> Writing for non-html-support email programs are like writing
> html for netscape
>
> the war is over my friends..
Uh, maybe so, but I suspect that for a while you might feel like one of the
poor saps who had to convince fanatic Japanese soldiers on deserted islands
- still in the trees, w
> Email messages with HTML (if designed correctly) are the same
> like webpages but have about 80% less graphics and resources
And an email message with a URL in it is just like a webpage with almost
100% less graphics and resources
~~
Structur
CTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 3:09 AM
Subject: Re: slightly OT: html formatted e-mails
> While bandwidth may not be a concern to you, it is to me. I live in
> the foothills,,. no DSL No cable just a modem at 31.2Kb at best.
>
&
While bandwidth may not be a concern to you, it is to me. I live in
the foothills,,. no DSL No cable just a modem at 31.2Kb at best.
Dick
At 8:34 PM -0400 4/24/01, Dave wrote:
>Agree with you, HTML email is the way to go. We send multipart text/html and
>also the html-commented bit as per last
ndard")
D.
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Lugassy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 8:58 PM
Subject: Re: slightly OT: html formatted e-mails
> will you just listen?
> we send abou
> HTML is giving out more clickthrough rate
> then this ugly texty blexty.
What a repulsive reason to corrupt a standard
~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives
TECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 1:36 AM
Subject: Re: slightly OT: html formatted e-mails
> Note that most ugs don't accept html format emails... too much bandwidth.
>
> IMO, html formatted email is like glitzy junk mail straight to the
trash
>
> Dick
>
>
> Writing for non-html-support email programs are like writing html
> for netscape
This isn't even remotely similar.
> the war is over my friends..
Yah...who needs standards compliance anyway. Hell, lets just start making
our own TCP/IP headers while we're at it.
or netscape
>
>the war is over my friends..
>
>Michael.
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "John Fix 3rd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 10:45 PM
>Subject: RE: slightly OT: ht
most time in the long run.
my .02
jon
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Lugassy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 7:09 PM
Subject: Re: slightly OT: html formatted e-mails
> Writing for non-html-supp
> They do indirectly - MIME encoding for internet mail supports HTML.
I would suggest that this is a separate issue and that support in the MIME
format for HTML data does not imply anything beyond that basic fact.
~~
Structure your ColdFusion co
M
Subject: RE: slightly OT: html formatted e-mails
> LOL! So true.
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: zac [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 3:03 PM
> >To: CF-Talk
> >Subject: RE: slightly OT: html formatted e-mails
&g
LOL! So true.
>-Original Message-
>From: zac [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 3:03 PM
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: RE: slightly OT: html formatted e-mails
>
>
>> Note that 80%+ of the e-mail programs are supporting HTML!
>
>Note that
They do indirectly - MIME encoding for internet mail supports HTML.
Howie
- Original Message -
From: "zac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 3:03 PM
Subject: RE: slightly OT: html formatted e-mails
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Dylan Bromby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 10:25 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: slightly OT: html formatted e-mails
he's intimating HTML readers will not display the content within the .
-Original Message-
From: M
> Note that 80%+ of the e-mail programs are supporting HTML!
Note that 0% of the internet standards for mail support it.
~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives
he's intimating HTML readers will not display the content within the .
-Original Message-
From: McAtee, Malcolm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 9:26 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: slightly OT: html formatted e-mails
I am sorry Michael I didn't quite
I am sorry Michael I didn't quite understand this.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Lugassy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 3:58 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: slightly OT: html formatted e-mails
What we do is simple:
Just start the message like
What we do is simple:
Just start the message like this:
That's the way Amazon and Others send their newsletters.
We've succesfully implemeneted this for all of our newsletters (sent you one
offlist).
Note that 80%+ of the e-mail programs are supporting HTML!
Thanks,
Michael Lugassy
I
: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 8:31 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: slightly OT: html formatted e-mails
> I am trying to send an HTML formatted e-mail that degrades gracefully
> so that e-mail clients thqt do not support HTML formated messages will
> be able to read plain text and not a HTML code.
Mal
> I am trying to send an HTML formatted e-mail that degrades gracefully
> so that e-mail clients thqt do not support HTML formated messages will
> be able to read plain text and not a HTML code.
Malcolm,
We had a thread going about this last week. Here's the answer from the
archives:
http://ta
I am trying to send an HTML formatted e-mail that degrades gracefully
so that e-mail clients thqt do not support HTML formated messages will
be able to read plain text and not a HTML code.
I appropriated the following from a message that I have received --- this
seems to get mixed results
And s
22 matches
Mail list logo
