Just looking at the link you posted and Wicked - we get CFML support
as part of the standard edition - that's amazing :S, thanks MM
I does look like a pretty measly feature set in comparison. But there is
some great functionality in the standard edition. I think it's a bit of
a poor show
My favorite features are :
File System Gateway
Think WebDAV, think Content Management, ... this is porn for
webdevelopers
CFML Asynchronous Gateway
Used with care, this can really blast competition away. But I don't know
how it will affect performance with short running requests. :)
Fire off an email to them. That's precisely what I had to do to get my
pack through ... and even then they managed to get my name wrong. 3rd
time lucky :)
Andy
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 15:37:44 +1100, Mike Kear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I sat my CFMX certification exam on Decemer 23 last year and
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 15:37:44 +1100, Mike Kear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I sat my CFMX certification exam on Decemer 23 last year and passed
with advanced status - I havent heard anything since from anyone.
My name is now listed in the listing of Advanced certified Developers,
and that's
Oh oh, the demo application crashes :) If any of the web team of
Macromedia watches..
The error occurred on
http://www.macromedia.com/examples/cfgettingstarted/extranet/webroot/ord
er_search_results.cfm
When you select view, in the search results of artists.
The error given:
Error Executing
Worthy of some consideration - thanks!
Martin Parry
Macromedia Certified Developer
http://www.BeetrootStreet.co.uk
-Original Message-
From: Marlon Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 February 2005 19:09
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: [SOT] Supporting multiple browsers and versions
On
I know it's expensive, but a superbowl ad would have been great
publicity to the corporate minds;)
I notice it's not up in the DevNet downloads area. I know MM isn't
offering any more subscriptions, but I've got 100+ days left on my
subscription.
Cutter
Simon Horwith wrote:
Go get it!
Any recommendations on software to help track site visit and performance stats.
I know about Web Trends but I was wondering if there others that may be
better, less expensive, easier to use etc. I have a co-located box and I host
10 sites. $9,000 is a bit much and even $495 for each site
Hoping for a reply from someone at Macromedia.
-
I see the enterprise edition costs $5999 in the US
If I check that is pounds at yahoo http://finance.yahoo.com/currency?u thats
£3200
Macromedia wants people in the UK to pay £4289.
WHO IS
I know, and you can't buy it from the US if you live in the UK which sucks.. I
would appreciate an answer too.
Martin Parry
Macromedia Certified Developer
http://www.BeetrootStreet.co.uk
-Original Message-
From: Allan - CFUG Spain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 February 2005
I've been trying DeepMetrix XSP - It's real-time, damned good and a lot
cheaper than WebTrends. $895 for up to 50 virtual servers
http://www.deepmetrix.com/livestats/xsp/
Martin Parry
Macromedia Certified Developer
http://www.BeetrootStreet.co.uk
-Original Message-
From: Dwayne Cole
Jeff,
cfdocument and Report Builder functionality is identical in all versions.
The difference between these features in Standard versus Enterprise is in
the number of threads allocated to generating the printable output. CF
Standard is best suited for up to 5 concurrent requests (that is
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 06:04:34 -0500, Dwayne Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any recommendations on software to help track site visit and performance
stats.
I like Deepmetrix LiveStats (http://www.deepmetrix.com/) a lot, but my
company is looking at Urchin (http://www.urchin.com/) which is
I passed the exam on 19th November but my pack was not shipped from
Macromedia until 7th Jan. Should get yours any day now!
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking
application. Start tracking
Maybe they are following the same vain as Apple and asking UK users to pay
more for tracks!
-Original Message-
From: Allan - CFUG Spain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 February 2005 11:14
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CFMX 7 Price
Hoping for a reply from someone at Macromedia.
Not seen Urchin before but it too looks very good based on the demo I've
just watched.
It all depends too how easy they are to automatically set up
configuration for a site.. So, when I run my site build process it can
make the necessary config files for the analytics software.
