So Davewhat you've said looks like it will pass a NULL if
the expression evaluates to YES and will pass the correct
value if the expression evaluates to NO??
Yes. Dave Carabetta's example is pretty typical of what this usually looks
like.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
Thanks for the info guys. That wasn't how I expected the attribute to work
based on reading the documentation. Anyway, here is my cfqueryparam now for
those who might still be confused:
CFQUERYPARAM value=#theQuery.numberColumn# cfsqltype=CF_SQL_NUMERIC
null=#NOT IsNumeric
Thanks Dave(s) ;-)
It just never occurred to me to use an expression as the NULL attribute
valuebut now the light has come on...and I must say...DOH! shoulda seen
that years ago ;-)
Cheers
Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
-Original Message-
It just never occurred to me to use an expression as the NULL
attribute valuebut now the light has come on...and I must
say...DOH! shoulda seen that years ago ;-)
That's definitely a major METOO.
cfsmack type=forhead /
--
Damien McKenna - Web Developer -
CFQUERYPARAM value=#theQuery.numberColumn# cfsqltype=CF_SQL_NUMERIC
null=#NOT IsNumeric(theQuery.numberColumn)#)
Talk about a smack on the head... I've always used len(trim(foo)), but
isnumeric is a little tighter. Never thought of that. It also covers
the issue of the field value itself, so
I have a number of tables in a SQL Server database that have the NVarchar
datatype. I want to use CFQUERYPARAM in my insert and updates to these columns
but also want to support the Unicode functionality. How is this done? I know if
I insert without CFQUERYPARAM, place an 'N' prior to the text
I have a number of tables in a SQL Server database that
have the NVarchar datatype. I want to use CFQUERYPARAM in
my insert and updates to these columns but also want to
support the Unicode functionality. How is this done? I
know if I insert without CFQUERYPARAM, place an 'N' prior
S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
cfqueryparam handles it for you...
provided you turn on the unicode option for that DSN. blogged about in
boring detail:
http://www.sustainablegis.com/blog/cfg11n/index.cfm?mode=entryentry=F9553D86-20ED-7DEE-2A913AFD8651643F
want to set the form and url scopes to UTF-8
I have a query that returns one row from the DB which uses cfqueryparam. I'd
heard about a problem with caching so after a puzzling 30 seconds asking
myself where my new column had gone I thought I'd remove the cfqp which
worked. Now when I put it back in I still get the cached data.
So
DBCC DROPCLEANBUFFERS looked like it might be the one but still no luck.
Ade
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25 March 2005 21:00
To: CF-Talk
Subject: cfqueryparam caching data
I have a query that returns one row from the DB which uses cfqueryparam
I have a query that returns one row from the DB which uses
cfqueryparam. I'd heard about a problem with caching so after
a puzzling 30 seconds asking myself where my new column had
gone I thought I'd remove the cfqp which worked. Now when I
put it back in I still get the cached data
Communications
10983 Granada Lane
Overland Park, KS 66211
(913) 754-4272
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 3:16 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: cfqueryparam caching data
I have a query that returns one row from the DB which uses
.
Ade
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25 March 2005 21:16
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: cfqueryparam caching data
I'm not sure it's the CFQUERYPARAM which is causing the problem.
Conceivably, you could have the same problem if you had a hardcoded value in
your
I am using SELECT * and changing it to a listing of the
columns(changing the statement) has caused it to refresh. But
going back to SELECT * still gets the cached data.
Here is my understanding of what happens.
If you use SELECT *, the database will have to resolve what * is, before
it
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 11:06:58 -0500, S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
specifically I believe cfsqltype=cf_sql_longvarchar
CF_SQL_CLOB is an undocumented type that is, I believe, more
specifically designed for the text field, though longvarchar also
works. I'm not sure if there's a significant difference
I believe with Oracle in later than CF5 you could insert/update more
than 4000 characters into a clob when using CF_SQL_CLOB. Not sure for
CF5 though, for some reason I recall it failing beyond 4000 and
requiring work arounds.
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 10:44:53 -0700, Scott Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED]
see much difference unless
you are in the hundreds of thousands of records or in really large
tables.
M!ke
-Original Message-
From: Taco Fleur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 11:39 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: cfqueryparam breaking query
CHAR is a fixed width
Dawson, Michael wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong but aren't var*** type fields also just pointers
to another location?
