One again my memory usage was steady at 20%, something happened and now its
up and down from 15% to 90% and back down within minutes. Here is a screen
shot of the memory graph in seeFusion. GC seems to be doing its job, but
this does not seem normal or does it!?
http://screencast.com/t
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Brook Davies cft...@logiforms.com wrote:
One again my memory usage was steady at 20%, something happened and now its
up and down from 15% to 90% and back down within minutes. Here is a screen
shot of the memory graph in seeFusion. GC seems to be doing its job
I wish I could see WHAT was taking up the ram, i.e a specific array, cfc
instances, etc etc
It can be done but it's not easy. Basically you need to do a heap dump
of the CF process (you can do that without shutting down the server)
and then analyze the heap dump using MAT for Eclipse. MAT
Java byte code - that is what is going to be in memory. I expect a CFC etc
would relate to a particular Java object however while I can dump what is in
RAM have not learned how to understand the output and join a CFM to an object.
I might be wrong but I don't think you can dump the
Java byte code - that is what is going to be in memory. I expect a CFC etc
would relate to a particular Java object however while I can dump what is in
RAM have not learned how to understand the output and join a CFM to an object.
I wish I could see WHAT was taking up the ram, i.e a specific
, cut them down.
Oh, and good luck.
nathan strutz
[http://www.dopefly.com/] [http://hi.im/nathanstrutz]
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Brook Davies br...@logiforms.com wrote:
Hello,
I have a question about a memory usage pattern that I am trying to figure
out. I am using seefusion to watch
Hi Brook,
You do not say what Cf version and JVm is in use eg CF8.01 Java 1.6.0_04
1. I understand that setting -Xms1024m -Xmx1024m should immediately
allocate that amount of ram to the JVM. So why does the taskManager report
the memory usage at 300 megs (prior to the event)?
Is TASKMAN
I wish I could see WHAT was taking up the ram, i.e a specific array, cfc
instances, etc etc
Brook
-Original Message-
From: Carl Meyer [mailto:ca...@tassweb.com.au]
Sent: December-04-10 1:00 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Memory Usage Question
Hi Brook,
You do not say what Cf version
Hello,
I have a question about a memory usage pattern that I am trying to figure
out. I am using seefusion to watch our server and this is what I am seeing:
1. We have two webservers and a loadbalancer with equal distribution
and sticky sessions enabled
2. Memory usage
Hello,
I have a question about a memory usage pattern that I am trying to figure
out. I am using seefusion to watch our server and this is what I am seeing:
1. We have two webservers and a loadbalancer with equal distribution
and sticky sessions enabled
2. Memory usage
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Brook Davies cft...@logiforms.com wrote:
1. I understand that setting -Xms1024m -Xmx1024m should immediately
allocate that amount of ram to the JVM. So why does the taskManager report
the memory usage at 300 megs (prior to the event)?
I think the answer
Hi everyone,
Thank you for reading this post...
In my server's windows task manager, I'm noticing that the jrun.exe process is
the biggest and growing. It does not appear to be releasing..
What's the best way to reset this?
What is the best way to prevent this from happening and/or why is
I've been trying to debug our server's memory useage and have installed
JRockit to try to detect memory leaks. I also have SeeFusion running.
Trouble is (or not), as soon as I start JRockit's MemLeak on the CF
instance, the memory useage graph changes dramatically in SeeFusion; going
from 5
It seems this was due to the 'Trend refresh intervel' being set to two
seconds - GC happens on each refresh...
2009/11/17 Dominic Watson watson.domi...@googlemail.com
I've been trying to debug our server's memory useage and have installed
JRockit to try to detect memory leaks. I also have
unsuccessfully.
There are a lot of developers and code on this box any one of which could be
causing the problem.
Does anyone know of a tool we can use to show memory usage versus thread ? If
we can isolate the thread, then we stand a chance of finding the cause.
