Hi,
This is my first ever post. I have been programing coldfusion for more than 3
years now.
I was working on a web application for almost a year now, and than i decided to
use fusebox5.5 (no xml).
Problem: loose session variables on relocation.
I have user object : user.cfc
I have
Check the cookies on windows to see if the CFID/CFTOKEN are changing
between pages.
On 3/26/12 11:43 PM, Uday Patel wrote:
Hi,
This is my first ever post. I have been programing coldfusion for more than 3
years now.
I was working on a web application for almost a year now, and than i
Check the cookies on windows to see if the CFID/CFTOKEN are changing
between pages.
On 3/26/12 11:43 PM, Uday Patel wrote:
Thanks Jonah,
yes the cookies are changing. this.setclientcookies was false, changed it to
true and now its working good.
AAh what a waste of my night.
Hi guys, just came in this morning. thanks for the responses will try out the
suggested code and get back to you.
I'm on CF9/Fusebox 5.5
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion
Thanks Matt your suggestion worked.
cfset session.myvariable = duplicate(form) /
cflocation url=foo.cfm /
Odd this is the first time I've encountered this specific behaviour in
Coldfusion. Thanks a byunch was spinning my wheels on this.
Cool beans. Always glad to help. Thanks for reporting back. :-)
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
Presumably you are doing something like so...
cfset session.myvariable = form /
cflocation url=foo.cfm /
I have not tested it, but I am guessing that you are loosing the session
variables because you are creating a _reference_ to the form scope. When
you redirect, the form scope is now
Dave, as you well know I usually agree with you. However, in this case, I
do not agree with you at all. Why? Because you are 100% wrong in your
statement. What I showed is **exactly** how references work.
1) If you create a _reference_ to something as my code example did...
cfset
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Matt Quackenbush wrote:
The only way to pass a structure in CF by reference is by using
duplicate().
Oops. That is suppose to say
The only way to pass a structure in CF by value is by using duplicate().
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Matt Quackenbush quackfu...@gmail.com wrote:
Dave, as you well know I usually agree with you. However, in this case, I
do not agree with you at all. Why? Because you are 100% wrong in your
statement. What I showed is **exactly** how references work.
Well,
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Sean Corfield seancorfi...@gmail.com wrote:
I tried it on Railo and discovered that the form scope is somehow
reused across multiple requests - so on Railo, your logic would be
correct. That's interesting and I'll have to take that up with
engineering to find
I have two different CF9 installations that behave the way I described. It
actually caught me out on a quickie application I did for someone awhile
back, because I did not expect that behavior. But that's exactly what it
does on two different installations. shrug
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Matt Quackenbush quackfu...@gmail.com wrote:
I have two different CF9 installations that behave the way I described.
Odd. I couldn't repro on CF9.0.1 locally. Do you have a small test
case that shows form scope behaving like that for you? I'd love to try
it on
I have some code where I am transferring the contents of a form submission into
a session variable.
According to some cfdumps, the form variables do get set in session.
but after the cflocation redirect, the session variables are there but empty.
Any ideas?
Presumably you are doing something like so...
cfset session.myvariable = form /
cflocation url=foo.cfm /
I have not tested it, but I am guessing that you are loosing the session
variables because you are creating a _reference_ to the form scope. When
you redirect, the form scope is now empty,
Hi all
I am having a weird issue which I can't seem to track down or resolve.
In my fusebox 5 architectured application, I have many links within the site
that all work as per normal. However, if I repeatedly click a link quickly, the
application goes into a timeout with the error below
Hey gang,
Having an issue I was hoping someone might have an answer to.
I have a mod_rewrite rule:
RewriteRule ^index.cfm?fuseaction=test.test$ bob.html
The problem is that this is not getting caught and rewritten, it's going
through to the Fusebox. I've also tried escpacing
was hoping someone might have an answer to.
I have a mod_rewrite rule:
RewriteRule ^index.cfm?fuseaction=test.test$ bob.html
The problem is that this is not getting caught and rewritten, it's going
through to the Fusebox. I've also tried escpacing the ? and the . both
alone and together
Hi I have an old fusebox app i am working on. it outputs a csv file with data
however the html (layout) is also getting added to the csv? anyone know why.
cfsetting enablecfoutputonly=yes
cfscript
function cleanField(sField){
sField = (replace(sField,,,;,All
What version of fusebox is it?
