I have to create a netcdf for an ensemble of precipitation accumulation
(standard_name = precipitation_amount).
An ensemble is composed of what we call members, in my case 25 members, for a
given time step.
Here is an extract of structure of my file looks like:
```
float time(time) ;
I don't think we should limit source information in this attribute, but leave
it up to the user to decide how much detail is provided, including back to the
initial source if they like.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it
I believe this means the immediately prior source. If that source is the result
of a process, it should have its own provenance chain going further back.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Thanks for the clarification! If we get version-level DOIs for free from
Zenodo, that's fine, I see no reason to go out of our way to avoid them. That
also means that there are likely to be future solutions for maintaining them,
since there will be a large community of users in the same boat.
What is meant by "original data" in the definition of the "source" attribute?
The Convention states that this global attribute should be used for "The method
of production of the original data. If it was model-generated, source should
name the model and its version, as specifically as could be
Thanks for the concept of the DOI assignment with Zenodo.
The following DOIs make sense for me
(B) for references in Journal Publication - I don't think the versions are
important here
and these could then also be mentioned in the text.
(C) also for Journal Publication
(D) for references from our
