So I'm going to have to stick with 32 bit machines for a bit longer while we
find alternatives for some com's we're using that don't work on a 64 bit
platform.
From my research It appears that request speed is directly correlated to CPU
clock, not number of cores, cache, or bus speed.
Here
So I'm going to have to stick with 32 bit machines for a bit longer while we
find alternatives for some com's we're using that don't work on a 64 bit
platform.
From my research It appears that request speed is directly correlated to CPU
clock, not number of cores, cache, or bus speed.
Here
More cores doesn't mean faster it means more processing ability.
In your example you compared a faster (3Ghz) Dual Core to a slower (2.53Ghz)
Quad Core.
In Practical Theory, the Quad Core can handle more requests per second than
the Dual Core, but not twice as many requests... There is a factor
Sure, but the quad core is handling the same number of requests and processing
them slower than the dual core. On top of that the quad core machine's bus is
more than twice as fast (533Mhz vs 1333Mhz) which I assumed may have made up
for the slower clock speed.
More cores doesn't mean
We normally see about 12 requests / machine / sec during peak load. I agree
that 64 bit should help by making it possible to use more RAM. We're currently
running 32bit with 1.25 GB allocated to the JVM and often come within 10 - 15%
of the available JVM RAM on single machines for short
of calculations
in a short period of time.
Mark A. Kruger, MCSE, CFG
(402) 408-3733 ext 105
www.cfwebtools.com
www.coldfusionmuse.com
www.necfug.com
-Original Message-
From: John Foster [mailto:jfos...@turbosquid.com]
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 8:31 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Fastest Hardware
Depending on how much cash you want to part with, look at a 64 node Apple
X-Serve system. I experimented with this when I worked for a biotech firm -
they were using it for genomics and proteomics research. This thing was scary
fast - and the load it could handle was astounding.
We are looking to speed up our application layer as much as possible. We've
pumped the DB up substantially and had great results. I realize there are
network, load balancer, memcache, etc and other ways than the hardware to have
impact, but we want to buy whatever will give us some gain.
Unfortunately, we didn't notice with a dual quad core server a ton of impact
in the past and didn't seem to be able to get the full
utilization, so we just stayed with multiple servers instead of fewer,
beefier servers.
Will 64 bit and many cores be the best for CF 9? Or less cores at
As Dave said - 64bit will give you the biggest boost. Mainly because you can
setup massive memory allocations for the JVM. Our servers each have 8Gb of
memory with 4Gb setup for the JVM.
More cores the better is the mantra, but we run 4 and 8 core servers and really
don't see much different
Hardware is important, but tuning is going to be more important. You
can throw 6 GB of ram at your application on a 64-bit JVM, but unless
you tune your JVM and make changes to your application to use that
memory, you won't see a dramatic increase in performance.
Invest in profiling tools such
Certified Advanced Coldfusion Developer
-Original Message-
From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 1:44 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Fastest...
For a compare? Wouldn't a list or an array be quicker?
This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Gateway
Trying to the fastest way to do the following.
comparing items that are stored in session ( as a list, or array ). This is
storing IDS or items.
Now, for product listings, searches etc... we need to compare if item is
already in the users session.
Which would be fastest as far as Coldfusion
Trying to the fastest way to do the following.
comparing items that are stored in session ( as a list, or array ).
This is storing IDS or items.
If you've not settled on a storage mechanism you might consider a structure.
You could then easily do your search using the structFind
-Talk
Sent: Mon Jun 25 18:30:32 2007
Subject: Re: Fastest...
Trying to the fastest way to do the following.
comparing items that are stored in session ( as a list, or array ).
This is storing IDS or items.
If you've not settled on a storage mechanism you might consider a structure.
You
Put em in a database and do an exception join =)
Chris Peterson
Gainey IT
Adobe Certified Advanced Coldfusion Developer
-Original Message-
From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 1:44 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Fastest...
For a compare
Mailingliste bei:
deutsch: http://de.groups.yahoo.com/group/railo/
english: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/railo_talk/
D F schrieb:
Trying to the fastest way to do the following.
comparing items that are stored in session ( as a list, or array ). This is
storing IDS or items.
Now, for product
: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 12:31 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Fastest...
Trying to the fastest way to do the following.
comparing items that are stored in session ( as a list, or array ).
This is storing IDS or items.
If you've not settled on a storage
-Original Message-
From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) [mailto:Neil.Robertson-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 1:44 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Fastest...
For a compare? Wouldn't a list or an array be quicker?
If each ID were a key in the struct, then no, not by a wide
I've been away from the computer for a few days and came back to a
great discussion answering my question. Thanks! Auth.net it is. I
worked with them once several years ago and it was indeed very simple.
Since the customer is creating a special online banking relationship
for this we aren't
I've been away from the computer for a few days and came back to a
great discussion answering my question. Thanks! Auth.net it is. I
Don't forget to check into the fraud detection suite. It's $5/month and woulda
saved me hundreds of $$$ in chargeback fees because some *ickweed nigerian
-
From: Mary Jo Sminkey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2006 12:25 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: easiest/fastest to implement payment processor?
So the only person who can attest that is Will Tomlinison? He fixes
cars for
a living... So like I said... it's pretty simple
Maybe PayPal is not hard but its not by far the fastest to integrate with.
After I did PayPal I worked with others like Moneris and was surprised at
how easy it was to integrate with them v.s. PayPal.
TK
-Original Message-
From: Bobby Hartsfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday
Not to mention that PayPal is a total turn-off to many consumers...
On 9/23/06, Tom Kitta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe PayPal is not hard but its not by far the fastest to integrate with.
After I did PayPal I worked with others like Moneris and was surprised at
how easy it was to integrate
We run on IIS and have no issues with using Auth.net This is just a tech
junkie blowing smoke up someones pajamas :)
-Original Message-
From: Crow T. Robot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 7:15 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: easiest/fastest to implement
PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: easiest/fastest to implement payment processor?
Paypal is actually pretty simple... including their cart
No it ain't! Paypal sucks! I did the IPN and PDT and it was a *itch.
~|
Introducing
I know you are asking about easy fast
but maybe is better to look for best risk management antifraud
protection
Max
-Original Message-
From: Mark A Kruger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 09:57:06 -0500
Subject: RE: easiest/fastest
. With that in
mind, who is the fastest ecommerce payment processor to sign up with?
The client is a well-established business. At LEAST as important and
maybe more so: Whose gateway is the easiest to implement?
Basically I need to try and knock a site out in a few days and spiff
it up later. Thankfully, we
: easiest/fastest to implement payment processor?
I have a client who is putting together an ecommerce store at the last
minute... actually they've been working on it for awhile and have run
past deadlines to get the work to me, and the holiday buying season is
now almost upon us.
So I am trying
So I am trying to make everything happen yesterday. With that in
mind, who is the fastest ecommerce payment processor to sign up with?
The client is a well-established business. At LEAST as important and
maybe more so: Whose gateway is the easiest to implement?
No, not PayPal, they are one
fastest way? send check, money order, or cash to my address at :)
I've never done this before, but almost had the mis-fortune to be involved
in setting it up. Check out your host. I have a client hosting with
hostmysite. They offer a whole inventory shopping cart payment system
tool
Subject: Re: easiest/fastest to implement payment processor?
So I am trying to make everything happen yesterday. With that in
mind, who is the fastest ecommerce payment processor to sign up with?
The client is a well-established business. At LEAST as important and
maybe more so: Whose gateway
I've used USAePay and it was really easy, they even have a CF tag available
to use as a module. It's all cfhttp posts.
=]
--
Alan Rother
Macromedia Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX 7 Developer
~|
Introducing the Fusion
: easiest/fastest to implement payment processor?
I've used USAePay and it was really easy, they even have a CF tag
available
to use as a module. It's all cfhttp posts.
=]
--
Alan Rother
Macromedia Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX 7 Developer
On 9/22/06, Michael E. Carluen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Alan, Looks interesting: http://www.usaepay.com/topics/coldfdev.htm
how's their cost compared to others? Still digging in their site for that
info.
Seriously, why isn't there any rates on the website.
I have to agree with Mary Jo on this one - Auth.NET has always been good to
me, as a programmer. There are lots of custom tags out there that can get
you set up within minutes, provided you have all the stuff set up on the
admin side correctly.
If you decide to go this way, I have said custom
@houseoffusion.com
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: easiest/fastest to implement payment processor?
So I am trying to make everything happen yesterday. With that in
mind, who is the fastest ecommerce payment processor to sign up with?
The client is a well-established
Authorize.net is pretty brainless. Was a perfect fit for me. :)
Will
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four
Paypal is actually pretty simple... including their cart
-Original Message-
From: Mary Jo Sminkey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 5:18 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: easiest/fastest to implement payment processor?
So I am trying to make everything happen
Paypal is actually pretty simple... including their cart
No it ain't! Paypal sucks! I did the IPN and PDT and it was a *itch.
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion
So the only person who can attest that is Will Tomlinison? He fixes cars for
a living... So like I said... it's pretty simple.
-Original Message-
From: Will Tomlinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 9:49 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: easiest/fastest to implement
So the only person who can attest that is Will Tomlinison? He fixes cars for
a living... So like I said... it's pretty simple.
and Mary Jo! And probably Jared.
And my last day was today. So everyone can look forward to me posting more
regularly everyday! Aren't you excited?? :)
Will
My vote also for authorize.net - integration was easy.
Thanks,
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Will Tomlinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 9:58 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: easiest/fastest to implement payment processor?
