Dear @JonathanGregory Dear Jonathan,
Thank you for the fedback. - yes, we had a sentence saying that the size of a tie point interpolation dimension must be less than or equal to the size of the corresponding interpolated dimension. I actually deleted it, since it is a consequence of other constraints, rather than a constraint of its own. But it makes sense to state it and I will re-introduce the sentence. - I like the the term interpolated dimension that we proposed- it has made it easier for me to read and write the text. And I am hesitant to introduce an additional term like "reduced" in the text. Note that it is "tie point interpolation dimension" against "interpolated dimension", so the difference is more than just the difference between interpolation and interpolated. The way I memorize it, is that a tie point interpolation dimension is available for interpolation, whereas the corresponding dimension in the target domain is, once it exists, an interpolated dimension. Non-interpolated dimensions are the same in both the tie point domain and the target domain and are never interpolated. I will discus the last point with the rest of the group when we meet tomorrow. Best regards, Anders -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/327*issuecomment-869854024__;Iw!!G2kpM7uM-TzIFchu!hwly8L8ZiKCCZonttxQnMfwJRAIuTdv2lKzYGkqMsy5w00yvCY_kKTbLf7_0v0Ey_PDcdsoxaUA$ This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from [email protected], although if you do nothing, a subscription to the UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list. To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to [email protected].
