Hi. I've got a client that every now and again finds her sequence of
order IDs skips a number. I do the thing where I put cftransaction
around the order being entered, get the max(order_id) as lastorder,
then use that ID for the line items. If there is an error or a
timeout between the ID
I am getting a session time out error even if I am using that session.
any help?
Thanks
Veena
~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives:
Hi Brendan
Thank you very much :)))
its working good :)
um.. but i wonder why have these 3 lines below;
1. cfif attributes.result is not ""
2. cfset "caller.#attributes.result#"=#currentvalue#
3. /cfif
Thank you very much
regards,
phim
-Original Message-
From: brendan avery
Nick,
Connecting to a ssl server is possible through JAVA ala JSSE and JDK1.2.
http://java.sun.com/products/jsse/
You should be able to modify your existing cfx tag to implement https
support.
Although I haven't had an occasion to use cfhttp with a https url I believe
that it was possible.
CHeck out iMS mail from coolfusion.com
Justin
-Original Message-
From: Melissa Fraher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 7:40 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CFMail -- Good Substitute???
Hello. Does anyone know of a good custom tag to use instead of CFMAIL?
Any
There is a difference between solicitation, and a comment in a sig. ;)
Theoretically I only post on relevant topics. (this thread aside, of course).
Mr Bean wrote:
Yea SLAM DUNK, talk talk, bitch and moan and your GUILTY
Have a great weekend
"Billy Cravens" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
You cant say it any better than that.
"Jon Hall" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
001d01c09869$0b37d3d0$a41f88d8@ns2">news:001d01c09869$0b37d3d0$a41f88d8@ns2...
Ask your question and it shall be answered. I have never seen a question
no
matter how advanced that has not been addressed in
I think if you create a custom button within Studio that points to the
correct executable, it straightens out the path issue.
Debbie
-Original Message-
From: Joe Sheble (Wizaerd) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2001 2:32 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: OT: Studio
Hello,
Is it possible to build an interface to administer .htaccess files from the
browser? I've never tried, but can't think of a reason why it would not
work. Any thoughts?
Dave
~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the
well you could build an interface to run it from the web, but anytime you
put a security function on the web you give yourself one more vunerablity.
So unless its important you might as well just do it the old fashined way.
Now i may be in the minority where i feel you should not expose yourself
YEah , there are 1000's of perl scripts to just that.
http://www.google.com/search?q=perl+htaccess+cgibtnG=Google+Search
Justin
-Original Message-
From: David Hannum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2001 2:51 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Admin .htaccess files
Help?
I'm sure this is a silly insert error but I just don't see the problem. The answer
filed is set up for 2000 Char. Do I need to use a special tag to insert HTML into the
field? Running CF 4.5 and SQL7.
ODBC Error Code = 22001 (String data right truncation)P [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server
Is that # hash mark in the color value causing you trouble?
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Davis" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "CF-Talk" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2001 10:16 AM
Subject: SQL error
Help?
I'm sure this is a silly insert error but I just don't see the
You may want to use a text field, not a char field.
I imagine the quotes in the insert may be cause of the problems. There are a
handful of statements that have an effect on the quotes. Look into htmleditformat()
first. I don't see any single quotes
in your insert, so
I have a backend page set up to insert new FAQ's to the site so teh CEO can
add them as they come up. This is really the only one that has this much
HTML for the table layout of requirements. It was teh # sign causing the
problem, I removed all the Font tags and it inserted just fine. Thanks
I have no idea who Mr Bean is or where he has come from, nor do I
recall any previous contributions being posted to this list from Mr Bean.
I am deeply suspicious of anyone who uses the name Mr Bean (For
those who are not aware, the character of Mr Bean is played to
great effect by Rowan
It would be just as secure as .htaccess itself, because the tool would be in
a directory protected by both CF and .htaccess
Dave
- Original Message -
From: William J Wheatley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2001 10:40 AM
Subject: Re:
IN a virtual hosting environment how would you use a custom 404 that is CF
based? Actually even if it a .cfm and the file is not found IIS wouldn't
return the 404 page but there is something else displayed.
Thanks,
Neil
p.s. It can not be the server wide error handler since there are several
You can manage SQL 7 (and 6.5) databases using the SQL 2k Enterprise
Manager. You cannot manage SQL 2k databases using the SQL 7 Enterprise
Manager.
Cary
At 06:54 PM 2/16/2001 -0500, you wrote:
On 2/16/01, Cary Gordon penned:
One possible negative is that, if you have a mixed environment,
Yup, that is exactly what is happening. Once you insert a new record the
autonumber index gets incremented. If you delete that record as happens in
case of an error with cftransaction. The next time a new record is inserted
it just continues on to the next highest number.
jon
- Original
The only way to do this is with iEP's redirection (error) handler. It
allows for the use of CFM's for error handling/custom 404's.. etc.
Lee Fuller
Chief Technical Officer
PrimeDNA Corporation
-Original Message-
From: Neil H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, February 17,
Neil,
If you have enabled session variables, this is easy. In your application.cfm
page insert this code below your cfapplication...
CFERROR TYPE="Request" TEMPLATE="error.html" MAILTO="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Then be sure to have a custom error.html page within that directory scope.
It
is
On 2/17/01, Jon Hall penned:
Yup, that is exactly what is happening. Once you insert a new record the
autonumber index gets incremented. If you delete that record as happens in
case of an error with cftransaction. The next time a new record is inserted
it just continues on to the next highest
I think there is more to what you stated then Jon Hall mentioned.