No, usually they are stored inline.
As you said, char(34) means set aside 34 chars and pad the the field if
not all 34 chars are used.
While CHAR fields may have a fixed
I have an Access 97 database(Yes I Know) that has a linked Oracle table\view in
it. I can query the linked table without cfqueryparam.
This Works:
SELECT
[LAWSON_SHC_EMPLOYEE_V].[LAST_NAME]
FROM
LAWSON_SHC_EMPLOYEE_V
WHERE
LAWSON_SHC_EMPLOYEE_V.LAST_NAME= '#ucase
I ahve an Access 97 database(Yes I Know) that has a linked Oracle table\view in
it. I can query the linked table without cfqueryparam.
This Works:
SELECT
[LAWSON_SHC_EMPLOYEE_V].[LAST_NAME]
FROM
LAWSON_SHC_EMPLOYEE_V
WHERE
LAWSON_SHC_EMPLOYEE_V.LAST_NAME= '#ucase
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 19:19:49 -0400, Ron G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have an Access 97 database(Yes I Know) that has a linked Oracle table\view
in it. I can query the linked table without cfqueryparam.
LAWSON_SHC_EMPLOYEE_V.LAST_NAME= cfqueryparam
value=#ucase(form.Lname
PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 19:19:49 -0400, Ron G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have an Access 97 database(Yes I Know) that has a linked Oracle
table\view in it. I can query the linked table without cfqueryparam.
LAWSON_SHC_EMPLOYEE_V.LAST_NAME= cfqueryparam
value
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 17:11:11 -0800, Tyler Fitch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know what Ron's problem is, but cf_sql_char isn't limited to a
single char. Sean, you thought wrong ;). It's the same thing as a
CHAR datatype in a RDBMS. I use cf_sql_char with a size=35 for my
UUID
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 16 March 2005 11:11 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: cfqueryparam breaking query
I don't know what Ron's problem is, but cf_sql_char isn't limited to a
single char. Sean, you thought wrong ;). It's the same thing as a CHAR
datatype in a RDBMS. I use cf_sql_char with a size=35
-Talk
Subject: RE: cfqueryparam breaking query
CHAR is a fixed width datatype
If you have a field with CHAR( 34 ) and you only insert 4 characters than
the other 30 characters are padded with a space.
--
Taco Fleur
Senior Web Systems Engineer
http://www.webassociates.com
-Original Message
Brain-dead. What's the cfqueryparam cfsqltype for a text column? - SQL
Server 2k. CF5.0
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent
Long varchar
Ade
-Original Message-
From: Dave Francis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 March 2005 12:50
To: CF-Talk
Subject: cfqueryparam question
Brain-dead. What's the cfqueryparam cfsqltype for a text column? - SQL
Server 2k. CF5.0
--
No virus found in this outgoing message
specifically I believe cfsqltype=cf_sql_longvarchar
Long varchar
Ade
-Original Message-
From: Dave Francis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 March 2005 12:50
To: CF-Talk
Subject: cfqueryparam question
Brain-dead. What's the cfqueryparam cfsqltype for a
text column? - SQL
. As in
cfqueryparam
cfsqltype=CF_SQL_VARCHAR
value=#form.SubFilter#
null=#YesNoFormat(not Len(form.SubFilter))#
--
--mattRobertson--
Janitor, MSB Web Systems
mysecretbase.com
~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading
, but I will force myself
using cfqueryparam purely because I am ignorant compared to fulltime
hackers. I don't play Russian roulette with the millions of email
addresses I might have in the database. I personally would have
preferred some shorthand mode for the tag, but until that becomes
available
To rephrase this the right way:
If you're concerned about database security, you should lock down CF's
user account(s) so it can only execute specific stored procs, and is
unable to run arbitrary queries.
cheers,
barneyb
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 16:22:06 -0500, Adrocknaphobia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
the horses (jwz's) pen this morning:
http://www.jwz.org/doc/groupware.html
Now for that Obligatory ColdFusion Bit:
Even if you think CF will protect you from SQL injection attacks without
needing to use cfqueryparam, there's one good reason for using it:
lists.
