[ceph-users] Error ENOENT: problem getting command descriptions from mon.5

Hi there, i have updated my ceph-cluster from luminous to 14.2.1 and whenever I run a "ceph tell mon.* version" I get the correct versions from all monitors except mon.5 For mon.5 is get the error: Error ENOENT: problem getting command descriptions from mon.5 mon.5: problem getting command

[ceph-users] Nautilus: xxx pgs not deep-scrubbed in time

Hi there, yesterday I upgraded my ceph cluster from luminous to nautilus and since then I have the message xxx pgs not deep-scrubbed in time. My deep scrubbings were okay before, I do have a deep scrub interval of 6 weeks: osd_deep_scrub_interval = 3628800 and i had no warning. Since yeterday

Re: [ceph-users] Possible data damage: 1 pg inconsistent

candidate had a read error > > > >When I check dmesg on the osd node I see: > > > >blk_update_request: critical medium error, dev sdX, sector 123 > > > >I will also see a few uncorrected read errors in smartctl. > > > >Info: > >Ceph: ceph versio

Re: [ceph-users] ceph 12.2.9 release

eep-scrub comes back as inconsistent, but doing another > manual scrub comes back as fine and clear each time. > > Not sure if related or not.. > > On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 at 11:57 PM, Christoph Adomeit < > christoph.adom...@gatworks.de> wrote: > > > Hello together,

Re: [ceph-users] ceph 12.2.9 release

Hello together, we have upgraded to 12.2.9 because it was in the official repos. Right after the update and some scrubs we have issues. This morning after regular scrubs we had around 10% of all pgs inconstent: pgs: 4036 active+clean 380 active+clean+inconsistent After

[ceph-users] Luminous 12.2.3 Changelog ?

Hi there, I noticed that luminous 12.2.3 is already released. Is there any changelog for this release ? Thanks Christoph ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Re: [ceph-users] Separate WAL and DB Partitions for existing OSDs ?

at 09:57:16AM +0200, Christoph Adomeit wrote: > Hi there, > > is it possible to move WAL and DB Data for Existing bluestore OSDs to > separate partitions ? > > I am looking for a method to maybe take an OSD out, do some magic and move > some data to new SSD Devices and t

[ceph-users] Separate WAL and DB Partitions for existing OSDs ?

Hi there, is it possible to move WAL and DB Data for Existing bluestore OSDs to separate partitions ? I am looking for a method to maybe take an OSD out, do some magic and move some data to new SSD Devices and then take the OSD back in. Any Ideas ? Thanks Christoph

Re: [ceph-users] Modification Time of RBD Images

object does maintain an mtime you can check via the rados tool. You could > > write a script to iterate through all the objects in the image and find the > > most recent mtime (although a custom librados binary will be faster if you > > want to do this frequently). &g

Re: [ceph-users] Modification Time of RBD Images

Hi, no i did not enable the journalling feature since we do not use mirroring. On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 08:10:05PM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote: > Did you enable the journaling feature? > > On 03/23/2017 07:44 PM, Christoph Adomeit wrote: > >Hi Yang, > > > >I mea

Re: [ceph-users] Modification Time of RBD Images

rote: > Hi Christoph, > > On 03/23/2017 07:16 PM, Christoph Adomeit wrote: > >Hello List, > > > >i am wondering if there is meanwhile an easy method in ceph to find more > >information about rbd-images. > > > >For example I am interested in the m

[ceph-users] Modification Time of RBD Images

Hello List, i am wondering if there is meanwhile an easy method in ceph to find more information about rbd-images. For example I am interested in the modification time of an rbd image. I found some posts from 2015 that say we have to go over all the objects of an rbd image and find the

Re: [ceph-users] Upgrading 2K OSDs from Hammer to Jewel. Our experience

to Jewel and with this > email we want to share our experiences. > -- Christoph Adomeit GATWORKS GmbH Reststrauch 191 41199 Moenchengladbach Sitz: Moenchengladbach Amtsgericht Moenchengladbach, HRB 6303 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Christoph Adomeit, Hans Wilhelm Terstappen christoph.adom

Re: [ceph-users] fast-diff map is always invalid

build the object map for that specific snapshot via > "rbd object-map rebuild vm-208-disk-2@initial.20160729-220225". > > On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 7:17 AM, Christoph Adomeit > <christoph.adom...@gatworks.de> wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > I upgraded m

