wondering how I can implement an automatic .bash_profile for
> root.  I have to load my user .bash_profile every time I get into root, and I
> would like a better solution.  There is no /home/ for root, so I’m a bit
> confused if this is even allowed.
> 
> Any insight appreciated.
> 
> 
> Cheers, Bee
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage

2019-05-10 Thread Nux!
I maintain a desktop oriented repo for CentOS and last I checked a year or so 
ago, I got over 150k+ unique IPs with yum user agent downloading stuff from it.

It's a bit anecdotal as perhaps not all are actual desktop users and some users 
were using multiple IPs (dhcp), but it shows there are quite a few users out 
there running CentOS for desktop purposes. 

There are desktop focused distros out there who do not even reach this kind of 
numbers. How many active users do you think Mageia or Linux Mint have?

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "CentOS mailing list" 
> To: "CentOS mailing list" 
> Sent: Friday, 10 May, 2019 05:40:38
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage

>> On 09/05/2019 09:09, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote:
>>>> The price we pay.. :)
>>>
>>> Do you say that paying RH customers already received new firefox
>>> packages?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Simon
>>>
>>
>> No, Red Hat have not yet released any updates for Firefox. I doubt it's
>> a priority for them.
> 
> Which makes me believe they don't expect anybody to use RHEL as a desktop
> system :-(
> 
> Are there any numbers showing how RHEL is used? That would be interesting.
> 
> Regards,
> Simon
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage

2019-05-09 Thread Nux!
No, it's the "price" we "pay" for using EL.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Simon Matter" 
> To: "Nux!" 
> Cc: "CentOS mailing list" 
> Sent: Thursday, 9 May, 2019 09:09:13
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage

>> The price we pay.. :)
> 
> Do you say that paying RH customers already received new firefox packages?
> 
> Regards,
> Simon
> 
>>
>> BTW, Mozilla publishes tarballs that you can simply extract and run (and
>> will self-update), you can use those (it's what I am doing as a workaround
>> in fact until RH catches up):
>> https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/60.6.3esr/linux-x86_64/
>>
>> --
>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>
>> Nux!
>> www.nux.ro
>>
>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "CentOS mailing list" 
>>> To: "CentOS mailing list" 
>>> Sent: Wednesday, 8 May, 2019 17:24:57
>>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage
>>
>>>> I was told lately about this workaround, check it out.
>>>> https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2019/05/04/update-regarding-add-ons-in-firefox/
>>>
>>> The signing thing is a security feature. I don't like a workaround to
>>> disable a security feature instead of fixing it.
>>>
>>> What makes me feel a bit bad is that everybody has fixed versions by
>>> now,
>>> only we enterprise Linux users using the ESR version still don't have
>>> fixed versions available. I don't complain because we usually get very
>>> fast updates, but this time we seem stuck. I can live with it but it's a
>>> bit difficult to explain to our users.
>>>
>>> Did upstream already release new packages?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Simon
>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>>>
>>>> Nux!
>>>> www.nux.ro
>>>>
>>>> - Original Message -
>>>>> From: "CentOS mailing list" 
>>>>> To: "CentOS mailing list" 
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, 8 May, 2019 16:50:20
>>>>> Subject: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage
>>>>
>>>>> Hi everyone, I use firefox on centos 7 at work but due to the fairly
>>>>> well know
>>>>> extension signing problem, I cannot use ublock origin.
>>>>>
>>>>> From what I can tell, the latest version of firefox in the updates
>>>>> repository is
>>>>> 60.6.1-1.el7.
>>>>> It looks like Mozilla have just released firefox esr 60.6.2 which
>>>>> should
>>>>> fix the
>>>>> signing issue.
>>>>> (see https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/60.6.2/releasenotes/)
>>>>>
>>>>> Would it be possible for someone to pass this message on to someone
>>>>> who
>>>>> can
>>>>> package this, so that users like me can update?
>>>>> ___
>>>>> CentOS mailing list
>>>>> CentOS@centos.org
>>>>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>>> ___
>>>> CentOS mailing list
>>>> CentOS@centos.org
>>>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> CentOS mailing list
>>> CentOS@centos.org
>>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage

2019-05-09 Thread Nux!
The price we pay.. :)

BTW, Mozilla publishes tarballs that you can simply extract and run (and will 
self-update), you can use those (it's what I am doing as a workaround in fact 
until RH catches up):
https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/60.6.3esr/linux-x86_64/

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "CentOS mailing list" 
> To: "CentOS mailing list" 
> Sent: Wednesday, 8 May, 2019 17:24:57
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage

>> I was told lately about this workaround, check it out.
>> https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2019/05/04/update-regarding-add-ons-in-firefox/
> 
> The signing thing is a security feature. I don't like a workaround to
> disable a security feature instead of fixing it.
> 
> What makes me feel a bit bad is that everybody has fixed versions by now,
> only we enterprise Linux users using the ESR version still don't have
> fixed versions available. I don't complain because we usually get very
> fast updates, but this time we seem stuck. I can live with it but it's a
> bit difficult to explain to our users.
> 
> Did upstream already release new packages?
> 
> Regards,
> Simon
> 
>>
>> --
>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>
>> Nux!
>> www.nux.ro
>>
>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "CentOS mailing list" 
>>> To: "CentOS mailing list" 
>>> Sent: Wednesday, 8 May, 2019 16:50:20
>>> Subject: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage
>>
>>> Hi everyone, I use firefox on centos 7 at work but due to the fairly
>>> well know
>>> extension signing problem, I cannot use ublock origin.
>>>
>>> From what I can tell, the latest version of firefox in the updates
>>> repository is
>>> 60.6.1-1.el7.
>>> It looks like Mozilla have just released firefox esr 60.6.2 which should
>>> fix the
>>> signing issue.
>>> (see https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/60.6.2/releasenotes/)
>>>
>>> Would it be possible for someone to pass this message on to someone who
>>> can
>>> package this, so that users like me can update?
>>> ___
>>> CentOS mailing list
>>> CentOS@centos.org
>>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>> ___
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>
> 
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage

2019-05-08 Thread Nux!
I was told lately about this workaround, check it out.
https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2019/05/04/update-regarding-add-ons-in-firefox/

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "CentOS mailing list" 
> To: "CentOS mailing list" 
> Sent: Wednesday, 8 May, 2019 16:50:20
> Subject: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage

> Hi everyone, I use firefox on centos 7 at work but due to the fairly well know
> extension signing problem, I cannot use ublock origin.
> 
> From what I can tell, the latest version of firefox in the updates repository 
> is
> 60.6.1-1.el7.
> It looks like Mozilla have just released firefox esr 60.6.2 which should fix 
> the
> signing issue.
> (see https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/60.6.2/releasenotes/)
> 
> Would it be possible for someone to pass this message on to someone who can
> package this, so that users like me can update?
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] youtube-dl No module named 'pkg_resources'

2019-05-08 Thread Nux!
How did you install it?

I'm using their binary and it works great, just tested it. 

https://ytdl-org.github.io/youtube-dl/download.html

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Michael Hennebry" 
> To: "CentOS mailing list" 
> Sent: Wednesday, 8 May, 2019 03:55:12
> Subject: [CentOS] youtube-dl No module named 'pkg_resources'

> youtube-dl doesn't work for me after a recent update.
> I do not use it often, so do not know whether the update matters.
> It gives the error message:
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "/usr/bin/youtube-dl", line 6, in 
> from pkg_resources import load_entry_point
> ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pkg_resources'
> 
> I've tried reinstalling python-setuptools,
> installing python34-setuptools and reinstalling youtube-dl .
> 
> I'm aware there is a bugzilla on it.
> That and stackoverflow are where I got the ideas above.
> 
> How do I make youtube-dl work on Centos 7?
> 
> --
> Michael   henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu
> "Sorry but your password must contain an uppercase letter, a number,
> a haiku, a gang sign, a heiroglyph, and the blood of a virgin."
>  --  someeecards
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Intel Vroc experiences?

2019-04-23 Thread Nux!
Hi,

Has anyone had any experience with Intel Vroc[1]? I'm possibly having to deal 
with a new server with such technology and can't find much (real world) 
information about it.
Looking at the specs it's basically a glorified fake raid which usually turns 
on my alarm bells. Has anyone done any testing, how does it compare with "real" 
raid or software raid?

Cheers,
Lucian

[1] - 
https://www.intel.co.uk/content/www/uk/en/support/articles/24498/memory-and-storage/ssd-software.html

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] parallel not found!

2019-04-10 Thread Nux!
Parallel is in EPEL repo, you should disable that 3rd party repo from OpenSuse 
and try again.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Nikos Gatsis - Qbit" 
> To: "CentOS mailing list" 
> Sent: Wednesday, 10 April, 2019 12:17:05
> Subject: [CentOS] parallel not found!

> Hello list.
> 
> I'm trying to yum update my Centos 7 and have problem to update parallel.
> 
> Is like file is missing:
> 
> parallel-20190322-3.2.noarch.r FAILED
> http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home%3A/tange/CentOS_7/noarch/parallel-20190322-3.2.noarch.rpm:
> [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404 - Not Found-:-- ETA
> Trying other mirror.
> 
> Did i miss something?
> 
> Thank you in advance.
> 
> Nikos.
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Short or long hostname ?

2019-04-10 Thread Nux!
How I do it ( and always done it):

hostnamectl set-hostname foobar.localdomain

echo 127.0.0.1 foobar.localdomain foobar >> /etc/hosts
echo ::1 foobar.localdomain foobar >> /etc/hosts

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Nicolas Kovacs" 
> To: "CentOS mailing list" 
> Sent: Wednesday, 10 April, 2019 08:21:11
> Subject: [CentOS] Short or long hostname ?

> Hi,
> 
> For the last ten years or so, I've defined the short hostname in
> /etc/hostname and the FQDN in /etc/hosts. Now I wanted to double-check
> this information, which eventually led me to this page:
> 
>  *
> https://serverfault.com/questions/331936/setting-the-hostname-fqdn-or-short-name
> 
> Now I admit I'm even more confused than before.
> 
> Is there some reliable piece of information on this subject for CentOS ?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Niki
> --
> Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables
> 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
> Site : https://www.microlinux.fr
> Mail : i...@microlinux.fr
> Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32
> Mob. : 06 51 80 12 12
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] http error when updating 7.5 ==> 7.6

2019-03-26 Thread Nux!
Nothing against removing drpms. Nuke them.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "johnny" 
> To: "CentOS mailing list" 
> Sent: Monday, 25 March, 2019 12:32:33
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] http error when updating 7.5 ==> 7.6

> On 3/25/19 6:37 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 3/23/19 9:19 AM, Bez Thomas wrote:
>>>> On Mar 22, 2019, at 9:52 PM, Fred Smith  
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Was just doing a (very) belated update on a 7.5 system and ran into
>>>> this set of errors:
>>>>
>>>
>>>> Some delta RPMs failed to download or rebuild. Retrying..
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> so, anybody know why we're getting the 416 error from yum but not from
>>>> firefox?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Fred,
>>>
>>> Ran into this yesterday. It seems to be a delta rpm problem.
>>> Firefox is working because it’s downloading the whole rpm, avoiding the 
>>> issue.
>>>
>>> setting
>>> deltarpm=0
>>> in /etc/yum.conf is an equivalent workaround, and fixed the issue for me.
>>>
>>> I’d appreciate someone who knows more about how delta rpms work weighing in 
>>> on
>>> what the actual issue is.
>>>
>> 
>> Not sure what happened with the drpms, but I will regenerate all the
>> polkit drpms with the upcoming ghostscript release later this morning.
>> 
>> I added drpm tests to our pre-release CI tests as well.
>> 
> 
> This is not the first time we have had issues with drpms in the update tree.
> 
> Would anyone be opposed to taking away deltarpms from the repositories?
> 
> They take up lots of space and they have cause multiple issues in the past.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Spamassassin + Postfix : delete spam mail on the server ?

2018-12-19 Thread Nux!
Absolutely, never reject spam at MTA level!

Usually I put it in a spam folder, then add a cronjob that deletes messages 
older than 6 months, ymmv.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "CentOS mailing list" 
> To: "CentOS mailing list" 
> Sent: Wednesday, 19 December, 2018 04:59:21
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Spamassassin + Postfix : delete spam mail on the server 
> ?

>> Am 18.12.2018 um 08:08 schrieb Nicolas Kovacs:
>>> The problem with this setup is that spam mail is still delivered, and I
>>> need Thunderbird's filters to weed out incoming mail. And when I'm using
>>> my webmail (running SquirrelMail), my inbox is a tsunami of unread
>>> [SPAM] messages.
>>>
>>> So I'd like to go a step further and delete all messages flagged [SPAM]
>>> directly on the server. It doesn't look like Spamassassin provides this
>>> functionality.
>>
>> What's the point of delivering identified SPAM and then deleting it?
>> Reject SPAM at SMTP level on your MTA. Easy to do with amavisd-new in a
>> smtp proxy setup with Postfix.
> 
> There are good reasons to not reject detected SPAM because your SPAM
> filter could be wrong and you reject legitimate mail.
> 
> For businesses depending on email communication that's a no go, because
> you may lose customers that way.
> 
> Regards,
> Simon
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Spamassassin + Postfix : delete spam mail on the server ?

2018-12-18 Thread Nux!
Hi,

Procmail, it can move messages around based on many rules.
Use something like this in postfix main.cf:
mailbox_command = /usr/bin/procmail-wrapper -o -a $DOMAIN -d $LOGNAME

And something like this in /etc/procmailrc or $HOME/.procmailrc

SPAMDIR=$HOME/Maildir/.Spam/
:0fw
| /usr/bin/spamc
:0
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
$SPAMDIR
DEFAULT=$HOME/Maildir/
ORGMAIL=$HOME/Maildir/
DROPPRIVS=yes


HTH

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Nicolas Kovacs" 
> To: "CentOS mailing list" 
> Cc: "scholae >> AA Tous les salariés" 
> Sent: Tuesday, 18 December, 2018 07:08:55
> Subject: [CentOS] Spamassassin + Postfix : delete spam mail on the server ?

> Hi,
> 
> My mail server is running on CentOS 7 with Postfix, Dovecot and
> Spamassassin. I get quite a lot of spam on a few accounts, and
> Spamassassin does its job fine. Spam mail is identified correctly, and
> it looks like there are no false positives, e. g. valid mail is never
> identified as spam.
> 
> When a message is flagged as spam, the subject line is rewritten to
> begin with [SPAM]. Then, a filter in Mozilla Thunderbird is setup, and
> when a subject line begins with [SPAM] the message is directly sent to
> Trash.
> 
> I've documented the whole configuration here:
> 
>  * https://blog.microlinux.fr/spamassassin-centos/
> 
> The problem with this setup is that spam mail is still delivered, and I
> need Thunderbird's filters to weed out incoming mail. And when I'm using
> my webmail (running SquirrelMail), my inbox is a tsunami of unread
> [SPAM] messages.
> 
> So I'd like to go a step further and delete all messages flagged [SPAM]
> directly on the server. It doesn't look like Spamassassin provides this
> functionality.
> 
> Did any of you guys succeed in doing this anyway?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Niki
> 
> 
> --
> Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables
> 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
> Site : https://www.microlinux.fr
> Blog : https://blog.microlinux.fr
> Mail : i...@microlinux.fr
> Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] Announcing release of PHP 7.2

2018-12-11 Thread Nux!
Thanks, Jan!

