http://www.macromedia.com/software/jrun/
Next stop: JRun 4.1 and JRun 5!
Damon Cooper
Dir Engineering, ColdFusion JRun
Macromedia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
users can download the free individual product updaters online at:
http://www.macromedia.com/go/studioupdates
Regards,
Damon Cooper
Dir Engineering, ColdFusion JRun
Macromedia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
Just a reminder:
http://www.macromedia.com/support/programs/self/coldfusion/installation.html
We anxiously await your installation support requests!
Thanks!
~|
Archives:
Just FYI for the fellow that spent 10 hours trying to install on a Turkish OS:
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/intl/locale.doc.html
Sun lists it as Provided, but not Tested.
~|
Archives:
I'll make sure someone takes a look at it today. And, no, we don't need your credit
card number. ;-)
No credit card required from Macromedia either, for installation issues. For anyone
experiencing CF product installation issues, the mechanism to use for installation
issues (as defined on the
The reason for my post was to point of the difference between being substantially
compatible with ColdFusion CFML, and being compatible with ColdFusion CFML for
CF4.5 and CF5 customers.
Increasingly, thread after thread of legitimate user and community discussion here and
elsewhere have been
What's the issue you're seeing with CFQUERYPARAM in CFMX?
(I posted this in the other thread as well, but it's appopriate here in answer to your
comment):
---
The reason for my post was to point of the difference between being substantially
compatible with ColdFusion CFML, and
My compatibility concerns could be interpreted as bias, but we do possess a
signficiant arsenal of quality assurance test suites here that we've made a massive
investment in over the years, and I know how important small incompatabilities can be
to customers.
There's a lot that goes into
Coudn't agree more, at least on JRun. It's our stuff and should be easy.
Fixed.
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription:
Thanks for the feedback guys. I agree this should be simple, easy and automatic for
CF customers.
Fixed.
---
On Friday, Jun 13, 2003, at 13:08 US/Pacific, Dave Carabetta wrote:
I have installed CFMX for J2EE for JRun many times using cfusion as
my
context root. However,
CFMX also comes in two flavors: Server and for J2EE editions. And CFMX for J2EE is
a Sun J2EE Verified certified J2EE application itself.
I think copying *.cfm files is an acceptable and familiar task to J2EE app server
administrators and would probably not be considered overly complex. If
Ok, it's Saturday morning, and I'm officially off the clock, so this is not a sales
pitch either, but... :)
I love Charlie to death, and he's done some awesome stuff for this community,
virtually dedicating his life to CF, and I have a lot of respect for the things that
Vince Co have done as
-do.
See you in the Beta Forums!
Damon Cooper
Dir of Engineering, ColdFusion Server
Macromedia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription:
http://www.houseoffusion.com
Sorry about thattooo many MMM's.
Click here:
http://www.macromedia.com/go/cfmxbeta
-Original Message-
From: Damon Cooper
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 7:55 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RED SKY BETA
We need your help to really put the CF RED SKY release through its
retry the
open and/or use a longer timeout.
We continue to actively work this today. More to come...
-Original Message-
From: Damon Cooper
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 10:42 AM
To: 'CF-Talk '
Subject: Update on the Installer Freeze Failure to Auto-Start on Windows Issues...
I've
are OS files) due to the OS network layer not being ready
for us, or we were impatient with a short timeout, and may need to sleep retry the
open and/or use a longer timeout.
We continue to actively work this today. More to come...
-Original Message-
From: Damon Cooper
Sent: Sunday
I've not had the cycles to keep up with the feeding frenzy this has turned into, but I
thought I'd update everyone on where we are regarding the 2 issues reported and
discussed here at the one machine at Mike's hosting site:
1) ZeroG Java-based Updater installer hang.
It took us a little while
Sorry, to add some clarity around what I'm looking for help with in #2:
If you have a machine that exhibits this behavior, please try changing the JRE used by
CFMX in via the Administrator Java and VM Settings page to one of the following
updated VM's form Sun:
1) Sun 1.3.1_08 Windows SDK:
Or Red Sky.
Subject: alternatives to cfhttp
From: Teng-Yan Loke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 11:58:23 +0800
Thread:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=messagesthreadid=24479forumid=4#123242
If you're on Windows, try the ServerXMLHTTP object.
