Gregory Farnum writes:
>
> You can mount subtrees with the -r option to ceph-fuse.
Yay! That did the trick to properly mount via fuse. And I can confirm that
the directory list results are now stable both locally and via samba.
> Once you've started it up you should find a file like
> "client.a
PS I start to use this patches with samba 4.1. IMHO some of problems may (or
must) be solved not inside vfs code, but outside - in samba kernel, but I still
use both in samba 4.2.3 without verification.
Dzianis Kahanovich пишет:
> I use cephfs over samba vfs and have some issues.
>
> 1) If I use
I use cephfs over samba vfs and have some issues.
1) If I use >1 stacked vfs (ceph & scannedonly) - I have problems with file
order, but solved by "dirsort" vfs ("vfs objects = scannedonly dirsort ceph").
Single "ceph" vfs looks good too (and I use it single for fast internal shares),
but you can
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Jörg Henne wrote:
> Gregory Farnum writes:
>>
>> Yeah, I think there were some directory listing bugs in that version
>> that Samba is probably running into. They're fixed in a newer kernel
>> release (I'm not sure which one exactly, sorry).
>
> Ok, thanks, good t
Gregory Farnum writes:
>
> Yeah, I think there were some directory listing bugs in that version
> that Samba is probably running into. They're fixed in a newer kernel
> release (I'm not sure which one exactly, sorry).
Ok, thanks, good to know!
> > and then detaches itself but the mountpoint stay
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Jörg Henne wrote:
> Gregory Farnum writes:
>>
>> What's the full stack you're using to run this with? If you're using
>> the kernel client, try updating it or switching to the userspace
>> (ceph-fuse, or Samba built-in) client. If using userspace, please make
>> s
Gregory Farnum writes:
>
> What's the full stack you're using to run this with? If you're using
> the kernel client, try updating it or switching to the userspace
> (ceph-fuse, or Samba built-in) client. If using userspace, please make
> sure you've got the latest one.
> -Greg
The system is:
ro
I don't have any answers but I am also seeing some strange results
exporting a Ceph file system using the Samba VFS interface on Ceph
version 9.0.2. If I mount a Linux client with vers=1, I see the file
system the same as I see it on a ceph file system mount. If I use
vers=2.0 or vers=3.0 on the
What's the full stack you're using to run this with? If you're using
the kernel client, try updating it or switching to the userspace
(ceph-fuse, or Samba built-in) client. If using userspace, please make
sure you've got the latest one.
-Greg
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Jörg Henne wrote:
> H
Hi all,
the faq at http://ceph.com/docs/cuttlefish/faq/ mentions the possibility to
run export a mounted cephfs via samba. This combination exhibits a very
weird behaviour, though.
We have a directory on cephfs with many small xml snippets. If I repeadtedly
ls the directory on Unix, I get the sam
10 matches
Mail list logo