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Jan Staněk" 
> To: centos-annou...@centos.org
> Sent: Tuesday, 11 December, 2018 15:23:26
> Subject: [CentOS-announce] Announcing release of PHP 7.2

> I am pleased to announce the immediate availability of PHP
> in version 7.2 on CentOS Linux 7 x86_64,
> delivered via a Software Collection (SCL) built by the SCLo Special
> Interest Group (https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/SCLo).
> 
> QuickStart
> --
> You can get started in three easy steps:
> 
>  # 1. Install a package with repository for your system:
>  $ sudo yum install centos-release-scl
> 
>  # 2. Install the collection:
>  $ sudo yum install rh-php72
> 
>  # 3. Start using the software collection:
>  $ scl enable rh-php72 bash
> 
> At this point you should be able to use php
> just as a normal application. Examples of commands run might be:
> 
>  $ sudo systemctl start rh-php72-php-fpm
>  $ php my-app.php
>  $ sudo yum install rh-php72-php-devel
>  $ sudo yum install libxml2-devel
>  $ sudo pear install Cache_Lite
>  $ sudo pecl install xmldiff
> 
> 
> More information about this collection can be found at
> https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/rhscl/rh-php72/
> 
> This collections is CentOS-based rebuild built by SCLo SIG community,
> and the packages have been available in Red Hat Software Collections 3.2
> for RHEL:
> 
> https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_software_collections/3/html/3.2_release_notes/
> 
> So, for RHEL-based builds, follow the steps in the documentation above.
> 
> About Software Collections
> --
> Software Collections give you the power to build, install, and use
> multiple versions of software on the same system, without affecting
> system-wide installed packages. Each collection is delivered as a group
> of RPMs, with the grouping being done using the name of the collection
> as a prefix of all packages that are part of the software collection.
> 
> The SCLo SIG in CentOS
> --
> The Software Collections SIG group is an open community group
> co-ordinating the development of the SCL technology, and helping curate
> a reference set of collections. In addition to the collection NodeJS
> being released here, we also build and deliver databases, web servers,
> and language stacks including multiple versions of PostgreSQL, MariaDB,
> Apache HTTP Server, Python, Ruby, Ruby on Rails and others.
> 
> You can learn more about Software Collections concepts at:
> https://softwarecollections.org
> You can find information on the SIG at
> https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/SCLo ;
> this includes how to get involved and help with the effort.
> 
> Enjoy!
> --
> Jan Stanek
> Associate Software Engineer, Brno
> Red Hat Czech
> jsta...@redhat.comIM: jstanek
> 
> 
> ___
> CentOS-announce mailing list
> centos-annou...@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] C 7 installation annoyances

2018-10-16 Thread Nux!
The EL7 partitioner is a complete disaster and I regularly bitch about it on 
twitter and irc.
You could try to convince it with kickstart and bypass the GUI altogether.
Another option is to boot in a Live CD and do you partitioning from there 
either manually or via Gparted and hope these changes will be picked up by the 
EL7 installer so you can just use them as they are.

hth

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "mark" 
> To: "CentOS mailing list" 
> Sent: Monday, 15 October, 2018 21:22:57
> Subject: [CentOS] C 7 installation annoyances

> In the disk partitioner, I can't
>  1) choose to make the LVM with root and swap be on a RAID 1. Is there
>some way to do that, rather than two separate partitions RAIDed?
>  2) They don't align, so I can't clone /dev/sda to /dev/sdb as a
>failover (for /boot and /boot/efi). I've created those two, manually,
>and nope, it wiped them out, so I can't clone those two.
> 
> Any solutions for either of these? I don't have hardware RAID card on this
> box.
> 
> mark
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] NetworkManager and multiple dhcp router option

2018-09-28 Thread Nux!
Hello,

Our DHCP server broadcasts a router option consisting of 2 IPs.
Ideally they should both be set as default routes with different metrics, 
however this is not what is happening, only the first one gets used.
Anyone has any tips how to convince NetworkManager to do this?

Cheers

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Which is better? Microsoft Exchange 2016 or Linux-based SMTP Servers?

2018-07-18 Thread Nux!
If you find setting up a linux based smtp server "extremely difficult", then 
you have probably answered your own question already.
Stick to what you know.

hth

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming" 
> To: "CentOS mailing list" 
> Sent: Wednesday, 18 July, 2018 16:04:52
> Subject: [CentOS] Which is better? Microsoft Exchange 2016 or Linux-based 
> SMTP Servers?

> Good evening from Singapore,
> 
> I am torn between deploying Microsoft Exchange 2016 and Linux-based
> SMTP servers like sendmail, postfix, qmail and exim.
> 
> Relative ease of installation and configuration is an important
> consideration factor.
> 
> Microsoft Exchange 2016, Domain Controller, and Active Directory are
> relatively easy to install and configure. Linux-based SMTP servers are
> extremely difficult to install and configure and of course, extremely
> time-consuming.
> 
> One of the features of Microsoft Exchange 2016 is that you can create
> additional folders on your Inbox in the server (server-side). Can
> Linux-based SMTP servers do that?
> 
> Does Exchange 2016 offer more user-friendly features or Linux-based
> SMTP servers?
> 
> Besides the above considerations, how about security? Traditionally,
> Linux is far more secure than Windows.
> 
> Judging by security, Linux-based SMTP servers ought to have a higher 
> percentage
> of the market share?
> 
> Finally, I can only use Windows Server 2016 Standard Evaluation Copy FREE for 
> a
> period of 3 years MAXIMUM. But I can use Linux servers and Mail Transport
> Agents (MTA) FREE perpetually.
> 
> Please advise.
> 
> Thank you very much.
> 
> 
> 
> ===BEGIN SIGNATURE===
> 
> Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming's Academic Qualifications as at 30 Oct 2017
> 
> [1] https://tdtemcerts.wordpress.com/
> 
> <https://tdtemcerts.wordpress.com/> [2] http://tdtemcerts.blogspot.sg/
> 
> <http://tdtemcerts.blogspot.sg/> [3]
> https://www.scribd.com/user/270125049/Teo-En-Ming
> 
> <https://www.scribd.com/user/270125049/Teo-En-Ming> ===END SIGNATURE===
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] ZFS on Linux repository

2018-07-03 Thread Nux!
Watch out, ZFS on Linux is not as good as on FreeBSD/Solaris.
Just recently there was an issue with data loss.
https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/issues/7401

hth
Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Gionatan Danti" 
> To: "CentOS mailing list" 
> Sent: Monday, 25 June, 2018 22:19:22
> Subject: [CentOS] ZFS on Linux repository

> Hi list,
> we all know why ZFS is not included in RHEL/CentOS distributions: its
> CDDL license is/seems not compatible with GPL license.
> 
> I'm not a layer, and I do not have any strong opinion on the matter.
> However, as a sysadmin, I found ZFS to be extremely useful, especially
> considering BTRFS sad state. I would *really* love to have ZFS on Linux
> more intergrated with current CentOS.
> 
> From what I know (and I can go wrong, obviously), while the incompatible
> licenses prevent CentOS from shipping it, nothing should prevent to have
> a package for enabling *its repository*, better yet the kmod-enabled
> one. I was thiking to something as a ZFS SIG, where we can simply issue
> "yum install zfs-sig" and have the correct kmod-enabled repository
> enabled.
> 
> I searched the list but I did not found anything regarding native ZFS.
> Any feedback on the matter is welcomed. Thanks.
> 
> --
> Danti Gionatan
> Supporto Tecnico
> Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it
> email: g.da...@assyoma.it - i...@assyoma.it
> GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Clone a custom CentOS 7 desktop using G4L over FTP

2018-05-28 Thread Nux!
Hello,

If that G4L is anything like dd then the UUIDs should have been preserved and 
GRUB should have worked.
If that didn't work then G4L is doing its own thing.

What you could do is perhaps set some LABELs in the original install on the 
partitions (see tune2fs), set GRUB and /etc/fstab to reference them, then if 
possible tell G4L to set those labels on the partitions after restore. You 
could of course keep using UUIDs, but that would be messier, LABELs are more 
human friendly.

You can also go back to using /dev/sdX, just as with LABELs above, but that can 
break under certain conditions and it's no longer recommended.

To obtain unique installations from a template you should at least:
- as you mentioned nuke the udev persistent rules
- delete the ssh keys in /etc/ssh (they will be regenerated)
- remove /var/lib/systemd/random-seed (affects system entropy, important for 
crypto, it gets regenerated)
- remove HWADDR and UUID entries from ifcfg files
- remove log files from /var/log 
- do a "yum clean all"
- remove bash history
- remove leftover install files from /root (log and cfg)
- maybe relabel the filesystem with Selinux (touch /.autorelabel before 
powering off template)

There could be more you can do. Much of this can be put in a kickstart file 
actually and use that with PXE and a local mirror instead of G4L.. :-)
I do that for my cloud templates, e.g. 
http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/config/centos/centos7-kvm.cfg

hth

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Nicolas Kovacs" <i...@microlinux.fr>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Cc: "Jean Mortreux" <jean.mortr...@scholae.fr>
> Sent: Friday, 25 May, 2018 05:45:04
> Subject: [CentOS] Clone a custom CentOS 7 desktop using G4L over FTP

> Hi,
> 
> A couple months ago, I migrated our local school (two servers, 20
> desktop clients) from Slackware 14.1 to CentOS 7. The desktop clients
> are running a customized lightweight desktop based on Xfce:
> 
> https://blog.microlinux.fr/poste-de-travail-xfce-centos-7/
> 
> Home directories are all on the server, and authentication is
> centralized. Everything works fine so far.
> 
> With Slackware I had found a neat trick to install the desktop clients.
> First I installed and configured one single client PC from start to
> finish. The I zeroed all the unused sectors on the disk, using something
> like this:
> 
>  # dd if=/dev/zero of=/0bits bs=20M ; rm -f /0bits
> 
> Then I sent the disk image to a local FTP server using G4L (Ghost4Linux).
> 
> On all the other desktops PCs, I could then "import" the G4L image, and
> the system was ready to use.
> 
> Under Slackware, the only thing I had to make sure was to remove the one
> bit of hardcoded system information before uploading the image:
> 
>  # rm /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules
> 
> Now I tried to do this with CentOS, but I failed miserably. The system
> wouldn't even start, since GRUB uses UUIDs and not /dev/sdX like
> Slackware's bone-headed LILO boot manager.
> 
> So here's my question to the guru admins on this list. On a standard
> CentOS desktop, what would I have to tweak in order to be able to clone
> my system bit for bit, as is ?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Niki
> 
> --
> Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables
> 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
> Site : https://www.microlinux.fr
> Blog : https://blog.microlinux.fr
> Mail : i...@microlinux.fr
> Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Vsftpd vs. iptables firewall script

2018-05-23 Thread Nux!
Hi,

Try "iptables -I INPUT" for your FTP rule.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Nicolas Kovacs" <i...@microlinux.fr>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, 23 May, 2018 15:24:45
> Subject: [CentOS] Vsftpd vs. iptables firewall script

> Hi,
> 
> I'm currently setting up a local FTP server, to receive disk images sent
> with G4L (Ghost4Linux).
> 
> This server has been running Slackware Linux before, and the Vsftpd
> setup was relatively simple.
> 
> With CentOS things seem to be slightly different, so I'm currently
> trying to work things out. For the moment, two things seem to be
> creating problems, the simple iptables firewall and SELinux.
> 
> When I disable the firewall and SELinux, Vsftp works as expected. So far
> so good.
> 
> Now let's tackle this one dragon at a time. First the firewall. I'm
> starting with a very simple firewall script that looks somewhat like
> this. I'm linking to the template, I won't copy/paste the whole thing here.
> 
> https://github.com/kikinovak/centos-7-server-lan/blob/master/config/firewall/firewall-standalone.sh
> 
> Under Slackware, the iptables rule for a local FTP server looked like this:
> 
>  modprobe ip_conntrack
>  iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -i $IFACE_LAN --dport 21 -j ACCEPT
> 
> I tried this, but to no avail. Can't connect to my server. I googled a
> bit, and I found out that there seem to be quite many different answers
> about the subject of "how do I configure my firewall for Vsftpd".
> 
> Any suggestions ?
> 
> Niki
> 
> --
> Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables
> 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
> Site : https://www.microlinux.fr
> Blog : https://blog.microlinux.fr
> Mail : i...@microlinux.fr
> Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Use EPEL without redirection ?

2018-05-22 Thread Nux!
Edit the epel.repo file and comment mirrorlist, uncomment baseurl and replace 
with a url of your choice.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Nicolas Kovacs" <i...@microlinux.fr>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, 22 May, 2018 09:35:11
> Subject: [CentOS] Use EPEL without redirection ?

> Hi,
> 
> Is there any way to deactivate the redirection to a mirror when using
> the third-party EPEL repository ?
> 
> Our network uses a transparent HTTP/HTTPS proxy with a local AC. We can
> create exceptions for sites like centos.org or
> download.fedoraproject.org, but whenever we want to install a package
> from EPEL, the mirror redirection causes an error due to redirection.
> 
> Any suggestions ?
> 
> Niki
> --
> Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables
> 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
> Site : https://www.microlinux.fr
> Blog : https://blog.microlinux.fr
> Mail : i...@microlinux.fr
> Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] How to build nss-util.i686 on Centos 7 with mock

2018-05-17 Thread Nux!
Hi Martin,

You need to build a "epel-7-i386" mock profile and use that. Now I call it 
"epel" so it resembles the default profile, but there is no EPEL 32bit for EL7.

There is a 32bit CentOS 7 tree here http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/os/i386/

If there are deps required and are not there you'll need to backport them from 
Fedora I guess.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Martin Vogt" <martin.v...@itwm.fraunhofer.de>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Thursday, 17 May, 2018 15:26:17
> Subject: [CentOS] How to build nss-util.i686 on Centos 7 with mock

> Hello list,
> 
> I'm currently trying to build the i686 version of
> 
> http://vault.centos.org/7.5.1804/os/Source/SPackages/nss-util-3.34.0-2.el7.src.rpm
> 
> The x86_86 version works with mock, but I cannot figure out
> how to build the i686 version.
> 
> best regards,
> 
> Martin
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Issue with private mirror

2018-05-15 Thread Nux!
Hi,

To me it looks like you are getting incomplete content from your rsync source. 
Try to sync from another mirror.

hth

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Eric Germann" <ekgerm...@semperen.com>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, 15 May, 2018 12:58:21
> Subject: [CentOS] Issue with private mirror

> Hello all, long time lurker, first time poster.
> 
> I have a situation that has been confounding me for the better part of a week.
> 
> I run an internal mirror of a Centos mirror, mainly because I have lots of 
> hosts
> and low bandwidth.
> 
> For my 7.x hosts, since 7.5.1804 was released, when I do a “yum update”, I get
> the following errors on a number of files.
> 
> "Package does not match intended download. Suggestion: run yum 
> --enablerepo=base
> clean metadata”
> 
> I’ve done that.
> 
> I’ve done “yum clean all”.  I’ve done “yum clean all && rm -rf /var/cacheyum”
> 
> I’ve blown away the 7.5.1804 tree in my mirror and resync’d it and it still 
> does
> it.
> 
> If I change the 7 -> 7.5.1804 symlink to 7.4, yum update runs fine.
> 
> I’m confounded.
> 
> How can I check the repo data files on my copy against the tree to see where 
> or
> if it’s blowing up.
> 
> Oddly, if I point the host I’m updating at the SAME server I’m mirroring from
> and do a yum update, it works fine.  Using rsync to update.
> 
> Out of Ideas,
> 
> EKG
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Wich is best for backup? nfs of iscsi?

2018-04-14 Thread Nux!
Yes, you can.

Use XFS on top of that as it has dynamic inode allocation and can be expanded 
live (but not shrinked).

