I do think the find a journal partition code isn't particularly robust.
I've had experiences with ceph-disk trying to create a new partition even
though I had wiped/zapped a disk previously. It would make the operational
component of Ceph much easier with replacing disks if the journal partition
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 6:01 PM, Gregory Farnum g...@gregs42.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Robert LeBlanc rob...@leblancnet.us wrote:
Before we base thousands of VM image clones off of one or more snapshots, I
want to test what happens when the snapshot becomes corrupted. I don't
Hidden HTML ... trying agin...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Robert LeBlanc rob...@leblancnet.us
Date: Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 5:20 PM
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Prioritize Heartbeat packets
To: ceph-us...@lists.ceph.com ceph-us...@lists.ceph.com,
ceph-devel ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
by the commit, this ought to do the trick:
osd heartbeat use min delay socket = true
On 07/03/15 01:20, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
I see that Jian Wen has done work on this for 0.94. I tried looking
through the code to see if I can figure out how to configure this new
option, but it all went over my
at 3:36 AM, Robert LeBlanc rob...@leblancnet.us wrote:
I've found commit 9b9a682fe035c985e416ee1c112fa58f9045a27c and I see
that when 'osd heartbeat use min delay socket = true' it will mark the
packet with DSCP CS6. Based on the setting of the socket in
msg/simple/Pipe.cc is it possible
Sorry HTML snuck in somewhere.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Robert LeBlanc rob...@leblancnet.us
Date: Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 8:15 PM
Subject: Force an OSD to try to peer
To: Ceph-User ceph-us...@ceph.com, ceph-devel ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
I've been working at this peering
libcephfs1-0.93-0.el7.centos.x86_64
ceph-0.93-0.el7.centos.x86_64
ceph-deploy-1.5.22-0.noarch
[ulhglive-root@mon1 systemd]# for i in $(rpm -qa | grep ceph); do rpm
-ql $i | grep -i --color=always systemd; done
[nothing returned]
Thanks,
Robert LeBlanc
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Turns out jumbo frames was not set on all the switch ports. Once that
was resolved the cluster quickly became healthy.
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Robert LeBlanc rob...@leblancnet.us wrote:
I've been working at this peering problem all day. I've done a lot of
testing at the network layer
on peering ?
In our setup so far, we haven't enabled jumbo frames other than performance
reason (if at all).
Thanks Regards
Somnath
-Original Message-
From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of
Robert LeBlanc
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 11:08 AM
I was desperate for anything after exhausting every other possibility
I could think of. Maybe I should put a checklist in the Ceph docs of
things to look for.
Thanks,
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Sage Weil s...@newdream.net wrote:
On Tue, 31 Mar 2015, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
Turns out jumbo
Also sending to the devel list to see if they have some insight.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Robert LeBlanc rob...@leblancnet.us wrote:
I tried finding an answer to this on Google, but couldn't find it.
Since BTRFS can parallel the journal with the write, does it make
sense to have
would like to try it to offer some feedback on your
question.
Thanks,
Robert LeBlanc
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Sage Weil sw...@redhat.com wrote:
Hey,
We are considering switching to civetweb (the embedded/standalone rgw web
server) as the primary supported RGW frontend instead
Cool, I'll see if we have some cycles to look at it.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Sage Weil sw...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
We tried to get radosgw working with Apache + mod_fastcgi, but due to
the changes in radosgw, Apache, mode_*cgi, etc
Thanks, we were able to get it up and running very quickly. If it
performs well, I don't see any reason to use Apache+fast_cgi. I don't
have any problems just focusing on civetweb.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Sage Weil sw...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
We
-ow...@vger.kernel.org
[mailto:ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Robert LeBlanc
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 12:27 PM
To: Sage Weil
Cc: Ceph-User; ceph-devel
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] who is using radosgw with civetweb?
