On Tuesday 15 Jul 2003 06:55 am, Kwang Suh wrote:
I myself will be waiting for Mach II: Championship Edition.
But it's already the best a man can get...
--
Thomas C
Advanced ColdFusion Programmer
HANDLE WITH EXTREME CARE: This Email Contains Minute Electrically Charged
Particles Moving at
Hi,
We were using struts as a development methodology/framework. Really cool
idea but overblown for most web apps. We are now back to CF and using a
methodology from www.benorama.com It's nice, supports internationalisation,
MVC, n-tier and it's a lot simpler than Struts which means that it's
-Original Message-
From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 6:24 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Anyone using Jakarta Struts for cfmx?
Interesting... looks a lot like Mach II (nee Fusebox MX). See
http://www.mach-ii.com/
On Monday, Jul 14, 2003, at 15:01 US/Pacific
After diving deep into actionscript/flash development the
past year I've come to understand the awesomeness of
using listeners + event broadcasting in keeping a design
flexible.
That makes a lot of sense, in an event-driven environment like most GUIs
provide. Web applications tend to be a
my head around this type of framework (coming from the
cf world)...
Stace
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 10:09 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Anyone using Jakarta Struts for cfmx?
After diving deep into actionscript/flash
.
Joe Eugene
- Original Message -
From: Jordan Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 5:38 AM
Subject: RE: Anyone using Jakarta Struts for cfmx?
Hi,
We were using struts as a development methodology/framework. Really cool
idea but overblown
Dave Watts and I had been going back and forth on this
framework question- of course he is a huge proponent of
Fusebox in all its incarnations-
Holy cow...was that the earth moving under my feet?!?! Did you say Dave
Watts was a huge proponent of Fusebox? :)
Since when?
Ken
Dave Watts and I had been going back and forth on this
framework question- of course he is a huge proponent of
Fusebox in all its incarnations-
Holy cow...was that the earth moving under my feet?!?! Did you say
Dave
Watts was a huge proponent of Fusebox? :)
Since when?
Ken
OMG, he's been outed!
Marlon
Ken Wilson wrote:
Dave Watts and I had been going back and forth on this
framework question- of course he is a huge proponent of
Fusebox in all its incarnations-
Holy cow...was that the earth moving under my feet?!?! Did you say Dave
Watts was a huge
Interesting... looks a lot like Mach II (nee Fusebox MX). See
http://www.mach-ii.com/
Most good developers tend towards the same small set of generalized
solutions to a given problem -- algorithms for math, design patterns for OO,
etc. Doesn't surprise me at all :) Not to mention that since
Hi Joe, That sounds really interesting. Any way I can convince you to make a
mini example that I could look at.
DRE
-Original Message-
From: Joe Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 4:01 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Anyone using Jakarta Struts for cfmx
On Monday, Jul 14, 2003, at 20:37 US/Pacific, Joe Eugene wrote:
Interesting.. didnt know Hal Helms and group were working on another
Framework Project.
They've just about finished Fusebox 4 (an evolution from Fusebox 3 but
a fairly radical one in my opinion) and Mach II is now in beta - note
On Monday, Jul 14, 2003, at 21:40 US/Pacific, Kwang Suh wrote:
Mach II == Fusebox MX.
Not entirely. Fusebox MX still had circuits and fuseactions - it was
halfway house between the procedural Fusebox of old and the shiny new
OO MVC behind Mach II. They really are quite different beasts (even
You should look at Mach II. It's less complex than Struts and it's a
nice clean CF implementation of MVC.
how does it compare with benorama's MVC?
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
of others in the community and work out any issues.
Joe Eugene
- Original Message -
From: Andre Turrettini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 12:24 PM
Subject: RE: Anyone using Jakarta Struts for cfmx?
Hi Joe, That sounds really interesting. Any way
: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 11:44 AM
Subject: Re: Anyone using Jakarta Struts for cfmx?
