Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Moin as we know it cannot do that on the account creation page. So there
would be two solutions: Allow everyone to edit content everywhere except
on especially hidden or protected pages and/or create a new account
creation mechanism for moin. Or as
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Ned Slider wrote:
Regarding this I don't know yet where that mail should be sent. Or do we
still want to have people who want to contribute subscribe to this
list?
Either here (centos-docs) or a dedicated Wiki editorial team ML? As this
list already exists, may as well
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Ned Slider wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
But this would mean that we have to either open up this list for
everyone, or take all of the people on the editorial team into the
moderators team for this list (which I don't have any problem with), or
require people to
Ned Slider wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
But this would mean that we have to either open up this list for
everyone, or take all of the people on the editorial team into the
moderators team for this list (which I don't have any problem with), or
require people to subscribe here.
I don't
Ned Slider wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
This is what I wanted to know: Do we want people who want to edit the
wiki to be subscribed to this list? This is taking the barrier a step
higher.
Presumably the alternative is for them to simply register an account on
the Wiki and off they go.
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...snip...
I'd like to know two things:
1:
Who would like to be on an editorial team for the wiki? That means that
you must monitor changes to all pages.
/me raises his hand.
2:
Is everbody fine with the following?
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 6:52 PM, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim Verhoeven wrote:
For me people don't need to be subscribe (as in must), but they are
encouraged to do so (as in may). Can people not subscribe to
centos-docs mail to it ?
Not at the moment (and I don't want to
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 07:05:57PM +0200, Tim Verhoeven enlightened us:
Tim Verhoeven wrote:
For me people don't need to be subscribe (as in must), but they are
encouraged to do so (as in may). Can people not subscribe to
centos-docs mail to it ?
Not at the moment (and I don't want to
On 03/06/2008, Ralph Angenendt
[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Moin as we know it cannot do that on the account creation page. So there
would be two solutions: Allow everyone to edit content everywhere except
on especially hidden or protected pages and/or
Alan Bartlett wrote:
Who would like to be on an editorial team for the wiki? That means that
you must monitor changes to all pages.
I would be willing to give that a go - assuming that I would be accepted.
The more, the merrier :)
Cheers,
Ralph
pgp0aizPfS0W1.pgp
Description: PGP
John wrote:
Just as an
equal opertunity that the centos core members would want there name on
updated packages. IE The Package Builder.
umm not true.
We dont have Packager set on any CentOS4/5 rpms anymore - anything that
comes through the buildsystem does not have that. We used to set
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:54 PM, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aggree..I would like for the Authors name and Co-Authored names to remain on
the article they have written.
Since many people feel this is important, maybe we should. But I'd
propose to include a note somewhere on the Wiki that it
John wrote:
Lets discuss. I'm kinda sure the author or authors, same as me would like
there name on it somehow or another. Now this is a whole different story for
articles that are no longer maintained by the original author. Just as an
equal opertunity that the centos core members would want
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 1:46 AM, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Akemi Yagi wrote:
The principle of Wiki is participation of anyone who wishes to
contribute. That of course raises a question of how we can maintain
the contents correct or appropriate. I agree that having an editorial
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Akemi Yagi wrote:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/2007-October/000734.html
As you can see in that thread, placing a moderator's name on each page
was opposed by a few core members of the CentOS team. Then
Good News, everybody!
Maybe not yet, though :)
There are two things I'd like to get at with this mail.
a) This also has something to do with Ned's mails from yesterday - we
have two FAQs at the moment (on www.centos.org and on wiki.centos.org)
and we want to unify those, if possible on the
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Or as a third way: Require people to mail
their account names to the above mentioned editor team with some
signed text we'd still have to write up. Then - in a timely fashion -
one of this editor group can put that account on the EditGroup page.
This could be done with
Ned Slider wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
b) Opening up the wiki
We had some more or less internal talks about that on Fosdem and via
mail and on IRC. While the situation we have at the moment keeps
spammers away, it also keeps away people who would like to edit stuff on
the wiki or just
18 matches
Mail list logo