Warren Koch
- JVM memory usage
We've been having a problem with our cfmx7 server. Something is grabbing all
the memory and refusing to release it. The memory just spikes right up and
sticks. The only way we have been able to fix this is to restart. We are
trying to use FusionReactor to figure out the cause
we have been able to fix this is to restart. We are
trying to use FusionReactor to figure out the cause but so far
unsuccessfully. There are a lot of developers and code on this box any one
of which could be causing the problem.
Does anyone know of a tool we can use to show memory usage
It's more than just varring or cfc's -- i know we have issues with that but
not to the extent where 1gb of memory is consumed in no time flat. Problem
is this is a corporate box -- lots of developers at varying levels of
experience with thousands of pages. I can't tell what the heck is
There can be many reasons for this. I think we've seen them all at our
company. They range from poorly written code and queries to outdated JVM's
Which JVM version are you running?
Large uncontrolled queries can cause memory problems.
Have you tuned the JVM for memory performance and tuned the
Hello Craig,
You will need an utility for monitoring and troubleshooting
ColdFusion application. If you can see how you server is processing
request in real time then you can tell what is going on. Try SeeFusion
from http://www.seefusion.com/
Good Luck,
Ravi Gehlot.
Craigsell wrote:
the problem.
Does anyone know of a tool we can use to show memory usage versus thread ?
If we can isolate the thread, then we stand a chance of finding the cause.
Warren Koch
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most
We are running Jrun version 4.
Our plan is to try and tune the JVM -- it needs it. We have folks who
specialize in that and will be bringing them on board as soon as they are
available.
Immediate problem is whatever is grabbing the memory is not releasing it so
the GC can clean it up. Or
Craig,
I think that SeeFusion has it broken down by thread. I might be
mistaken as to what you mean by Thread in actuality but if you look at
the demo it says there on the label Thread for Active Requests. It then
shows you the file name asked by the request. Correct me if I am wrong.
With both of those you can see the details of each thread. I'm guessing
your using the JDBC wrapping features so you can see the details of each
query that is run.
Also, anything older than JVM 1.4.2_13 (1.4.2_19 is the most current version
of the .14 line) is going to cause you problems.
No, neither application shows memory usage at the thread level. They only
display the two types of allocated memory in the heap-used memory and total
memory at the time the thread was running.
I would love to try and tune the server but I don't own the box. I have
no access at that level
Hi Sean,
I have tested Performance of function fileexists(). This function is not not a
bottleneck. Also in a directory it doesn't search inside other folders.
Following scenario i used to test this:
30 Vusers for 10 mins trying to hit some randomly generated filenames(some of
them do not
This may not be directly related. When you use CF server monitoring, can you
disable the memory tracking option and check if that helps?
Thanks,
Hemant
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic
Hey everyone,
An update:
* We installed FusionReactor
* Deployed the site on a development box running CF Enterprise
* Ran a number of load tests and tests on discrete parts of the application
* Did various application and memory monitoring using both FusionReactor and
CF's Server Monitor
*
Hey everyone,
An update:
* We installed FusionReactor
* Deployed the site on a development box running CF Enterprise
* Ran a number of load tests and tests on discrete parts of the application
* Did various application and memory monitoring using both FusionReactor and
CF's Server Monitor
*
Whoops, somehow submitted that post twice. Sorry for the double-posting...
Sean
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
Moreover, in the CF Server Monitor it shows that CF is
actually destroying the objects as expected and releasing
memory back into the pool. However, if you actually look at
Jrun in the Task Manager, it's not. And, hitting Run GC to
invoke garbage collection in the Server Monitor doesn't
We had a similiar issue. Let me preface by saying I have not read this entire
thread so if the info I give is redundant.. sorry.
Anyways, we had a similiar issue. Code that worked fine under CFMX 7 would
cause Jrun cfmx 8 to suck down memory until it crashed. We narrowed it down
to a piece
CF8 ships with JDK 1.6
Version 1.6_06 isn't supported by CF8; 1.6_04 is the latest version
showing in the support matrix. Regardless, 1.6_06 still suffers the
classloader issue (which isn't fixed until 1.6u10 and that's still in
beta).
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:01 AM, Alex DeMarco [EMAIL
CF8 ships with JDK 1.6
Version 1.6_06 isn't supported by CF8; 1.6_04 is the latest version
showing in the support matrix. Regardless, 1.6_06 still suffers the
classloader issue (which isn't fixed until 1.6u10 and that's still in
beta).
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:01 AM, Alex DeMarco [EMAIL
Try this to deal with your possible missing images.
img src=theimage.jpg
onerror=this.src='http://www.mydomain.com/missing_image.jpg'
;
Wil Genovese
One man with courage makes a majority.
-Andrew Jackson
A fine is a tax for doing wrong. A tax is a fine for doing well.
On Jun 6, 2008, at
for.
-Mark
Mark A. Kruger, CFG, MCSE
(402) 408-3733 ext 105
www.cfwebtools.com
www.coldfusionmuse.com
www.necfug.com
-Original Message-
From: s. isaac dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 6:55 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Jrun Memory Usage Problem: could
Isaac,
That's an interesting guess and comment. We should test it and see if it
does degrade performance as you suggest.
Sean,
I would try the JVM arguments the other guy suggested first tho... I
really wouldn't put what I mentioned high on my list of likely suspects.
But thanks for the
Thanks everyone for all your suggestions. Some initial JVM tweaking didn't
solve anything, but you've given me a number of things to follow up on. Will
let you know how it goes.
Cheers,
Sean
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software
heap, 1024 megs max, maxpermsize set to 256 megs
* CF is already configured to minimize other possible memory usage (max number
of simulaneous requests is 12, number of cached queries, templates etc. has
been lowered below the defaults to see if that would help, which it doesn't)
Any ideas
Settings:
* CF's JVM has 512 megs min heap, 1024 megs max, maxpermsize set to 256
megs
* CF is already configured to minimize other possible memory usage (max
number of simulaneous requests is 12, number of cached queries, templates
etc. has been lowered below the defaults to see if that would
Hey Sean,
I know you said you already did a thorough code review and fixed all the
errors so you're not having any application errors, however, my guess
would be there's still some kind of subtle recursion-related issue
that's been overlooked. I would be real surprised if fileexists() does
min heap, 1024 megs max, maxpermsize set to
256 megs
* CF is already configured to minimize other possible memory usage
(max number of simulaneous requests is 12, number of cached queries,
templates etc. has been lowered below the defaults to see if that
would help, which it doesn't
.)
Anyway, if we hit the page that starts the syncs manually using a
browser, the job runs great. However, if we setup a ColdFusion
scheduled task to hit the page, memory usage spikes during the last
3-5 minutes of the job, to dangerous levels (out of memory errors
after climbing
scheduled task to hit the page, memory usage spikes during the last
3-5 minutes of the job, to dangerous levels (out of memory errors
after climbing from ~100 MB to almost 1 GB).
Do you have debugging enabled for 127.0.0.1 but not for the IP of
the
browser?
Jochem
that integrates with a
Windows app.)
Anyway, if we hit the page that starts the syncs manually using a browser, the
job runs great. However, if we setup a ColdFusion scheduled task to hit the
page, memory usage spikes during the last 3-5 minutes of the job, to dangerous
levels (out of memory errors
that integrates with a
Windows app.)
Anyway, if we hit the page that starts the syncs manually using a browser,
the job runs great. However, if we setup a ColdFusion scheduled task to hit
the page, memory usage spikes during the last 3-5 minutes of the job, to
dangerous levels (out
Are these Windows servers? If so, does the CF7 server run under a user
other then the default 'localsystem'. If so, does the CF8 server run
under the same user?
That's the first thing I always look at when something works for a user
directly in a browser but not when CF requests the
syncs and updates. (We're running a pretty closed-source
CMS that integrates with a Windows app.)
Anyway, if we hit the page that starts the syncs manually using a
browser, the job runs great. However, if we setup a ColdFusion
scheduled task to hit the page, memory usage spikes during
Stupid question, but - what stress testing did you do on your app
before you deployed it?
Mark
On Jan 24, 2008 4:53 AM, Vesko Kehayov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Mark,
When we first decided to implement cfqueryparam, we stress tested the
customer facing portion (which gets 95% or
Group, I set the max pooled statements to 0 for all
datasources. This change did not resolve the memory issue
introduced by cfqueryparam.