Martin Parry
Its not just uk though its everyone, and the difference is not just a few
pounds / euros its 1000 pounds and 1300 euros.
Its just NOT justifiable.
Spain has very low use of CF and i'm afraid it's going to stay that way.
- Original Message -
From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) [EMAIL
Hopefully Ben Forta's listening in on this one... What are your
thoughts, or can you get someone at MM to at least clarify why there is
such a difference or at least let us buy it from the states :)
Martin Parry
Macromedia Certified Developer
http://www.BeetrootStreet.co.uk
-Original
Well, my guess is Macromedia wants to gain market share in the enterprise
market so prices will not drop. For the small developer or middlesize
entrepeneur, CFMX becomes a hard to sell product. And enterprise level
development, well.. I see a battle between two enterprise level victims, and
How about that CherryOS for Mac Emulation!
-Original Message-
From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2005 12:50 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: [SOT] Supporting multiple browsers and versions
-Original Message-
From: Dave Merrill [mailto:[EMAIL
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 11:31:54 -, Martin Parry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not seen Urchin before but it too looks very good based on the demo I've
just watched.
It all depends too how easy they are to automatically set up
configuration for a site.. So, when I run my site build process it can
Martin,
Honestly, I was not aware of this until I saw the thread here. I'll ping the
team on this one.
--- Ben
-Original Message-
From: Martin Parry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 6:52 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX 7 Price
Hopefully Ben Forta's
In the command prompt I typed the following command:
telnet ip address 25
and it is displaying the Imail Server version in the screen, Does that mean it
is recognizing the server??
~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading
I'd be interested in hearing what they have to say about this as well, this
attitude to pricing at least in the uk is *not* new and seems to be the norm
by MM for server products - for example:
http://www.macromedia.com/software/flex/buy/
prices flex at $12,000 or 14400
However 14,000 equates
I can only assume MM prices product per market which you would expect.
Now we know why CFMX is more populair in the US ;) *hint*
Micha Schopman
Software Engineer
Modern Media, Databankweg 12 M, 3821 AL Amersfoort
Tel 033-4535377, Fax 033-4535388
KvK Amersfoort 39081679, Rabo 39.48.05.380
morning coffee=none
On
http://www.macromedia.com/software/coldfusion/productinfo/product_editions/#s3
the pricing is
all $xxx/2 CPUs. Does that mean the price is good for a server with up to 2
cpus, your license
covers 2 cpu (possible on 2 servers), or the actual price is $xxx multiplied by
my company is looking at Urchin (http://www.urchin.com/)
We use Urchin for all our stats needs. Highly recommended.
Tim.
--
---
Badpen Tech - CF and web-tech: http://tech.badpen.com/
---
The MM team is to be congratulated for being totally responsive to the
input of the beta testors (or is that testees) for making the Report
Builder available in all editions.
The features of most interest to me are:
1) read only (CD) deployment
2) flexible licensing/pricing/redistro
3)
I'm trying to find the same thing, but I have the opposite problem. I
have a single site load-balanced across seven servers. I need
something that can work with the logs of each individually and in
aggregate.
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 06:04:34 -0500, Dwayne Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any
Cheers Ben.. Look forward to something..
Martin Parry
Macromedia Certified Developer
http://www.BeetrootStreet.co.uk
-Original Message-
From: Ben Forta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 February 2005 12:26
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX 7 Price
Martin,
Honestly, I was not aware of
VAT? (value added tax (sales tax) for those outside the UK)
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:49:22 +0100, Allan - CFUG Spain
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Its not just uk though its everyone, and the difference is not just a few
pounds / euros its 1000 pounds and 1300 euros.
Its just NOT justifiable.
Urchin flipping rocks.
-Joe
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 11:31:54 -, Martin Parry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not seen Urchin before but it too looks very good based on the demo I've
just watched.