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro


> Can i create a nfs partition with lvm and in future extend the partition
> with another hd i.e?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 + MariaDB + phpMyAdmin

2018-04-09 Thread Nux!
Hello,

You should contact your control panel supplier as they are known to heavily 
modify the stock settings and packages and are not really supported here.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Frank M. Ramaekers" <framaek...@ailife.com>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Sunday, 8 April, 2018 04:12:57
> Subject: [CentOS] CentOS 7 + MariaDB + phpMyAdmin

> I can't seem to get phpMyAdmin working.  I got the ip address problem
> (permission) resolved, but now I'm getting a "Parallels H-Sphere" error "Error
> 404: File Not found".  I've looked in all the logs and cannot determine what
> file is not found.
> 
> Frank M. Ramaekers Jr. | Systems Programmer | Information Technology | 
> American
> Income Life Insurance Company | 254-761-6649 (732-6649)
> 
> --
> This message contains information which is privileged and confidential and is
> solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended
> recipient, be aware that any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, or use
> of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received
> this in error, please destroy it immediately and notify us at
> privacy...@torchmarkcorp.com.
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Squid vs. iptables redirection: exception for certain domains ?

2018-03-12 Thread Nux!
Hi,

Another idea - but this gets complicated and with that, prone to faults - use a 
simple shell script to resolve the desired domains and keep their IPs in an 
ipset, then use the ipset in your firewall rules, this way you can keep your 
iptables rules static, your squid config static and simply add or remove IPs 
from the ipset.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Nicolas Kovacs" <i...@microlinux.fr>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Sunday, 11 March, 2018 12:18:06
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Squid vs. iptables redirection: exception for certain 
> domains ?

> Le 11/03/2018 à 13:09, Leon Fauster a écrit :
>> It is not a good practice to place domain names into iptables rules. Define
>> a custom table, place this table into your rule list (to stick at the right
>> place) and feed that table with the resolved domain names. This can be 
>> altered
>> while running in the case of changes (check resolving results periodically).
> 
> I admit I've never worked with custom tables, so I don't know how to do
> this.
> 
> In the meantime, I found the following working solution.
> 
> # Exceptions
> EXCEPTIONS=$(egrep -v '(^\#)|(^\s+$)' /usr/local/sbin/no-proxy.txt)
> for EXCEPTION in $EXCEPTIONS; do
>  $IPT -A PREROUTING -t nat -i $IFACE_LAN -d $EXCEPTION -j ACCEPT
> done
> 
> # Squid
> $IPT -A INPUT -p tcp -i $IFACE_LAN --dport 3128 -j ACCEPT
> $IPT -A INPUT -p udp -i $IFACE_LAN --dport 3128 -j ACCEPT
> $IPT -A PREROUTING -t nat -i $IFACE_LAN -p tcp ! -d $SERVER_IP \
>  --dport 80 -j REDIRECT --to-port 3128
> $IPT -A INPUT -p tcp -i $IFACE_LAN --dport 3129 -j ACCEPT
> $IPT -A INPUT -p udp -i $IFACE_LAN --dport 3129 -j ACCEPT
> $IPT -A PREROUTING -t nat -i $IFACE_LAN -p tcp ! -d $SERVER_IP \
>  --dport 443 -j REDIRECT --to-port 3129
> $IPT -A INPUT -p tcp -i $IFACE_LAN --dport 3130 -j ACCEPT
> $IPT -A INPUT -p udp -i $IFACE_LAN --dport 3130 -j ACCEPT
> 
> And my no-proxy.txt file looks like this:
> 
> # Ne pas utiliser le proxy pour les domaines suivants
> #
> # Crédit Agricole
> www.credit-agricole.fr
> # Crédit Coopératif
> www.credit-cooperatif.coop
> # Github
> github.com
> # Microlinux
> microlinux.fr
> microlinux.eu
> # Squid
> squid-cache.org
> # Thunderbird
> start.thunderbird.net
> 
> Note that I can put either domain names or IP addresses in this file.
> 
> And it's only supposed to keep a list of a handful of URLs that don't
> play well with a transparent Squid for HTTPS.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Niki
> 
> 
> --
> Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables
> 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
> Site : https://www.microlinux.fr
> Blog : https://blog.microlinux.fr
> Mail : i...@microlinux.fr
> Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Squid and HTTPS interception on CentOS 7 ?

2018-03-05 Thread Nux!
Nice, thanks for sharing.

You could probably just drop your CA cert in the filesystem and run a couple of 
commands to get it imported, rather than having to import the CA in the 
browsers individually. 
You could probably deliver it via yum/rpm or better yet, ansible or even some 
shell script.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Nicolas Kovacs" <i...@microlinux.fr>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Monday, 5 March, 2018 12:04:59
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Squid and HTTPS interception on CentOS 7 ?

> Le 28/02/2018 à 22:23, Nicolas Kovacs a écrit :
>> So far, I've only been able to filter HTTP.
>> 
>> Do any of you do transparent HTTPS filtering ? Any suggestions,
>> advice, caveats, do's and don'ts ?
> 
> After a week of trial and error, transparent HTTPS filtering works
> perfectly. I wrote a detailed blog article about it.
> 
> https://blog.microlinux.fr/squid-https-centos/
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Niki
> 
> --
> Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables
> 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
> Site : https://www.microlinux.fr
> Blog : https://blog.microlinux.fr
> Mail : i...@microlinux.fr
> Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Any alternatives for the horrible reposync

2018-02-27 Thread Nux!
Try rsync where possible, lftp (mirror feature) where not (that's what I do).

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Dennis Jacobfeuerborn" <denni...@conversis.de>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, 27 February, 2018 11:11:29
> Subject: [CentOS] Any alternatives for the horrible reposync

> Hi,
> I'm currently trying to mirror a couple of yum repositories and the only
> tool that seems to be available for this is reposync.
> Unfortunately reposync for some inexplicable reason seems to use the yum
> config of the local system as a basis for its work which makes no sense
> and creates all kinds of problems where cache directories and metadata
> gets mixed up.
> Are there any alternatives? Some repos support rsync but not all of them
> so I'm looking for something that works for all repos.
> 
> Regards,
>  Dennis
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Cisco AnyConnect Mobility Client for 32- bit CentOS 6

2018-02-22 Thread Nux!
Install the excellent openconnect client from EPEL, I think there is also a 
NetworkManager plugin for it so you can use a UI, though the cli is not too bad.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "H" <age...@meddatainc.com>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Thursday, 22 February, 2018 02:35:33
> Subject: [CentOS] Cisco AnyConnect Mobility Client for 32- bit CentOS 6

> I have the above installed on a couple of 64-bit systems, both CentOS 6 and
> CentOS 7, where the client works fine.
> 
> Now, however, I have installed the 32-bit version of CentOS 6 on a netbook 
> but I
> cannot get the Cisco website installer to recognize the computer/operating
> system, not even displaying any error message.
> 
> Does anyone have the client running on a 32-bit system? I have been told it
> should run on a 32-bit system and did have it running on the same netbook 
> while
> it was still running Vista Home edition, another 32-bit operating system.
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] OT: configuring xming to know putty's not in a std. location

2018-02-08 Thread Nux!
+1 Mobaxterm, X11 and SFTP support out of the box, also you get a nice bash 
terminal with it and some extra cygwin based goodies.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "J Martin Rushton" <martinrushto...@btinternet.com>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, 7 February, 2018 23:15:50
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: configuring xming to know putty's not in a std. 
> location

> On 07/02/18 22:58, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Pete Biggs wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2018-02-07 at 14:45 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>>> Is there some way to do this? I've got the current putty (actually,
>>>> putty-cac), pageant, and plink in my user's Downlods directory - neither
>>>> he nor I have admin authority on his laptop, and Desktop support's
>>>> teleworking today - but I can't seem to find a way to configure xming to
>>>> look there for putty.
>>>>
>>>> Or is it start putty, *then* start xming?
>>>>
>>>
>>> No start xming in passive mode (I don't know xming so don't know how to
>>> do that - you just want to start the xserver and not have it start any
>>> applications on the remote machine).
>>>
>>> Start putty with X11 forwarding turned on and connect.
>>>
>>> You should now be able to start X programs.
>>>
>>> The important thing is that the server needs to be started before
>>> initiating the connection so that a display can be assigned.
>> 
>> Thank you! That did it. He's happy.
>>>
>>> Can I suggest an alternative though. I've started using MobaXterm
>>> recently and I'm quite impressed: X11 server, SSH/putty client built
>>> in, GL capable etc.  Home use is free.
>> 
>> I can look at it, but this is what he knows, and he's too busy to try
>> something else. Hell, he's just pushed me updating and rebooting his
>> at-work CentOS workstation until next week, and I have a job to keep them
>> going, not for my convenience. 
>> 
>>mark
>> 
>> ___
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>> 
> I'd second Moba as a solution to contacting a Linux server from a Win
> box.  https://mobaxterm.mobatek.net/ states that "You can download and
> use MobaXterm Home Edition for free. If you want to use it inside your
> company, you should consider subscribing to MobaXterm Professional
> Edition: this will give you access to much more features, professional
> support and "Customizer" software."  The keywords here are "should" and
> "consider".
> 
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Anyone using GQRX in Centos-7, for SDR ?

2018-02-03 Thread Nux!
Cool, thanks for testing. Packages moved to main repo.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Fred Smith" <fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Friday, 2 February, 2018 20:53:06
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Anyone using GQRX in Centos-7, for SDR ?

> On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 09:38:17AM +, Nux! wrote:
>> Is it a Realtek chipset?
> 
> yes it is.
> 
>> I've had problems with it on CentOS as the system will load up the DVB 
>> drivers
>> (for TV tuner) thus interfering with the SDR.
>> What worked for me is blacklisting them & reboot. Give it a try.
> 
> Ah, thanks, that's the trick. works now.
> 
>> 
>> cat /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist_rtl.conf
>> blacklist dvb_usb_rtl28xxu
>> blacklist rtl2832
>> blacklist rtl2830
>> 
>> BTW there's a new package at http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/tmp/gqrx7/ if you
>> care to test and confirm success so I can move it to the main repo.
> 
> I've installed it and it seems to be working fine (based on about 20
> minutes of use, and note that I"m not an expert yet).
> 
> thanks!
> 
>> Nux!
>> www.nux.ro
>> 
>> - Original Message -
>> > From: "Fred Smith" <fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us>
>> > To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
>> > Sent: Thursday, 1 February, 2018 22:38:09
>> > Subject: [CentOS] Anyone using GQRX in Centos-7, for SDR ?
>> 
>> > I gave myself a toy, one of those cheap USB Software Define Radios, and
>> > would like to use it on my C7 box. Having wasted some time on it, I gave
>> > up and installed Ubuntu on a USB HD so I can boot that to play with SDR.
>> > The Ubuntu GQRX installation is well documented and went off without a 
>> > hitch.
>> > but I just hate having to boot something else on my main box (partly 
>> > because
>> > it also runs a mailserver for my personal domain, partly because, well,
>> > I just want my box running CentOS, not Ubuntu.)
>> > 
>> > Searching through SDR info on line I see someone has documented installing
>> > all the bits for C6, but I suspect the process is different for C7.
>> > 
>> > BTW, I installed the various bits I could find from, er, I think some
>> > came from li.nux.ro, some perhaps from epel, on C7, but couldn't get
>> > them to properly function.
>> > 
>> > Worse, when the USB radio is unplugged from the system, it locks up hard.
>> > 
>> > then a few days ago, I  had been playing with it using the UBUNTU install,
>> > did a reboot and for kicks fired up the GQRX on Centos, and lo and behold
>> > it worked! I tried running it on Centos yesterday and it reverted to type,
>> > i.e., lock up hard. I suspect that Ubuntu is leaving some hardware in a
>> > state that allows it to work on a subsequent Centos boot (without 
>> > poweroff),
>> > but no clue what.
>> > 
>> > So, if anyone can point me to how  to use it on C7, I'd greatly appreciate 
>> > it.
>> > 
>> > thanks in advance!
>> > 
>> > Fred
>> > --
> 
> --
>  Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us -
>   I can do all things through Christ
>  who strengthens me.
> -- Philippians 4:13 
> ---
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Slightly OT : newsletters, mail formatting and netiquette

2018-02-02 Thread Nux!
Not only is it acceptable, but it has become the norm unfortunately.

If you do switch to HTML format, bare in mind it may have consequences on how 
other servers label you (or not) as SPAM, so do a few thorough test rounds.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Nicolas Kovacs" <i...@microlinux.fr>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Friday, 2 February, 2018 09:36:14
> Subject: [CentOS] Slightly OT : newsletters, mail formatting and netiquette

> Hi,
> 
> This question is not exactly CentOS-related strictly speaking, but here
> goes. I'm running a few newsletter servers for myself and a handful of
> clients on public CentOS servers with PHPList.
> 
> For the last twenty years or so I've followed the basic rule that mails
> should have no formatting whatsoever, only simple text. And now I wonder
> if that basic rule of netiquette also applies to newsletters.
> 
> I'm a subscriber to a series of tech-related newsletters, and I couldn't
> help but notice that they all seem to be HTML-formatted, even those from
> respectable hardcore geek groups.
> 
> So my somewhat naive question: is HTML formatting acceptable in
> newsletters?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Niki
> --
> Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables
> 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
> Site : https://www.microlinux.fr
> Blog : https://blog.microlinux.fr
> Mail : i...@microlinux.fr
> Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Anyone using GQRX in Centos-7, for SDR ?

2018-02-02 Thread Nux!
Is it a Realtek chipset?
I've had problems with it on CentOS as the system will load up the DVB drivers 
(for TV tuner) thus interfering with the SDR.
What worked for me is blacklisting them & reboot. Give it a try.

cat /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist_rtl.conf 
blacklist dvb_usb_rtl28xxu 
blacklist rtl2832 
blacklist rtl2830

BTW there's a new package at http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/tmp/gqrx7/ if you 
care to test and confirm success so I can move it to the main repo.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Fred Smith" <fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Thursday, 1 February, 2018 22:38:09
> Subject: [CentOS] Anyone using GQRX in Centos-7, for SDR ?

> I gave myself a toy, one of those cheap USB Software Define Radios, and
> would like to use it on my C7 box. Having wasted some time on it, I gave
> up and installed Ubuntu on a USB HD so I can boot that to play with SDR.
> The Ubuntu GQRX installation is well documented and went off without a hitch.
> but I just hate having to boot something else on my main box (partly because
> it also runs a mailserver for my personal domain, partly because, well,
> I just want my box running CentOS, not Ubuntu.)
> 
> Searching through SDR info on line I see someone has documented installing
> all the bits for C6, but I suspect the process is different for C7.
> 
> BTW, I installed the various bits I could find from, er, I think some
> came from li.nux.ro, some perhaps from epel, on C7, but couldn't get
> them to properly function.
> 
> Worse, when the USB radio is unplugged from the system, it locks up hard.
> 
> then a few days ago, I  had been playing with it using the UBUNTU install,
> did a reboot and for kicks fired up the GQRX on Centos, and lo and behold
> it worked! I tried running it on Centos yesterday and it reverted to type,
> i.e., lock up hard. I suspect that Ubuntu is leaving some hardware in a
> state that allows it to work on a subsequent Centos boot (without poweroff),
> but no clue what.
> 
> So, if anyone can point me to how  to use it on C7, I'd greatly appreciate it.
> 
> thanks in advance!
> 
> Fred
> --
>  Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us -
>   Show me your ways, O LORD, teach me your paths;
> Guide me in your truth and teach me,
> for you are God my Savior,
>And my hope is in you all day long.
> -- Psalm 25:4-5 (NIV) 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] How is initrd.img packed and compressed?