I welcome other possible suggestions on how to address this issue.
Is the memory consumption actually causing a problem? 800 MB isn't overly
large
Group, I set the max pooled statements to 0 for all
datasources. This change did not resolve the memory issue
introduced by cfqueryparam.
I welcome other possible suggestions on how to address this issue.
Is the memory consumption actually causing a problem? 800 MB isn't overly
large
the memory usage. So far,
CFQueryParam has doubled the memory usage of our application.
I will take a look at the max pool statements because this is the number of
prepared statements that is saved by ColdFusion for QueryParams and we currenty
use the default of 1000.
Thanks for the suggestion
the memory usage. So far, CFQueryParam has doubled the memory
usage of our application.
I will take a look at the max pool statements because this is the
number of prepared statements that is saved by ColdFusion for
QueryParams and we currenty use the default of 1000.
Thanks
. That
said, the servers have been up for a few more days after this change
and the Working Set is now about 1 GB on the servers. This is the
slowest web traffic time of the year for us and as traffic increases
so does the memory usage. So far, CFQueryParam has doubled the memory
usage
after this change and the
Working Set is now about 1 GB on the servers. This is the slowest web traffic
time of the year for us and as traffic increases so does the memory usage.
So far, CFQueryParam has doubled the memory usage of our application.
I will take a look at the max pool statements
Stupid question, but - what stress testing did you do on your app
before you deployed it?
Mark
On Jan 24, 2008 4:53 AM, Vesko Kehayov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark,
When we first decided to implement cfqueryparam, we stress tested the customer
facing portion (which gets 95% or more of all
There is a 'max pooled statements' setting on a datasource, you may
find that changing that will change how the memory is held up.
Iirc the max pooled statements setting doesn't work quite the way one
might expect and actually it seems in many cases it may be preferable to
set it to zero. I
set climbed over 800mb.
Has anyone else ever experienced this or have additional knowledge as to why
the webserver memory usage has increased so significantly.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important
this or have additional knowledge as to why
the webserver memory usage has increased so significantly.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
http
attribute is handled by CF at the very least).
So your memory usage goes up. But what about the performance? If
individual queries are run many many many times, the use of
cfqueryparam in a high traffic system should provide significant
performance improvements on top of the obvious security benefits
probably though
I'm not sure the CF side of things handles any of that (though I
suspect the maxlength attribute is handled by CF at the very least).
So your memory usage goes up. But what about the performance? If
individual queries are run many many many times, the use of
cfqueryparam
Has anyone else noticed that SQL Server seems to be using significantly more
virtual memory when CF8 connects to it as opposed to CF7 and CF6.1? We
upgraded from 6.1 to 8 and the VM usage for SQL has tripled with no
significant change in usage.
One thing I have noticed however is that the logins
to 64, my memory usage in the task manager
for JRUN drops considerably to about 125,000k. The other Visa machine
actually went up to about 125,000k when it had the heap set to 64.
This is even weirder though. When my machine goes back to 512 for the
heap, my memory goes back up to 500,000K
Dan Crouch wrote:
Ok, we have ColdFusion 8 installed on several development machines. They all
have the same JVM version 1.6.0_02, two are Vista and two are on XP. On my
Vista machine, the task manager shows jrun.exe using right around 500,000K of
memory. Another Vista machine shows it
. Both were
installed with the same options. Both have a maximum JVM heap size of 512 which
appears to be the default. However, when I drop mine to 64, my memory usage in
the task manager for JRUN drops considerably to about 125,000k. The other Visa
machine actually went up to about 125,000k when
I've never actually paid much attention to CFMX's memory usage before, but I
just started monitoring our memory, and I'm a little unsure whether what we're
seeing is normal or not.
Setup: CFMX6.1, linux ES4, 800MB Xmx. Server averages 30 templates/second.
Cached queries set to 0 (same thing
... but I'm wondering if this is
symptomatic of a memory problem/leak somewhere ...
