RE: neo question

2002-04-18 Thread Raymond Camden
Um - you _do_ know that this isn't the proper place to talk about Neo? Haven't we been over this already? -sigh- Please post your question to the Neo beta forums. Anyone on this list who _could_ help you is bound by NDA, and, if you have discovered a bug, the only way we can help you is if we

Re: neo question

2002-04-18 Thread Jochem van Dieten
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: weird thing just happened. i tried to install the neo beta on my xp pro box and the installation did go fine. the thing is that after the install, i tried to access the cf administrator backend and the cfide directory is not in my wwwroot directory. i did a search on

RE: neo question

2002-04-18 Thread Christine Lawson
Hi Tony, Ditto to the NDA comments from others, here is the link to the beta forums where you should post your Neo questions: http://betaprograms.macromedia.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=67 Regards, Christine Lawson Macromedia Technical Support -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: neo question

2002-04-18 Thread Tony_Petruzzi
Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 10:05 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: neo question Um - you _do_ know that this isn't the proper place to talk about Neo? Haven't we been over this already? -sigh- Please post your question to the Neo beta forums. Anyone on this list who

RE: neo question

2002-04-18 Thread Cantrell, Adam
Yes, for the love of god, PLEASE stop posting questions about neo. It's not that your questions bother me, it just these pissy little NDA police getting their panties all in a bunch. I swear, I think some of these people do nothing BUT search for neo questions so they can refer to the NDA. I

RE: neo question

2002-04-18 Thread Allan Pichler
I second that --Allan -Original Message- From: Cantrell, Adam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 4:45 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: neo question Yes, for the love of god, PLEASE stop posting questions about neo. It's not that your questions bother me, it just

RE: neo question

2002-04-18 Thread Jeffry Houser
At 09:45 AM 4/18/2002 -0500, you wrote: Yes, for the love of god, PLEASE stop posting questions about neo. It's not that your questions bother me, it just these pissy little NDA police getting their panties all in a bunch. I swear, I think some of these people do nothing BUT search for neo

RE: neo question

2002-04-18 Thread Cantrell, Adam
hehe, I stand corrected. -Original Message- From: Jeffry Houser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:56 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: neo question At 09:45 AM 4/18/2002 -0500, you wrote: Yes, for the love of god, PLEASE stop posting questions about neo

RE: neo question

2002-04-18 Thread Neil Clark - =TMM=
Sorry you take offence Adam :( But it does help if everyone would honour the NDA - unfortunately its not the case and leaks do get out!, when people 'rant' about NDA it is merely to protect the interests of both MACR and the developers who use the products. Also when people post about itÂ’s a

RE: neo question

2002-04-18 Thread Michael Dinowitz
Actually, the people who are mentioning the NDA when MX comes up are protecting me and the lists as much as they are enforcing the NDA. If MX is discussed openly here in violation of the NDA then MM could get upset with me personally and could request changes. I would have to reject that and

RE: neo question

2002-04-18 Thread Cantrell, Adam
. -Original Message- From: Neil Clark - =TMM= [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 10:27 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: neo question Sorry you take offence Adam :( But it does help if everyone would honour the NDA - unfortunately its not the case and leaks do

RE: neo question

2002-04-18 Thread Haggerty, Michael A.
PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: neo question Actually, the people who are mentioning the NDA when MX comes up are protecting me and the lists as much as they are enforcing the NDA. If MX is discussed openly here in violation of the NDA then MM could get upset with me personally and could request

RE: neo question

2002-04-18 Thread VAN VLIET, SCOTT E (SBCSI)
| +--+---+ -Original Message- From: Cantrell, Adam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 10:18 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: neo question It is not about who or what someone can do re: CF J2EE convertor (which seems a little pointless with Neo) Whoa

RE: neo question

2002-04-18 Thread Pete Freitag
. + Pete Freitag ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) CTO, CFDEV.COM ColdFusion Developer Resources http://www.cfdev.com/ -Original Message- From: VAN VLIET, SCOTT E (SBCSI) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 2:36 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: neo question Well, I hate

RE: neo question

2002-04-18 Thread Jacob
NDA exists to protect the developer and the company... you wouldn't like it if someone called your bank and asked the bank freely gave away your credit history, details or if someone visited your doctor and he gave sensitive CONFIDENTIAL information to that visitor would you? You can now in

RE: neo question

2002-04-18 Thread Jeffry Houser
At 03:10 PM 4/18/2002 -0400, you wrote: I don't think TagServlet has been out for 3 years, I think it just came out last year. You are probably thinking of CF_Anywhere which was made by Live Software (who made JRun, and was bought by Allaire). CF_Anywhere was probably where the idea for Neo

Re: neo question

2002-04-18 Thread Pete Ruckelshaus
CF_Anywhere was pretty cool, I regret not being able to play with it more when it was available in JRun. Pete - Original Message - From: Pete Freitag [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 3:10 PM Subject: RE: neo question I don't think