So the only person who can attest
Good... you'll be available to change my oil then. ;-P
-Original Message-
From: Will Tomlinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 9:58 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: easiest/fastest to implement payment processor?
So the only person who can attest
Message -
From: Mary Jo Sminkey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: easiest/fastest to implement payment processor?
So I am trying to make everything happen yesterday. With that in
mind, who is the fastest
So the only person who can attest that is Will Tomlinison? He fixes
cars for
a living... So like I said... it's pretty simple.
and Mary Jo! And probably Jared.
And if you don't believe us, just go on the PayPal developer Forums and look at
all the people begging for help to get IPN
-Original Message-
From: Sean Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 6:26 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Best, Fastest, Cleanest, Most Elegant way to determine if
your in an application?
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 17:41:01 -0500, Jim Davis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
to generate an error instance).
Basically I'm looking for the fastest, best way to do this.
(My CFCs store metadata about themselves - if they're called in an
application they store it the application scope, if they're called outside
of an application they store it in the server scope.)
Jim Davis
an error instance).
Basically I'm looking for the fastest, best way to do this.
(My CFCs store metadata about themselves - if they're called in an
application they store it the application scope, if they're called outside
of an application they store it in the server scope.)
Jim Davis
-Original Message-
From: Barney Boisvert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 2:02 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Best, Fastest, Cleanest, Most Elegant way to determine if
your in an application?
(My CFCs store metadata about themselves - if they're called
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 14:25:47 -0500, Jim Davis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The data stored is specific to a CFC class. So while I might have over a
hundred instances of cfc_Depressedpress.Framework.DP_Session I only have
one metadata cache for all of them.
Use getMetadata(this) and then store
Now that's deviously tricky. Presumably that works because CF only
generates a metadata struct for each CFC file once per modification of
that file, and caches it until the file changes again? What happens
if you dynamically change something in the CFC without changing the
file (like adding a
-Original Message-
From: Sean Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 5:32 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Best, Fastest, Cleanest, Most Elegant way to determine if
your in an application?
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 14:25:47 -0500, Jim Davis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 17:41:01 -0500, Jim Davis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sorry - but then wouldn't storing the extra information have to be done
each time? If not then I want to know more. ;^)
No, once you update the metadata, the server remembers it (it's
effectively server scope storage
Just wanted to thank everyone for the help, unfortunately I couldn't
get the Merant drivers to work. I was able to find only one document
out there on setting up Merant drivers, but it wasn't pertinent to CF
for the most part.
Luckily I was able to use the Microsoft Text Driver and set up a ODBC
, 2002 8:07 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Fastest way to convert a csv file to cf array/query?
Hmmm, I've done some hunting around and the Merant driver seems to be
named ODBC Text which is part of JDBC from what I can make out.
I'm guessing I need to select Other from the dropdown selection
Using MX anyone have any ideas on a really fast way to convert a
large (200-500k) cvs file into a CF complex data type like a query or
array?
Barry Manilow,Dr. Sholz,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
jon
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
~|
Using MX anyone have any ideas on a really fast way to
convert a large (200-500k) cvs file into a CF complex data
type like a query or array?
Barry Manilow,Dr. Sholz,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CF5 came with the Merant ODBC driver for text files. I don't have a
machine handy that has MX but never
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 2:48 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Fastest way to convert a csv file to cf array/query?
Using MX anyone have any ideas on a really fast way to
convert a large (200-500k) cvs file into a CF complex data
type like a query or array?
Barry
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 3:42 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Fastest way to convert a csv file to cf array/query?
Using MX anyone have any ideas on a really fast way to convert a
large (200-500k) cvs file into a CF complex data type like a query or
array?
Barry Manilow,Dr
found the helpfile for the driver had enough info to figure it out.
Where did you find a helpfile for the driver?
Thanks,
Ken
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription:
On Friday, October 4, 2002, at 03:01 PM, Rob Rohan wrote:
FYI MX doesn't seem to have the Merant driver.
What's the name of the driver?
jar -tvf macromedia_drivers.jar
shows many, many Merant classes on CFMX Mac OS X (Linux) -- See below
Dick
0 Mon Apr 29 12:02:08 PDT 2002
Nice!
I just looked in cfide/admin
thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Dick Applebaum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 4:14 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Fastest way to convert a csv file to cf array/query?
On Friday, October 4, 2002, at 03:01 PM, Rob Rohan wrote
Hmmm, I've done some hunting around and the Merant driver seems to be
named ODBC Text which is part of JDBC from what I can make out.
I'm guessing I need to select Other from the dropdown selection of
drivers, but some of the fields I am not sure of.
The JDBC URL should be:
try
com.merant.sequelink.jdbc.SequeLinkDriver
if not already
-Original Message-
From: Jon Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 5:07 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Fastest way to convert a csv file to cf array/query?
Hmmm, I've done some hunting around
65 matches
Mail list logo