Thanks, we were able to get it up and running very
+1 for proxy. Keep the civetweb lean and mean and if people need
extras let the proxy handle this. Proxies are easy to set-up and a
simple example could be included in the documentation.
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Wido den Hollander w...@42on.com wrote:
Op 26 feb. 2015 om 18:22 heeft
it doesn't like the rack definition. I can move things
around, like putting root before it and it always chokes on the first
rack definition no matter which one it is.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Robert LeBlanc rob...@leblancnet.us wrote:
I was trying to decompile and edit the CRUSH map
are on). Saving for posterity's sake. Thanks Sage!
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Robert LeBlanc rob...@leblancnet.us wrote:
Ok, so the decompile error is because I didn't download the CRUSH map
(found that out using hexdump), but I still can't compile an
unmodified CRUSH map.
[root@nodezz
or something (I know that
Ceph journals pgmap changes and such). I'm concerned that this could
be very detrimental in a production environment. There doesn't seem to
be a way to recover from this.
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Robert LeBlanc
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe ceph
I'm trying to create a CRUSH ruleset and I'm using crushtool to test
the rules, but it doesn't seem to mapping things correctly. I have two
roots, on for spindles and another for SSD. I have two rules, one for
each root. The output of crushtool on rule 0 shows objects being
mapped to SSD OSDs when
Should stretch be added as well?
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:18 AM, Alexandre DERUMIER
aderum...@odiso.com wrote:
Hi,
Debian Jessie has been released this weekend,
any plan to add jessie repositories soon ?
Regards,
Alexandre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
What is the feeling about generating debug packages along with the
standard packages? Seems like it could be useful. That and even though
I enjoying building my own packages, I am lazy.
Thanks,
-
Robert LeBlanc
GPG Fingerprint 79A2
ng3hoFhiLxXev2+TwyCN8KP4AwbWC0oqPe88XI7U+Lvbc/95Vyj4B6mDU5Cx
p9YLHNnEkEWWv0xivEukPwJP4rBbjx+dUqdU3kr34HsqWlkr0s1MvwEi8hkf
5CmbkMhpoLIrS5EumZD/hQIe6JKgpEh4is60iqiB9c2YwzDk2XRPpWFc5RRV
R7Qo
=jkb2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Robert LeBlanc
GPG Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654
% ceph-osd ceph-osd [.]
ReplicatedPG::execute_ctx
+6.09% 0.15% ceph-osd [kernel.kallsyms] [k] ___sys_sendmsg
+5.68% 0.00% ceph-osd [kernel.kallsyms] [k] do_sock_sendmsg
Thanks for humoring me,
-
Robert LeBlanc
GPG Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4
/2rC74LvTscIIdf1dZQHWwXHelRm49
y1pxq07V7LlL6gM+zA6Zskm9QwlJ3D81mH7QpiaixKX8cEzcVifD7WUzP/YV
Go8K
=gB4o
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Robert LeBlanc
GPG Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 12:07 AM, Dałek, Piotr
piotr.da...@ts.fujitsu.com wrote
enable_experimental_unrecoverable_data_corrupting_features = ms-type-async
BTW, what kind of workload you are trying , random read or write ?
Also, is this SSD or HDD cluster ?
Thanks Regards
Somnath
-Original Message-
From: ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org
[mailto:ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Robert LeBlanc
Sent
+F0Uvs3xWAxxaIR9r83wMj9qQeBZTKVzQ
1aFIi15KqAwOp12yWCmrqKTeXhjwYQNd8viCQCGN7AQyPglmzfbuEHalVjz4
oSJX
=k281
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Robert LeBlanc
GPG Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 6:02 AM, Alexandre DERUMIER aderum...@odiso.com wrote
/ceph`'
It coughs at the install/RPM package part.
Any help with preventing the whole tar/untar process which I can't
seem to get exactly right either would be very helpful.
Thanks,
-
Robert LeBlanc
GPG Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
-BEGIN PGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
+1
-
Robert LeBlanc
GPG Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote:
Thanks Mark !