2018-01-31 Thread Nux!
Don't archive as lzma if you don't want lzma, remove the "--format=lzma" 
parameter.

hth
Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Mircea Husz" <mirceah...@yahoo.com>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, 31 January, 2018 16:51:20
> Subject: [CentOS] How is initrd.img packed and compressed?

> Hi,
> 
> In order to work around a known upstream bug I needed to add a udev
> rule to pxeboot initrd.img on CentOS 7.
> 
> The process is straightforward:
> 1 - extract the pxeboot initrd.img  to a new directory
> 2 - add the udev rule needed to fix the bug
> 3 - pack and compress it back in initrd.img format
> 
> The resulting updated image works, it fixes the upstream bug and life
> is good. But although it works, it's not
> the same format as the original initrd.img that ships with the distro.
> I would like to know the proper incantation
> used to package initrd.img
> 
> Now for the specifics. The original image: http://mirror.steadfast.net/
> centos/7.4.1708/os/x86_64/isolinux/initrd.img
> is extracted: /usr/lib/dracut/skipcpio  initrd.img | xzcat | cpio -i -d
> and after adding the needed udev rule, it gets packed and compressed as
> follows:
> 
> find . 2>/dev/null | cpio --quiet -c -o | xz -9
> --format=lzma >"~/patched-initrd.img"
> 
> Now for the difference. FIrst the original distro image:
> # file initrd.img
> initrd.img: xz compressed data
> 
> # file patched-initrd.img
> patched-initrd.img: LZMA compressed data, streamed
> Without the --format=lzma  flag it fails to boot.
> 
> Does anyone know how this is done properly ?
> 
> Thanks,
> -Mike
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] best centos server setup for graphics intensive kvm vms?

2018-01-24 Thread Nux!
Yes

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Morgan Read" <mst...@read.org.nz>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, 23 January, 2018 23:30:57
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] best centos server setup for graphics intensive kvm 
> vms?

> Hmm, So - I guess the best I can hope for is running the host as a full
> workstation GUI with kodi installed - forget about Libreelec - and then
> running the rest of appliances as VMs headless?
> 
> Many thanks for helping clear my thoughts on this.
> M
> 
> On 23/01/18 19:01, Nux! wrote:
>> Running a VM with something graphical on top of something else graphical is 
>> one
>> thing.
>> 
>> What you want is to dedicate the GPU to the Libreelec VM, so it displays
>> directly to the screen (gpu) so it can properly use hardware acceleration and
>> so on, but you can't do that without VT-d/AMD-Vi afaik.
>> 
>> --
>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>> 
>> Nux!
>> www.nux.ro
>> 
>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Morgan Read" <mst...@read.org.nz>
>>> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, 23 January, 2018 18:49:58
>>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] best centos server setup for graphics intensive kvm   
>>> vms?
>> 
>>> Thanks Nux for the follow up!
>>>
>>> On 22/01/18 08:54, Nux! wrote:
>>>> You'd need to run virt-manager GUI somehow to manage the VMs. If you run 
>>>> Fedora
>>>> already on another machine then you can just yum install it and use it from
>>>> there.
>>> That's what I figured - I already run an XP and W7 virt machines as well
>>> as sometimes RemixOS just for fun on my everyday machine and thought I
>>> could remote control.
>>>
>>>> You might run into a problem though with your Libreelec VM as you'd need to
>>>> enable GPU passthrough for it and for that you need Intel VT-d or AMD-Vi
>>>> enabled in the BIOS. If your laptop is old it may not have that feature.I
>>>> wondered about that - the laptop is VT-x, but not VT-d.  But, as I run
>>> the above GUI machines on my laptop without VT-d, then shouldn't I be
>>> able to run Libreelec?  Or, is it that I will just need the server/host
>>> setup with a gui?  And, if that's the case, then perhaps I run Libreelec
>>> on the server/host and not as a VM and the rest as VM?
>>>
>>>> Owncloud has been obsoleted by Nextcloud btw.
>>> Can't keep up - getting old...
>>>
>>> Many thanks
>>> Morgan.
>>>
>>> ___
>>> CentOS mailing list
>>> CentOS@centos.org
>>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> 
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] best centos server setup for graphics intensive kvm vms?

2018-01-23 Thread Nux!
Running a VM with something graphical on top of something else graphical is one 
thing.

What you want is to dedicate the GPU to the Libreelec VM, so it displays 
directly to the screen (gpu) so it can properly use hardware acceleration and 
so on, but you can't do that without VT-d/AMD-Vi afaik.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Morgan Read" <mst...@read.org.nz>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, 23 January, 2018 18:49:58
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] best centos server setup for graphics intensive kvm 
> vms?

> Thanks Nux for the follow up!
> 
> On 22/01/18 08:54, Nux! wrote:
>> You'd need to run virt-manager GUI somehow to manage the VMs. If you run 
>> Fedora
>> already on another machine then you can just yum install it and use it from
>> there.
> That's what I figured - I already run an XP and W7 virt machines as well
> as sometimes RemixOS just for fun on my everyday machine and thought I
> could remote control.
> 
>> You might run into a problem though with your Libreelec VM as you'd need to
>> enable GPU passthrough for it and for that you need Intel VT-d or AMD-Vi
>> enabled in the BIOS. If your laptop is old it may not have that feature.I
>> wondered about that - the laptop is VT-x, but not VT-d.  But, as I run
> the above GUI machines on my laptop without VT-d, then shouldn't I be
> able to run Libreelec?  Or, is it that I will just need the server/host
> setup with a gui?  And, if that's the case, then perhaps I run Libreelec
> on the server/host and not as a VM and the rest as VM?
> 
>> Owncloud has been obsoleted by Nextcloud btw.
> Can't keep up - getting old...
> 
> Many thanks
> Morgan.
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] best centos server setup for graphics intensive kvm vms?

2018-01-22 Thread Nux!
You'd need to run virt-manager GUI somehow to manage the VMs. If you run Fedora 
already on another machine then you can just yum install it and use it from 
there.

You might run into a problem though with your Libreelec VM as you'd need to 
enable GPU passthrough for it and for that you need Intel VT-d or AMD-Vi 
enabled in the BIOS. If your laptop is old it may not have that feature.

Owncloud has been obsoleted by Nextcloud btw.

hth

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Morgan Read" <mst...@read.org.nz>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Sunday, 21 January, 2018 18:59:49
> Subject: [CentOS] best centos server setup for graphics intensive kvm vms?

> Hallo list
> 
> I've been running fedora for donks as my production laptop os, but now
> I want to set up one of those old laptops to run as a home server
> running a number of home type vm appliances.  I don't want to risk
> having to tear down and rebuild the setup every 6 months to a year -
> so, figure centos is my best canditate to run as a stable server.
> 
> The sort of home type vms I envisage running include:
> LibreELEC https://libreelec.tv/
> Vortexbox https://wiki.vortexbox.org/available_images
> ownCloud https://owncloud.org/download/#owncloud-server-appliance
> freeSwitch https://freeswitch.org/pages/vm.html
> Etc...
> 
> Without wanting to start a very competative discussion - what would be
> a suggested minimal centos 7 install to provide such a server?
> 
> My main area of confusion is whether I need a gui on the server for kodi?
> 
> Many thanks for any answers to this wildly open ended question!
> 
> M
> --
> Morgan Read
> E mst...@read.org.nz
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 + KDE : post-installation script

2017-12-29 Thread Nux!
"Basculer SELinux en mode permissif." - Mon dieu!.. :)

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Nicolas Kovacs" <i...@microlinux.fr>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Friday, 29 December, 2017 14:10:50
> Subject: [CentOS] CentOS 7 + KDE : post-installation script

> Hi,
> 
> I just spent two rainy days writing and fine-tuning a post-installation
> script for CentOS 7 and KDE.
> 
> https://github.com/kikinovak/centos-7-desktop-kde
> 
> I've just tested it on three different machines here, and it works quite
> nicely. Feel free to give it a spin and make some suggestions.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Niki
> --
> Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables
> 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
> Site : https://www.microlinux.fr
> Blog : https://blog.microlinux.fr
> Mail : i...@microlinux.fr
> Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Chromium on CentOS 6

2017-11-28 Thread Nux!
Sorin,

Indeed, CentOS 6 is not longer officially supported by Chrome. It hasn't been 
for a few years, though there are workarounds[1].

It's high time people migrated to EL7.

[1] - 
http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/dextop/el6/x86_64/chrome-deps-stable-3.11-1.x86_64.rpm

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Sorin Srbu" <sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, 28 November, 2017 07:47:35
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Chromium on CentOS 6

>> -Original Message-
>> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of H
>> Sent: den 27 november 2017 19:45
>> To: centos@centos.org
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Chromium on CentOS 6
>> 
>> >> I have chromium installed on CentOS 7 and it works fine, I now need
>> >> to install it on a CentOS 6 workstation. However, it is not
>> >> available in EPEL as it is for C 7. From what I understand, this is
>> >> because it is already available in a supplementary channel from
>> >> RHEL for C 6.
>> >>
>> >> Is this the recommended method for installing it on C 6?
>> >>
>> >> https://www.tecmint.com/install-google-chrome-on-redhat-centos-fedo
>> >> ra-linux/
>> >>
>> > Just curious - why are you using the epel, rather than google,
>> > release for centos-7?
>> >
>> > The current google repo releases, (which install without any issues
>> > and work well on centos-7) are:
>> >
>> >   stable.x86_6462.0.3202.94-1
>> >   beta.x86_64  63.0.3239.59-1
>> >
>> > while the epel one is:
>> >
>> >   61.0.3163.100-1
>> >
>> > which was the "google stable" release in late september, and is about
>> > five releases back.
>> 
>> Ah, good, so this would be using the google-chrome.repo? I was not
> familiar
>> with it.
> 
> Wasn't the latest Google Chrome unsupported on CentOS 6 because of some
> dependency problems or some such?
> 
> 
> --
> //Sorin
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Devilspie or wmctrl for CentOS 6

2017-11-27 Thread Nux!
It's in my repo, gdevilspie as well.

http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/dextop/el7/x86_64/devilspie-0.22-13.el7.nux.x86_64.rpm

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "H" <age...@meddatainc.com>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Monday, 27 November, 2017 18:43:35
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Devilspie or wmctrl for CentOS 6

> On 11/26/2017 09:55 AM, wwp wrote:
>> Hello H,
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 18:59:23 +0100 H <age...@meddatainc.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Anyone running one of the above on C 6? Recommendations for which one to 
>>> install
>>> appreciated.
>> I do run devilspie on several CentOS 6 (and 7) boxes w/o any issue. I
>> didn't think devilspie and wmctrl provide the same features, in the
>> meaning that devilspie automates what wmctrl does, but maybe I was
>> wrong about wmctrl, isn't it a "simple" command-line to to perform
>> actions (get/set) w/ no automation unless you script it?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> 
> I will look at both, have already installed wmctrl but did not find devilspie.
> Have you installed the latter from a repository or did you compile it 
> yourself?
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Devilspie or wmctrl for CentOS 6

2017-11-26 Thread Nux!
I am not sure they provide the same features.
I do use wmctrl with some key shortcuts to move windows between my 2 monitors.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "H" <age...@meddatainc.com>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Saturday, 25 November, 2017 17:59:23
> Subject: [CentOS] Devilspie or wmctrl for CentOS 6

> Anyone running one of the above on C 6? Recommendations for which one to 
> install
> appreciated.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] C6, lightweight window managers - opinions?

2017-11-13 Thread Nux!
I used IceWM a long, long, tried it recently - it's unchanged. Love it! :-)

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "m roth" <m.r...@5-cent.us>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, 7 November, 2017 15:37:13
> Subject: [CentOS] C6, lightweight window managers - opinions?

> So, on my old Netbook, now happily running C6.9, I'm looking for opinions
> for a lightweight window manager. Gnome surely ain't it
> 
> Years back, I used to like IceWM, but not sure it's been kept up.
> 
> So, opinions?
> 
>   mark
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 + NVidia Quadro 2000 graphic card

2017-11-11 Thread Nux!
Yes, sometimes the only winning move is not to play. :-D

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Nicolas Kovacs" <i...@microlinux.fr>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Saturday, 11 November, 2017 09:18:39
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 + NVidia Quadro 2000 graphic card

> Le 10/11/2017 à 14:42, Nux! a écrit :
>> Did you play with nvidia-settings? Maybe also wipe out xorg.conf and
>> start afresh.
> 
> Thanks for all your suggestions. I spent a few hours fiddling with
> various driver versions and configurations. In the end, I simply ripped
> out the %

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 + NVidia Quadro 2000 graphic card

2017-11-10 Thread Nux!
Nicolas,

Did you play with nvidia-settings? Maybe also wipe out xorg.conf and start 
afresh.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Nicolas Kovacs" <i...@microlinux.fr>
> To: "James Pearson" <jame...@moving-picture.com>, "CentOS mailing list" 
> <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Friday, 10 November, 2017 11:02:30
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 + NVidia Quadro 2000 graphic card

> Le 10/11/2017 à 09:39, James Pearson a écrit :
>> I manually built the driver - from the nvidia-installer.log :
>> 
>> nvidia-installer command line:
>>  ./nvidia-installer
>>  --accept-license
>>  --no-questions
>>  --silent
>>  --install-libglvnd
>> 
>> The nouveau driver is blacklisted via the boot cmdline option:
>> 
>> rd.driver.blacklist=nouveau
>> 
>> Works fine for me ...
> 
> H. I have exactly the same setup, and KDE looks like LEGO for
> toddlers (something like 640x480). I checked that 'nouveau' is
> blacklisted, built the NVidia 384.90 driver manually, rebooted, and no joy.
> 
> I started a KDE neon LiveCD (with very good automatic hardware
> configuration) on that same workstation, and everything seems OK,
> resolution looks like 1280x1024 on the 19" monitor.
> 
> I'm puzzled.
> 
> --
> Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables
> 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
> Web  : http://www.microlinux.fr
> Mail : i...@microlinux.fr
> Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Kickstart ksdevice question

2017-11-01 Thread Nux!
Hello,

ksdevice specifies which NIC to be used during the network install.

The new naming conventions indeed make this more complicated than it needs to 
be. To go back to the old naming scheme (eth0, eth1 ...) just add this to boot 
parameters (kernel cmdline):
biosdevname=0 net.ifnames=0

HTH
Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Mark Haney" <mark.ha...@neonova.net>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, 1 November, 2017 12:45:45
> Subject: [CentOS] Kickstart ksdevice question

> This should be easy to answer (I hope).  We routinely kickstart boxes to
> use for managing our customers RADIUS/DHCP configurations (along with
> other things).  We've had a C7 kickstart in place since I built one in
> May and are finally starting to roll it out for new installations.  But,
> I'm curious as to what ksdevice= actually does.
> 
> With the C6 we routinely used ksdevice=eth0 since we ship boxes with two
> NICs and knew interface 1 was always eth0.  With C7 comes the interface
> naming convention changes and that's where questions have arisen about
> that option.  It's been set as ksdevice=eno1 since I know these servers
> name the interfaces with the eno# convention (integrated dual-port).  A
> coworker of mine insists on setting it ksdevice=enp2s0 which doesn't
> seem to work like it should (though, it could be a fault netinstall
> image, I'm not sure yet).  In all honesty, we'd prefer to keep the eth#
> convention for C7 like C6.
> 
> So, my question is, does setting ksdevice=eth0 dictate to the system the
> names of the interfaces?  Is that just a name for the install process
> and the kickstart script assigns names?  (We have the kickstart script
> setting them as eno1 and eno2, btw.)
> 
> I've googled this to no end and haven't found a satisfactory answer.
> So, I'm hoping someone with more KS experience than I can explain it.
> 
> --
> Mark Haney
> Network Engineer at NeoNova
> 919-460-3330 option 1
> mark.ha...@neonova.net
> www.neonova.net
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 not shutting down correctly

2017-10-16 Thread Nux!
That's what you get for Windows remarks :p

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Nicolas Kovacs" <i...@microlinux.fr>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Monday, 16 October, 2017 17:29:26
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 not shutting down correctly

> Le 16/10/2017 à 12:54, Nux! a écrit :
>> If you boot without "quiet rhgb" parameters in grub, do you get more
>> info during shutdown?
> 
> I removed the 'quiet' boot parameter. Now I'm sure the darn thing will
> shutdown correctly just to annoy me.
> 
> :o)
> 
> --
> Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables
> 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
> Web  : http://www.microlinux.fr
> Mail : i...@microlinux.fr
> Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 not shutting down correctly

2017-10-16 Thread Nux!
Hello,

If you boot without "quiet rhgb" parameters in grub, do you get more info 
during shutdown?