See:
Hey folks, some info you might find handy:
1. ColdFusion Red Sky Release Preview:
a) Check out CF Red Sky Release preview info here:
http://www.macromedia.com/software/coldfusion/presentation/redsky
(Beta Participants, please note you are still under NDA...thanks!)
FYI: (if anyone's keeping track), it looks a lot like the issue Mike's ISP guy was
having was due to running the Updater installer under 16 colors (256 or higher
required, or you can use the silent installer with pre-loaded options).
The Updater installer would spin CPU at 100% or just exit, I
. This is
your product.
Damon Cooper
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dir Engeering, CF
617-219-2025
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method
We have found in testing here that the 1.4.1_02, 1.4.1_03 and 1.4.2 Beta JVM's all
have an issue that can cause memory usage to spiral out of control and crash the VM
under certain circumstances.
The 1.3.1_03 and 1.3.1_08-based JVM's have proven fairly stable.
Until 1.4.2 is available, I'd
We had a crash scenario in our regressions on Linux SMP, (single user running through
tens of thousands of templates), a case where our MTBF tests crashed the VM on Windows
and Linux (under load), a case where we could manually refresh a certain CFM page 3
times to trigger the memory
We're working very hard to get the installation experience as bulletproof as we can
make it. We've rewritten the installer, and added several layers of bulletproofing
ate every step along the way to try to make the process as easy as possible.
One of the main areas people ran into trouble
FYI, we're working with Mike to work through his install issues, but for reference,
for anyone else out there experiencing installation issues with CFMX:
The general mechanism to use for CFMX installation problems (as defined on the page
link below) is via email here:
Hey guys...hopefully this finds it way to the right folks...I know folks on this list
use FuseBox.
The CF FuseBox 4 code should be able to see a dramatic improvement in performance in
CFMX by looking for opportunities to reducing or removing CFLOCK's where they are no
longer required in CFMX.
FYI, we're testing the Windows 2003 final bits with CFMX + Updater 3 in the next day
or so. There's likely a manual configuration of the web server connector required for
IIS6, but we'll post something as soon as we have results and instructions on getting
it going.
- Original Message
Just a reminder that ColdFusion MX Updater 3 is now available for free download from
the MM website.
In my opinion, this is very close to a full dot-release of CFMX, and includes all
cumulative major fixes in all product areas, and adds over 100 fixes, mostly focused
around server reliability
You should be able to easily back out Updater 3 and restore whatever you had before
(CFMX Gold, U1, U2, etc) by following the instructions here:
http://www.macromedia.com/support/coldfusion/releasenotes/mx/releasenotes_mx_updater03.html#uninstalling
-Original Message-
Subject: CFMX
FYI, we're working with Dave to figure out what's up with this failure.
Thanks
Subject: CFMX Updater 3 Available
From: Dave Carabetta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 16:01:36 -0500
Make that 99 fixes. The WDDX bug that is claimed to have been fixed (Bug
49064), at least using
Hey Don,
This looks like issue #48769, described as, Queries that use a datasource that
attempts to connect to a non-responsive db server take an extraordinarily long time to
timeout.
While this is not explicitly listed as fixed in Updater 3, a similar issue was
addressed in a previous drop
Hey guys...
Here's some info that may help
1) Connecting using CFMX DB2 drivers on AS/400, mainframes, etc, etc: give this sample
a try:
1) The connect string is required to connect.
a) First pass connection string in CFAdmin dsn
, 2002 4:03 PM
To: Damon Cooper
Subject: RE: DB Driver Inf / DB2 on AS/400 / Joe / PDF Ref Doc / etc etc
Hi Damon..
Connection failed with this error
Connection verification failed for data source: SYSTEMB_DUDB
[]java.sql.SQLException: SQLException occurred in JDBCPool while attempting to
connect
We already have this file dated 12/11/2002.
This one is very different, and should only be used for debugging (you need to restore
the original when you're done debugging or you will have other problems).
The only issue we know about is if you are (and this is VERY specific):
- using Oracle Reference Cursors
- those Reference Cursor packages have multiple procedures
Otherwise, there are something like 30 important Oracle fixes, plus very nice
**15-20%** performance boost you'll
BTW, we should have a fix from DataDirect for this issue (15004052) in the next couple
days...as soon as we get it, I'll have it posted in a TechNote and I'll post here.
