On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Guiwen wrote:
> Hi sage,
> Thanks for explanation. We read ceph papers and known ebofs has good
> performance by writing the data to device directly. Does btrfs have same
> performance as ebofs?
Generally speaking, I expect better performance from btrfs, and
performance is im
Hi sage,
Thanks for explanation. We read ceph papers and known ebofs has good
performance by writing the data to device directly. Does btrfs have same
performance as ebofs?
Thanks,
Guiwen
>Hi,
>>
>We dropped support for ebofs a few months back since the plan moving
>forward is to use btrfs and
Hi,
We dropped support for ebofs a few months back since the plan moving
forward is to use btrfs and the maintenance burden wasn't deemed
worthwhile. Btrfs does (almost *) everything ebofs does, and much more,
and is very actively developed.
The main issue with building ebofs at this point is