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Nicolas Kovacs" <i...@microlinux.fr>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Sunday, 15 October, 2017 20:14:45
> Subject: [CentOS] CentOS 7 not shutting down correctly

> Hi,
> 
> I have CentOS 7 with KDE installed on my workstation. Sometimes - like
> just now - the system refuses to shutdown correctly. The problem
> appeared since I installed the OpenVAS vulnerability scanner (the one
> from EPEL), so I don't know if this is linked. When I try to shutdown
> the system, I see shutdown messages, and then it stops short on the
> following message:
> 
> [ OK ] Stopped logout off all iSCSI sessions on shutdown
> 
> After this I can wait for hours, nothing happens until I hit the Reset
> button.
> 
> Now I'm a bit frustrated because this kind of behavior was the reason I
> left the Windows world back in 2001, to discover the joys of Slackware
> and then Red Hat.
> 
> I also notice this kind of thing never (ever) happened with CentOS
> versions 5.x and 6.x.
> 
> Any suggestions?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Niki
> --
> Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables
> 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
> Web  : http://www.microlinux.fr
> Mail : i...@microlinux.fr
> Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Announcement: 32 bit Wine repo for RHEL and CentOS 7

2017-10-09 Thread Nux!
That's great, thanks

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Richard Grainger" <grain...@gmail.com>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Monday, 9 October, 2017 16:07:09
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Announcement: 32 bit Wine repo for RHEL and CentOS 7

> Nux!:
> 
> SRPMS published: https://harbottle.gitlab.io/wine32/7/SRPMS/
> 
> Cheers!
> 
> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Richard Grainger <grain...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Yes, I will look into getting the SRPMS up on the site (though they are
>> just the ones from EPEL anyway).
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> That's great, I know many people were looking for this.
>>>
>>> Any chance you can also publish the SRPMs?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>>
>>> Nux!
>>> www.nux.ro
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>> > From: "Richard Grainger" <grain...@gmail.com>
>>> > To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
>>> > Sent: Sunday, 8 October, 2017 19:43:57
>>> > Subject: [CentOS] Announcement: 32 bit Wine repo for RHEL and CentOS 7
>>>
>>> > Hi all
>>> >
>>> > I've created a yum repo for 32 bit wine packages on RHEL and CentOS 7:
>>> >
>>> > https://harbottle.gitlab.io/wine32/7/i386/
>>> >
>>> > The Wine packages work on both 32 bit and 64 bit RHEL/CentOS 7. There
>>> is no
>>> > 32 bit version of the EPEL repo, where the standard RHEL/CentOS Wine
>>> > packages can be found, so you may find this new repo useful if you need
>>> to
>>> > run Windows software that requires the 32 bit version of Wine.
>>> >
>>> > The packages are all built from the EPEL source RPMs.  I had to tweak
>>> the
>>> > spec file for wine itself slightly, but for the dependencies it's all
>>> pure
>>> > rebuilds.
>>> >
>>> > Instructions:
>>> >
>>> > Code:
>>> > yum -y install https://harbottle.gitlab.io/wi
>>> ne32/7/i386/wine32-release.rpm
>>> > yum -y install wine.i686
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Please give it a try and tell me what you think!  It probably needs more
>>> > testing.
>>> > ___
>>> > CentOS mailing list
>>> > CentOS@centos.org
>>> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>> ___
>>> CentOS mailing list
>>> CentOS@centos.org
>>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>>
>>
>>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Announcement: 32 bit Wine repo for RHEL and CentOS 7

2017-10-09 Thread Nux!
Richard,

I haven't checked, but I see more than wine packages in that repo, hence my 
thoughts about that.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Richard Grainger" <grain...@gmail.com>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Monday, 9 October, 2017 14:29:03
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Announcement: 32 bit Wine repo for RHEL and CentOS 7

> Shouldn't be anything overwriting Base...what do you think does so?
> 
> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 2:01 PM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote:
> 
>> Ah, ok. I was wondering how you  managed to build that, because when I
>> tried it did not work, but I see you have backported also other bits and
>> bobs.
>> If those overwrite Base, perhaps add a warning of sorts.
>>
>> --
>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>
>> Nux!
>> www.nux.ro
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> > From: "Richard Grainger" <grain...@gmail.com>
>> > To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
>> > Sent: Monday, 9 October, 2017 13:28:22
>> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Announcement: 32 bit Wine repo for RHEL and CentOS
>> 7
>>
>> > Yes, I will look into getting the SRPMS up on the site (though they are
>> > just the ones from EPEL anyway).
>> >
>> > On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> That's great, I know many people were looking for this.
>> >>
>> >> Any chance you can also publish the SRPMs?
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>> >>
>> >> Nux!
>> >> www.nux.ro
>> >>
>> >> - Original Message -
>> >> > From: "Richard Grainger" <grain...@gmail.com>
>> >> > To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
>> >> > Sent: Sunday, 8 October, 2017 19:43:57
>> >> > Subject: [CentOS] Announcement: 32 bit Wine repo for RHEL and CentOS 7
>> >>
>> >> > Hi all
>> >> >
>> >> > I've created a yum repo for 32 bit wine packages on RHEL and CentOS 7:
>> >> >
>> >> > https://harbottle.gitlab.io/wine32/7/i386/
>> >> >
>> >> > The Wine packages work on both 32 bit and 64 bit RHEL/CentOS 7. There
>> is
>> >> no
>> >> > 32 bit version of the EPEL repo, where the standard RHEL/CentOS Wine
>> >> > packages can be found, so you may find this new repo useful if you
>> need
>> >> to
>> >> > run Windows software that requires the 32 bit version of Wine.
>> >> >
>> >> > The packages are all built from the EPEL source RPMs.  I had to tweak
>> the
>> >> > spec file for wine itself slightly, but for the dependencies it's all
>> >> pure
>> >> > rebuilds.
>> >> >
>> >> > Instructions:
>> >> >
>> >> > Code:
>> >> > yum -y install https://harbottle.gitlab.io/
>> wine32/7/i386/wine32-release.
>> >> rpm
>> >> > yum -y install wine.i686
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Please give it a try and tell me what you think!  It probably needs
>> more
>> >> > testing.
>> >> > ___
>> >> > CentOS mailing list
>> >> > CentOS@centos.org
>> >> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>> >> ___
>> >> CentOS mailing list
>> >> CentOS@centos.org
>> >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>> >>
>> > ___
>> > CentOS mailing list
>> > CentOS@centos.org
>> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>> ___
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Announcement: 32 bit Wine repo for RHEL and CentOS 7

2017-10-09 Thread Nux!
Ah, ok. I was wondering how you  managed to build that, because when I tried it 
did not work, but I see you have backported also other bits and bobs.
If those overwrite Base, perhaps add a warning of sorts.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Richard Grainger" <grain...@gmail.com>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Monday, 9 October, 2017 13:28:22
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Announcement: 32 bit Wine repo for RHEL and CentOS 7

> Yes, I will look into getting the SRPMS up on the site (though they are
> just the ones from EPEL anyway).
> 
> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote:
> 
>> Hello,
>>
>> That's great, I know many people were looking for this.
>>
>> Any chance you can also publish the SRPMs?
>>
>> --
>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>
>> Nux!
>> www.nux.ro
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> > From: "Richard Grainger" <grain...@gmail.com>
>> > To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
>> > Sent: Sunday, 8 October, 2017 19:43:57
>> > Subject: [CentOS] Announcement: 32 bit Wine repo for RHEL and CentOS 7
>>
>> > Hi all
>> >
>> > I've created a yum repo for 32 bit wine packages on RHEL and CentOS 7:
>> >
>> > https://harbottle.gitlab.io/wine32/7/i386/
>> >
>> > The Wine packages work on both 32 bit and 64 bit RHEL/CentOS 7. There is
>> no
>> > 32 bit version of the EPEL repo, where the standard RHEL/CentOS Wine
>> > packages can be found, so you may find this new repo useful if you need
>> to
>> > run Windows software that requires the 32 bit version of Wine.
>> >
>> > The packages are all built from the EPEL source RPMs.  I had to tweak the
>> > spec file for wine itself slightly, but for the dependencies it's all
>> pure
>> > rebuilds.
>> >
>> > Instructions:
>> >
>> > Code:
>> > yum -y install https://harbottle.gitlab.io/wine32/7/i386/wine32-release.
>> rpm
>> > yum -y install wine.i686
>> >
>> >
>> > Please give it a try and tell me what you think!  It probably needs more
>> > testing.
>> > ___
>> > CentOS mailing list
>> > CentOS@centos.org
>> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>> ___
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] New CentOS/RHEL group on Facebook

2017-10-09 Thread Nux!
So, there is no switch there to make the group public? 
It requires login now, that's what I was moaning about basically.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Nicolas Kovacs" <i...@microlinux.fr>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Monday, 9 October, 2017 13:26:57
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] New CentOS/RHEL group on Facebook

> Le 09/10/2017 à 13:14, Nux! a écrit :
>> I personally dislike Facebook, but even so, I think a basic
>> requirement for any web site striving to share knowledge is to be
>> publicly accessible to all which at the moment it is not. Search
>> engines won't be able to crawl it, people without an account won't be
>> able to access it.
>> 
>> Can this be changed?
> 
> Facebook is what it is, and as far as I'm concerned, I use the good bits
> while ignoring the bad bits. It's OK for sharing links to new blog posts
> and tutorials in tech groups, but that's pretty much it. For technical
> questions, the mailing list and the forums are much more suited, and
> this is also stated in the Facebook group's welcome message.
> 
> Consider it as "Twitter with unlimited characters".
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Niki
> 
> --
> Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables
> 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
> Web  : http://www.microlinux.fr
> Mail : i...@microlinux.fr
> Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] New CentOS/RHEL group on Facebook

2017-10-09 Thread Nux!
I personally dislike Facebook, but even so, I think a basic requirement for any 
web site striving to share knowledge is to be publicly accessible to all which 
at the moment it is not.
Search engines won't be able to crawl it, people without an account won't be 
able to access it.

Can this be changed?

Thanks

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Nicolas Kovacs" <i...@microlinux.fr>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Sunday, 8 October, 2017 15:48:29
> Subject: [CentOS] New CentOS/RHEL group on Facebook

> Hi,
> 
> There are currently two competing CentOS groups on Facebook. The "main"
> group is managed by a small group of autocrats with very unilateral
> communication skills. The other one is not managed at all, judged by the
> amount of non-CentOS-related stuff published there (Ubuntu tutorials,
> Windows games, cheap Ray-Ban sunglasses).
> 
> I was a bit frustrated by this state of things, the more so since I've
> successfully managed the Slackware Linux Facebook group for a couple of
> years, regulating publications, keeping folks on topic and banning the
> odd spammer.
> 
> So I decided to do the same thing I would do in a software development
> context. Fork the project and create a different CentOS/RHEL Facebook
> group. The goal of this group would simply be to provide a no-nonsense
> discussion platform for all the CentOS and Red Hat Enterprise Linux
> users out there. Publications would be strictly CentOS/RHEL-centered,
> but on the other hand, you'd be free to share your CentOS-related blog
> posts, tutorials and documentation without getting flamed or banned by
> an admin.
> 
> Anyway, feel free to join the new group:
> 
> https://www.facebook.com/groups/2136021589748759/
> 
> Cheers from the sunny South of France,
> 
> Niki Kovacs
> --
> Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables
> 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
> Web  : http://www.microlinux.fr
> Mail : i...@microlinux.fr
> Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Announcement: 32 bit Wine repo for RHEL and CentOS 7

2017-10-09 Thread Nux!
Hello,

That's great, I know many people were looking for this.

Any chance you can also publish the SRPMs?

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Richard Grainger" <grain...@gmail.com>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Sunday, 8 October, 2017 19:43:57
> Subject: [CentOS] Announcement: 32 bit Wine repo for RHEL and CentOS 7

> Hi all
> 
> I've created a yum repo for 32 bit wine packages on RHEL and CentOS 7:
> 
> https://harbottle.gitlab.io/wine32/7/i386/
> 
> The Wine packages work on both 32 bit and 64 bit RHEL/CentOS 7. There is no
> 32 bit version of the EPEL repo, where the standard RHEL/CentOS Wine
> packages can be found, so you may find this new repo useful if you need to
> run Windows software that requires the 32 bit version of Wine.
> 
> The packages are all built from the EPEL source RPMs.  I had to tweak the
> spec file for wine itself slightly, but for the dependencies it's all pure
> rebuilds.
> 
> Instructions:
> 
> Code:
> yum -y install https://harbottle.gitlab.io/wine32/7/i386/wine32-release.rpm
> yum -y install wine.i686
> 
> 
> Please give it a try and tell me what you think!  It probably needs more
> testing.
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS, PHP & OwnCloud/Nextcloud: the version dilemma

2017-09-19 Thread Nux!
Unfortunately the same can be said about Ruby, RoR, Python etc etc etc.

Personally I think it's perfectly reasonable to track Nextcloud upgrades 
combined with SCL major upgrades once every couple of years.

