Hi Jacob,
well the difference is, that we use the same resources. We separate the Webs
logically. And from my own experience I know how much ressources are consumed
when creating a new instance.
With Railo comes a server administrator that allows you to configure each
security settings per web
: Re: Railo (was BlueDragon vs. ColdFusion 6/7)
Hi Jacob,
well the difference is, that we use the same resources. We
separate the Webs logically. And from my own experience I
know how much ressources are consumed when creating a new instance.
With Railo comes a server administrator
Or as one of the BD guys said at a talk a few months back, we're CFML
programmers.
Ade
-Original Message-
From: Munson, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 January 2006 14:33
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Railo (was BlueDragon vs. ColdFusion 6/7)
Yes, it is more clear now. Thank you
of which server we use.
-Original Message-
From: Gert Franz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 12:36 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Railo (was BlueDragon vs. ColdFusion 6/7)
Hi Jacob,
well the difference is, that we use the same resources. We
separate the Webs
BTW: ch is TLD for Switzerland.
I'm assuming you're referring to my blog post. Someone already
corrected me on that, and I put an update at the bottom of the post. ;)
-
[INFO] -- Access Manager:
This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential
and/or
Just a couple of other things here. Apparently I can't spell after all, I meant
covered. Also, I generally like BD and think it is a worthy competitor to
CFMX. I don't know about the licensing issues, but from a technology standpoint
it seems good. I don't own stock in New Atlanta or anything,
Yes Bluedragon does do this with the .net version
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Rouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 January 2006 16:26
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: BlueDragon vs. ColdFusion 6/7
I am no expert on BD but I thought BD.NET did this? Where can information
on Railo
Aaron,
I hate to say it, but I think I would even consider paying the extra
$400 knowing that a reputable company such as Adobe is standing behind
ColdFusion MX 7. I don't like the fact that Adobe is moving my
Macromedia MVLP license to an AOO (Adobe Open Options) license, so I
am investigating
Hi Aaron,
why don't you give Railo a try. Railo is nearly fully compatible with MX 6.1
and has some features neither of the two other products has. One of these is
separating different webs into different coldfusion-contexts. This means, that
you have two administrators for two different webs
From: Gert Franz
why don't you give Railo a try. Railo is nearly fully
compatible with MX 6.1 and has some features neither of the
two other products has. One of these is separating different
webs into different coldfusion-contexts. This means, that you
have two administrators for two
I am no expert on BD but I thought BD.NET did this? Where can information
on Railo be found online?
On 1/18/06, Gert Franz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Aaron,
why don't you give Railo a try. Railo is nearly fully compatible with MX
6.1 and has some features neither of the two other products
i found some brief Railo information on www.railo.ch - nothing much
though...don't think it's even a v1 product yet..
yes, BlueDragon.NET for sure gives you an administrator per IIS
virtual server...
jb.
On 1/18/06, Aaron Rouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am no expert on BD but I thought BD.NET
I think your general questions have been convered. I would add that I have been
tinkering with BD recently and so far I have found it does an admirable job at
most stuff. The index and search stuff lacks Verity's full feature set, but I
haven't seen it bomb out and behave badly like Verity,
I have recently been looking at BlueDragon 6.2 and have been comparing
it with ColdFusion MX 7. I would like to do a series of comparisons
and ask you to respond and/or added your own comparisons to this list:
I have found that BD only supports CFML as it stands with CF 6. The
price for
Hi Aaron,
I'm not from NewAtlanta, but seeing as my company is a BlueDragon
Certified web host I am quite familiar with their software. You might
consider re-posting this message to the BlueDragon mailing list and
seeing if you don't get a better response.
I've responded to your message in-line
Jordan,
Thanks for your reply, I am not soliciting feedback from the folks at
New Atlanta alone. I really value the developer community's input and
would like to hear from more developers. From a BlueDragon web hosting
companies perspective, your feedback is very appreciated.
I would like to
I have no expereince with Blue Dragon, but logically
speaking, if CF has all the features that you want and
need, and BD is lacking features, why go with the copyt
when you can get the original at the same price?
Eric
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 14:23:49 -0800
Aaron Roberson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eric,
I hate to say it, but I think I would even consider paying the extra
$400 knowing that a reputable company such as Adobe is standing behind
ColdFusion MX 7. I don't like the fact that Adobe is moving my
Macromedia MVLP license to an AOO (Adobe Open Options) license, so I
am investigating
On 1/17/06, Jordan Michaels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3. Is ServletExec comparable to enterprise J2EE servers?
As far as I know, yes. ServletExec is one of NewAtlanta's flagship
products - I'd imagine it'd be roughly comparable to most J2EE servers
available.
ServetExec supports JSP and the
19 matches
Mail list logo