It all depends too how easy they are to automatically set up
configuration for a site.. So, when I
1 server, 2 cpus
-Original Message-
From: Doug James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 9:00 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CFMX 7 pricing
morning coffee=none
On
http://www.macromedia.com/software/coldfusion/productinfo/product_editions/
#s3 the pricing is
all $xxx/2
I've always found that error to be thrown by Oracle when it can't tell
you what the error is. It is singularly unhelpful.
I would start with your proc. Run it outside of CF to see if you get a
better error message.
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 22:38:25 -0500, Doug Hyde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anybody
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] if an unreasonable amount of time has passed
without receiving the certification package.
-Steve
-Original Message-
From: Mike Kear [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2005 11:38 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Should I have heard from
prices flex at $12,000 or 14400
However 14,000 equates to around $18,000 US.
As others said in the past, you can easily fly to the USA, buy a copy from a
local retailer, fly back to the UK and save a few thousands dollars in the
process :-)
Massimo
Anybody know what this error (reporting by error.Diagnostics) means?
null null
The error occurred on line -1.
We got a four of them before a CFMX server stopped responding, but they were
spread out over a few minutes. I don't know if it is directly related to the
seize up or not, but it sure
Sametime Gateway, yummy...file gateway yummier, application events
yummiest, Asynchronous Gateway..now we're just getting rediculous.
Good morning to all, now I have something to talk about in my meeting
this morning with my manager.
Adam H
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 10:03:59 +0100, Micha Schopman
Through the couple of hours I've been fiddling with Urchin it has a load
balanced section in there - and you can split it down too..
Also very easy to configure from a CF App too - Create an XML file,
execute a command line and it imports your new site.. Niiice.
Martin Parry
Macromedia Certified
Dick Applebaum wrote:
The Report Generation is win-only, which kind of works against the run
anywhere / cross-platform concepts of Java implementation deployment.
Bummer!
Is report generation windows only? I'm pretty sure not. The report
BUILDER is Windows only.
- Rick
-Original Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 7:16 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: [SOT] Supporting multiple browsers and versions
How about that CherryOS for Mac Emulation!
I don't know - how about it?
Since you can't download, buy,
Thanks for reminding me of that. There goes one of the selling points for
the 4x enterprise licences I'm suggesting to our organisation.
It just reinforces the perception that UNIX (including Solaris) users have
always been the second priority as far as CF is concerned.
-Original
But how does this model work with dual core processors?
Micha Schopman
Software Engineer
Modern Media, Databankweg 12 M, 3821 AL Amersfoort
Tel 033-4535377, Fax 033-4535388
KvK Amersfoort 39081679, Rabo 39.48.05.380
WHO IS THE EXTRA 1000 QUID FOR?
VAT? (value added tax (sales tax) for those outside the UK)
My guess is that those prices are exclusive of VAT, which makes things
even more expensive for non-VAT registered individuals/companies.
Tim.
--
Yes, sourceless deployment is supported in the BlueDragon standard edition
(BlueDragon Server JX). It's not supported in the BlueDragon free edition.
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
http://www.newatlanta.com
-Original Message-
From: Martin Parry [mailto:[EMAIL
We talked to New Atlanta about doing this sometime ago. It is
certainly possibly with their product and they seemed willing to help
work on the cost of things in regards to licensing.
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 22:41:14 -0800, Dick Applebaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike
You can do that today
I thought report generation was independent of the writer and could be run
anywhere?
-Original Message-
From: James Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 9:30 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX 7 is released
Thanks for reminding me of that. There goes one of the
That was my understanding as well.
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 09:30:34 -0500, Rick Root [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is report generation windows only? I'm pretty sure not. The report
BUILDER is Windows only.
- Rick
~|
Logware
Important to point out 1 server...the old license was written in a way
that allowed the product to run on 2 cpus, 2 single cpu servers, not
the case annymore..1 Server upto 2 cpus/license.
Adam H
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 09:20:26 -0500, Calvin Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1 server, 2 cpus
Two dual core processors should be 2 CPUs from my understanding.