You should be able to swap or suppress the layout around the csv content.
-Original Message-
From: Glyn Jackson [mailto:glyn.jack...@newebia.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 9:12 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: fusebox layout adding to csv?
Hi I have
We're using fuse-q (based around fb 3?)
And I'm trying to use cfmodule to redirect to another page..
Is the syntax:
cfmodule template=../index.cfm fuseaction=usermanager.editor
Or cfmodule template=../index.cfm
attributes.fuseaction=usermanager.editor
--
Scott Stewart
The former. Attributes on the CFMODULE tag are passed to the custom
tag in the attributes scope, exactly the same as any other custom tag
invocation (CF_ prefix, CFIMPORT, CFMODULE name=...).
myTag.cfm:
cfparam name=attributes.name default=world /
cfoutputHello, #attributes.name#!/cfoutput
-talk
Subject: Re: cfmodule and fusebox
The former. Attributes on the CFMODULE tag are passed to the custom
tag in the attributes scope, exactly the same as any other custom tag
invocation (CF_ prefix, CFIMPORT, CFMODULE name=...).
myTag.cfm:
cfparam name=attributes.name default=world
Hi Folks!
I am on the hunt for a CF Fusebox 4+ or 5+ eCommerce solution, and can't find
any -- other than the demos at Fusebox.org.
Has no one developed such a thing? I would build one myself, but I just don't
know how I would find the time to do so.
Surely there must be something out
I am on the hunt for a CF Fusebox 4+ or 5+ eCommerce solution, and
can't find any -- other than the demos at Fusebox.org.
Has no one developed such a thing? I would build one myself, but I
just don't know how I would find the time to do so.
CFWebstore is a somewhat modified FB3 app
Hey Joel,
You definitely want to sign up to the Yahoo group. I did do a few posts about
the no XML flavour of Fusebox which might be of interest
http://www.aliaspooryorik.com/blog/. The skeleton apps on the Fusebox site are
definitely a good starting point.
Good luck
Thanks, I am in the group.
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 4:51 AM, John Whish
john.wh...@crisp-ebusiness.comwrote:
Hey Joel,
You definitely want to sign up to the Yahoo group. I did do a few posts
about the no XML flavour of Fusebox which might be of interest
http://www.aliaspooryorik.com/blog
Concur. Should have been more clear: How to Drive Fusebox 5.5
*requires*Fusebox 5 FLiP: Master-Class ColdFusion Applications or
equivalent FB
knowledge.
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Mary Jo Sminkey mary...@cfwebstore.comwrote:
Assuming you're not opposed to books, www.protonarts.com
I've been searching around and there seems to be limited tutorials on FB 5.5 --
there's quite a bit on 4.x -- and the references in the 5.x say that the 4.0
tutorials and code samples for the most part also work with Fusebox 5 - which
is scary as I don't know what will and won't work and how
IF they were local to me sure! I'd need online or in person (preferred)
Thanks
Joel,
Try one of Teratech's Fusebox classes. I've taken a couple of them.
Greg Luce
Luce Consulting Services, Inc.
www.luceconsulting.net
(863) 273-0289
Joel,
Try one of Teratech's Fusebox classes. I've taken a couple of them.
Greg Luce
Luce Consulting Services, Inc.
www.luceconsulting.net
(863) 273-0289
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Joel Polsky jsp2...@hotmail.com wrote:
I've been searching around and there seems to be limited
Assuming you're not opposed to books, www.protonarts.com (when the site's
working :-( ) has two books you should purchase: Fusebox 5 FLiP:
Master-Class ColdFusion Applications and How to Drive Fusebox 5.5 both by
Jeff Peters (www.grokfusebox.com).
Other Fusebox resources to bookmark
I've been asked to start on a new project from the ground up and I'm
interested in using FB55 for this project. I haven't been able to find any
good tutorials on it and I've spent the last cpl of weeks trying to reverse
engineer the Cat Club samples on the Fusebox site with limited success. Can
for this project. I haven't been able to find any
good tutorials on it and I've spent the last cpl of weeks trying to reverse
engineer the Cat Club samples on the Fusebox site with limited success.