- Mail original -
De: Mark Nelson
À: aderumier , Robert
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Any update on the recorded sessions? Last I see is 10 Jun 2015 in the Etherpad.
Thanks,
-
Robert LeBlanc
GPG Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 7:28 AM, Mark Nelson wrote:
8AM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Cool, I'll have to give it a shot.
-
Robert LeBlanc
GPG Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 7:44 AM, Owen Synge wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Robert
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Brad,
I've been able to do this just fine. I'm looking for a way to build
right out of a git branch where the tarball isn't on the downloads
page.
-
Robert LeBlanc
GPG Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
-Stop: 0 1 6 on Debian, and leave the values blank on Red Hat.
Robert LeBlanc
GPG Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe ceph-devel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Have you configured and enabled the epel repo?
-
Robert LeBlanc
GPG Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 6:26 AM, Shambhu Rajak wrote:
I am trying to install ceph gaint on rhel
time because I don't know many of the
tricks that help people get to speed quickly.
Thanks,
-
Robert LeBlanc
GPG Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: Mailvelope v0.13.1
Comment: https://www.mailvelope.com
Rx6DfsdHfSN5ji4poAlpExwvRmwbdBSr16kVhPU07DdODdmlK8nF64g8U4yY
WItD
=sGNI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Robert LeBlanc
GPG Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Ken Dreyer kdre...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/10/2015 09:44 AM, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
This is really
+8AjeVa45EDHkAQqa5t8Kb5+sKr/LyyKBmqw0suD77kqKqWtKs9+sVFd6X
TXOhPKmAnd8TEGE86JzsfFeypfb76jil08MuIzvDvVj8hsRjpRHsZBQi+DPn
VIIbONqNM4CknURJW17rmP0o9l+sF+KAeji0AGivZuawtD+vbThwfWNRyMjN
5IXZ
=Sgkt
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Robert LeBlanc
GPG Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Well, I think this has gone well past my ability to implement. Should
this be turned into a BP and see if someone is able to work on it?
-
Robert LeBlanc
GPG Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Tue
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 7:52 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jun 2015, Gregory Farnum wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
One feature we would like is an rbd top
situation are we trying to target/solve?
-
Robert LeBlanc
GPG Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: Mailvelope v0.13.1
Comment: https://www.mailvelope.com
wsFcBAEBCAAQBQJVZ154CRDmVDuy+mK58QAAXTcP/1bJDaE2KU1BKVk2O+o1
implementing Kerberos and
preventing the client from mapping to other UID/GIDs, but that really
takes the flexibility out of the system.
Robert LeBlanc
GPG Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe ceph-devel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
The workload is on average, 17KB per read request and 13KB per write
request with 73% read abd 27% write. This is a web hosting workload.
-
Robert LeBlanc
GPG Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Wed
storage tiering. Is the idea
to be able to move data off to near-line storage like tape?
Thanks,
-
Robert LeBlanc
GPG Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 2:39 AM, Marcel Lauhoff wrote:
Hi,
I wrote a prototype for an OSD-based
/spreadsheets/d/1n12IqAOuH2wH-A7Sq5boU8kSEYg_Pl20sPmM0idjj00/edit?usp=sharing
Test script is multitest. The real world test is based off of the disk
stats of about 100 of our servers which have uptimes of many months.
- -
Robert LeBlanc
GPG Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654
can
determine if jemalloc is something that would be worth switching to
eventually.
-
Robert LeBlanc
GPG Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: Mailvelope v0.13.1
Comment: https://www.mailvelope.com
this is one
thing SMB got right and why I prefer Samba over NFS for multi-tenant
environments.