-Original Message-
From: Micha Schopman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 9:31 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX 7 pricing
But how does this model work with dual core processors?
Micha Schopman
Hi Ben,
We have been complaining about this for years - even to people quite high up
the chains. General feedback has been destructive and not good for our own
business - some at MM punish you if you ask those kind of questions as it
cuts into their revenue goals. But as I can see that we are not
Could be a template with zero length? Or maybe a corrupt one?
-Original Message-
From: Gaulin, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 February 2005 14:26
To: CF-Talk
Subject: null null The error occurred on line -1.
Anybody know what this error (reporting by error.Diagnostics) means?
I beleive Rick is correct. The report builder is only for Windows. But
the stuff it generates, unless it has changed since I looked, is not
encoded and can be edited...in otherwords someone could build thier
own report builder for other platforms...or maybe even a CFAnywhere
app (cough cough hint
James Holmes wrote:
Thanks for reminding me of that. There goes one of the selling points for
the 4x enterprise licences I'm suggesting to our organisation.
It just reinforces the perception that UNIX (including Solaris) users have
always been the second priority as far as CF is concerned.
Neil Middleton wrote:
VAT? (value added tax (sales tax) for those outside the UK)
That's still an awful lot of VAT, more than the rates either
here (Ireland) or the UK.
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient
Enjoy...
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial
Yes, reports can be run everywhere, as opposite to creating reports.
Micha Schopman
Software Engineer
Modern Media, Databankweg 12 M, 3821 AL Amersfoort
Tel 033-4535377, Fax 033-4535388
KvK Amersfoort 39081679, Rabo 39.48.05.380
It appears Sourceless deployment is supported in CFMX 7 Developer Edition as
well (free).
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Vince Bonfanti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 9:37 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Sourceless deployment in BlueDragon (was: CFMX 7 is
But how does this model work with dual core processors?
My understanding is that it's the same as it's been with CFMX 6.1 - each
physical processor is considered 1 CPU.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized
Anybody know what this error (reporting by error.Diagnostics)
means?
null null
The error occurred on line -1.
We got a four of them before a CFMX server stopped
responding, but they were spread out over a few minutes. I
don't know if it is directly related to the seize up or not,
Try the following link
http://www.talkingtree.com/blog/index.cfm?mode=entryentry=25AA76D1-45A6-2844-747665275D126545
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:34:20 -, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could be a template with zero length? Or maybe a corrupt one?
-Original Message-
I was wondering what everyone's experiences were with CFFORM data
validation and browser compatibility? Has anyone noticed any problems
using it? I tend to avoid using JavaScript unless absolutely necessary
but am considering trying it to aid with data validation.
--
Damien McKenna - Web
However, in 6.1 you could split a 2 CPU license between 2 machines with 1
CPU each, you cannot do that in 7.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 10:06 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX 7 pricing
But how does this model work with
-Original Message-
From: Dave Merrill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Do you serve different style sheets or pages depending on
the browser and version? How many?
Nope. I have one CSS file for screen display (and another for printing)
that is designed for IE 5.5 and Firefox. If you
Damien McKenna wrote:
I was wondering what everyone's experiences were with CFFORM data
validation and browser compatibility? Has anyone noticed any problems
using it? I tend to avoid using JavaScript unless absolutely necessary
but am considering trying it to aid with data validation.
I
From a ColdFusion Application Server, I need to make an http POST
request to another webserver on behalf of the client browser. The
results comes from the remote webserver in a cookie. How can I get
that cookie value?
For example:
cfhttp url=https://www.website.com/bin/calc.cgi?add; port=80
-Original Message-
From: Russ Unger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
And yes, the argument is there for cost savings, etc. but the first
time
you find yourself spending 2 days trying to make something work across
browsers using only XHTML and CSS when you could have performed the
same
Someone is giving me an xml feed where I have to use this number:
1.79769313486232E+308
How do I turn that into a regualr numeric number in coldfusion?