Writing queries against lists
Even if you think CF will protect you from SQL injection attacks without
needing to use cfqueryparam, there's one good reason for using it:
lists.
...
Now imagine if the list was a bunch of strings, say email addresses.
Now that's even more annoying because you have to loop over all
Dave Watts wrote:
I'm a big fan of CFQUERYPARAM,
As any right-thinking person would be.
but this is a bad example to justify its use. You don't need to do all
that work. There's a function called ListQualify that takes care of
this for you:
Forgot about that one! Cheers!
cfquery name
always worked, before there even was a CFQUERYPARAM tag.
Anyway, the main thrust of my code was to say that cfqueryparam made
the type of the list unimportant. It just makes inserting lists into
queries a bit easier.
Again, though, it doesn't. I'm not trying to be annoying about
I always thought of cfqueryparam as primarily a security tag to help
avoid SQL injection. Honestly, I now think that's really a secondary
purpose. It's all about performance!
We have a table with email addresses for some 80,000 alumni here at
Duke. When I do an email search without using
Rick Root wrote:
I always thought of cfqueryparam as primarily a security tag to help
avoid SQL injection. Honestly, I now think that's really a secondary
purpose. It's all about performance!
We have a table with email addresses for some 80,000 alumni here at
Duke. When I do an email
friendly people?
I admit, I don't like the tag syntax at all, but I will force myself
using cfqueryparam purely because I am ignorant compared to fulltime
hackers. I don't play Russian roulette with the millions of email
addresses I might have in the database. I personally would have
preferred some
I'm thinking that's over the top.
The only crazy question is the one that's never asked.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Tyler Fitch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 1:31 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFQUERYPARAM in CFC?
Holy crap. That's an amazing thing
I suspect Mike was trolling in his own forum... ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 16 February 2005 7:26
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFQUERYPARAM in CFC?
I'm thinking that's over the top.
The only crazy question is the one that's never
What?!?!? Don't feed the trolls! :P
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: James Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 6:29 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFQUERYPARAM in CFC?
I suspect Mike was trolling in his own forum... ;-)
-Original Message-
From
of the mighty cfqueryparam.
Cheers,
t
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 06:26:08 -0500, Calvin Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm thinking that's over the top.
The only crazy question is the one that's never asked.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Tyler Fitch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
Personally, I see no reason for a CFQUERYPARAM being used inside a CFC. It adds
extra overhead and the protection that it provides should be provided instead
by the CFARGUMENT tag. Does anyone see a reason for it in such a case? Data
binding
Subject: CFQUERYPARAM in CFC?
Personally, I see no reason for a CFQUERYPARAM being used inside a CFC. It
adds extra overhead and the protection that it provides should be provided
instead by the CFARGUMENT tag. Does anyone see a reason for it in such a
case? Data binding
Couldn't you still pass SQL injection strings into a string parameter of a
CFC?
- Matt Small
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 12:26 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CFQUERYPARAM in CFC?
Personally, I see no reason
Holy crap. That's an amazing thing to say. CFARGUMENT doesn't filter
SQL Injection attacks.
I can't see a single reason for such a case.
That's crazy talk.
t
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 13:26:10 -0400, Michael Dinowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally, I see no reason for a CFQUERYPARAM being
Personally, I see no reason for a CFQUERYPARAM being used inside a CFC. It
adds extra overhead and the protection that it provides should be provided
instead by the CFARGUMENT tag. Does anyone see a reason for it in such a
case? Data binding?
Besides the fact that security should be performed
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Personally, I see no reason for a CFQUERYPARAM being used
inside a CFC. It adds extra overhead and the protection that
it provides should be provided instead by the CFARGUMENT tag.
Does anyone see a reason for it in such a case? Data
Personally, I see no reason for a CFQUERYPARAM being used
inside a CFC. It adds extra overhead and the protection that
it provides should be provided instead by the CFARGUMENT tag.
Does anyone see a reason for it in such a case? Data binding?
How exactly would you provide the requisite
If your backend database supports it, then CFQUERYPARAM implements bind
variables for your query.
Consider:
select * from emp where id = #variable#
if you execute this for employee 1, 2, 3, etc, then:
- without bind variables, the db will reparse the statement each and
every time, because
You typically won't see any cfqueryparam performance gains on low-usage
queries and servers. In these cases, the reason for using them is
typically security, standardization and best practices.