Can
anyone recommend any online resources that they've used previously? I'm
considering buying
24th of this month is a class Intro to Fusebox and next month is
Intermediate Fusebox 5
http://teratech.com/go/training/class-schedule?trainingaction=detailTID=358
$400 class and a $300 plane ticket... I'm sure you'll make up that $700 in
productivity in the next few months.
Greg Luce
Luce
Fusebox 4 - 5 is almost always the same, just don't stray off the beaten
path (like making your own lexicons or plugins) and you will be fine.
Fusebox 5 was sort of like ColdFusion 5 - 6 Complete rewrite with a couple
of tweak an addtions. The current version 5.5.x introduce some implicit
And apparently I might John's email :)
Adam
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 4:08 PM, John M Bliss bliss.j...@gmail.com wrote:
Assuming you're not opposed to books, www.protonarts.com (when the site's
working :-( ) has two books you should purchase: Fusebox 5 FLiP:
Master-Class ColdFusion
for the most part also work with Fusebox 5 -
which is scary as I don't know what will and won't work and how to tell, as
it's ALL NEW to me!
Can someone point me to a site that has GOOD tutorials for a newbie in the
Fusebox world. I need basic understanding of the framework, where stuff
goes
Assuming you're not opposed to books, www.protonarts.com (when the site's
working :-( ) has two books you should purchase: Fusebox 5 FLiP:
Master-Class ColdFusion Applications and How to Drive Fusebox 5.5 both by
Jeff Peters (www.grokfusebox.com).
I'm not really sure I'd recommend the Fusebox
Hi All,
Are nested loops allowed in fusebox 5?
If so, can I have the syntax?
Thanks
DA
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
http
Are nested loops allowed in fusebox 5?
I'm not sure I understand your question:
Fusebox is not a language, just a framework, and as such has no mean to
allow
loops or not.
Fusebox relies on the ColdFusion language, and yes, CF allows nested loops
Claude,
DA is probably talking about the fusebox XML language, which is, in essence
a programming language (a DSL even).
In that case, yes, you should be able to nest loops. Maybe posting some code
asking why it's not working would be a better idea. In general, it goes like
this:
loop [tag
In the Fusebox XML, you can nest verbs arbitrarily. Note that 'do' is
not a verb, so you can't nest that one. So you can put loops inside
loops, ifs inside ifs, ifs inside loops inside ifs inside loops, ad
nauseum.
cheers,
barneyb
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Claude Schneegans
[EMAIL
I'm not sure I understand your question:
Fusebox is not a language, just a framework, and as such has no mean to
allow
loops or not.
Fusebox relies on the ColdFusion language, and yes, CF allows nested
loops.
Fusebox 4 had its own xml-based syntax for flow control, I think this is
what
Are nested loops allowed in fusebox 5?
I'm not sure I understand your question:
Fusebox is not a language, just a framework, and as such has no mean
to allow loops or not. Fusebox relies on the ColdFusion language,
and yes, CF allows nested loops.
Actually that's inaccurate. It depends
Nathan Struts said:
In that case, yes, you should be able to nest loops.
Oh, well I guess I was wrong. Thanks Nathan. :)
--
s. isaac dealey ^ new epoch
isn't it time for a change?
ph: 781.769.0723
http://onTap.riaforge.org/blog
]
To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 4:36:17 PM
Subject: Re: Are nested loops allowed in fusebox 5?
Claude,
DA is probably talking about the fusebox XML language, which is, in essence
a programming language (a DSL even).
In that case, yes, you should be able
OK, one last point just for accuracy. Fusebox does NOT rely on the
Coldfusion language. There is also Fusebox for php. One of the reasons for
the XML was to make it platform agnostic.
Greg Luce
Luce Consulting Services, Inc.
