> Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 11:09:29 AM
> > Subject: [ceph-users] killing ceph-disk [was Re: ceph-volume: migration and
> > disk partition support]
> >
> > To put this in context, the goal here is to kill ceph-disk in mimic.
> >
>
>
> >
ay, October 9, 2017 11:09:29 AM
> > Subject: [ceph-users] killing ceph-disk [was Re: ceph-volume: migration and
> > disk partition support]
> >
> > To put this in context, the goal here is to kill ceph-disk in mimic.
> >
>
>
> > Perhaps the "
> From: "Sage Weil" <s...@newdream.net>
> To: "Alfredo Deza" <ad...@redhat.com>
> Cc: "ceph-devel" <ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org>, ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 11:09:29 AM
> Subject: [ceph-users] killing
Hi,
On 09/10/17 16:09, Sage Weil wrote:
To put this in context, the goal here is to kill ceph-disk in mimic.
One proposal is to make it so new OSDs can *only* be deployed with LVM,
and old OSDs with the ceph-disk GPT partitions would be started via
ceph-volume support that can only start (but
On 10-10-2017 14:21, Alfredo Deza wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 8:14 AM, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>> On 10-10-2017 13:51, Alfredo Deza wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 8:50 PM, Christian Balzer wrote:
Hello,
(pet peeve alert)
On
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 8:14 AM, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
> On 10-10-2017 13:51, Alfredo Deza wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 8:50 PM, Christian Balzer wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> (pet peeve alert)
>>> On Mon, 9 Oct 2017 15:09:29 + (UTC) Sage Weil wrote:
On 10-10-2017 13:51, Alfredo Deza wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 8:50 PM, Christian Balzer wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> (pet peeve alert)
>> On Mon, 9 Oct 2017 15:09:29 + (UTC) Sage Weil wrote:
>>
>>> To put this in context, the goal here is to kill ceph-disk in mimic.
Right,
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 8:50 PM, Christian Balzer wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> (pet peeve alert)
> On Mon, 9 Oct 2017 15:09:29 + (UTC) Sage Weil wrote:
>
>> To put this in context, the goal here is to kill ceph-disk in mimic.
>>
>> One proposal is to make it so new OSDs can *only* be
Hello,
(pet peeve alert)
On Mon, 9 Oct 2017 15:09:29 + (UTC) Sage Weil wrote:
> To put this in context, the goal here is to kill ceph-disk in mimic.
>
> One proposal is to make it so new OSDs can *only* be deployed with LVM,
> and old OSDs with the ceph-disk GPT partitions would be
To put this in context, the goal here is to kill ceph-disk in mimic.
One proposal is to make it so new OSDs can *only* be deployed with LVM,
and old OSDs with the ceph-disk GPT partitions would be started via
ceph-volume support that can only start (but not deploy new) OSDs in that
style.
10 matches
Mail list logo