Under heavy loads, cfqueryparam (sql bind variables actually) can help
your database cache queries
cfset midtime = Now()
cfloop index=i from=1 to=1000 step=1
cfquery name=TestQuery2 datasource=#sc_datasource#
Select object_name from all_objects where object_id =
cfqueryparam value=#i# cfsqltype=CF_SQL_INTEGER
/cfquery
/cfloop
cfset endtime = Now()
cfoutput
starttime: #starttime
Hey Mike,
For security, CFQueryparam interacts with the database driver,
telling it that the value provided is only a value and not SQL code -
without it, a string arg could still contain injection code
For performance, bind queries can be cached by some RDBMS platforms
providing a performance
Thank you all for bringing out the arguments for the use of CFQUERYPARAM for
everyone to read. I expect that this will motivate many here to start using the
tag, now that they see it's use.
One thing not mentioned is that the tag can not be used along with cached
queries using CachedWithin
When a cfqueryparam tag is executed, does CF do any type of bounds
checking on numeric values? (CF 5)
For instance, if I'm inserting a longint into a table, with the following
code would CF throw an error if the value of the id were greater than some
integer value?
cfqueryparam cfsqltype
I'm pretty sure it just does type checking, not bound checking. The
exception would be the maxlength attribute for string lengths.
cheers,
barneyb
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:57:17 -0700, Jim McAtee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When a cfqueryparam tag is executed, does CF do any type of bounds
Then what's the reason behind all the possible values (data types) for the
cfsqltype attribute?
- Original Message -
From: Barney Boisvert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 5:04 PM
Subject: Re: CFQUERYPARAM data checking
I'm
Jim McAtee wrote:
When a cfqueryparam tag is executed, does CF do any type of bounds
checking on numeric values? (CF 5)
It tries to cast it to a certain type in the driver and throws an
error if that fails.
Jochem
CF differentiate between
the different drivers, or does it treat all of them the same?
- Original Message -
From: Jochem van Dieten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 5:44 PM
Subject: Re: CFQUERYPARAM data checking
Jim McAtee wrote
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 17:57:14 -0700, Jim McAtee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are the actual definitions of smallint, integer, bigint, etc. fixed (no
indication of this in the CF5 help) or are they dependant upon the DBMS
driver? What about for ODBC datasources - does CF differentiate between
the
Hi,
I'm not too sure I accurately understand the role of attribute null in
the CFQUERYPARAM tag.
Does it mean that if it is YES, when the VALUE attribute is empty, the
query will use NULL instead of the empty string?
For instance, these two quries are about the same?
INSERT INTO Clients
If the NULL atributes is set to true, then NULL will be passed to the
database. If the NULL attributes is set to false (or omitted), then
the value of the VALUE attribute will be passed to the database.
Here's a 'typical' usage:
cfqueryparam cfsqltype=cf_sql_integer value=#form.myNumberField
I'm not too sure I accurately understand the role of
attribute null in the CFQUERYPARAM tag.
Does it mean that if it is YES, when the VALUE attribute is
empty, the query will use NULL instead of the empty string?
Yes. You can use inline conditional logic to determine whether to specify
That'll pass the number in the database, unless the value isn't
numeric, in which case it will pass NULL.
Do you mean that if NULL=yes null will be passed to the database, even if the
VALUE attributes contains a valid value ?
--
___
REUSE CODE! Use custom
Do you mean that if NULL=yes null will be passed to the
database, even if the VALUE attributes contains a valid value?
Yes, that is correct.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized
instruction at our
Yes, that is correct.
Ok, I understand, the null must be specify by program, because
CFQUERYPARAM has no way to distinguish an empty string from a true null.
Thanks.
--
___
REUSE CODE! Use custom tags;
See http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags
I'm having a strange issue with postgresql...
I have a database table containing a field defined as follows:
ABSTRACT text not null default ''
When I insert data, I use cfqueryparam as follows:
cfqueryparam cfsqltype=cf_sql_longvarchar
value=#arguments.details.abstract#
And I'm seeing
Rick Root wrote:
I'm having a strange issue with postgresql...
I have a database table containing a field defined as follows:
ABSTRACT text not null default ''
What is the function of DEFAULT ''?