(863) 273-0289
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Claude Schneegans
it further
thanks again for your comments
hi
we have just reviewed model glue, and have also looked into fusebox
very briefly
is fusebox similiar to model glue? and if so is it a case of using one
or the other? and if so then what are your feelings on which one is
better?
thanks
I don't know anyone who thinks that TDD is the be-all-end-all of software
development. The reality is that it does offer some very tangible benefits:
- Everyone writes some kind of test. It might be a scribble pad that you
run to make sure something works. It might be that you write code
I'm not going to get into the discussion of whether or not TDD is good, bad, or
should be done lest you are just stupid and ugly. Anytime, or anyway, you think
hard about the software you deliver, it's is going to be better than if you
just bang it out with one eye open and hope no one sees
still
looking!
Jaime
-Original Message-
From: Bill Shelton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 4 September 2008 1:59 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: TDD vs. Big Ball of Mud (was Re: fusebox vs model glue)
I'm not going to get into the discussion of whether or not TDD is good
I like that you've been thinking about thinking while writing your
framework, Isaac. I dig that. :-)
The way I'm currently tackling the tests, is to try to work them into
my routine.
That hard part is, as been mentioned, not having to go back a lot to
keep it all in sync.
I wonder if this
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 11:11 PM, s. isaac dealey wrote:
TDD is on my ever growing list of things to tackle. :) Not something I'm
doing currently, but it is something I plan to do at some point.
It's cool, really, to have the computer do stuff it can do, while
you're doing other stuff, so
denstar wrote:
Sounds like with FB you could end up with a Pretty Entertaining Environment.
*groans*
Is there a down side to all the flexibility? :-)
Yes. It means that no 2 application developers will develop websites the
same way. Though IMHO, that's not much of a downside.
It could also
It's actually switching over, to where the tests come first, that's
the hard part, for me. Due to a lot of the reasons listed in that
article about big balls of mud. :]
I'm not entirely convinced that writing the test before writing the code
is the best strategy... or at least that it's the
personally prefer the ease of use and flow of FB (or more specifically, my
bastardized version of FB ;-) which based on a combination of my personal
coding style that is very close to a fusebox-esque style and a version that
we were forced to use due to empdraconian/emp server restrictions at
ATT
Eric sometime we should talk about these draconian restrictions and what
you've had to do with Fusebox, drop me a line sometime.
Adam
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Eric Roberts
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which I have run into with MG...most of what we are doing is made
overly
complex
TDD advocate here... I really think folks are going into TDD with this
mindset that it's just write a test before you write code (so yes your are
somewhat right). Doing this is going to result in frustration and an
eventual failure and abandonment of TDD. Focusing on just writing a test is
really
Eric sometime we should talk about these draconian restrictions and
what you've had to do with Fusebox, drop me a line sometime.
I imagine you were thinking something like I was...
What was it in Fusebox (of all things) that would be anathema to the
server managers at ATT? FB's always struck
-Original Message-
From: s. isaac dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 2 September 2008 3:06 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: TDD vs. Big Ball of Mud (was Re: fusebox vs model glue)
snip
And so it's an assumed that the TDD advocates who talk about writing all
your tests before
TDD advocate here... I really think folks are going into TDD with
this mindset that it's just write a test before you write code (so yes
your are somewhat right). Doing this is going to result in frustration
and an eventual failure and abandonment of TDD. Focusing on just
writing a test is
Whoa, hold it right there. Show me the TDD advocate who promotes
writing all tests before writing code and I'll personally have their
card revoked! TDD means write a test, then write some code, then write
another testby the time you write your last test, you've written
all your code bar
the ease of use and flow of FB (or more specifically, my
bastardized version of FB ;-) which based on a combination of my personal
coding style that is very close to a fusebox-esque style and a version that
we were forced to use due to empdraconian/emp server restrictions at
ATT ).
Eric
Disclaimer: I just took over the Fusebox core files so my opinion is most
likely slaned ;)
Well the easy answer here is no they are not similar and yes use one or the
other. The hard answer is that evil last one. What's the maturity level of
you/your group? Fusebox offers a vast bit more
, but not inwardly from the historicity of
their souls.
Karl Jaspers
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 9:00 AM, Adam Haskell wrote:
Disclaimer: I just took over the Fusebox core files so my opinion is most
likely slaned ;)
Well the easy answer here is no they are not similar and yes use one or the
other
denstar wrote:
Sounds like with FB you could end up with a Pretty Entertaining Environment.