Re: [ceph-users] Read Stalls with Multiple OSD Servers

ave received > this transmission in error, please immediately notify us by reply e-mail at > thomas.helan...@kla-tencor.com<mailto:thomas.helan...@kla-tencor.com> or by > telephone at (408) 875-7819, and destroy the original transmission and its > attachments without

[ceph-users] fast-diff map is always invalid

Hi there, I upgraded my cluster to jewel recently, built object maps for every image and recreated all snapshots du use fast-diff feature for backups. Unfortunately i am still getting the following error message on rbd du: root@host:/backups/ceph# rbd du vm-208-disk-2 warning: fast-diff map is

Re: [ceph-users] Is anyone seeing iissues with task_numa_find_cpu?

t; [] do_page_fault+0x22/0x30 > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685939] > >>>> > >>>> [] page_fault+0x28/0x30 > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912

Re: [ceph-users] Does object map feature lock snapshots ?

gt; > ----- Original Message - > > From: "Christoph Adomeit" <christoph.adom...@gatworks.de> > > To: "Jason Dillaman" <dilla...@redhat.com> > > Cc: ceph-us...@ceph.com > > Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 6:19:16 AM > > Subject: Re: [

Re: [ceph-users] Cannot remove rbd locks

Zhanks Jaseon, this worked ... On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 02:31:44PM -0400, Jason Dillaman wrote: > Try the following: > > # rbd lock remove vm-114-disk-1 "auto 140454012457856" client.71260575 > > -- > > Jason Dillaman > > > - Original Me

[ceph-users] Infernalis: chown ceph:ceph at runtime ?

Hi, we have upgraded our ceph-cluster to infernalis from hammer. Ceph is still running as root and we are using the "setuser match path = /var/lib/ceph/$type/$cluster-$id" directive in ceph.conf Now we would like to change the ownership of data-files and devices to ceph at runtime. What ist

[ceph-users] Cannot remove rbd locks

Hi, some of my rbds show they have an exclusive lock. I think the lock can be stale or weeks old. We have also once added feature exclusive lock and later removed that feature I can see the lock: root@machine:~# rbd lock list vm-114-disk-1 There is 1 exclusive lock on this image. Locker

Re: [ceph-users] Does object map feature lock snapshots ?

have been fixed in v9.2.1. > > [1] http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14542 > > -- > > Jason Dillaman > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Christoph Adomeit" <christoph.adom...@gatworks.de> > > To: ceph-us...@ceph.com > > Sent:

[ceph-users] Does object map feature lock snapshots ?

Hi, i have installed ceph 9.21 on proxmox with kernel 4.2.8-1-pve. Afterwards I have enabled the features: rbd feature enable $IMG exclusive-lock rbd feature enable $IMG object-map rbd feature enable $IMG fast-diff During the night I have a cronjob which does a rbd snap create on each of my

[ceph-users] Can I rebuild object maps while VMs are running ?

Hi there, I just updated our ceph-cluster to infernalis and now I want to enable the new image features. I wonder if I can add the features on the rbd images while the VMs are running. I want to do something like this: rbd feature enable $IMG exclusive-lock rbd feature enable $IMG object-map

[ceph-users] Modification Time of RBD Images

Hi there, I am using Ceph-Hammer and I am wondering about the following: What is the recommended way to find out when an rbd-Image was last modified ? Thanks Christoph -- Christoph Adomeit GATWORKS GmbH Reststrauch 191 41199 Moenchengladbach Sitz: Moenchengladbach Amtsgericht

Re: [ceph-users] v0.94.4 Hammer released

Hi there, I was hoping for the following changes in 0.94.4 release: -Stable Object Maps for faster Image Handling (Backups, Diffs, du etc). -Link against better Malloc implementation like jemalloc Does 0.94.4 bring any improvement in these areas ? Thanks Christoph On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at

Re: [ceph-users] possibility to delete all zeros

ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com -- Christoph Adomeit GATWORKS GmbH Reststrauch 191 41199 Moenchengladbach Sitz: Moenchengladbach Amtsgericht Moenchengladbach, HRB 6303 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Christoph Adomeit, Hans Wilhelm

Re: [ceph-users] How to disable object-map and exclusive features ?

> environment. > > Thanks, > > Jason > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Christoph Adomeit" <christoph.adom...@gatworks.de> > > To: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > > Sent: Monday, August 31, 2015 7:49:00 AM > > Subject: [ceph-users]

[ceph-users] How to disable object-map and exclusive features ?