On Monday, Jul 14, 2003, at 20:37 US/Pacific, Joe Eugene wrote:
Interesting.. didnt know Hal Helms and group were working on another
Framework Project.
They've just about finished Fusebox 4 (an evolution from
On Tuesday, Jul 15, 2003, at 09:49 US/Pacific, Paul Hastings wrote:
You should look at Mach II. It's less complex than Struts and it's a
nice clean CF implementation of MVC.
how does it compare with benorama's MVC?
I'd say the main difference is: Mach II is a framework; MVCF is more a
Having done a couple Struts projects, you need a couple of good Java folks
to help wade through implementing Struts. I'd look at Fusebox (3 or 4, not
MX nee Mach-II) if you're looking for a plug and play framework *for
ColdFusion*. Struts has many more built in features (eg the validator) but
is a
, but the directions for
the Simple Struts App is lacking.
Tkx,
Jim
-Original Message-
From: John Paul Ashenfelter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 3:57 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Anyone using Jakarta Struts for cfmx?
Having done a couple Struts projects, you need
,
Jim
-Original Message-
From: John Paul Ashenfelter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 3:57 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Anyone using Jakarta Struts for cfmx?
Having done a couple Struts projects, you need a couple of good Java folks
to help wade through
I have used alot of Concepts from Jakarta Structs as MVC for recent
application.
It worked very well, with a very high level of code management. Begining
with
file structure
index.cfm is the only exposed page of the applicaiton.
application.xml for application level control/instantiation
Interesting... looks a lot like Mach II (nee Fusebox MX). See
http://www.mach-ii.com/
On Monday, Jul 14, 2003, at 15:01 US/Pacific, Joe Eugene wrote:
I have used alot of Concepts from Jakarta Structs as MVC for recent
application.
It worked very well, with a very high level of code
-Talk
Subject: Re: Anyone using Jakarta Struts for cfmx?
Interesting... looks a lot like Mach II (nee Fusebox MX). See
http://www.mach-ii.com/
On Monday, Jul 14, 2003, at 15:01 US/Pacific, Joe Eugene wrote:
I have used alot of Concepts from Jakarta Structs as MVC for recent
application
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 5:23 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Anyone using Jakarta Struts for cfmx?
Here is an article on using Struts with in CFMX:
http://www.macromedia.com/devnet/mx/coldfusion/articles/struts.html
Yeah, I've seen that. CFCs as a model instead of JavaBeans
Mach II == Fusebox MX.
- Original Message -
From: Joe Eugene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 9:37 PM
Subject: RE: Anyone using Jakarta Struts for cfmx?
http://www.mach-ii.com/
Interesting.. didnt know Hal Helms and group were working
Mach II == Fusebox MX.
Any reason why they renamed Fusebox MX to Mach II?
Joe Eugene
-Original Message-
From: Kwang Suh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 12:40 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Anyone using Jakarta Struts for cfmx?
Mach II == Fusebox MX
They decided that it's too far from the current Fusebox architecture, so
they rebranded it.
- Original Message -
From: Joe Eugene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 10:58 PM
Subject: RE: Anyone using Jakarta Struts for cfmx?
Mach II == Fusebox
-Talk
Subject: RE: Anyone using Jakarta Struts for cfmx?
Mach II == Fusebox MX.
Any reason why they renamed Fusebox MX to Mach II?
Joe Eugene
-Original Message-
From: Kwang Suh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 12:40 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Anyone using
Webapper Services LLC
Web Site http://www.webapper.com
Blog http://www.webapper.net
Webapper Web Application Specialists
-Original Message-
From: Joe Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 9:59 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Anyone using Jakarta Struts for cfmx?
Mach
I myself will be waiting for Mach II: Championship Edition.
- Original Message -
From: Mike Brunt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 11:19 PM
Subject: RE: Anyone using Jakarta Struts for cfmx?
I think to differentiate it from Fusebox 4
30 matches
Mail list logo