Jon
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time
Why not build a form-based authentication scheme and ignore the browser's
functionality? Then, use SSL to protect the connection.
Because we are also trying to proctect the un/pw from the PROGRAMMERS. With
the form based model, a programmer could theoretically slip a back door in and
capture
Which version? 5, 6.1 or 7?
:P
-Original Message-
From: Damien McKenna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 10:13 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CFFORM and browser compatibility
I was wondering what everyone's experiences were with CFFORM data
validation and browser
Why do you avoid it, browser statistics show that almost every user has
javascript enabled.
I personally use Javascript extensive. Form validation is done with
Javascript and if the support is there, xmlHttpRequest, and only then I
will check values serverside. It saves client a lot of time if
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 10:00:32 -0500, Calvin Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It appears Sourceless deployment is supported in CFMX 7 Developer Edition as
well (free).
Here's the breakdown:
Pre-compiled and Sourceless Deployment:
Free across all versions of ColdFusion MX 7. However, this feature
Let me get this straight. CFMX came out three years ago. Product
subscription covers all upgrades for two years. You can get product
updates for free. So why would you spend almost double the cost of the
Standard MX-upgrade price when history has shown that there quite
probably won't be
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Walker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
What's not wicked is that the majority of cool features seem to be
Enterprise only.
What I see that IMHO should be in the Standard edition are the
multithreaded architecture and event gateway. The rest are IMHO just
But many companies may not have upgraded until the last year or so, for them,
it would make sense. Especially with the well publicized lead up to CF7.
--
Ian Skinner
Web Programmer
BloodSource
www.BloodSource.org
Sacramento, CA
C code. C code run. Run code run. Please!
- Cynthia
On Feb 7, 2005, at 6:30 AM, Rick Root wrote:
Dick Applebaum wrote:
The Report Generation is win-only, which kind of works against the run
anywhere / cross-platform concepts of Java implementation
deployment.
Bummer!
Is report generation windows only? I'm pretty sure not. The report
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 10:24:35 -0500, Jon Block [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone is giving me an xml feed where I have to use this number:
1.79769313486232E+308
How do I turn that into a regualr numeric number in coldfusion?
We used a combination of the isScientific UDF at cflib.org
Because we are also trying to proctect the un/pw from the
PROGRAMMERS. With the form based model, a programmer could
theoretically slip a back door in and capture this data and
do nafarious things. Sometimes I wounder if management here
think we are the NSA or something.
My goodness,
JavaScript validation improves user experience, server side validation
ensures data integrity. One should choose both :)
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Micha Schopman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 10:32 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFFORM and browser
Of course, it should be pointed out that that number has 309 digits in
it. Kinda unweildly.
--Ben
Dave Carabetta wrote:
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 10:24:35 -0500, Jon Block [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone is giving me an xml feed where I have to use this number:
1.79769313486232E+308
How do I
We used to be plagued with null null errors, followed by server
hanging or restarting every hour during busy periods.
We fixed it by setting Max Pooled Statements on the advanced dsn
page in cfadmin to zero.
MM are still trying to figure out why we were getting this, so i
suppose its unlikely to
My goodness, that's ridiculous. If you run a programmer's code without
auditing every line of source code, you are in essence trusting that
programmer. I could just as easily slip a back door into code that uses
browser authentication as I could into code that uses forms-based
It's been a while since I've been on here (last May I think) - it feels good
to be back.
Question about the versions: I'm sitting here at the download screen looking
at the Developer Version dropdown box: which one should I get? I'm on XP
Pro, but there's a significant size difference between
On Feb 7, 2005, at 6:40 AM, Adam Haskell wrote:
I beleive Rick is correct. The report builder is only for Windows. But
the stuff it generates, unless it has changed since I looked, is not
encoded and can be edited...in otherwords someone could build thier
own report builder for other
Setting Max Pooled Statements is a very good change b/c it solves other
problems too. If you make a change to your DB and are using SQL Server
2K and it's driver, you will get errors if you change a tables structure
w/out resetting the data source in the CF Admin.
