RE: CFObjects vs. FuseBox vs. Good CFML Code and SmartObjects

2001-03-10 Thread Hal Helms
a L Walker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 9:19 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFObjects vs. FuseBox vs. Good CFML Code and SmartObjects Thank you for the real world opinions on the fusebox, it does seem to be something worth trying again, but has anybody out there ever used

RE: CFObjects vs. FuseBox vs. Good CFML Code and SmartObjects

2001-03-09 Thread Dave Watts
Thank you for the real world opinions on the fusebox, it does seem to be something worth trying again, but has anybody out there ever used CFObjects and/or SmartObjects? With all this Java hoopla and Object Oriented programming we all like to use, why don't I hear anything about those

RE: CFObjects vs. FuseBox vs. Good CFML Code and SmartObjects

2001-03-09 Thread Tristram Charnley
r anything about those two CF methods? Erika -Original Message- From: Maia, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 3:55 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFObjects vs. FuseBox vs. Good CFML Code and SmartObjects I'll second this - I'm still learning FuseBox m

CFObjects vs. FuseBox vs. Good CFML Code and SmartObjects

2001-03-08 Thread Erika L Walker
Here's a question I'm a little curious about. I know we've had some posts to the Fusebox methodology and a lot of people like it and a lot of people don't. What about CFObjects? (http://www.cfobjects.com) Does anyone out there use it? Is it better than Fusebox? Better than just plain old

Re: CFObjects vs. FuseBox vs. Good CFML Code and SmartObjects

2001-03-08 Thread Ken Wilson
I worked on one Fusebox application and it was a little tedious. But probably because I was not used to the methodology. I can't help on the other methodologies but, being a full-time FuseBox fan, I can tell you that getting started with it can be a bit tedious. It's not difficult at all but

RE: CFObjects vs. FuseBox vs. Good CFML Code and SmartObjects

2001-03-08 Thread Maia, Eric
the architecture and details of your app more quickly due to naming and organizational conventions. eric -Original Message- From: Ken Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 12:02 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CFObjects vs. FuseBox vs. Good CFML Code and SmartObjects I worked

RE: CFObjects vs. FuseBox vs. Good CFML Code and SmartObjects

2001-03-08 Thread Erika L Walker
methods? Erika -Original Message- From: Maia, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 3:55 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFObjects vs. FuseBox vs. Good CFML Code and SmartObjects I'll second this - I'm still learning FuseBox methodology, but I've found that as I