Re: [Cerowrt-devel] AQM and ADSL

2013-08-14 Thread Sebastian Moeller
Hi Dave, On Aug 13, 2013, at 22:33 , Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Fred Stratton fredstrat...@imap.cc wrote: DT has taken to stealth with his releases. Heh. No, these are not releases. If I don't get a chance to do some testing I don't post

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] AQM and ADSL

2013-08-14 Thread Sebastian Moeller
Hi Fred, On Aug 14, 2013, at 14:01 , Fred Stratton fredstrat...@imap.cc wrote: On 14 Aug 2013, at 12:42, Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de wrote: Hi Fred, On Aug 13, 2013, at 21:40 , Fred Stratton fredstrat...@imap.cc wrote: (apologies for wrecking the list, and introducing email

[Cerowrt-devel] Fwd: AQM and ADSL

2013-08-14 Thread Fred Stratton
{sent to wrong address) Begin forwarded message: Hi Fred, On Aug 14, 2013, at 14:01 , Fred Stratton fredstrat...@imap.cc wrote: On 14 Aug 2013, at 12:42, Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de wrote: Hi Fred, On Aug 13, 2013, at 21:40 , Fred Stratton fredstrat...@imap.cc wrote:

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] No legend for netperf-wrapper graphs

2013-08-14 Thread Fred Stratton
UK and German rrul server address would be helpful, on the basis that I shall be using them to test ADSL based configurations. For whatever reason I could not access the Yurt resident one. (I thought that everyone who owned a Yurt maintained a breeding herd of goats or alpaca.) You have given

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] No legend for netperf-wrapper graphs

2013-08-14 Thread Fred Stratton
If it is the 'What is wrong with wifi talk, the I have found that. On 14 Aug 2013, at 19:21, Fred Stratton fredstrat...@imap.cc wrote: UK and German rrul server address would be helpful, on the basis that I shall be using them to test ADSL based configurations. For whatever reason I could

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] No legend for netperf-wrapper graphs

2013-08-14 Thread Fred Stratton
Nothing is mentioned in the MIT talk. I f the servers are not available, so work cannot be duplicated, and the meaning of terms used is not revealed anywhere, the project ceases to be Open. On 14 Aug 2013, at 20:50, Fred Stratton fredstrat...@imap.cc wrote: If it is the 'What is wrong with

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] No legend for netperf-wrapper graphs

2013-08-14 Thread Fred Stratton
If it is confirmed that the servers are run by volunteers, I would be happy to contribute. I note their silence over past months. Running a server here is of little help. Again, the Comcast funding involvement is unexplained. If they are funding the open vehicle, then they could pay. I

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Fwd: [PATCH] net_sched: restore linklayer atm handling

2013-08-14 Thread Sebastian Moeller
Hi Dave, On Aug 15, 2013, at 02:46 , Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote: jesper just dropped this set of patches on the netdev list, which I hope address some of the remaining issues on htb. There was some debate the last time this went by on the list, so the word is not in yet.

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] tc-stab versus htb on ADSL 8000/700

2013-08-14 Thread Fred Stratton
Thank you. It would be useful know what the different traffic classes used by the tool are. BE == Best Effort. Beyond that I suspect the only person who knows is its Danish author. On 15 Aug 2013, at 02:53, Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote: The server in germany is demo.tohojo.dk -

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] tc-stab versus htb on ADSL 8000/700

2013-08-14 Thread Dave Taht
They are 802.11e markings. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11e-2005 BE = best effort BK = background VO = Voice CS5 or VI = video (diffserv marking) This test originated with the wifi work and then ended up being used for tons more stuff. And the specification is mine. I was delighted

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] tc-stab versus htb on ADSL 8000/700

2013-08-14 Thread Fred Stratton
I do not intend to promulgate any data. On 15 Aug 2013, at 03:25, Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote: and the mlabs thing was off the record. damn it. On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 7:24 PM, Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote: I really didn't want those ips published. thanks a lot. Among

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] tc-stab versus htb on ADSL 8000/700

2013-08-14 Thread Fred Stratton
I do not yet have sufficient paranoia about buffering. I have 2 D-Link power line adaptors between the gateway device and the wndr 3800. http://caia.swin.edu.au/reports/130417A/CAIA-TR-130417A.pdf Perhaps I should attempt to position both before the power line link. On 15 Aug 2013, at 03:25,

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] tc-stab versus htb on ADSL 8000/700

2013-08-14 Thread Fred Stratton
I see the error and apologise. I shall stop posting. On 15 Aug 2013, at 03:33, Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote: you just did. twice. now it's on the record in the public archive. now I gotta go do an security audit and lock down some stuff in chrooted jails and make sure the

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] tc-stab versus htb on ADSL 8000/700

2013-08-14 Thread Dave Taht
I have taken down the server in england until I have time to get it configured properly. Sorry for the inconvienence. On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Fred Stratton fredstrat...@imap.cc wrote: I see the error and apologise. I shall stop posting. On 15 Aug 2013, at 03:33, Dave Taht