First off, congrats to inktank!
I'm sure having Redhat backing the project it will see even quicker
development.
My only worry is support for future non-RHEL platforms; like many others
we've built our ceph stack around ubuntu and I'm just hoping it won't
deteriorate into something like how it
On 01/05/14 18:26, Wido den Hollander wrote:
Ok, thanks for the information. Just something that comes up in my mind:
- Repository location and access
- Documentation efforts for non-RHEL platforms
- Support for non-RHEL platforms
I'm confident that RedHat will make Ceph bigger and better, but
On 01/05/14 17:49, Martin B Nielsen wrote:
I fear a political decision to only have those extra tests on
Centos/Redhat will 'force' people to run it on Centos/Redhat
eventually.
To be fair, I haven't witnessed any pro-RedHat agenda regarding other
technologies like KVM, libvirt and spice. The
Congratulations! From reading the Red Hat announcement, you get the
impression they will want to push Glustre for files, and focus on Ceph for
block/object. As someone who is very excited about CephFS and keen on it
becoming supported this year, I hope it doesn't become de-prioritised for
some
What a huge news ! big congrats for the Ceph team, without forgetting
all the volunteers that helped for.
Keep up the amazing work, Ceph is going to be a revolution for the
storage, and that's great.
Follow up in lines responses.
Le 01/05/2014 08:26, Wido den Hollander a écrit :
On 04/30/2014
hello, my cluster have some error two days before ,now some pg in incomplete
state,
e.g , in the current osdmap, the pg 49.6 is map to [35,29,0] , but osd[35,29,0]
are have noany data of pg 49.6, I check the entire cluster, I found in osd.42
have the Complete data of pg
I thing if I can
This is already marked as urgent and I am working on it. A point
release should be coming up as soon as possible.
I apologize for the bug.
The workaround would be to use 1.4.0 until the new version comes out.
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:01 PM, Mike Dawson mike.daw...@cloudapt.com wrote:
Victor,
Hi Patrick,
It would be great to start a thread on that topic.
Cheers
On 30/04/2014 22:46, Patrick McGarry wrote:
Hey Danny (and Wido),
WRT the foundation I'm sure you can see why it has been on hold for
the last few weeks. However, this is not signifying the death of the
effort. Both
This Dumpling point release fixes several non-critical issues since
v0.67.7. The most notable bug fixes are an auth fix in librbd (observed
as an occasional crash from KVM), an improvement in the network failure
detection with the monitor, and several hard to hit OSD crashes or hangs.
We
Hi,
The XioMessenger work provides native support for Infiniband, if I understand
you correctly.
Early testing is now possible, on a codebase pulled up to Firefly. See
discussion
from earlier this week.
Regards,
Matt
- Gandalf Corvotempesta gandalf.corvotempe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Sure, that's planned for integration in Giant (see Blueprints).
Matt
- Gandalf Corvotempesta gandalf.corvotempe...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-05-01 0:11 GMT+02:00 Mark Nelson inktank.com:
Usable is such a vague word. I imagine it's testable after a
fashion. :D
Ok but I prefere an
Hi,
I should have been careful. Our efforts are aimed at Giant. We're
serious about meeting delivery targets. There's lots of shakedown, and
of course further integration work, still to go.
Regards,
Matt
- Gandalf Corvotempesta gandalf.corvotempe...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-05-01 0:20
Victor, ceph-deploy v1.5.1 has been released with a fix that should
take care of your problem
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 7:32 AM, Alfredo Deza alfredo.d...@inktank.com wrote:
This is already marked as urgent and I am working on it. A point
release should be coming up as soon as possible.
I
A minor issue was found while attempting to activate OSDs that has
just been fixed and released
as ceph-deploy v.1.5.1
Even if you haven't encountered this particular issue I do recommend
an upgrade anyway.
Thanks!
Alfredo
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Alfredo Deza
There are few things that need to be tidied up and we will need to
liaise with our new Red Hat colleagues around license choice but I
believe the code is in relatively good shape to be open sourced thanks
to the team who've been working in it (Yan, Gregory, John and Dan).
It's important to me that
On 5/1/14 10:11 , kevin horan wrote:
Here is how I got into this state. I have only 6 OSDs total, 3 on one
host (vashti) and 3 on another (zadok). I set the noout flag so I
could reboot zadok. Zadok was down for 2 minutes. When it came up ceph
began recovering the objects that had not been
Well, we haven't finished diagnosing #8232 yet — I think it's actually
different from #6992 — so I can't really tell you what will fix it!
Restarting the hosts might. If not, I'd love for somebody to reproduce
this with debug ms = 10 enabled so I can get a log and see what's
causing it.
-Greg
Hi Ceph,
This month Ceph User Committee meeting proposed agenda is at
https://wiki.ceph.com/Community/Meetings#Proposed_topics:
Feel free to add what you would like to discuss.
Date: May 2nd, 2014
Time:
18:00-19:00 UTC
14:00-15:00 US-Eastern
12:00-13:00 US-Mountain
You can use librados directly or you can use radosgw, which, I think,
would be pretty much exactly what you are looking for.
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Stuart Longland stua...@vrt.com.au wrote:
Hi all,
Is there some kind of web-based or WebDAV-based front-end for accessing
a Ceph
On 4/29/14 16:36 , Stuart Longland wrote:
I was thinking something along the lines of a WebDAV or Samba interface,
which I realise could be done with conventional Apache/Samba atop
CephFS, but I was wondering if there was something that would do it
using the librados API? Something like Ceph
Congrats to the Inktank team and Sage! ... Hope to see more
innovation/interesting products coming in future.
Regards
sadhu
-Original Message-
From: ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com
[mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of Pawel Stefanski
Sent: 30 April 2014 21:38
21 matches
Mail list logo