-
Robert LeBlanc
GPG Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Sage Weil wrote
/pYWtjcLZYB079Yjl5NKqWOdewStCM9JhTNwjc7bclQ4H0LLW3EW2P
jeQE
=KYfI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Robert LeBlanc
GPG Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 4:13 AM, John Spray john.sp...@redhat.com wrote:
On 28/05/2015 06:47, Gregory Farnum wrote:
Thread
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I've got some more tests running right now. Once those are done, I'll
find a couple of tests that had extreme difference and gather some
perf data for them.
-
Robert LeBlanc
GPG Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2
/GID to store unique
UID/GIDs on the back end and just strip off the tenant ID when
presented to the client so there are no collisions of UID/GIDs between
tenants in the MDS.
Hmm, that is another thought...
-Greg
-
Robert LeBlanc
GPG Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E
think I'm stating the
obvious here, sorry).
-
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Milosz Tanski wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Shishir Gowda
wrote:
Hi All,
Have sent out a pull request
://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_loading
Robert LeBlanc
Sent from a mobile device please excuse any typos.
On Aug 22, 2015 7:55 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015, Milosz Tanski wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Shishir Gowda
wrote:
Hi All,
Have sent out a pull request which enables
+HWBQTZgLi0bxIyBEo7Pg75+f8yzawTpWWx5tM4JR
yKkADT8+hid8PK6YwUrsaYnRhdRunAZv9BdvOulXyJ9azcCHSzlJWeYWHEwq
krdm
=m+W6
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 7:54 AM, Sage Weil sw...@redhat.com wrote:
As time
systemctl to shut down the process and unmount itself?
-
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 6:45 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015, Alex Elsayed wrote:
Sage Weil wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015, Alex
and report back to the list.
Thank you,
-
Robert LeBlanc
GPG Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: Mailvelope v0.13.1
Comment: https://www.mailvelope.com
wsFcBAEBCAAQBQJVpUQtCRDmVDuy+mK58QAA3d8P/3tSSFXInMDLde9IZFfE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Here is the pull request against master.
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/6429
-
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:44 PM, Robert LeBlanc wrote
/6BxREpKgXoQ9EgZMdDWntLUBU+QV+FedlXRTEHD3zQKwlT
Hix1lTuNxVY+VZSXos18FaFz+duVjUS/O2yuy1bmLWD6PfouFFCMfRwmK1rl
QaaE1k6vinAzGbwq48D94hMPBcNQmJTWd8GC8kOGP+F9EFHyCPaHVK0Lu/T2
jdnx9h/HcshOWh60CKu6N5w+JfvIcqyrLcDmiS3A9scgYOsdphLf1etxrKdq
Xd8Z
=evCv
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Robert LeBlanc
PGP
at all. It is
really weird.
-
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> We are testing out cache tiering, but w
cently and
didn't see this problem (only took an hour or two to evict 700GB of
data). I saw a very slow evict a while back, but just chalked it up to
btrfs being dumb.
[1]
http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/rados/operations/cache-tiering/#removing-a-writeback-cache
- ----
Robert LeBla
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I created a pull request to fix an op dequeuing order problem. I'm not
sure if I need to mention it here.
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/6417
-
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
for that. Do you know the priorities of snap trim, scrub and recovery
so that I can do some math/logic on applying costs in an efficient way
as we talked about last week?
Thanks,
-
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
-BEGIN PGP
/tWqDNwg3TBXtWSFU5S1XgJzoAQm5
yE7dbMwhAObw3XQ/eGMTmyICs1vwD0+mxaNHHWzSubtFKcdblUDW6BUxc+lj
ztfA
=GSDL
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Samuel Just <sj...@redhat.com> wrote:
/I5rlCL5CKTxb2LR1/5WJt0eh7xtyKU1B0yh4G7JlMf/3kmrznOWu
VEUUA3mJ1depDToadnECnCZMKHrGYC36XCy8xq3FDqhvl4BWV0VMA+yi1uhj
zZ5udKKbN5Cxo/Sc48DG8wz9lQKn4LPCH2PD81oTcTfyd1iG2oNNkchrXa6K
iwed
=WjDS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654
o do next taking into account
> fairness across io classes and ops with different costs.
