Hi,
Le 29/09/2015 19:06, Samuel Just a écrit :
> It's an EIO. The osd got an EIO from the underlying fs. That's what
> causes those asserts. You probably want to redirect to the relevant
> fs maling list.
Thanks.
I didn't get any answer on this from BTRFS developers yet. The problem
seems
Hi Ceph,
TL;DR: If you have one day a week to work on the next Ceph stable releases [1]
your help would be most welcome.
The Ceph "Long Term Stable" (LTS) releases - currently firefly[3] and hammer[4]
- are used by individuals, non-profits, government agencies and companies for
their
What are the best options to setup the Ceph radosgw so it supports
separate/independent "tenants"? What I'm after:
1. Ensure isolation between tenants, ie: no overlap/conflict in bucket
namespace; something separate radosgw "users" doesn't achieve
2. Ability to backup/restore tenants' pools
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
We are still struggling with this and have tried a lot of different
things. Unfortunately, Inktank (now Red Hat) no longer provides
consulting services for non-Red Hat systems. If there are some
certified Ceph consultants in the US that we can do
Hi Robin,
On 03/10/2015 21:38, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 11:07:22AM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
>> Hi Ceph,
>>
>> TL;DR: If you have one day a week to work on the next Ceph stable releases
>> [1] your help would be most welcome.
> I'd like to throw my name in.
>
> As of
Hello,
I've looked over the crush documentation but I am a little confused.
Perhaps someone here can help me out!
I have three chassis with 6 SSD osds that I use for writeback cache.
I have removed one OSD from each server and I want to make a new
replicated ruleset to use just these
On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 11:07:22AM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
> Hi Ceph,
>
> TL;DR: If you have one day a week to work on the next Ceph stable releases
> [1] your help would be most welcome.
I'd like to throw my name in.
As of August, I work on Ceph development for Dreamhost. Most of my work