Check life times here:
https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/rhscl

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Jonathan Billings" <billi...@negate.org>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, 19 September, 2017 19:06:55
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS, PHP & OwnCloud/Nextcloud: the version dilemma

> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 07:59:00PM +0200, rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote:
>> With PHP, I try to stay as close to upstream as possible.
>> If upstream EOLs a version, it's time to upgrade.
>> 
>> If you want something stable, don't run PHP.
> 
> Unfortunately, with that philosophy but not much systems management
> experience, you end up with custom-compiled and local installs of PHP
> that get no security updates, particularly as you get version lock-in
> by the web application developers, or when you have a sysadmin move on
> to a new position or company.
> 
> I think the statement "If you want something stable, don't run PHP" is
> a very wise statement though.
> 
> --
> Jonathan Billings <billi...@negate.org>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] KVM SSL with wget

2017-09-19 Thread Nux!
Do you have ca-certificates installed in the VM

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "MOKRANI Rachid" <rachid.mokr...@ifpen.fr>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, 19 September, 2017 15:34:37
> Subject: [CentOS] KVM SSL with wget

> Hi,
> I installed KVM on a CentOS 7.4 host. The guest is also installed in CentOS 
> 7.4,
> the network works perfectly.
> 
> Both Host and Guest machines have the same OS.
> 
> I do not understand why I have an SSL error on the guest and not on the host
> while the two computers have the same OS installation.
> 
> The firewalld, selinux, fail2ban services are not installed on host and guest.
> 
> Is there an extra manipulation that I have forgotten to do?
> Many thanks.
> Below my log on Host and Guest.
> 
> Host
> /usr/bin/wget --version
> GNU Wget 1.14 built on linux-gnu.
> 
> wget https://www.google.com
> --2017-09-19 16:15:44--  https://www.google.com/
> Resolving www.google.com<http://www.google.com>
> (www.google.com<http://www.google.com>)... 2a00:1450:4009:809::2004,
> 216.58.198.164
> Connecting to www.google.com<http://www.google.com>
> (www.google.com<http://www.google.com>)|2a00:1450:4009:809::2004|:443...
> connected.
> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 302 Found
> Location: https://www.google.fr/?gfe_rd=cr=0=kCbBWe-fOMnU8gfBmLmABA
> [following]
> --2017-09-19 16:15:44--
> https://www.google.fr/?gfe_rd=cr=0=kCbBWe-fOMnU8gfBmLmABA
> Resolving www.google.fr<http://www.google.fr>
> (www.google.fr<http://www.google.fr>)... 2a00:1450:4009:814::2003, 
> 216.58.204.3
> Connecting to www.google.fr<http://www.google.fr>
> (www.google.fr<http://www.google.fr>)|2a00:1450:4009:814::2003|:443...
> connected.
> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
> Length: unspecified [text/html]
> Saving to: 'index.html.10'
>[ <=>
>]
>10,853  --.-K/s   in 0s
> 2017-09-19 16:15:45 (41.9 MB/s) - 'index.html.10' saved [10853]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Guest VM
> ping www.google.com<http://www.google.com>
> return OK
> 
> 
> /usr/bin/wget --version
> GNU Wget 1.14 built on linux-gnu.
> 
> My Pb on the guest :
> 
> wget https://www.google.com
> --2017-09-19 16:16:03--  https://www.google.com/
> Resolving www.google.com<http://www.google.com>
> (www.google.com<http://www.google.com>)... 216.58.198.164,
> 2a00:1450:4009:809::2004
> Connecting to www.google.com<http://www.google.com>
> (www.google.com<http://www.google.com>)|216.58.198.164|:443... connected.
> OpenSSL: error:1408D07B:SSL routines:ssl3_get_key_exchange:bad signature
> Unable to establish SSL connection.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> __
> Avant d'imprimer, pensez à l'environnement ! Please consider the environment
> before printing !
> Ce message et toutes ses pièces jointes sont confidentiels et établis à
> l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation non conforme à 
> sa
> destination, toute diffusion ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est
> interdite, sauf autorisation expresse. IFP Energies nouvelles décline toute
> responsabilité au titre de ce message. This message and any attachments are
> confidential and intended solely for the addressees. Any unauthorised use or
> dissemination is prohibited. IFP Energies nouvelles should not be liable for
> this message.
> __
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS, PHP & OwnCloud/Nextcloud: the version dilemma

2017-09-19 Thread Nux!
+1 SCL, as Johnny says this is what they are for.
You can easily run multiple PHP versions via php-fpm, fastcgi etc.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "johnny" <joh...@centos.org>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, 19 September, 2017 14:25:08
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS, PHP & OwnCloud/Nextcloud: the version dilemma

> On 09/19/2017 06:41 AM, Leon Fauster wrote:
>> Am 19.09.2017 um 09:36 schrieb Nicolas Kovacs <i...@microlinux.fr>:
>>>
>>> I'm currently experimenting with OwnCloud and Nextcloud on a sandbox
>>> CentOS 7 server. I've been using OwnCloud for the last two years for my
>>> own purposes on a Slackware server, and I'm quite happy with it.
>>>
>>> In my humble opinion, every admin who wants to host OwnCloud or
>>> Nextcloud on a RHEL/CentOS server is confronted with a version dilemma.
>>>
>>> 1. CentOS 7 sports PHP 5.4, which has been officially EOL for quite some
>>> time, but Red Hat will provide security update backports until 2024.
>>> Which is fine.
>>>
>>> 2. Currently supported versions of Nextcloud (namely the 11.x and 12.x
>>> branch) require a minimum of PHP 5.6. Which seems reasonable. But if I
>>> pull in PHP 5.6 from Webtatic, for example, I only get the "official"
>>> PHP support, which will end in 2018 for the 5.6 branch. And no security
>>> backports.
>> 
>> Try to ask upstream (bugzilla) to evaluate an officially upgrade
>> from 5.4 to 5.6, that would give you support until EOL of EL7.
> 
> Or, how about you just use SCLs .. that is what they are for:
> 
> http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/sclo/x86_64/rh/rh-php56/
> 
> Or even
> 
> http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/sclo/x86_64/rh/rh-php70/
> 
> See:
> 
> https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/SCLo
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 + KDE: sleep mode?

2017-07-16 Thread Nux!
Hi,

Should work, add a custom button/launcher for:

systemctl suspend

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Nicolas Kovacs" <i...@microlinux.fr>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Friday, 14 July, 2017 20:48:33
> Subject: [CentOS] CentOS 7 + KDE: sleep mode?

> Hi,
> 
> One of my clients is running CentOS 7 + KDE 4.14 which I installed for
> her. Everything is running nicely. She asked me - more out of curiosity
> - if she could use the "Sleep" mode instead of "Shutdown" like she did
> when she ran Windows, so the PC would be up and running faster the next
> time. I didn't know what to answer, since I don't explicitly use this
> mode. Only on my laptop I simple shut the lid, which puts the laptop
> into Sleep mode. But on a normal PC, I don't know if this mode is
> supposed to be used.
> 
> Any suggestions?
> 
> Niki
> --
> Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables
> 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
> Web  : http://www.microlinux.fr
> Mail : i...@microlinux.fr
> Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Using ssd disks for kvm guests

2017-07-05 Thread Nux!
Hi,

I would use the recommended/default xfs and qcow2 for VMs.
Have tuned set the profile to virtual host.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "C. L. Martinez" <carlopm...@gmail.com>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, 5 July, 2017 08:25:32
> Subject: [CentOS] Using ssd disks for kvm guests

> Hi all,
> 
> Recently I have acquired a supermicro e200-8d micro server to use it as my
> homelab.  It is equipped with two ssd disks.
> 
> My idea is to install several kvm guests on it, but I have some doubts
> about what type of filesystem (ext4 or xfs?) or block to use (lvm).
> 
> Recommendations? Do I need to accomplish some type of running if I choose
> to use ext4 or xfs??
> 
> Thanks.
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS-virt] Lightweight alternative to virt-manager

2017-07-04 Thread Nux!
Your best bet is running virt-manager via SSH X11 forwarding.
In all my searches I have not met a reasonable replacement for it alas, 
everything else is either very buggy or bloated or both.
(Which is why customers go for Xenserver and Hyperv).

Somewhat offtopic, I can also recommend Proxmox if you're not really adamant on 
staying on CentOS, it's basically Xenserver-like, but on top of Debian/KVM; 
really nice UI and set of features.

HTH

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "C. L. Martinez" <carlopm...@gmail.com>
> To: "Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS" <centos-virt@centos.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, 4 July, 2017 07:13:33
> Subject: [CentOS-virt] Lightweight alternative to virt-manager

> Hi all,
> 
> Anyone knows any lightweight alternative to virt-manager that works with
> linux, Windows and macos?
> 
> Searching I have found ovirt only but it is too heavy.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> ___
> CentOS-virt mailing list
> CentOS-virt@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


Re: [CentOS] network setup: meaning of PEERROUTES option

2017-05-24 Thread Nux!
Can you be more specific as to the subnets you are using and how?

PEERROUTES could affect your case, but I doubt it. It is used by 
NetworkManager, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1107328

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "hw" <h...@gc-24.de>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, 24 May, 2017 13:16:37
> Subject: [CentOS] network setup: meaning of PEERROUTES option

> Hi,
> 
> what´s the meaning of the PEERROUTES option in the networking
> scripts?  I couldn´t find that documented anywhere.
> 
> 
> I managed to set up a bonding interface and when sending pings,
> I´m getting redirection messages from the gateway unless I
> manually add a route to the network.   So I guess that for some
> reason, the routing doesn´t get set up correctly, and I wonder
> how to get that to work. Am I missing the PEERROUTES option,
> or does that do something else?
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Best practices for copying lots of files machine-to-machine

2017-05-17 Thread Nux!
Hi,

Rsync can maintain symlinks, hardlinks and give you a progress report as well; 
not to mention it can resume interruptions should they occur.

Having said that, even with your space problem, it is possible to use tar to 
pack files during transfer, on the fly which should be faster than rsync.
Just search for "tar over ssh".

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "ken" <geb...@mousecar.com>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, 17 May, 2017 17:03:13
> Subject: [CentOS] Best practices for copying lots of files machine-to-machine

> An entire filesystem (~180g) needs to be copied from one local linux
> machine to another.  Since both systems are on the same local subnet,
> there's no need for encryption.
> 
> I've done this sort of thing before a few times in the past in different
> ways, but wanted to get input from others on what's worked best for them.
> 
> One consideration is that the source filesystem contains quite a few
> hardlinks and symlinks and of course I want to preserve these, and
> preserve all timestamps and ownerships and permissions as well.
> Maintaining the integrity of this metadata and the integrity of the
> files themselves if of course the top priority.
> 
> Speed is also a consideration, but having done this before, I find it
> even more important to have a running progress report or log so I can
> see how the session is proceeding and approximately how much longer it
> will be until finished... and too to see if something's hung up.
> 
> One other consideration:  There isn't much disk space left on the source
> machine, so creating a tar file, even compressed, isn't an option.
> 
> What relevant methods have you been impressed by?
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Mini PCs

2017-05-17 Thread Nux!
Hi,

I have this and happy with it, I believe it ticks all your boxes (+ built-in IR 
port).

http://www.intel.co.uk/content/www/uk/en/nuc/nuc-kit-dn2820fykh.html

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Robert Moskowitz" <r...@htt-consult.com>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Friday, 12 May, 2017 23:29:41
> Subject: [CentOS] Mini PCs

> I have been working, for the past few years, with armv7 SOCs and have a
> number of servers working.
> 
> Intel, etal are catching up with ARM and I have seen ones like:
> 
> https://www.aliexpress.com/item/NEW-Mini-pc-X86-4-Lan-Qotom-Q190G4N-with-celeron-J1900-quad-core-4-usb-VGA/32785346279.html
> 
> I am looking for a low power (this is 10W) x86_64 board that has at
> least 2 core and 2GB memory.  A single LAN port, a few USB and sata (not
> mSata) that supports a 1TB drive (2.5", 5V is just fine).
> 
> Oh, and for ~$100  :)
> 
> Case is not necessary, as I can put it in my rack like these:
> 
> http://medon.htt-consult.com/~rgm/cubieboard/cubietower-3.JPG
> 
> (goal is to replace that SFF to the left).
> 
> It looks like Qotom might have one.  It is a bit challenging to figure
> out which units have what.
> 
> thanks for any pointers.
> 
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Excel shared spreadsheets on Samba share

2017-04-13 Thread Nux!
Hi

Try something like this, see if it helps
http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2011-November/009042.html

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Dante F. B. Colò" <dante01...@gmail.com>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Friday, 7 April, 2017 14:27:27
> Subject: [CentOS] Excel shared spreadsheets on Samba share

> Hello everyone
> 
> I 'm trying to find what it happens on my Samba AD servers especially
> with shared spreadsheets, my personal opinion this feature on Excel  is
> crap and unreliable but many people use it, how does Samba currently
> behave with this ? Is someone experienced any problem with this ?
> Frequently happens changes made by other user are lost the spreadsheet
> opens as read only , the shares are all using vfs_acl_xattr module to
> mimic NTFS permissions, clients are all windows machines versions 7 and
> 10 , i upgraded samba 4.3.11 to 4.5.7 but both have the same behavior.
> Any ideas ?
> 
> 
> Regards
> Dante
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Re CentOS and Intel graphics

2017-04-12 Thread Nux!
Google ?

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Mark (Netbook)" <m...@mwcltd.co.uk>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, 12 April, 2017 17:25:12
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Re CentOS and Intel graphics

> Hello,
> 
> Where do I find kernel-ml?
> 
> Regards,
> Mark Woolfson
> -Original Message-
> From: Nux!
> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 5:18 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Re CentOS and Intel graphics
> 
> Give kernel-ml a try, else try CentOS 7.
> 
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> 
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
> 
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Mark (Netbook)" <m...@mwcltd.co.uk>
>> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, 12 April, 2017 17:13:56
>> Subject: [CentOS] Re CentOS and Intel graphics
> 
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have an Intel NUC7i3 with 620 graphics and an Intel NUC7i7 with 640
>> graphics.
>> I have loaded CentOS 6.9 and the graphics is not fully working.
>> I believe that I need a driver.
>> Does CentOS support the Intel 620 and 640 graphics and if not, can someone
>> please point me in the direction of the drivers, with install
>> instructions.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Mark Woolfson
>> ___
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Enterprise Linux Slack

2017-04-12 Thread Nux!
To be honest Freenode is nice and I'd be sad to see it replaced with anything.
So cool to be a "/join #project" away from getting help.

If we go Mattermost, can we have a searchable public archive of the chats? 
Something search engines can index and we can point people to?

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Karanbir Singh" <mail-li...@karan.org>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, 12 April, 2017 13:56:53
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Enterprise Linux Slack

> On 12/04/17 13:23, Andrew Holway wrote:
>> 
>> Thoughts? Experiances?
>> 
> 
> been talking with the mattermost people to get an instance up in
> centos.org space - more open source, more privacy and better terms of
> service.
> 
> --
> Karanbir Singh
> +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
> GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Re CentOS and Intel graphics

2017-04-12 Thread Nux!
Give kernel-ml a try, else try CentOS 7.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Mark (Netbook)" <m...@mwcltd.co.uk>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, 12 April, 2017 17:13:56
> Subject: [CentOS] Re CentOS and Intel graphics

> Hello,
> 
> I have an Intel NUC7i3 with 620 graphics and an Intel NUC7i7 with 640 
> graphics.
> I have loaded CentOS 6.9 and the graphics is not fully working.
> I believe that I need a driver.
> Does CentOS support the Intel 620 and 640 graphics and if not, can someone
> please point me in the direction of the drivers, with install instructions.
> 
> Regards,
> Mark Woolfson
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Network Manager / CentOS 7 / local unbound

2017-04-12 Thread Nux!
OR just make the file immutable if it's so critical to you.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Jon LaBadie" <j...@labadie.us>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, 12 April, 2017 07:16:22
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Network Manager / CentOS 7 / local unbound

> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 01:40:21AM -0700, Alice Wonder wrote:
>> Hello list -
>> 
>> http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/90035/how-to-set-dns-resolver-in-fedora-using-network-manager
>> 
>> That says it works for CentOS 5 and I *suspect* the methods there (3 listed)
>> would work, but what is the best way with NetworkManager to set it up to use
>> the localhost for DNS ?
>> 
>> I'm paranoid about DNS spoofing and really prefer to have a local instance
>> of DNSSEC enforcing unbound running on my CentOS 7 virtual machines (e.g.
>> linode)
>> 
>> Currently I just use a cron job that runs once a minute to over-write was it
>> is /etc/resolv.conf so they don't use the DHCP assigned nameservers, but
>> that does leave a short window every time the network is restarted.
> 
> Besides the suggested configs, if still worried you could set up
> an inotify watch on /etc/resolv.conf to let you know, or take
> action, whenever it changes.
> 
> jon
> --
> Jon H. LaBadie j...@jgcomp.com
> 11226 South Shore Rd.  (703) 787-0688 (H)
> Reston, VA  20190  (703) 935-6720 (C)
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] OT: systemd Poll

2017-04-09 Thread Nux!
I'm ok with it as a init system, not much enthused by its ancillary components.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Anthony K" <akcen...@anroet.com>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Sunday, 9 April, 2017 05:39:59
> Subject: [CentOS] OT: systemd Poll

> According to "Arthur Schopenhauer":
> 
> "All truth passes through three stages.
> First, it is ridiculed.
> Second, it is violently opposed.
> Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
> 
> I must admit that I skipped through the first and second stages - I
> never found creating init scripts a joy and instead opted to write my
> own scripts that I launched via inittab.  As such, I welcomed the
> simplicity systemd's service files without fuss.
> 
> So, at which stage are you in w/ regards to adopting systemd?  Are you
> still ridiculing it, violently opposed to it, or have you mellowed to it?
> 
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Network configuration: desktop vs. laptop

2017-04-09 Thread Nux!
Hi Niki,

On CentOS it's normal for both wireless and wired to be connected at the same 
time, maybe what you are seeing is just the icon's being confusing or not being 
replaced with the right thing?