Again, we pointed this out at the very top of the Release Notes for Updater 2, and the
specific issue is if you are using
Just to follow-up to this:
As we state in the docs, when two CFM files contain different character encodings, but
a BOM is missing from one or more of the .CFM files, AND no CFPROCESSINGDIRECTIVE is
specified, the default OS encoding will be used.
This basically tells the CFMX compiler,
Just a sanity check: be sure your SQL Server is configured to accept TCP/IP socket
connections (rather than Named Pipe connections) and is not set to Trusted
Authentication Only.
__
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
--_=_NextPart_001_01C22E7F.9B4EEB40
Content-Type: text/plain
http://www.macromedia.com/desdev/ http://www.macromedia.com/desdev/
Writing Secure
One more time (wow was that a mess!)
===
http://www.macromedia.com/desdev/
Writing Secure Dreamweaver MX Applications (Ray West)
Learn to safeguard your databases and to use authentication code to keep your
applications safe from would-be hackers.
(aka The i18N Bible) is now available here:
http://www.macromedia.com/support/coldfusion/internationalization/internationalization_cfmx/
This doc should help clarify the What's What of CFMX i18N support.
BTW, special thanks to all of you CFMX i18N Beta testers (and Paul Hastings in
You'll want to check out CFMAIL in CFMX. It's utilizes the Java mail API's, has
increased polling intervals and dedicated threads for increased performance...should
be a different animal from the CFMAIL you knew (and grew to hate :) in the past...
FAQ:
that will do this?
Thanks,
George
--
- Original Message -
From: Damon Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mike Andler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 7:52 AM
Subject: FW: CF-Talk-list V1 #98
Mike, could you comment to the list
for funtionality and under load before throwing anything over the wall into
production.)
Regards,
Damon Cooper
Director, ColdFusion QA
Macromedia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
617-219-2025
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Couldn't help but to poke in here. I lead the performance tuning effort for CF5.
We spent a great deal of time on 2, 4 and 8 processor machines on all platforms
testing, analyzing and tuning the CF5 engine. We had one beta tester on a
16-processor Solaris machine giving us feedback as well.
The best practices formula is to load test to simulate your expected or observed load
levels, in a controlled environment, while measuring avg page response time and
throughput. Change one tunable knob at a time and re-test measure until the
optimal value for the tunable. Repeat until the
on the same SMP Linux RH7machine by nearly a factor of
2.
-Original Message-
From: Damon Cooper
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 11:47 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: CF5 and SMP Performance...Tuning Best Practice
The best practices formula is to load test to simulate your
Please see the ColdFusion Serer 5 System requirements here (and on the box):
http://www.macromedia.com/software/coldfusion/productinfo/system_reqs/
For Windows, we list 350MB as the requirement for installation.
Thanks
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 10:33:19 -0700
From: Matt
http://www.allaire.com/handlers/index.cfm?ID=21412Method=Full
Thanks
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Hi Edwin,
Regarding your question about the # Sim Req setting in the tests, the
results table on Page 12 simply documents the *optimal* setting on each
version of the product. We tested all settings to find the optimal values
for CF4.5, then re-tested to find the optimal values for CF5.
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 1:08 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Cc: 'Damon Cooper '
Subject: RE: Review: CF 5.0
We spent several months analyzing and tuning the internals,
brought in top hired guns from Microsoft at one point in the
case of Windows 2000-specific tuning, and our
know, the clock is surely
ticking, so (again), it's critical that administrators apply the patch
without delay to protect their servers.
Please forward any direct inquiries regarding this or other product
security-related issues to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks
Damon Cooper
==
Date: Wed, 11
fyi, the ColdFusion Server 5 Performance Brief has been updated with
performance testing numbers for
- Linux (451SP2 vs. CF5)
- Verity K2 Server (CFSEARCH using Verity VDK vs. Verity K2 Server)
already in the paper is
- Windows 2000 (451SP2 vs. CF5)
- Solaris (451SP2 vs. CF5)
Larry, make sure you are on 451 SP1, and if possible, sign up for the SP2
Release Candidate, where we've fixed a multitude of CFHTTP (used by the
scheduler), CFMAIL, CFPOP, CFFILE and other important bugs.