*groans*
Is there a down side to all the flexibility? :-)
Yes. It means that no 2 application developers will develop websites the
same way. Though IMHO, that's not much of a downside.
Hell yes there can be a downside to flexibility. That's one of the things
I've always complain about with fusebox, but I am not planning on changing
that flexibility. With a good set of best practices and coding standards you
can wrangle in the variations some and not loose all your flexibility
Hell yes there can be a downside to flexibility. That's one of the
things I've always complain about with fusebox, but I am not planning
on changing that flexibility. With a good set of best practices and
coding standards you can wrangle in the variations some and not loose
all your
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Phillip M. Vector wrote:
denstar wrote:
Sounds like with FB you could end up with a Pretty Entertaining Environment.
*groans*
First I was going to go with Pretty Incredible, Sophisticated and
Simple-- but thought that it was a little much. =]
Is there a
Hey, Isaac, you got unit tests being generated as well? I'd toss that
in there, while you're at generating stuff.
I'm loving my tests...
TDD is on my ever growing list of things to tackle. :) Not something I'm
doing currently, but it is something I plan to do at some point.
As of yet I
hi
we have just reviewed model glue, and have also looked into fusebox very briefly
is fusebox similiar to model glue? and if so is it a case of using one or the
other? and if so then what are your feelings on which one is better?
thanks for your help
richard
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 1:03 PM, Richard White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi
we have just reviewed model glue, and have also looked into fusebox very
briefly
is fusebox similiar to model glue? and if so is it a case of using one or
the other? and if so then what are your feelings on which
hi
we have just reviewed model glue, and have also looked into fusebox
very briefly
It might be good to also review Coldbox.
www.coldboxframework.com
Will
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important
Richard White said:
is fusebox similiar to model glue? and if so is it a case of using
one or the other? and if so then what are your feelings on which one
is better?
Although it might not mean much right now, I'll say very briefly that
Model-Glue is an OO framework, meaning that, if you're
I may be in the minority here, but I've come into several projects that
use Model Glue AND fusebox (turning it into a confusing mess for us
developers who don't know much OO programing).
If you do happen to pick a framework, if possible, please try to stick
to that one
I may be in the minority here, but I've come into several projects that
use Model Glue AND fusebox (turning it into a confusing mess for us
developers who don't know much OO programing).
If you do happen to pick a framework, if possible, please try to stick
to that one. :)
I would
won't be *nearly*
as daunting or intimidating. as i had alluded to... the fact that i had
somewhat of a grasp of fusebox definitely helped me in picking up
model-glue. that's not to say they're interchangeable, but it's
definitely easier to learn your 2nd framework than your first. i've
recently
framework. for my foray into
ColdBox, i took a page from Dan Wilson's book and did a simple contact
manager.
I will actually nod general agreement to everything you've said here. :)
Though I will also say that as an individual developer and having
already had a good deal of experience with Fusebox
Oh... Beyond belief. :)
I could try to explain HOW confusing... but I can't even begin to
explain it. That's how confusing it is. :)
But the last 5 contracts I did (with different people) had Model Glue
with a fusebox like setup (or standard fusebox). Hopefully, I'm just
unlucky
())#)
I have been able to do similar inserts in scripts that are not under Fusebox
using FORM and URL with no errors being thrown. I was just wondering if the
'attributes' is the problem. This is an older Fusebox 3 application. THANKS
: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 9:14 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Using attributes within cfqueryparam in Fusebox application
Is there a problem using 'attributes' instead of FORM or URL within
cfqueryparam? I am getting invalid binding errors on this insert:
INSERT INTO OrderHeader (Orderno, ItemTotal, Shipping
) 703.220.2835
-Original Message-
From: Toni Steinhauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 10:14 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Using attributes within cfqueryparam in Fusebox application
Is there a problem using 'attributes' instead of FORM or URL within
cfqueryparam? I am
23, 2008 9:27 PM
Subject: RE: Using attributes within cfqueryparam in Fusebox application
As long as the param exists no there is not a problem. What kind of
binding
error are you getting?
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8
Does anyone know if there's a Fusebox extension for Dreamweaver CS?
