Dear @JonathanGregory
That's an interesting suggestion, than you. We will discuss it in the group
tomorrow.
Best regards,
Anders
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Dear @AndersMS
In your proposed change 10, you used the word "uncompressed", and "compression"
is in the title of this proposal. I think it would be clear to speak of a
"compressed dimension" of the tie point variable corresponding to an
"uncompressed dimension" of the data variable, or
Dear @JonathanGregory
Dear Jonathan,
Thank you for the fedback.
- yes, we had a sentence saying that the size of a tie point interpolation
dimension must be less than or equal to the size of the corresponding
interpolated dimension. I actually deleted it, since it is a consequence of
other