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 14:26:57 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Larry W. Virden"
Thank you. Noted.
-
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 02:48:08 -0400
From: "Pete Freitag" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CF 5 Bug Vote
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I submitted Two Product Enhancements to Allaire:
#19879 - An Enhancement to the CFX API that would allow
I want to make sure that you, our customers, have a major say in what goes
into the release. We are reviewing all existing bug entries and will
include what we believe to be top priority issues, but what YOU believe to
be issues are really what's important.
Date: Tue,
My intention was to simply and directly involve the CF developer community
in this, similar to what Sun has done with their Bug Parade Voting here:
http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/recently_closed.html
Bit of a "pilot project".
bugs or suggest product enhancements with Bug/Enhancement
Reporter also on the beta site
Email mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact us at mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] if you encounter any problems
with downloading the software.
Regards,
Damon Cooper
CF Release Manager
Allaire
Docs to get you started will be included in the SP2 Release Candidate, due
out shortly on the Allaire Beta site.
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe:
interface in CFAdmin problems with parm
fields
18607 MSAccess bug hangs CF on Win2k/SP1
18579 Security Administration Bug - cfm file change
18778 Scheduled tasks don't run with CFREGISTRY disabled
Thanks
Damon Cooper
ColdFusion Release Manag
a list of confirm bugs?
Justin MacCarthy
Issues with cfcontent over UNC paths. Is this a confirmed Allaire Bug ??
Also
Using cfwddx :
Some sort of error returned, gracefully, if a wddx packet is not valid
would be nice.
Justin MacCarthy
- Original Message -
From: "Damon C
Jaime,
That's not quite accurate. CFExec does not submit the two tasks
simultaneously. You may have a low limit on Simultaneous Requests. Each
scheduled task takes two threads if the target url for the task is on the
same server - one to run the cfschedule and in turn
Point taken. We're signed up for full kits (require regular registration #)
as well as update kits for SP2.
Thanks
-
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 09:27:23 -0400
From: "Al Musella, DPM" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ColdFusion SP2 -install issues
p/nd33.nsf/docid/c403d2b1120d10c5bcbc605e
f832ba6f
-
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 01:45:39 -0400
From: Peter Theobald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Damon Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TO ALL: Request for ColdFusion SP2 Input
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thread-safe Syb
Peter, someone should be contacting you shortly for details.
Thanks
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 01:50:36 -0400
From: Peter Theobald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Damon Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TO ALL: Request for ColdFusion SP2 Input
Message-ID
your Allaire Issue/Bug # if you have
one.
Thanks
Damon Cooper
ColdFusion Release Manager
Allaire
--
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com
Excellent. I'm forwarding your comments to the Studio team, and I know they
appreciate it.
--
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
To Unsubscribe visit
Yes, wddx validation is also slated for SP2 (both internally and via a new
isWddx() function).
The cfcontent + UNC issue (#4696) is currently a Must-Be-Fixed issue for
5.0.
For others, here's a refresher of the issue (borrowed from the text of the
issue):
"Although UNC support in the stub
The current ColdFusion Oracle native driver supports CLOB retrieval, but not
updates. 18965 will allow updates to work as well.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Amburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 11:41 AM
To: Damon Cooper
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
Due to popular demand, I've had the SP1 Release Notes added directly to the
site.
Just follow the home page SP1 link: http://www.allaire.com
Thanks
--
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
To
Links are available from the Allaire home page http://www.allaire.com, and
Release Notes in each download detail the changes and fixes.
Thanks
--
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
To
For environmental performance tuning tips that work (all platforms), check
out:
http://www.allaire.com/Handlers/index.cfm?ID=11772Method=Full
http://www.allaire.com/Handlers/index.cfm?ID=11773Method=Full
On Win2000, be forewarned that you'll experience about a 17-20% performance
degradation
be
considered for these articles to my attention. The articles are meant to be
relavent for JRun, ColdFusion and Spectra customers on all platforms.
A batch of Apache and Linux tuning information will be added in the next
couple weeks.
Damon Cooper
Enterprise Lab Manager
Allaire
[EMAIL PROTECTED
74 matches
Mail list logo