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>> Thanks, I think some of the fog is clearing. I was wondering how
>
difference there may be as it
would help decide if this is a path to continue pursuing.
-
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Blinick, Stephen L wrote:
> Thanks for taking a look!
>
> First, the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
It sounds like dmclock/mclock will alleviate a lot of the concerns I
have as long as it can be smart like you said. It sounds like the
queue thread was already tried so there is experience behind the
current implementation vs. me thinking it might
as well). What are some of the next steps for
something like this, meaning a pretty significant change to core code?
Thank you to all who took time to help point me in the right direction.
-
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Wed, Nov
, osd_repop_reply).
If the recovery is in another separate queue, then there is no
reliable way to prioritize OPs between them.
If I'm going off in to the weeds, please help me get back on the trail.
Thanks,
-
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2
for the assert and pointers how
to resolve it.
4. It seems like there are multiple threads of the queue keeping the
queues pretty small. How can I limit the queue to one thread so all
OPs have to be queued in one queue? I'd like to see the differences
with changing this.
5. I'd like any pointers to improving this co
as I've tried to figure this out.
Thanks,
-
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:20 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 3:12 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Nov 2015, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>> Thanks Gregory,
>>
>> People are most likely busy an
0ryi4KDriU+zTUo7J0P6qQHm6ab
nImA
=e7Ar
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--------
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Gregory Farnum <gfar...@redhat.com> wrote:
> As we've discussed on the PR, this isn't rig
XU8gYbG1um5YY8jrtvvkhnbHdeO/k24/cH7MGslxeezBPnMNzmqj3qVdiX1H
EBbyBBtp8OF+pKExrmZc2w01W/Nxl6GbVoG+IKJ61FgwKOXEiMwb0wv5mu30
eP3D
=R0O9
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 12:00 AM, Haomai Wang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I'm sure I have a log of a 1,000 second block somewhere, I'll have to
look around for it.
I'll try turning that knob and see what happens. I'll come back with
the results.
Thanks,
-
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
We forgot to upload the ceph.log yesterday. It is there now.
-
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIG
-
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Sage Weil <sw...@redhat.com> wrote:
> The current design is based on two simple ideas:
>
> 1) a key/value interface is better way to manage all of our internal
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Are you testing with straw or straw2?
-
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Xusangdi wrote:
> Hi Sage,
>
> Recently when I was learn
/ynVLLY8fOKb2/x1GEKYNz3cGKx3M0u
S5wRtYvOOZEwb/B2bhvCSNtb2FgqpS4INfgKn+334ibd2X1o42oj52SA1lz/
baNh
=LmYc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Sage Weil <sw...@redhat.com> wrote:
&g
32M/
luUMXHZ8lTHk9C8MfZcpyPGvwp2FliD9LqaWOVPWtWZJcerEWcZVlEApg4qb
fo5a
=ahEi
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
----
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 6:37 AM, Sage Weil <sw...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Oct 2015, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
>&
.
-
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Oct 2015, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>> I can't think of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On my second test (a much longer one), it took nearly an hour, but a
few messages have popped up over a 20 window. Still far less than I
have been seeing.
-
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2
clean build as that is my most limiting factor?
Thanks,
- ----
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Oct 2015, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
D6hcAZGtdvpiBRXBC5gORfiFWFxwu5kQ+daUhgUIe/O/EWyeD0rirZoqlLnZ
EDrG
=BZVw
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Robert LeBlanc <rob...@leblancnet.us> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNE
+aT2m1erdSyZn0ZC9a6CjWmwJXY6FCSGhE53BbefBxmCFxn+8tVav+Q8W
7s14TntP6ex4ca7eTwGuSXC9FU5fAVa+3+3aXDAC1QPAkeVkXyB716W1XG6b
BCFo
=GJL4
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Robert LeBlanc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
In my experience with throttles, we had to restart the OSD, the admin
socket would not apply the change to a running OSD.