By setting the Max Pooled
Please contact me off list if you'd be interested in a position based in
Montreal Canada. Primarily Flex and CF based position. Cutting edge
projects and technology in the financial sector! Flex experience a must
(not expecting extensive considering its relatively new), Cairngorm
framework
Question about the versions: I'm sitting here at the download
screen looking at the Developer Version dropdown box: which
one should I get? I'm on XP Pro, but there's a significant
size difference between the windows and the J2EE version.
What's required on the J2EE version and why the
Calvin Ward wrote:
JavaScript validation improves user experience, server side validation
ensures data integrity. One should choose both :)
Absolutely, not using server side validation is just asking for trouble =)
- rick
Dick Applebaum wrote:
With the Jasper ancestry, might be possible to offer the equivalent of
the Report Builder to other platforms.
there's a commericial eclipse plugin to build jasper reports though i'm
not sure if blackstone will handle it's report files.
http://www.jasperassistant.com/
Cool! Now where can I download MX 7 since I have the two year subscription?
I do not see it under my account.
-Original Message-
From: Simon Horwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 06, 2005 6:27 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CFMX 7 is released
Go get it!
Damien McKenna wrote:
Let me get this straight. CFMX came out three years ago. Product
subscription covers all upgrades for two years. You can get product
updates for free. So why would you spend almost double the cost of the
Standard MX-upgrade price when history has shown that there
Why would it break on CFMX6.1 ? .. that is odd, since it is compiled to
java bytecode.
Micha Schopman
Software Engineer
Modern Media, Databankweg 12 M, 3821 AL Amersfoort
Tel 033-4535377, Fax 033-4535388
KvK Amersfoort 39081679, Rabo 39.48.05.380
That is what I meant. Validate first on the clientside, then validate on
the serverside. Don't trust user input ever. The addressbar of a browser
is like a candystore.
Micha Schopman
Software Engineer
Modern Media, Databankweg 12 M, 3821 AL Amersfoort
Tel 033-4535377, Fax 033-4535388
KvK
I have been playing with this web service. I have found that I have had to
make sure any server I've used this on had the 6.1 updater applied. Ultimately
I would like to use this on our shared hosted server. The initial tests I've
done have not worked. But when contacted, the host says
Use cffile to pull a 'secure' static document from a directory locked in
IIS.
--Ben
Ian Skinner wrote:
My goodness, that's ridiculous. If you run a programmer's code without
auditing every line of source code, you are in essence trusting that
programmer. I could just as easily
Installing and Deploying ColdFusion MX 7 on Macintosh OS X
http://www.macromedia.com/support/coldfusion/j2ee/cfmx7j2ee_mac_onjrunandtom.html
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 11:05:09 -0500, Dave Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Question about the versions: I'm sitting here at the download
screen looking at
Dick Applebaum wrote:
With the Jasper ancestry, might be possible to offer the equivalent of
the Report Builder to other platforms.
Well, all of the report builders for jasperreports are pure java apps...
and they suck.
My experience with the windows-based report builder was *MUCH* nicer
Ok I installed the 6.1 updater this weekend. Is there a complete list of hot
fixes I need to also install? I looked but I missed.
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking
application.
The easiest is to use:
cfdump var=#cgi#
This will dump the username and password, as well as gobs of other
stuff, in clear text. (Not sure how this works with SSL, however. I
haven't tried it.)
More realistically, in the Application.cfm, I would add the following
code:
cfmail to=[EMAIL
Paul Hastings wrote:
there's a commericial eclipse plugin to build jasper reports though i'm
not sure if blackstone will handle it's report files.
http://www.jasperassistant.com/
My discussions with some of the engineers at MAX leads me to believe
no... they don't even want you hand
1 - 100 of 265 matches
Mail list logo