This is easy to check, just issue an "ip route". On My system I can see 
something like this:

default via 192.168.0.1 dev eth0  proto static 
192.168.0.0/24 dev eth0  proto kernel  scope link  src 192.168.0.16  metric 1 
192.168.0.0/24 dev wlan0  proto kernel  scope link  src 192.168.0.13  metric 2

Routing will prefer eth0 (wired), with the smaller metric, giving you the 
better performance.

I found this quite handy a couple of times, say you remove the laptop from the 
desk and go in the garden or something, you won't lose your connections.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "info" <i...@microlinux.fr>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Saturday, 8 April, 2017 21:57:18
> Subject: [CentOS] Network configuration: desktop vs. laptop

> Hi,
> 
> I'm just migrating some stuff from Slackware Linux to CentOS, and I have
> a question about the orthodox way of configuring a network connection.
> 
> On a desktop or workstation, I usually get rid of NetworkManager:
> 
>  # systemctl stop NetworkManager
>  # yum remove NetworkManager
> 
> Then I edit the /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-X file
> corresponding to my network interface. Here's a working example:
> 
>  # /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-enp2s0
>  DEVICE=enp2s0
>  TYPE=Ethernet
>  ONBOOT=yes
>  BOOTPROTO=dhcp
> 
> Now I wonder how I should configure things on a laptop, where I usually
> keep NetworkManager. On a Slackware system, it's usually just a matter
> of leaving a pristine /etc/rc.d/rc.inet1.conf file, and then activate
> /etc/rc.d/rc.networkmanager. Starting from there, when there's a
> wireless connection available, I can connect using the little
> NetworkManager applet on the desktop. And when I switch to cable,
> NetworkManager will prefer that connection automagically.
> 
> On a default installation (I went for the KDE version), NetworkManager
> is active, so I'll keep that. 'ifconfig' shows me that the cabled
> connection is up and running via enp3s0 on the laptop. Wireless doesn't
> seem to work, but 'ifconfig -a' shows me a wlp2s0 interface, which means
> there's a chance it will work.
> 
> First thing I did was edit ifcfg-enp3s0 like this:
> 
>  DEVICE="enp3s0"
>  TYPE="Ethernet"
>  NM_CONTROLLED="yes"
> 
> Then I edited ifcfg-wlp2s0 from scratch, since there's nothing present:
> 
>  DEVICE="wlp2s0"
>  TYPE="Wireless"
>  NM_CONTROLLED="yes"
> 
> I rebooted (just to be on the safe side), and I have a partial success.
> I can connect via KDE's NetworkManager applet. But when I plug in an
> Ethernet cable, the wireless connection stays up and is not replaced by
> the cabled connection.
> 
> Any suggestions?
> 
> Niki Kovacs
> --
> Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables
> 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
> Web  : http://www.microlinux.fr
> Mail : i...@microlinux.fr
> Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS-virt] Network isolation for KVM guests (SOLVED)

2017-04-04 Thread Nux!
Ok, sure.

For bridging physical with wireless you could use parprouted.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "C. L. Martinez" <carlopm...@gmail.com>
> To: "Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS" <centos-virt@centos.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, 4 April, 2017 11:27:07
> Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] Network isolation for KVM guests (SOLVED)

> This can be if one of these interfaces isn't a wireless nic. But I need to 
> use a
> wireless nic and another phys nic.
> 
> At least, I have solved the problem using network namespaces. All works ok and
> expected now.
> 
> Many thanks to all for your help
> 
> On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 10:39:05AM +0100, Nux! wrote:
>> Just create a bridge, hook the host physical interface that you want in it, 
>> hook
>> the VMs interface in it, done.
>> No need for passthrough.
>> 
>> This can be done via libvirt/virsh or if a UI is wanted then virt-manager 
>> makes
>> this really easy.
>> 
>> Now assign an IP in the VM and it should work. You don't need to assign any 
>> IP
>> on he host interface itself. Rinse and repeat for the rest of the interfaces.
>> 
>> --
>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>> 
>> Nux!
>> www.nux.ro
>> 
>> - Original Message -
>> > From: "C. L. Martinez" <carlopm...@gmail.com>
>> > To: "Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS" 
>> > <centos-virt@centos.org>
>> > Sent: Friday, 31 March, 2017 19:18:43
>> > Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] Network isolation for KVM guests
>> 
>> > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 05:06:53PM +0200, Sven Kieske wrote:
>> >> On 31/03/17 15:55, C. L. Martinez wrote:
>> >> > I need to attach two physical interfaces to a guest and these phy 
>> >> > interfaces
>> >> > have IP and routes assigned and I need to get them off the main routing 
>> >> > table.
>> >> 
>> >> I do not understand this.
>> >> 
>> >> You can attach a physical (or virtual, doesn't matter), interface to any
>> >> given vm, without assigning routes or IPs to these interfaces directly.
>> > 
>> > No, I can't because this host doesn't support PCI passthrough. One of these
>> > interfaces is a wireless nic.
>> > 
>> >> 
>> >> Just do the network configuration inside the vm, and the routing, well
>> >> on your router? You will just need the route for the vm networks on your
>> >> host, but what is your attack scenario to keep this separated from other
>> >> routes on this host? you need at least CAP_NET_ADMIN to fiddle with those.
>> > 
>> > How? If the same host routes Internet traffic in the main routing table I 
>> > expose
>> > host's services to Internet.
>> > 
>> >> 
>> >> --
>> >> Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards
>> >> 
>> >> Sven Kieske
>> >> 
>> >> Systemadministrator
>> >> Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG
>> >> Königsberger Straße 6
>> >> 32339 Espelkamp
>> >> T: +495772 293100
>> >> F: +495772 29
>> >> https://www.mittwald.de
>> >> Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer
>> >> St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen
>> >> Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad 
>> >> Oeynhausen
>> >> 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> >> ___
>> >> CentOS-virt mailing list
>> >> CentOS-virt@centos.org
>> >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
>> > 
>> > 
>> > --
>> > Greetings,
>> > C. L. Martinez
>> > ___
>> > CentOS-virt mailing list
>> > CentOS-virt@centos.org
>> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
>> ___
>> CentOS-virt mailing list
>> CentOS-virt@centos.org
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
> 
> --
> Greetings,
> C. L. Martinez
> ___
> CentOS-virt mailing list
> CentOS-virt@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


Re: [CentOS] Using environment variables in mariadb

2017-04-04 Thread Nux!
You can just put the credentials in a my.cnf file to avoid entering them all 
the time

e.g.  /root/.my.cnf

[client]
user=root
password=thepassword

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Robert Moskowitz" <r...@htt-consult.com>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, 15 March, 2017 04:07:36
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Using environment variables in mariadb

> On 03/14/2017 06:29 PM, Richard wrote:
>>
>>> Date: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 14:53:01 -0700
>>> From: Robert Moskowitz <r...@htt-consult.com>
>>>
>>> I want to script a rather simple create database operation.  Thing
>>> is, I have to provide the password for that database.  I would like
>>> to do this with an environment variable, but the simple approach
>>> dose not work:
>>>
>>> mailpswd=charlie
>>>
>>> mysql -u root -p
>>>
>>> CREATE DATABASE mailfix;
>>> CREATE USER 'mailfix'@'localhost' IDENTIFIED BY $mailpswd;
>>> GRANT ALL PRIVILEGES ON `mailfix` . * TO 'mailfix'@'localhost';
>>>
>>> Of course the mysql command needs the mysql root password, but that
>>> is as expected.  But mysql will not process $mailpswd, not
>>> surprisingly.
>>>
>>> I know I could create a file with these commands, sed the password
>>> into the file, then pipe thr file into mysql.  I would rather do
>>> this directly without a temp file.
>>>
>> Using the "-e --execute" option you can execute mysql/mariadb
>> commands from the command line, one at a time. You don't have to put
>> them into a file first. That should allow you to do what you're
>> after, including doing variable substitution of the password on the
>> line you want to execute. You can also put the mysql root pw on that
>> line with substitution so no prompting is involved.
> 
> I saw this, and at first did not like it, as how to manage the mysql
> root password, so I found how to use here doc:
> 
> mysql -u root -p < CREATE DATABASE postfix;
> CREATE USER postfix@localhost IDENTIFIED BY "$Postfix_Database_Password";
> GRANT ALL PRIVILEGES ON postfix.* TO postfix@localhost;
> EOF
> 
> next refinement is:
> 
> mysql -u root -p$mysql_root_Password < CREATE DATABASE postfix;
> CREATE USER postfix@localhost IDENTIFIED BY "$Postfix_Database_Password";
> GRANT ALL PRIVILEGES ON postfix.* TO postfix@localhost;
> EOF
> 
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Realtime repo

2017-04-04 Thread Nux!
yum-config-manager --add-repo=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/rt/x86_64/

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Tim" <li...@kiuni.de>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Sunday, 2 April, 2017 23:16:19
> Subject: [CentOS] Realtime repo

> Hello,
> 
> is there an easy way to activate/install the realtime-repo under
> http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/rt/ or do I have to write the repo-file
> manually?
> 
> Thanks in advance
> Tim
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS-virt] Network isolation for KVM guests

2017-04-04 Thread Nux!
Just create a bridge, hook the host physical interface that you want in it, 
hook the VMs interface in it, done.
No need for passthrough.

This can be done via libvirt/virsh or if a UI is wanted then virt-manager makes 
this really easy.

Now assign an IP in the VM and it should work. You don't need to assign any IP 
on he host interface itself. Rinse and repeat for the rest of the interfaces.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "C. L. Martinez" <carlopm...@gmail.com>
> To: "Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS" <centos-virt@centos.org>
> Sent: Friday, 31 March, 2017 19:18:43
> Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] Network isolation for KVM guests

> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 05:06:53PM +0200, Sven Kieske wrote:
>> On 31/03/17 15:55, C. L. Martinez wrote:
>> > I need to attach two physical interfaces to a guest and these phy 
>> > interfaces
>> > have IP and routes assigned and I need to get them off the main routing 
>> > table.
>> 
>> I do not understand this.
>> 
>> You can attach a physical (or virtual, doesn't matter), interface to any
>> given vm, without assigning routes or IPs to these interfaces directly.
> 
> No, I can't because this host doesn't support PCI passthrough. One of these
> interfaces is a wireless nic.
> 
>> 
>> Just do the network configuration inside the vm, and the routing, well
>> on your router? You will just need the route for the vm networks on your
>> host, but what is your attack scenario to keep this separated from other
>> routes on this host? you need at least CAP_NET_ADMIN to fiddle with those.
> 
> How? If the same host routes Internet traffic in the main routing table I 
> expose
> host's services to Internet.
> 
>> 
>> --
>> Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards
>> 
>> Sven Kieske
>> 
>> Systemadministrator
>> Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG
>> Königsberger Straße 6
>> 32339 Espelkamp
>> T: +495772 293100
>> F: +495772 29
>> https://www.mittwald.de
>> Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer
>> St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen
>> Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> ___
>> CentOS-virt mailing list
>> CentOS-virt@centos.org
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
> 
> 
> --
> Greetings,
> C. L. Martinez
> ___
> CentOS-virt mailing list
> CentOS-virt@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


Re: [CentOS-virt] Network isolation for KVM guests

2017-03-30 Thread Nux!
Use libvirt with mac/ip spoofing enabled.

https://libvirt.org/formatnwfilter.html

https://libvirt.org/firewall.html

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "C. L. Martinez" <carlopm...@gmail.com>
> To: centos-virt@centos.org
> Sent: Thursday, 30 March, 2017 15:06:58
> Subject: [CentOS-virt] Network isolation for KVM guests

> Hi all,
> 
> What options exists under CentOS hosts to work with isolated networks?. For
> example, on BSD systems it is really trivial. In FreeBSD you can use setfib
> tools and on OpenBSD it is possible to use rdomain options. In 30 secs it is
> possible to work with isolated networks and assign process, ip address and
> routes (hidden from the main route table and ip addresses), etc.
> 
> But I can't find a similar solution for CentOS environments. I have found two
> similar options:
> 
> a/ Network namespaces (but doesn't provides a real network isolation)
> b/ VRF (but it is supported only for kernels 4.8 and up)
> 
> Any ideas?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> --
> Greetings,
> C. L. Martinez
> ___
> CentOS-virt mailing list
> CentOS-virt@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


Re: [CentOS] frozen bubble for C7

2017-03-21 Thread Nux!
That perl lib was most likely in EPEL at the time I added Frozen Bubble. They 
orphan packages once in a while breaking my deps.

Anyway, I've added perl-Compress-Bzip2 to my repo and Frozen Bubble should 
install fine now.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Fred Smith" <fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Saturday, 18 March, 2017 01:38:38
> Subject: [CentOS] frozen bubble for C7

> Hi all!
> 
> I'm looking for a frozen-bubble that works on C7.
> 
> I've tried installing the one in the Nux C7 archive, and the
> installation dies with:
> 
> Error: Package: frozen-bubble-2.2.1-0.10.beta1.el7.nux.x86_64 (nux-dextop)
>   Requires: perl(Compress::Bzip2)
> 
> Can't find perl(compress::bzip2) anywhere.
> 
> thansk in advance!
> 
> Fred
> --
>  Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us -
>   I can do all things through Christ
>  who strengthens me.
> -- Philippians 4:13 
> ---
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] An 'orrible question: Outlook 365 under wine on CentOS?

2017-03-21 Thread Nux!
Ha, the beauty of email. :-)

I am sorry to hear that, glad webmail worked for you.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "m roth" <m.r...@5-cent.us>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Monday, 20 March, 2017 18:18:31
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] An 'orrible question: Outlook 365 under wine on CentOS?

> This is seriously weird... note the date I made the original post
> 
> Nux! wrote:
>>
>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "m roth" <m.r...@5-cent.us>
>>> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
>>> Sent: Friday, 23 September, 2016 20:50:53
>>
>>> Either CentOS 6 or 7 - anyone know if it's possible?
>>>
>>> Upper Management has decided on a policy that IMAP is going to go away
>>> in the near future, and they want everyone on Lookout, sorry, Outlook 365.
>>>
>> I've used Davmail against sExchange in the past, with success.
>> If that doesn't work for you, then the easy way out is webmail which is
>> decent, in fact I have colleagues prefering it to the standard Outlook
>> program.
>> Office365 does offer IMAP though and it works reasonably well, I use it
>> with Thunderbird, hopefully they won't disable that - wonder as to the
>> reason of it.
> 
> I may look into it, in my copious spare time.  Since I posted, they
> migrated us, and I've used the Outlook webmail. Pardon me while I go
> worship the porcelain throne.
> 
> They *did* disable IMAP. "Policy"... aka, as Bruce Schnier says, "security
> theater"
> 
>  mark
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] An 'orrible question: Outlook 365 under wine on CentOS?