No, as long as memory used doesn't increase over time.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized
instruction at our training
Yes this is normal. Our busy SPARC server has a 2.5 GB JVM and frees
over 600MB when it does a GC. It does this at roughly 30 second
intervals or so, like your figures show.
On 6/6/07, Terry Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've never actually paid much attention to CFMX's memory usage before
Thanks.
I guess the developer in me isn't quite comfortable with so much temporary
object creation and destruction. CFMX pools db connections and threads; why
not pool query objects, instead of instantiating new ones on each request?
Looks like the JRE creates and destroys new query objects
Brian Peddle wrote:
jrun.exe uses about 629,936 mem usuage when you look at the processer usage
When you look at seefusion I can see memory usage at about 85 - 91%
consistently.
My Maximum JVM heap size is 512 MB
And the jvm arguments are:
-server -Dsun.io.useCanonCaches=false
We have 2 gigs of Ram per Webserver
jrun.exe uses about 629,936 mem usuage when you look at the processer usage
When you look at seefusion I can see memory usage at about 85 - 91%
consistently.
My Maximum JVM heap size is 512 MB
And the jvm arguments are:
-server -Dsun.io.useCanonCaches
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Thu Jan 18 22:28:41 2007
Subject: Memory Usage
We have 2 gigs of Ram per Webserver
jrun.exe uses about 629,936 mem usuage when you look at the processer usage
When you look at seefusion I can see memory usage at about 85 - 91%
consistently.
My Maximum JVM heap size is 512 MB
you back it up before making any changes.
Also you did not mention whether you're on Windows or Linux.
-- Josh
- Original Message -
From: Brian Peddle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 2:28 PM
Subject: Memory Usage
We have 2 gigs
Exhibitions.
Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com
-Original Message-
From: Josh Nathanson
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Thu Jan 18 22:39:18 2007
Subject: Re: Memory Usage
Yes, but whatever you do, don't make the change within CF Admin! It will
incorrectly rewrite the config file and crash
Hmm, wasn't this fixed? I have never seen ColdFusion crash with the
change
in ColdFusion, I have however rendered ColdFusion useless by changing it
within the JMC.
OK, it looks like it's fixed in 7.0.2 - I guess I may have been on 7.0.1
when it happened to me. Obviously left a bad taste
Do any of you Java guys know if it is possible to calculate how much memory
any individual application on a server is using, e.g. data in variable
scopes, cached queries etc.
--
Russ
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority
Hmm, not sure if it gives you down to the application level (ColdFusion app
level) but I always use VisualGC from Sun to look at memory usage on the
JVM.
I am not sure if there is any tool to monitor the ColdFusion scopes to that
degree.
Does SeeFusion or FusionReactor do this?
This e
Alas no FustionReactor doesn't tell u anything except overall memory usage
-Original Message-
From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 November 2006 14:31
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Detecting application memory usage
Hmm, not sure if it gives you down
I think I know the answer to this but I wanted to verify with the experts.
When you create a variable on a page, it lives until the request is
complete, right?
And since coldfusion string variables are java string objects... they're
immutable, and thus every time you change a variable, it
Is that right, or close?
I'd be very surprised there is not some kind of garbage collection somehow.
--
___
REUSE CODE! Use custom tags;
See http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/tagstore.cfm
(Please send any spam to this address: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Hi All, was there a solution to this problem?
Thanks
On 19/09/06, Dan Plesse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if this issue has to do with Microsoft undermining Java (again)
only this time its with the JDBC driver?
I would switch up the driver and start over and see if the problem comes
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 4:19 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Excessive Memory Usage CFMX 7 Standard Windows 2003
resulting in Crash
Tom, Dan,
Since you're both running Windows 2003 and SQL Server, is BlueDragon.NET
an option to consider?
http://www.newatlanta.com/products
.
Thanks,
Ken Ferguson
214.636.6126
-Original Message-
From: Tom Kitta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 4:21 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Excessive Memory Usage CFMX 7 Standard Windows 2003
resulting in Crash
55,144K is rather low for jrun - on my dev box its
The latest Macromedia drivers for cfmx are version 3.5 and available here:
http://www.adobe.com/go/42dcb10a.