Why not lose the autonumber field and do autonumber yourself by incrementing
MAX(id) + 1 and using that as your unique id. This way your related link
from the line items to the order header is something YOU created and can
RECREATE
I have seen all of the warnings to make sure to use cflock around any of
the in memory variable types in a CF application. I hear that every access
of a session, or application variable should have cflock around it, or I
could enable automatic locking on the server which will exact a performance
Hi,
I've found CFERROR does not trap the CF 404 errors even when used in the global
application.cfm. Also a couple of statements in Tony's mail aren't correct in regards
to CFERROR:
At 2/17/2001 12:09 PM -0800, Tony Gruen wrote:
If you have enabled session variables, this is easy.
You
Hi all. This may be a little long, but I really need some advice from
the gurus out there.
I'm updating an application I built for a client awhile back and am
looking to try and pick up some speed if possible. The way it works
now is, the items being sold can only be sold one to an area.
Jon Hall wrote:
I have seen all of the warnings to make sure to use cflock around any of
the in memory variable types in a CF application. I hear that every access
of a session, or application variable should have cflock around it, or I
could enable automatic locking on the server which
Bud
Have you considered making a separate ProductArea table which is a
child of the Product table:
ProductID Int,
AreaID Int,
PRIMARY KEY (ProductID, AreaID)
Both as the PK
You could just do the insert bookended with CFTry...
If no error, it was the first of that
OK, I've heard the call for an advanced list and I I'll see what I can do
over the next 2 days. Why 2 days? Because I'm taking down post.office and
putting up the iMS listserver (which I'm writing from scratch now). Once its
up, I'll set up a CF mailing list that's moderated only, but of a
Strongly support you on this Michael. Sounds like a great idea.
I'll be waiting to hear more about it.
Lee Fuller
Chief Technical Officer
PrimeDNA Corporation
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2001 5:28 PM
To:
Current specs:
1. A person has to sign up for a list online. This will change in the
future, but for now that's the fastest and easiest signup we have.
2. A subscription allows a person to enter the following information:
a. username
b. password
c. primary email address (address used to receive
Quite a project, Micahel. Looks good.
A couple of comments interspersed below .
OK, I've heard the call for an advanced list and I I'll see what I can do
over the next 2 days. Why 2 days? Because I'm taking down post.office and
putting up the iMS listserver (which I'm writing from scratch
In short
1) You need to have locks around even the Cfif Isdefined() statements. In
order for CF to check if a function is defined it has to attempt a read of
said function.
2) When accessing a shared variable to read its value the cflock type=""
attribute should be Readonly.
3) When
At 8:27 PM -0500 2/17/01, Michael Dinowitz wrote:
OK, I've heard the call for an advanced list and I I'll see what I can do
Michael
I like the cf-talk list the way it is. I am a member of several
moderated lists and they leave a lot to be desire.
Sometimes, something appears on the cf-talk
I have to agree. I like the list the way it is.
We all have delete keys. Let the list live as is.
At 08:36 PM 2/17/01 -0700, you wrote:
At 8:27 PM -0500 2/17/01, Michael Dinowitz wrote:
OK, I've heard the call for an advanced list and I I'll see what I can do
Michael
I like the cf-talk
I second that too. I have no problems using the delete key.
And it's been the source of some great help, suggestions and ideas in the
past. I'd prefer to see it continue as is.
From: Chad Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 11:16:15 -0500
To:
Since I run (and moderate) several forums (is300.net the most active right
now), I'm always trying to think of ways to make Simple Message Board the
best and easiest to use (that's where the Brownie Point idea came from)
and the other day I had a thought (watch out!):
I'm going to add a "This
Kirk and all,
This may be insufficient for your needs, but it is easy and useful:
You can add an "Add this meeting to your calendar" hyperlink to your web
pages. The link is to a simple text file in the vCalendar format. When
the user clicks on the link, the browser invokes the user's
Lee,
Do you have a link to more information?
Jim
- Original Message -
From: "Lee Fuller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "CF-Talk" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2001 1:01 PM
Subject: RE: Custom 404 in CF.
The only way to do this is with iEP's redirection (error) handler. It
I don't like the idea of a new list. Face it. 90% of us are going to join
both lists anyway. Where is the savings?
I run about 10 mailing list, and have run into this problem of too much off
topic stuff a few times. I think I found a way to stop it
Just assign a few volunteers to be the
I agree. While my delete button gets overheated from time to time, that's
a small penalty for the usefulness of the list. I think Al's suggestions
below are more practical than setting up a new list.
The new rules, whichever list, should identify whether messages like this
one are off
Only a few people can post. Posters are
set by recommendation from a current poster.
Can you compile a 'grandfathered' list of historically productive
cf-talk members in order to streamline the start up of the posting
privileged list?
Already done. We've got a number of people who are
Michael
I like the cf-talk list the way it is. I am a member of several
moderated lists and they leave a lot to be desire.
CF-Talk will not be changing. I'm defining a new, extended list that'll be
both more limited than CF-Talk and more restrictive. Also, due to its nature
it'll be slower.
I have to agree. I like the list the way it is.
We all have delete keys. Let the list live as is.
The lists are staying as is, I was talking about a new experimental list.
~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book
Let it be a Administrator defined maintenance task.
So in the Admin menu somewhere there will be a "Run Maintenance Profiles"
button or something that will execute this and other features.
Yeah..this is manual, but it's either that or do a check everytime the board
is accessed to see what needs
Let it be a Administrator defined maintenance task.
So in the Admin menu somewhere there will be a "Run Maintenance Profiles"
button or something that will execute this and other features.
Yeah..this is manual, but it's either that or do a check everytime the board
is accessed to see what
I don't know if the will work out or not, but kudos for trying something
new. I'm sure it was a huge amount of work, too.
Hal Helms
== See ColdFusionTraining.com for info on "Best Practices with ColdFusion
Fusebox" training ==
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL
48 matches
Mail list logo