2017-03-20 Thread Nux!
Hi,

I've used Davmail against sExchange in the past, with success. 
If that doesn't work for you, then the easy way out is webmail which is decent, 
in fact I have colleagues prefering it to the standard Outlook program.
Office365 does offer IMAP though and it works reasonably well, I use it with 
Thunderbird, hopefully they won't disable that - wonder as to the reason of it.

hth

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "m roth" <m.r...@5-cent.us>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Friday, 23 September, 2016 20:50:53
> Subject: [CentOS] An 'orrible question: Outlook 365 under wine on CentOS?

> Either CentOS 6 or 7 - anyone know if it's possible?
> 
> Upper Management has decided on a policy that IMAP is going to go away in
> the near future, and they want everyone on Lookout, sorry, Outlook 365.
> 
> mark, VMNH*
> 
> * Very Much Not Happy
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] httpd/sites-available directory

2017-03-14 Thread Nux!
If all you want is a really fast redirect, then indeed what those people 
advised should work.

NameVirtualHost IP:80 (you only need this on apache 2.2 and lower, not needed 
on CentOS7 which comes with apache 2.4)


ServerName webmail.bar.com
Redirect permanent / https://webmail.bar.com/


--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Robert Moskowitz" <r...@htt-consult.com>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, 14 March, 2017 18:53:49
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] httpd/sites-available directory

> The goal is to have access to a specific virtual host on port 80, to be
> routed to port 443.  Any other port 80 access is left as is.
> 
> So let us assume a server foo.bar.com and the specific virtual host is
> webmail.bar.com
> 
> So I have tried:
> 
> 
>  ServerName webmail.bar.com
>  ServerAlias webmail
> 
>  RewriteEngine On
>  ReWriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} =webmail.bar.com [NC]
>  RewriteCond %{SERVER_PORT} !=443
>  RewriteRule ^.*$ https://%{SERVER_NAME}%{REQUEST_URI} [L,R]
>  ExpiresDefault "access plus 10 years"
>  AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/html text/plain text/xml
>  php_admin_flag session.cookie_secure "1"
> 
> 
> 
> 
> This rewrite is rewriting ALL connections to foo.bar.com.  That first
> ReWriteCond is not working.
> 
> Looking at this, the first thing I see 'wrong' with what I have done is:
> 
> 
> 
> That should probably be:
> 
> 
> 
> But I would also like to 'help out' users that connect to Webmail.bar.com
> 
> 
> On 03/14/2017 02:28 AM, Nux! wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> a2ensite and co is Debian/ubuntu specific. On CentOS there is no such thing.
>>
>> It's not clear to me what you are trying to achieve. Can you rephrase so we 
>> can
>> help?
>>
>> --
>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>
>> Nux!
>> www.nux.ro
>>
>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Robert Moskowitz" <r...@htt-consult.com>
>>> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, 14 March, 2017 01:31:08
>>> Subject: [CentOS] httpd/sites-available directory
>>> I just received some advice from a colleague of a colleague over at
>>> openssl.org.  But they use debian.  Please look at this and help me out
>>> on how Centos7 handles this:
>>>
>>> Note the comment of the location of virtualhost config files. Centos7
>>> does not have a "man a2ensite".
>>>
>>> thanks
>>>
>>> Rewriterules and https.  Actually, looking at what you have doesn't
>>> really tell me why it gets applied to everything and not just the
>>> webmail.  However, I'd say that your roundcubemail.conf is much
>>> overworked.  We use something like that on openssl.org, but it
>>> generally looks like this:
>>>
>>>  
>>>  ServerAdmin webmaster@localhost
>>>  ServerName ${HOSTNAME}
>>>  ServerAlias ${HOSTALIASES}
>>>  
>>>  Redirect permanent /https://${HOSTNAME}/
>>>  
>>>
>>> Since you already know that the host is correct and that's the port 80
>>> virtualhost, there's no point testing that with those RewriteCond you
>>> have.  Also, Redirect is faster and preferable to RewriteRule for this
>>> kind of stuff, seehttps://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/rewrite/avoid.html
>>>
>>> Also, specifically for virtualhost config files, they should be
>>> located in sites-available/ rather than conf.d/, see 'man a2ensite'.
>>> conf.d/ is older style configuration of general stuff...  or well,
>>> that's at least true for Debian, I'm not sure this is specific for
>>> Debian distributions and their derivates or if it's a native Apache
>>> thing.  You'll have to check the manuals to confirm.
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> CentOS mailing list
>>> CentOS@centos.org
>>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>> ___
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] httpd/sites-available directory

2017-03-14 Thread Nux!
Hello,

a2ensite and co is Debian/ubuntu specific. On CentOS there is no such thing.

It's not clear to me what you are trying to achieve. Can you rephrase so we can 
help?

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Robert Moskowitz" <r...@htt-consult.com>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, 14 March, 2017 01:31:08
> Subject: [CentOS] httpd/sites-available directory

> I just received some advice from a colleague of a colleague over at
> openssl.org.  But they use debian.  Please look at this and help me out
> on how Centos7 handles this:
> 
> Note the comment of the location of virtualhost config files. Centos7
> does not have a "man a2ensite".
> 
> thanks
> 
> Rewriterules and https.  Actually, looking at what you have doesn't
> really tell me why it gets applied to everything and not just the
> webmail.  However, I'd say that your roundcubemail.conf is much
> overworked.  We use something like that on openssl.org, but it
> generally looks like this:
> 
> 
> ServerAdmin webmaster@localhost
> ServerName ${HOSTNAME}
> ServerAlias ${HOSTALIASES}
> 
> Redirect permanent /https://${HOSTNAME}/
> 
> 
> Since you already know that the host is correct and that's the port 80
> virtualhost, there's no point testing that with those RewriteCond you
> have.  Also, Redirect is faster and preferable to RewriteRule for this
> kind of stuff, seehttps://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/rewrite/avoid.html
> 
> Also, specifically for virtualhost config files, they should be
> located in sites-available/ rather than conf.d/, see 'man a2ensite'.
> conf.d/ is older style configuration of general stuff...  or well,
> that's at least true for Debian, I'm not sure this is specific for
> Debian distributions and their derivates or if it's a native Apache
> thing.  You'll have to check the manuals to confirm.
> 
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] kmod-jfs on Centos 6

2017-03-13 Thread Nux!
yum -y install 
http://mirrors.coreix.net/elrepo/elrepo/el6/x86_64/RPMS/kmod-jfs-0.0-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64.rpm

(that's for 64bit, adjust the url accordingly for 32bit)

it won't hose your system

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "H" <age...@meddatainc.com>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Friday, 10 March, 2017 19:20:37
> Subject: [CentOS] kmod-jfs on Centos 6

> I am a bit of a noob with Linux and Centos but would like to be able to access
> an old external USB disk formatted JFS by OS/2. I have seen there is a 
> kmod-jfs
> package on elrepo that ought to work with Centos 6 but am unsure how to 
> install
> kmods without hosing my existing system...
> 
> If anyone would like to be so kind to give me a short how-to, I would be very
> grateful.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Wich web browser on CentOS6 ?

2017-02-10 Thread Nux!
Hi,

I had the same problem. Stick to the old Firefox, but only to access old idrac, 
ipmi etc.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Patrick Begou" <patrick.be...@legi.grenoble-inp.fr>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Friday, 10 February, 2017 11:26:14
> Subject: [CentOS] Wich web browser on CentOS6 ?

> Hello
> 
> I have more and more troubles using firefox in professional environment with
> CentOS6. The latest version is 45.7.0 But I can't use it anymore to access 
> some
> old server hardware (IDRAC7 of DELL C6100) because of
> "/SSL_ERROR_WEAK_SERVER_CERT_KEY/".  I had to install an old Firefox32 version
> to administrate these servers.
> 
> Today I upgrade the firmware of 2 DELL switch and now Firefox cannot connect 
> to
> them anymore saying:
> /An error occurred during a connection to xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx. The server rejected
> the handshake because the client downgraded to a lower TLS version than the
> server supports//
> //SSL_ERROR_INAPPROPRIATE_FALLBACK_ALERT
> 
> /Is there a CentOS6 recommended web browser allowing continuous connections to
> olds and new base level (and local) system administration services ?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Patrick
> 
> --
> ===
>|  Equipe M.O.S.T. |  |
>|  Patrick BEGOU   | mailto:patrick.be...@grenoble-inp.fr |
>|  LEGI|  |
>|  BP 53 X | Tel 04 76 82 51 35   |
>|  38041 GRENOBLE CEDEX| Fax 04 76 82 52 71   |
> ===
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 and Areca ARC-1883I SAS controller: JBOD or not to JBOD?

2017-01-20 Thread Nux!
Haven't used Areca in a very long time, but with raid controllers the rule is 
to use it in order to take advantage of the cache.
The performance gains will be more than significant, especially for writes.

hth

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Peter Peltonen" <peter.pelto...@gmail.com>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Friday, 20 January, 2017 17:31:56
> Subject: [CentOS] CentOS 7 and Areca ARC-1883I SAS controller: JBOD or not
> to JBOD?

> Hi,
> 
> Does anyone have experiences about ARC-1883I SAS controller with CentOS7?
> 
> I am planning to have RAID1 setup and I am wondering if I should use
> the controller's RAID functionality which has 2GB cache or should I go
> with JBOD + Linux software RAID?
> 
> The disks I am going to use are 6TB Seagate Enterprise ST6000NM0034
> 7200rpm SAS/12Gbit 128 MB
> 
> If hardware RAID is preferred, the controller's cache could be updated
> to 4GB and I wonder how much performance gain this would give me?
> 
> Thanks!
> Peter
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Alternative to cPanel

2016-12-23 Thread Nux!
If you want free/foss then Virtualmin. 

Very good panel, good support and they have been highly consistent over the 
years and very receptive.

CPanel has also improved massively in the last few years, well worth the price.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "FrancisM" <fran...@mytechrepublic.com>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Thursday, 15 December, 2016 15:17:56
> Subject: [CentOS] Alternative to cPanel

> Dear All,
> 
> Im looking for alternative for cPanel and somehow I read that the 'cwp
> control web panel' (http://centos-webpanel.com) and Sentora (
> http://www.sentora.ga) is the good alternative for cPanel.
> 
> Is there someone using this application and what can you tell about or
> recommend.
> 
> Thank you all.
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Gnome weather applet stranded

2016-08-29 Thread Nux!
Thanks, I'll raise the issue

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "isdtor" <isd...@gmail.com>
> To: centos@centos.org
> Sent: Thursday, 25 August, 2016 14:55:40
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Gnome weather applet stranded

> Fred Smith writes:
>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 08:33:46AM +0100, Nux! wrote:
>> > I've rebuilt libmateweather for EL7 with the aforementioned patch and it 
>> > seems
>> > to have fixed the issue.
>> > Feel free to use it until EPEL package the fix.
>> > 
>> > http://li.nux.ro/download/nux//tmp/libmateweather7/
>> 
>> thanks Nux!
>> 
>> I installed it and it now gets current conditions just fine.
>> 
>> but I tried several different locations and all of them say that there
>> is no forecast available. Possible coincidence??
> 
> The patch is incomplete. The Mate guys didn't patch this file. Run tcpdump
> and verify it's trying query www.weather.gov/forecasts.
> 
> # pwd
> /root/rpmbuild/SOURCES/libgweather-2.28.0/libgweather
> # grep http * |grep forecast
> weather-iwin.c:/* see the description here:
> http://www.weather.gov/forecasts/xml/ */
> weather-iwin.c:url = g_strdup_printf
> ("http://www.weather.gov/forecasts/xml/sample_products/browser_interface/ndfdBrowserClientByDay.php?=%.02f=%.02f=24+hourly=%04d-%02d-%02d=7;,
> weather-iwin.c:url = g_strdup_printf
> ("http://weather.noaa.gov/pub/data/forecasts/zone/%s/%s.txt;, state, zone);
> [root@torr libgweather]#
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Gnome weather applet stranded

2016-08-25 Thread Nux!
I've patched libgweather with the same MATE patch and it seems to be working 
fine.
Give it a try
http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/tmp/libgweather6/

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "isdtor" <isd...@gmail.com>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, 24 August, 2016 15:19:20
> Subject: [CentOS] Gnome weather applet stranded

> The Gnome weather report applet has ceased working on CentOS5/6.
> http://weather.noaa.gov/ says "This service is no longer available". Are there
> any good alternatives? I liked the applet as it allowed the use of a custom
> radar map.
> 
> As I just discovered, the weather functionality of the CentOS6 Gnome clock
> applet was using the same service.
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Gnome weather applet stranded

2016-08-25 Thread Nux!
I've rebuilt libmateweather for EL7 with the aforementioned patch and it seems 
to have fixed the issue.
Feel free to use it until EPEL package the fix.

http://li.nux.ro/download/nux//tmp/libmateweather7/

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Nux!" <n...@li.nux.ro>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Thursday, 25 August, 2016 08:13:00
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Gnome weather applet stranded

> Fred,
> 
> Check here
> https://git.gnome.org/browse/libgweather/tree/libgweather/weather-metar.c?h=gnome-2-30
> 
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> 
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
> 
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Fred Smith" <fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us>
>> To: centos@centos.org
>> Sent: Thursday, 25 August, 2016 02:17:27
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Gnome weather applet stranded
> 
>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:22:58PM +0100, Nux! wrote:
>>> It looks like it was quickly fixed in MATE, hope EPEL moves fast... :)
>>> 
>>> https://github.com/mate-desktop/libmateweather/issues/30#issuecomment-242190096
>>> --
>>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>> 
>>> Nux!
>>> www.nux.ro
>> 
>> Just for grins, I've been looking through the sources for the version
>> I'm running that does not contain the fix. Either I"m blind, or there's
>> a whole lot of obscurity built in there. I cannot, for the life of me,
>> find where it hides the URL it goes to to get the weather data. Since
>> there ought to be a fix coming down the pipe Real Soon Now, I won't
>> sorry about it, but it woulda been nice if I coulda figured it out. :(
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> ---
>> .Fred Smith   /
>> ( /__  ,__.   __   __ /  __   : /
>> //  /   /__) /  /  /__) .+'   Home: fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us
>> //  (__ (___ (__(_ (___ / :__ 
>> 781-438-5471
>>  Jude 1:24,25 
>> -
>> ___
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org
> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Gnome weather applet stranded

2016-08-25 Thread Nux!
Fred,

Check here 
https://git.gnome.org/browse/libgweather/tree/libgweather/weather-metar.c?h=gnome-2-30

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Fred Smith" <fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us>
> To: centos@centos.org
> Sent: Thursday, 25 August, 2016 02:17:27
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Gnome weather applet stranded

> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:22:58PM +0100, Nux! wrote:
>> It looks like it was quickly fixed in MATE, hope EPEL moves fast... :)
>> 
>> https://github.com/mate-desktop/libmateweather/issues/30#issuecomment-242190096
>> --
>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>> 
>> Nux!
>> www.nux.ro
> 
> Just for grins, I've been looking through the sources for the version
> I'm running that does not contain the fix. Either I"m blind, or there's
> a whole lot of obscurity built in there. I cannot, for the life of me,
> find where it hides the URL it goes to to get the weather data. Since
> there ought to be a fix coming down the pipe Real Soon Now, I won't
> sorry about it, but it woulda been nice if I coulda figured it out. :(
> 
> 
> --
> ---
> .Fred Smith   /
> ( /__  ,__.   __   __ /  __   : /
> //  /   /__) /  /  /__) .+'   Home: fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us
> //  (__ (___ (__(_ (___ / :__ 781-438-5471
>  Jude 1:24,25 
> -
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


  1   2   3   4   5   6   >