When I insert data, I use cfqueryparam as follows:
cfqueryparam cfsqltype
=tn_18338
I would think that cfqueryparam would be sending an empty string, not a
null...
I would think the PostgreSQL ODBC driver doesn't know the difference.
I can't force all users of my application to use JDBC. I can't imagine
that many hosting providers would say Sure, I'll install
Rick Root wrote:
Jochem van Dieten wrote:
ABSTRACT text not null default ''
What is the function of DEFAULT ''?
It's a simple and common option that assigns a default value upon INSERT
if the field is not included.
But why is that better then just inserting a NULL?
I can't force
Jochem van Dieten wrote:
But why is that better then just inserting a NULL?
It guarantees that I don't ever have to worry about null values, I
guess. Though I never realized that oracle didn't know the difference
between null and an empty string.
I can't imagine any hosting provider
That is pretty strange - does setting the null attribute on the
cfqueryparam help?
cfqueryparam cfsqltype=cf_sql_longvarchar
value=#arguments.details.abstract# null=No
From that error message it looks like you're going through the SequeLink
drivers - you might want to try using the PostgreSQL
I have a WHERE statement that I'm building, but I am having trouble adding
cfqueryparam to the agency field. This is Oracle and the agency field is a
varchar2(100). While I've simplified the query for the posting, it gives
displays the problem.
SELECT *
FROM internships
WHERE 1=1
cfif
sorry it posted a bunch of times. I only clicked once so I don't know why it
did it, but sorry anyway. Hope this doesn't reply 5 times.
~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble
Ticket application
Try, LIKE cfqueryparam value=%#UCase(Form.Agency)#%
cfsqltype=cf_sql_varchar
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 15:31:16 -0400, daniel kessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sorry it posted a bunch of times. I only clicked once so I don't know why it
did it, but sorry anyway. Hope this doesn't reply 5 times
Try, LIKE cfqueryparam value=%#UCase(Form.Agency)#%
cfsqltype=cf_sql_varchar
ah that makes sense, thanks. I have a followup question.
I changed UPPER to UCase in the next line and received an error, UCase:invalid
identifier, but it works fine with Agency in the line above and with
UPPER
query line:
cfif Form.agency neq
AND UCase(agency) LIKE cfqueryparam value=%#UCase(Form.Agency)#%
cfsqltype=cf_sql_varchar
/cfif
cfif Form.city neq
AND UCase(city) LIKE cfqueryparam value=%#UCase(Form.city)#%
cfsqltype=cf_sql_varchar
/cfif
On the left side of the LIKE operator you
That is because UCase() is a CF function and not an Oracle function.
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 17:17:11 -0400, daniel kessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try, LIKE cfqueryparam value=%#UCase(Form.Agency)#%
cfsqltype=cf_sql_varchar
ah that makes sense, thanks. I have a followup question.
I
That is because UCase() is a CF function and not an Oracle function.
Oops. Thanks.
~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble
Ticket application
Thanks for the clarification Jochem, I thought it was a database issue!
variables is impossible. The only thing you need to make sure is
that you don't just use the query string and name as keys, but
the bind variables as well.
Sorry, I'm not sure what you mean here though (may be too
variables is impossible. The only thing you need to make sure is
that you don't just use the query string and name as keys, but the
bind variables as well.
Sorry, I'm not sure what you mean here though (may be too
early in the morning and I'm being dumb)
Yeah it was too early, I
Thanks to everyone on their help on this. I'll start looking at the
suggested work-arounds.
Saturday
On 13/1/05 7:03 pm, Dave Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not really a bug. Using CFQUERYPARAM with CFQUERY
means that rather than a regular statement, CF is able to use
prepared
Hi guys,
I noticed that i had an error occuring while my cfquery with a cachedwithin
also included a cfqueryparam, is that normal?
Thanks,
Saturday
~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble
Ticket
Yep. You can't mix em. Since I'd recommend cfqueryparam, I'd look into
caching your query manually.
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:48:09 -0500, Stuart Kidd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
I noticed that i had an error occuring while my cfquery with a cachedwithin
also included a cfqueryparam
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:48:09 -0500, Stuart Kidd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
I noticed that i had an error occuring while my cfquery with a cachedwithin
also included a cfqueryparam, is that normal?