Also, Microsoft has a new JDBC driver of their own. It might be worth testing
with it to see if there is a change in behavior.
.
Thanks,
Ken Ferguson
214.636.6126
-Original Message-
From: Vince Bonfanti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 4:19 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Excessive Memory Usage CFMX 7 Standard Windows 2003
resulting in Crash
Tom, Dan,
Since you're both running Windows 2003
morning (12/09) CPU usage
for JRun was minimal, but Memory usage was at 1.4 Gb, and increasing
(this is on a server with 2Gb RAM, also running MS SQL Server)
- We attempted to restart ColdFusion ? eventually CF service stopped
(after about 5 min) and once stopped, we started
I wonder if this issue has to do with Microsoft undermining Java (again)
only this time its with the JDBC driver?
I would switch up the driver and start over and see if the problem comes
back. If this is a fix please tell everyone about it.
Thanks Dan
a mapping to process this request.*
*These requests were logged in the IIS log files.
- When we connected to the server on Monday morning (12/09) CPU usage
for JRun was minimal, but Memory usage was at 1.4 Gb, and increasing
(this is on a server with 2Gb RAM, also running MS SQL Server
Hi Daniel,
Pretty much everyone running CF/Windows/SQL Server has this problem.
See my page here
http://www.digitalmethod.co.uk/cf/
There is no guaranteed fix other than to have an alert system in place to
monitor memory usage and restart when it gets over 90% or so.
Don't waste time playing
user, there is no need to
do this.
Better to cache a single copy in application scope.
Russ
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Peer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 September 2006 16:18
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Excessive Memory Usage CFMX 7 Standard Windows 2003 resulting
in Crash
Hi
As a test you could chop out the SQL Server DSN and do a one new connection
for reach new request and no pooling and see if that
does it. Start the connection in the application file and close it when the
person leaves.
~|
logged in user - and there is a restriction of 5 concurrent
authenticated users on the system.
I doubt therefore thatsession memory usage is the problem here.
Cheers
Dan.
On 9/18/06, Snake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That fact that you have stated you store large objects in session scope is
most
/
There is no guaranteed fix other than to have an alert system in place to
monitor memory usage and restart when it gets over 90% or so.
Don't waste time playing with garbage collection - you also might do more
harm than good. The only settings you might want to consider playing with
are the SQL connections
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Lancelot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 3:48 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Excessive Memory Usage CFMX 7 Standard Windows 2003
resulting in Crash
Hi Thomas,
It's a real relief (in a way) to know we are not the only ones
yet, but this seems like a good culprit.
We are on SQL 2k and cf 7.0.1
Are there any updated drivers available?
Russ
-Original Message-
From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 5:06 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Excessive Memory Usage CFMX 7
, September 18, 2006 5:06 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Excessive Memory Usage CFMX 7 Standard Windows 2003
resulting in Crash
Come to think of it, virtually all of my CF performance problems started
just about the time I added an application to the server which uses SQL
Server. This is a server on which
this problem.
See my page here
http://www.digitalmethod.co.uk/cf/
There is no guaranteed fix other than to have an alert system in place
to monitor memory usage and restart when it gets over 90% or so.
Don't waste time playing with garbage collection - you also might do
more harm than good
It wasn't you who said it, it was someone else you replied to you and gave a
link to his problem.
Russ
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Lancelot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 September 2006 21:33
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Excessive Memory Usage CFMX 7 Standard Windows 2003 resulting
files.
- When we connected to the server on Monday morning (12/09) CPU usage
for JRun was minimal, but Memory usage was at 1.4 Gb, and increasing
(this is on a server with 2Gb RAM, also running MS SQL Server)
- We attempted to restart ColdFusion ? eventually CF service
We're running CF7 Enterprise as in integrated JRUN system. Does anyone know
what a typical memory usage should be when i view the process via the task
manager?
We run about 30 - 60 sites per server with an average load :)
thanks in advance for answering this vague question.
jonese
1 - 100 of 205 matches
Mail list logo
