Re: [CF-metadata] Usage of histogram_of_X_over_Z

2016-10-13 Thread Bodas-Salcedo, Alejandro
Dear Martin, Thanks for your detailed explanation. I'd like to add a bit more information. These variables are not joint distributions, they are 1D distributions for different ranges of Z. The question is, does "histogram_of_X[_over_Z]" mean that the Z coordinate has to be completely collapsed?

[CF-metadata] Missing data bins in histograms

2016-10-13 Thread martin.juckes
Dear Jonathan, I'm sorry I didn't respond on the point about it being the first bin: I had not intended the special value to be restricted to the first bin, so I guess there is something ambiguous in my intial formulation which is giving this impression. I agree that we should formulate any ext

[CF-metadata] Missing data bins in histograms

2016-10-13 Thread Jonathan Gregory
Dear Martin Ah, OK, thanks. I must have misunderstood. Best wishes Jonathan - Forwarded message from martin.juc...@stfc.ac.uk - > Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 08:20:56 + > From: martin.juc...@stfc.ac.uk > To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu > Subject: [CF-metadata] Missing data bins in histogr

Re: [CF-metadata] Missing data bins in histograms

2016-10-13 Thread Jonathan Gregory
Dear Jim In Appendix A it does not say that the flag attributes are allowed for coordinate variables - it has just "D" in the "Use" column. This is not an argument why they shouldn't be if there is a need, but they weren't introduced with that in mind. The use which you suggested for Martin's case

[CF-metadata] Usage of histogram_of_X_over_Z

2016-10-13 Thread martin.juckes
Dear Alejandro, The two CMIP variables which I'm talking about are cfadDbze94 currently defined as "CFAD (Cloud Frequency Altitude Diagrams) are joint height - radar reflectivity (or lidar scattering ratio) distributions." and cfadLidarsr532, which has the same definition. If they are not joint

Re: [CF-metadata] Usage of histogram_of_X_over_Z

2016-10-13 Thread Bodas-Salcedo, Alejandro
Dear Martin, You are right, those definitions are not correct. > From your reply I understand now that these are univariate distributions > giving the > frequency of different radar reflectivities in different height bands. Coming > from > radar/lidar instruments (or an emulator of these instru

[CF-metadata] Broken links to NUG in conventions document

2016-10-13 Thread Heiko Klein
Hi, the CF-convention document, both the draft 1.7 and the current 1.6 version have several links to the NUG, e.g. http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf/docs/netcdf.html . This page no longer exists and has moved to http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf/docs/user_guide.html There are