[CentOS-docs] Change "bi-weekly" newsletter on "FrontPage" to "monthly"

2009-09-15 Thread Timothy Lee
Dear all, FrontPage currently mentions a bi-weekly newsletter. This should be changed to "monthly". Regards, Timothy Lee ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs

Re: [CentOS-docs] proposed nvidia wiki page

2009-09-15 Thread Scott Robbins
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 08:51:23PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: > On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, Akemi Yagi wrote: > > The only reason for me to keep maintaining the dkms packages, would be > for those people not running supported kernels (recent/official). But if > we could describe and automate the building

Re: [CentOS-docs] proposed nvidia wiki page

2009-09-15 Thread Dag Wieers
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Phil Schaffner wrote: Ned Slider wrote on 09/14/2009 01:23 PM: There are (to my knowledge) the Nvidia binary installer, dkms driver from rpmforge, kmdl package from ATrpms, and a kmod driver from elrepo. I'd say pres

Re: [CentOS-docs] proposed nvidia wiki page

2009-09-15 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Phil Schaffner wrote: > Ned Slider wrote on 09/14/2009 01:23 PM: >> There are (to my knowledge) the Nvidia binary installer, dkms driver >> from rpmforge, kmdl package from ATrpms, and a kmod driver from elrepo. > I'd say present all the options known to be viabl

Re: [CentOS-docs] proposed nvidia wiki page

2009-09-15 Thread Phil Schaffner
Ned Slider wrote on 09/14/2009 01:23 PM: ... > Do we need to decide what the official (or preferred) CentOS Way is for > this? Or do we just present all the options without prejudice? > > There are (to my knowledge) the Nvidia binary installer, dkms driver > from rpmforge, kmdl package from ATrp

Re: [CentOS-docs] Contribution to wiki: nagios incompatibility with centos 5.2

2009-09-15 Thread Christoph Maser
Am Dienstag, den 15.09.2009, 09:21 +0200 schrieb Martin Boel, Silverbullet: > Hi > > Thanks for you reply. I guess this should be fixed i the next nagios package > or next centos version, but for now the public should > be told about a workaround, that works with the current versions. There is >

Re: [CentOS-docs] Contribution to wiki: nagios incompatibility with centos 5.2

2009-09-15 Thread Ralph Angenendt
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 09:21 +0200, Martin Boel, Silverbullet wrote: > Hi > > Thanks for you reply. I guess this should be fixed i the next nagios package > or next centos version, but for now the public should > be told about a workaround, that works with the current versions. There is > quite

Re: [CentOS-docs] Contribution to wiki: nagios incompatibility with centos 5.2

2009-09-15 Thread Christoph Maser
Am Dienstag, den 15.09.2009, 09:21 +0200 schrieb Martin Boel, Silverbullet: > Hi > > Thanks for you reply. I guess this should be fixed i the next nagios package > or next centos version, but for now the public should > be told about a workaround, that works with the current versions. There is >

[CentOS-docs] Contribution to wiki: nagios incompatibility with centos 5.2

2009-09-15 Thread Martin Boel, Silverbullet
Hi Thanks for you reply. I guess this should be fixed i the next nagios package or next centos version, but for now the public should be told about a workaround, that works with the current versions. There is quite a lot of work hours in this simple workaround, and some people may simply give