Re: [Cerowrt-devel] PIE and ADSL2+

2013-11-22 Thread Sebastian Moeller
Hi Fred, On Nov 20, 2013, at 11:08 , Fred Stratton fredstrat...@imap.cc wrote: I have been using PIE instead of fq_codel for approximately 10 days. It works well. Intrigued by your report I went ahead and tested simple.qos with fq_codel and pie (cerowrt 3.10.18-1) with rrul against

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] PIE and ADSL2+

2013-11-22 Thread Fred Stratton
Yes, PIE does apparently work better here than fq_codel. This is a subjective judgement. I have stopped using RRUL. On 22/11/13 09:23, Sebastian Moeller wrote: Hi Fred, On Nov 22, 2013, at 10:15 , Fred Stratton fredstrat...@imap.cc wrote: Thank you. Are you still using ADSL2+,

[Cerowrt-devel] PIE and ADSL2+

2013-11-20 Thread Fred Stratton
I have been using PIE instead of fq_codel for approximately 10 days. It works well. Should it? Has PIE been optimized for ADSL? ___ Cerowrt-devel mailing list Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel