Yeah, I've been wondering why this would use multiple threads when the
aim is to deliberately single thread the execution.
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Mark Mandel wrote:
Silly question - why not just run the executing code you want to fire
to happen at the end of thread 1? It has exactly
of obvious feedback method when scheduled tasks
(and cfthread's, for that matter) are run?
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Mark Mandel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2008 12:44 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: cfthread running condition?
Silly question - why not just run
This should be pretty simple to achieve. One of the restrictions with threads
is that a cfthread can not spawn another cfthread. So your going to need one
scheduled task that runs at a suitable interval. It will need to see if theres
a thread running and if not, kick off the first thread.
You might be able to kick of the first thread (set the action to run) then have
a list or something that you can loop over and have a join cfthread inside
the loop with the same name as the first one. Something like this.
cfthread action='run' name='t1'
do something
/cfthread
cfloop index='i'
Rick Faircloth wrote:
Is there a way to make the start of one thread
conditional upon the ending of a previous thread?
It should be possible using the thread.status feature. You would create
a thread then watch the status until it reports completed then start
the next thread.
Don't have a
it sound the other way around.
???
Rick
-Original Message-
From: joey krabacher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2008 2:02 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: cfthread running condition?
You might be able to kick of the first thread (set the action to run) then
have
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: cfthread running condition?
Rick Faircloth wrote:
Is there a way to make the start of one thread
conditional upon the ending of a previous thread?
It should be possible using the thread.status feature. You would create
a thread then watch the status until
Rick Faircloth wrote:
Is there a way to break out of the cfscript block once
the status of the first thread, 2_hmls_offices, is Completed and go
on to process regular CFML code?
There is nothing special about the cfscript.../cfscript code. This
is not a requirment of threads or anything,
was finished
before processing. But the description makes it sound the other way
around.
???
Rick
-Original Message-
From: joey krabacher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2008 2:02 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: cfthread running condition?
You might
]
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2008 4:20 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: cfthread running condition?
In the docs under timeout it says:
'The number of milliseconds that the current thread waits for the thread or
threads being joined
to
finish. If any thread does not finish by the specified time
I'm not too sure what constitutes a page thread.
Assuming that it's the processing of the .cfm page, then that
wouldn't really apply, I don't think, because I'd be using
these merged templates with multiple threads coded in them as
part of scheduled tasks, which, if I understand
But unlike a page thread that's running in a browser,
the scheduled task page thread isn't subject to a timeout, right?
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2008 7:09 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: cfthread running condition?
I'm
But unlike a page thread that's running in a browser,
the scheduled task page thread isn't subject to a
timeout, right?
Why wouldn't it be? It's just another HTTP request.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
~|
Adobe®
Silly question - why not just run the executing code you want to fire
to happen at the end of thread 1? It has exactly the same result,
there is no need to create a whole new thread, as you can just
continue in the one you are in.
Mark
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Dave Watts [EMAIL
14 matches
Mail list logo