Yep. You can't use cfqueryparam if you are using
cachedwithin/cachedafter. Lame
recommend cfqueryparam, I'd look into
caching your query manually.
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:48:09 -0500, Stuart Kidd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
I noticed that i had an error occuring while my cfquery with a cachedwithin
also included a cfqueryparam, is that normal?
Thanks,
Saturday
with cfqueryparam, you
are telling it that these values may change... So how can CF cache a
query that is going to change :)
Caching queries manually, how is that done?
Either in a shared scope (application or session) or physical disk (by
WDDXing the query and then writing the file)
hth
Stuart Kidd wrote:
I noticed that i had an error occuring while my cfquery with a cachedwithin
also included a cfqueryparam, is that normal?
It is documented.
http://www.macromedia.com/go/wish/
Jochem
~|
Now there’s
COLLIE David wrote:
Not got anything to do with MM AFAIK... It's more a database issue cos
it uses bind variables which denote that the value will prolly change
from query to query but still allows the database to build a compiled
execution plan.
There are no technical reasons why query
Stuart Kidd wrote:
Oh MM, sort it out!
Caching queries manually, how is that done?
You could store it in a struct in the APPLICATION scope, along with
information identifying it and when it times out.
It's not really a bug. Using CFQUERYPARAM with CFQUERY means that
rather than a regular
It's not really a bug. Using CFQUERYPARAM with CFQUERY
means that rather than a regular statement, CF is able to use
prepared statements, so the execution plan (depending on the
RDBMS you're working with) can be cached for extra execution speed.
To cache with both, it's have to store
CF_SQL_VARCHAR works in Access, mySQL, SQL Server, Oracle 8 and Oracle
9. A safe bet it works in Oracle 10.
I'll have to check the docs on that IDSTAMP type. Never heard of it. rtfm.
--
--mattRobertson--
President, Janitor
MSB Web Systems
mysecretbase.com
passed,
that once I fixed, things seem to be working fine now.
1) Shouldn't the cfqueryparam value be #URL.cotid# and not Attributes ?
No - fuseBox pushes form and URL into attributes on every request so
you dont have to mess around when you change a form to get / post.
While I am here - I have
Duncan I Loxton wrote:
While I am here - I have read that using cfqueryparam gives a
performance gain over not using it - is there any proof or technical
data out there? An explanation over why/how it makes a query faster?
http://www.google.com/custom?q=cfqueryparam+execution+plansitesearch
On Thursday 06 Jan 2005 09:13 am, Duncan I Loxton wrote:
one affected. The fact that it had the ? on it threw me a bit and
This is standard denotation for a bind parameter, which is what cfqueryparam
does.
--
Tom Chiverton
Advanced ColdFusion Programmer
Tel: +44 (0)1749 834900
email: [EMAIL
--- Jochem van Dieten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Duncan I Loxton wrote:
While I am here - I have read that using cfqueryparam gives a
performance gain over not using it - is there any proof or technical
data out there? An explanation over why/how it makes a query faster?
http
We use UUId for our users primary key - what cfsqltype should I use to
get the correct match?
e.g.
cfquery name=getStaffDetail dataSource=#Application.DataSource#
userName=#Application.DBUserName#
password=#Application.DBUserPwd#
SELECT *
FROM Users
usr_id = cfqueryparam
I've always used cfqueryparam value=#attributes.usr_id#
cfsqltype=CF_SQL_CHAR length=35 and not had any problems.
HTH,
t
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:52:13 +1100, Duncan I Loxton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We use UUId for our users primary key - what cfsqltype should I use to
get the correct match
usr_id = cfqueryparam value=#attributes.usr_id#
cfsqltype=CF_SQL_UUID
/cfquery
There doesnt seem to be a match in the documentation - should I be
using a different type that copes with UUID's?
If there is a special type for UUIDs you will find it in the
documentation of your database
The best that I know, as far as cfqueryparam is conserened a UUID is
simply a 35 character string. I usually use char or varchar when I have
them in a queryparam.
Duncan I Loxton wrote:
We use UUId for our users primary key - what cfsqltype should I use to
get the correct match?
e.g.
cfquery
901 - 1000 of 1538 matches
Mail list logo
