t wishes
Jonathan
- Forwarded message from "Saulter, Andrew"
-
> Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 09:31:11 +0000
> From: "Saulter, Andrew"
> To: "cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu"
> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] proposed new standard name for storm surge
>
pplication of harmonic tidal series as boundary conditions to a
numerical tidal model.
Many thanks
Andy
-Original Message-
From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of
Jonathan Gregory
Sent: 09 May 2018 15:46
To: cf-metadata@cg
Dear Andy
> tidal_sea_surface_height_above_lowest_astronomical_tide
> Units: m
> "Sea surface height" is a time-varying quantity. "Height_above_X" means the
> vertical distance above the named surface X. "Chart datum" describes a local
> vertical reference from which depths displayed on a
to:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of Lowry,
Roy K.
Sent: 08 May 2018 16:04
To: Gregory, Jonathan <j.m.greg...@reading.ac.uk>; cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] proposed new standard name for storm surge residual
Dear Andy,
I agree with Jonathan that specifically referenc
y 2018 15:34
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: [CF-metadata] proposed new standard name for storm surge residual
Dear Andy
Thanks for this, and to Roy for support. I agree, I think we've pretty much
worked out what we mean now.
Instead of chart_datum I would prefer that we had standard name
;
> To: "cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu" <cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu>
> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] proposed new standard name for storm surge
> residual
>
> Dear Jonathon,
>
> Thanks for all the constructive inputs - this feels like we are getting
> somewh
gt; > > > variable describing the time varying tidal signal, for example as
> > > > > > > generated based on a summation of harmonically analysed
> > > > > > > components, or resulting from the application of such components
> > > > >
at helped - but don't think this this should be a
> 'due_to' any more since we are not pinning the changes in sea surface height
> to a specific process. In other words we would have something like:
>
> sea_surface_height_above_X = tidal_sea_surface_height_above_X +
> non_tidal_resi
talking total nonsense.
Of course not. Sorry this is so hard.
Best wishes
Jonathan
> -Original Message-
> From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf
> Of Jonathan Gregory
> Sent: 02 May 2018 14:27
> To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
> Subject: [CF-metadat
course not. Sorry this is so hard.
Best wishes
Jonathan
> -Original Message-
> From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of
> Jonathan Gregory
> Sent: 02 May 2018 14:27
> To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
> Subject: [CF-metadata] proposed new standard
odc.ac.uk>
Sent: 03 May 2018 09:47
To: Saulter, Andrew; cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] proposed new standard name for storm surge residual
Hi Andy,
A thought that struck me as I read through your e-mail is that surges aren't
the only meteorological forcing. Whilst in a m
.
From: CF-metadata <cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu> on behalf of Saulter,
Andrew <andrew.saul...@metoffice.gov.uk>
Sent: 03 May 2018 09:28
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] proposed new standard name for storm surge residua
total nonsense.
Andy
-Original Message-
From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of
Jonathan Gregory
Sent: 02 May 2018 14:27
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: [CF-metadata] proposed new standard name for storm surge residual
Dear Andy
Thanks for your
-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of
Jonathan Gregory
Sent: 02 May 2018 14:27
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: [CF-metadata] proposed new standard name for storm surge residual
Dear Andy
Thanks for your email. This is surprisingly mind-bending. Although MSL could
mean time-means on various
.
From: CF-metadata <cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu> on behalf of Jonathan
Gregory <j.m.greg...@reading.ac.uk>
Sent: 02 May 2018 14:27
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: [CF-metadata] proposed new standard name for storm surge residual
Dear Andy
Thanks for your email. This is
<andrew.saul...@metoffice.gov.uk>
> To: "cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu" <cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu>
> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] proposed new standard name for storm surge
> residual
>
> Thanks Jonathon,
>
> From the below:
>
> We use the term &qu
gt;
Sent: 24 April 2018 08:17
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] proposed new standard name for storm surge residual
John,
I see where you are with that, but my understanding from Jonathon Gregory's
email earlier is that the 'due_to' part of the phrasing identifies a compon
24 April 2018 18:30
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] proposed new standard name for storm surge residual
Dear Andy
> - I'm only going to do this for sea water levels, so from my point of
> view using the term "sea" is fine; I'm just aware that what comes
>
; > to some datum. Or maybe I'm not getting it? Steep learning curve this...
> > >
> > > Anyway, having thought about datum's now I have done some further
> > > searching and noted the following already exist as standard names:
> > >
> > > water_sur
;
> So some consensus as to whether "sea_surface_elevation" is the phrasing to go
> for would be very helpful...
>
> Cheers
> Andy
>
> -Original Message-
> From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf
> Of Saulter, Andrew
&g
ome consensus as to whether "sea_surface_elevation" is the phrasing to go
> for would be very helpful...
>
> Cheers
> Andy
>
> -Original Message-
> From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of
> Saulter, Andrew
> Sent: 20 April 2018 1
ar.edu] On Behalf Of
Saulter, Andrew
Sent: 20 April 2018 17:04
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] proposed new standard name for storm surge residual
Jonathon, Helen,
Thanks for the feedback.
I'd looked at the existing 'sea_surface_height' terms but had the same worry as
Jona
:37
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: [CF-metadata] proposed new standard name for storm surge residual
Dear Helen and Andy
I noticed the sea_surface_height_amplitude_due_to_X_tide names as well, and I
wondered, what does "amplitude" mean here? The definitions of these names don't
ta@cgd.ucar.edu" <cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu>
> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] proposed new standard name for storm surge
> residual
> x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.6.18)
>
> Hi Andy
>
> Many of the sea_surface_height terms have been used in satellite altimetry
> for
..@metoffice.gov.uk> -
> Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 16:13:18 +
> From: "Saulter, Andrew" <andrew.saul...@metoffice.gov.uk>
> To: "cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu" <cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu>
> Subject: [CF-metadata] proposed new standard name for storm su
Dear all,
First posting to this list, so please forgive me if I'm doing it wrong...
I'd like to request an addition to the standard name list to include storm
surge residual and tide. These variables are generated for the purpose of
coastal flood prediction and will be available in future,
26 matches
Mail list logo