Hi there, I have a ceph-cluster (0.94-2) with >100 rbd kvm images. Most vms are running rock-solid but 7 vms are hanging about once a week. I found out the hanging machines have features: layering, exclusive, object map while all other vms do not have exclusive and object map set. Now I want

[ceph-users] Defective Gbic brings whole Cluster down

be configured or changed in ceph so that availability will become better in case of flapping networks ? I understand, it is not a ceph problem but a network problem but maybe something can be learned from such incidents ? Thanks Christoph -- Christoph Adomeit GATWORKS GmbH Reststrauch 191 41199

[ceph-users] How to prefer faster disks in same pool

the faster disks ? Just give them another weight or are there other methods ? Thanks Christoph -- Christoph Adomeit GATWORKS GmbH Reststrauch 191 41199 Moenchengladbach Sitz: Moenchengladbach Amtsgericht Moenchengladbach, HRB 6303 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Christoph Adomeit, Hans Wilhelm Terstappen

Re: [ceph-users] straw to straw2 migration

Hello Dziannis, I am also planning to change our cluster from straw to straw2 because we habe different hdd sizes and changes in the HDD-Sizes always triggers a lot of reorganization load. Did you experience any issues ? Did you already change the other hosts ? Don't you think we will have

[ceph-users] Use object-map Feature on existing rbd images ?

Hi there, we are using ceph hammer and we have some fully provisioned images with only little data. rbd export of a 500 GB rbd Image takes long time although there are only 15 GB of used data, even if the rbd-image is trimmed. Do you think it is a good idea to enable the object-map feature on

[ceph-users] fstrim does not shrink ceph OSD disk usage ?

Hi there, I have a ceph cluster running hammer-release. Recently I trimmed a lot of virtual disks and I can verify that the size of the images has decreased a lot. I checked this with: /usr/bin/rbd diff $IMG | grep -v zero |awk '{ SUM += $2 } END { print SUM/1024/1024 MB }' the output after

[ceph-users] OSD Crash makes whole cluster unusable ?

Hi there, today I had an osd crash with ceph 0.87/giant which made my hole cluster unusable for 45 Minutes. First it began with a disk error: sd 0:1:2:0: [sdc] CDB: Read(10)Read(10):: 28 28 00 00 0d 15 fe d0 fd 7b e8 f8 00 00 00 00 b0 08 00 00 XFS (sdc1): xfs_imap_to_bp: xfs_trans_read_buf()

Re: [ceph-users] Slow Requests when taking down OSD Node

: If you watch `ceph -w` while stopping the OSD, do you see 2014-12-02 11:45:17.715629 mon.0 [INF] osd.X marked itself down ? On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Christoph Adomeit christoph.adom...@gatworks.de wrote: Thanks Craig, but this is what I am doing. After setting ceph osd

Re: [ceph-users] Slow Requests when taking down OSD Node

wrote: I've found that it helps to shut down the osds before shutting down the host. Especially if the node is also a monitor. It seems that some OSD shutdown messages get lost while monitors are holding elections. On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Christoph Adomeit christoph.adom

[ceph-users] Fastest way to shrink/rewrite rbd image ?

-- Christoph Adomeit GATWORKS GmbH Reststrauch 191 41199 Moenchengladbach Sitz: Moenchengladbach Amtsgericht Moenchengladbach, HRB 6303 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Christoph Adomeit, Hans Wilhelm Terstappen christoph.adom...@gatworks.de Internetloesungen vom Feinsten Fon. +49 2166 9149-32

[ceph-users] Solaris 10 VMs extremely slow in KVM on Ceph RBD Devices

faster on ceph storage ? Many Thanks Christoph -- Christoph Adomeit GATWORKS GmbH Reststrauch 191 41199 Moenchengladbach Sitz: Moenchengladbach Amtsgericht Moenchengladbach, HRB 6303 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Christoph Adomeit, Hans Wilhelm Terstappen christoph.adom...@gatworks.de Internetloesungen

[ceph-users] Newbie Ceph Design Questions

Hello Ceph-Community, we are considering to use a Ceph Cluster for serving VMs. We need goog performance and absolute stability. Regarding Ceph I have a few questions. Presently we use Solaris ZFS Boxes as NFS Storage for VMs. The zfs boxes are totally fast, because they use all free ram for