-
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015
+jClEPU3GdDSrMluFCOH4Qu+F
pvIy0PxdGlGDS4P4Xs+NiWIeCu12NjtO8dRg++BO0rPbladBlsF3ZD+G7R/q
pG/QTKhf41s+pbDal+HJoNKiK7+WZgHhy8IBXdR4a8SQeMHRa/MYJk6MFLKr
vK/6
=wcJB
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Wed, Sep 2
.
-
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Mark Nelson wrote:
> On 09/03/2015 11:23 AM, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>> Somnath,
>&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
This is great work. Thanks for sharing. I'm looking forward to the
resolution of the scale out issues!
-
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Somnath Roy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Can we get http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10399 into hammer. We hit this today.
-
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 4:57 AM, Miyamae, Takeshi wrote:
>
Bbev+JYEoYT
8/WX+fhueHt4dqUYWIl3HZ0CEzbXbug0xmFvhrbmL2f3t9XOkDZRbAjlYrGm
lswiJMDueY8JkxSnPvCQrHXqjbCcy9rMG7nTnLFz98rTcHNCwtpv0qVYhheg
4YRNRVMbfNP/6xsJvG1wVOSQPwxZSPqJh42pDqMRePJl3Zn66MTx5wvdNDpk
l7OF
=OI++
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--------
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Sounds reasonable to me.
-
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 2:48 AM, Nathan Cutler wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> I have been tinkering with the %preun an
CN6w6xu1FHLeVobKAWe5ZzKY5lxw6b8YG+ce/E2dvW73gSASPTvtv68gaT04
2SPF9Ql0fERL5EDY9Pc4MHpQVcS0XxxJA69CgnWgaG6fzq2eY7fALeMBVWlB
fRj3zQwqJls/X8JZ3c4P4G0R6DP9bmMwGr++oYc3gWGrvgzxw3N7+ornd0jd
GdXC
=Aigq
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
to congest things. We probably already saw this issue, just
didn't know it.
-
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Mark Nelson wrote:
> FWIW, we've got some 40GbE Intel cards in the commun
;
> sage
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9
wVjQ43qLfuDTS4o+IJ4ztOMd26vIv6Mn6WVwKCjoCXJc8ajywR9Dy+6lL
o8oJ+tn7hMc9Qy1iBhu3/QIP4WCsUf9RVeu60oahNEpde89qW32S9CZlrJDO
gf4iTryRjkAhdmZIj9JiaE8jQ6dvN817D9cqs/CXKV9vhzYoM7p5YWHghBKB
J3hS
=0J7F
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--------
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Tu
d reliable for ping, but still had the
blocked I/O.
I reduced the MTU to 1500 and checked pings (OK), but I'm still seeing
the blocked I/O.
- --------
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Tue
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
4.2.0-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64
- -
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Samuel Just wrote:
> I loo
Z_FULL_FLUSH may help provide some seek points
within an archive to prevent decompressing the whole object for reads?
-
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Igor Fedotov wrote:
>
>
> On 24.09.2
and TIME_WAIT at this point. There are 130 OSDs, 8 KVM
hosts hosting about 150 VMs. Open files is set at 32K for the OSD
processes and 16K system wide.
Does this seem like the right spot to be looking? What are some
configuration items we should be looking at?
Thanks,
Robert LeBlanc
PGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Thanks, didn't find the original ticket number in the list.
-
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 12:57 AM, Loic Dachary wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
/DC0mqpnmo0Clx3jkdHX+x1EXpJUtocSeI44LX
KWIMhe9wXtKAoHQFEcJ0o0+wrXWMevvx33HPC4q1ULrFX0ILNx5Mo0Rp944X
4OEo
=P33I
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Robert LeBlanc <
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