Thanks
--
Scott Stewart
ColdFusion Developer
4405 Oakshyre Way
Raleigh, NC 27616
(h) 919.874.6229 (c) 703.220.2835
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software
Can anyone tell me what I am doing wrong with these conditionals?
Basically, if the form.emailAddr is present, check the database. If found
throw error. If not, continue on. For some reason, I am getting just a
blank screen with no errors.
fuseaction name=genPassword
xfa
Hi, Chris,
I know for a fact that you could not nest if tags like that in Fusebox 4.0.
I'm pretty sure that you have to use Fusebox 5 or later to do that.
--
Brian Swartzfager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8
Here is ColdFusion and Fusebox news
* CFUNITED/Express Chicago (aka CF_Underground) early bird ends 8/31/07
* CFUNITED/Europe-08 call for speakers ends 8/24/07
* Adobe's Damon Cooper on ColdFusion 8 and CFUNITED
* CFUNITED podcasts - Simon Horwith - Object Think - Common Sense
Software
Thanks. :) Not exactly what I hoping for, but it'll work for the basics
and I can expand on it later. Thank you. :)
Dave Anderson wrote:
I'm sure I'm overlooking something obvious..
If I want to run 2 different sites on 1 fusebox app.. How would I do that?
For example, let's say I own
I'm sure I'm overlooking something obvious..
If I want to run 2 different sites on 1 fusebox app.. How would I do that?
For example, let's say I own the domain www.foo.com and www.bar.com. I'd
like to direct people to one directory which will figure out what the
URL is and then load
Is it possible to dynamically generate XML data set for Spry in Fusebox 5.1?
It is possible to do that outside of Fusebox, but not in Fusebox framework. Did
anyone encounter this issue yet?
Thanks,
Elena.
~|
ColdFusion 8
Yes to q1. Spry could care less what your back end is. Fusebox.
Model-Glue. Even dreaded PHP. Spry is entirely client side. Elves
could make the XML - it wouldn't matter.
As to your second question, it didn't make sense to me. :)
On 8/7/07, Elena Aminova [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible
Is it possible to dynamically generate XML data set for Spry in Fusebox 5.1?
It is possible to do that outside of Fusebox, but not in Fusebox framework. Did
anyone encounter this issue yet?
The following code does not result in a drop down list of the data within
Fusebox application: and yet
All right, Ray, Let me try to rephrase my question:
the following code does not result in a drop down list of the data within a
fusebox application. and yet calling the fuseaction directly from the browser
does show the generated xml data. Its working when the page is set outside of
fusebox
in a drop down list of the data within a
fusebox application. and yet calling the fuseaction directly from the browser
does show the generated xml data. Its working when the page is set outside of
fusebox... I am not sure if there is a connection, but it is what it is...
(as an aside, all I am
Or any Fusebox or CF debugging, Fusebox layouts, etc?
On 8/7/07, Raymond Camden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh ok - did you forget your cfcontent perhaps?
http://www.coldfusionjedi.com/index.cfm/2007/8/6/Dont-forget-that-CFCONTENT-tag-when-working-with-Spry
On 8/7/07, Elena Aminova [EMAIL
by spry's dataset within fusebox.
Thank you very much for your help, Ray.
Oh ok - did you forget your cfcontent perhaps?
http://www.coldfusionjedi.com/index.
cfm/2007/8/6/Dont-forget-that-CFCONTENT-tag-when-working-with-Spry
On 8/7/07, Elena Aminova [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All right, Ray
in the code but it seems the problem is with some of our data in the
database.
Special chars like ý causes the generated xml file to be incomplete.
By getting rid of these special chars the xml file was correctly generated
and used by spry's dataset within fusebox.
Thank you very much for your
Ah cool. So yeah - my little rant. Don't bother with
XMLFOrmat. Well, I won't say don't bother - but XMLFormat
will ignore certain invalid characters.
This isn't a problem with XMLFormat. There are only five built-in XML
character entities, and XMLFormat replaces those. Characters like ý are
.
Special chars like ý causes the generated xml file to be incomplete.
By getting rid of these special chars the xml file was correctly generated
and used by spry's dataset within fusebox.
Thank you very much for your help, Ray.
Oh ok - did you forget your cfcontent perhaps
1 - 100 of 2256 matches
Mail list logo
